Identifying Self-Contradictory Arguments
10 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the best way to confront those who commit the fallacy of incompatible premises?

  • Agreeing with their contradictory premises to avoid conflict
  • Translating their contradictory premises with the symbols of A and not-A (correct)
  • Bringing in unrelated premises to confuse the argument
  • Ignoring their premises and focusing on the conclusion
  • Which of the following is a necessary condition of meaningful intellectual discourse?

  • Drawing explicit conclusions from contradictory claims
  • Using ambiguous language to confuse the audience
  • Including irrelevant information in the argument
  • The law of noncontradiction (not both A and not-A) (correct)
  • When an argument has contradictory premises, what is typically true about the conclusion that is drawn?

  • The conclusion brings in new unrelated information
  • There is no conclusion drawn at all (correct)
  • The conclusion is often implicitly clear
  • The conclusion is directly derived from the premises
  • What can be inferred if both A and not-A are claimed to be true in an argument?

    <p>The argument is flawed due to incompatible premises</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does resolving the implied conflict in premises impact the acceptability of conclusions drawn from an argument?

    <p>It renders the conclusions unacceptable</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if an arguer uses contradictory claims but doesn't draw an explicit conclusion?

    <p>The argument becomes fallacious</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is it crucial for those committing the fallacy of incompatible premises to be familiar with the law of noncontradiction?

    <p>To ensure logical consistency in their arguments</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What approach can be taken to confront an argument with incompatible premises?

    <p>'Playing devil's advocate' by challenging the arguer to draw a conclusion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How can using symbols like A and not-A help in resolving incompatible premises in an argument?

    <p>It simplifies contradictory claims for clearer analysis</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an effective way to address an argument with incompatible premises if the arguer is not familiar with the law of noncontradiction?

    <p>Briefly explain the law of noncontradiction and its importance in intellectual discourse.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Understanding Logical Reasoning
    10 questions
    Logical Reasoning Fundamentals
    6 questions
    Logical Reasoning Exercises
    30 questions
    Logical Reasoning: Premises and Conclusions
    8 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser