Human Tissue Ownership and Legal Cases
48 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the outcome of Doodeward's lawsuit regarding the corpse?

  • The court allowed ownership due to skillful preservation. (correct)
  • The court ruled it was illegal to modify a corpse.
  • The court sided with the police.
  • The court ruled that the corpse could not be owned.
  • Human tissues can be bought and sold for profit according to the Council of Europe’s Convention.

    False

    What rights does a recipient gain when a body part is removed from the donor?

    The right to possess the body part.

    The Supreme Court case established in 1908 allowed for the ownership of corpses under __________ conditions.

    <p>special</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following articles with their main focus:

    <p>Article 21 = Prohibition of financial gain Article 22 = Disposal procedures for removed body parts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Anthony-Noel Kelly accused of?

    <p>Stealing preserved body parts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Hair and nails are excluded from the rules about human tissue ownership.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal consequence did Kelly face for his actions?

    <p>He was imprisoned for 9 months.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary function of a patent?

    <p>To prevent others from importing, utilizing, or selling an invention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A patent grants the holder the right to measure heart rate without additional permissions.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Moore v. Regents of the University of California case, why did the court rule Moore had no property rights over his modified cells?

    <p>Because Moore's cells underwent genetic engineering, which meant they could be owned as property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Washington University v. Catalona case, the tissues were deposited in the ______ biobank.

    <p>WU</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main argument of Washington University in the lawsuit against Catalona?

    <p>Washington University claimed ownership of the tissue samples.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their key outcomes:

    <p>Moore v. Regents = No property rights over modified cells Washington University v. Catalona = Consent transferred tissues to a private lab</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Patients have the right to authorize the transfer of their donated tissue samples after they have donated them.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle was established regarding human tissues in the Moore case?

    <p>Tissues can be claimed as property once removed from the body</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights declare about the human genome?

    <p>The human genome in its natural state shall not give rise to financial gains.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Once a donor has donated their tissue, they __________ ownership of the donated material.

    <p>lose</p> Signup and view all the answers

    William Catalona obtained consent from patients to use their tissues for research.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their take-home messages:

    <p>Moore v. Regents of the University of California = Donors have the right to be informed about the use of their tissues WU v. Catalona = Patients have no rights to any financial returns from tissue processing Universal Declaration on the Human Genome = The human genome cannot be commercially exploited</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Washington University object to in the Catalona case?

    <p>Catalona's transfer of tissue samples to a privately owned lab.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the reaction of the scientific community to Craig Venter's actions regarding the human genome sequencing data?

    <p>They expressed that it was ethically problematic.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The court ruling stated that donated tissue samples were meant for the benefit of Catalona.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens to a donor's say in the usage of their donated tissue once it is donated?

    <p>The donor no longer has a say.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which company was a primary investor when 23andMe was founded?

    <p>Google</p> Signup and view all the answers

    23andMe was regulated from the time of its inception in 2006.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did 23andMe do with clients' genetic data in 2018?

    <p>Sold it to GlaxoSmithKline for 300 million US dollars.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In 2013, a famous actress underwent a double mastectomy due to a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Her name is ________.

    <p>Angelina Jolie</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which issue was raised due to the patenting of the BRCA1 gene?

    <p>Higher genetic testing costs</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Most users read the terms and conditions before consenting to genetic data usage.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following entities with their roles:

    <p>23andMe = Direct-to-consumer genetic testing GlaxoSmithKline = Pharmaceutical company Myriad Genetics = Patented BRCA1 gene testing Angelina Jolie = Notable figure in BRCA mutation awareness</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The controversial sale of genetic data by 23andMe to GSK raised questions about patient ________ and consent.

    <p>rights</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main ethical concern regarding Henrietta Lacks' cells?

    <p>Her cells were used without her consent</p> Signup and view all the answers

    HeLa cells were discovered to be immortal and could be grown indefinitely for research purposes.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significant medical advancements were facilitated by the use of HeLa cells?

    <p>The polio vaccine, chemotherapy, cloning, gene mapping, and in vitro fertilization.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Henrietta Lacks' cells were harvested in the year _____ before she died.

    <p>1951</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following key terms with their definitions:

    <p>Informed Consent = Agreement obtained from individuals before they participate in research HeLa cells = Cancer cells from Henrietta Lacks that have been cultured for research Genome Sequence = The complete set of DNA including all of its genes Research Ethics = The principles guiding the conduct of research involving human subjects</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what year was HeLa's genome sequence published publicly?

    <p>2013</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Henrietta's family has received financial benefits from the scientific use of her cells.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who was responsible for recognizing the unique properties of Henrietta Lacks' tumor cells?

    <p>Dr. George Gey</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which consent model requires donors to consent to all possible future research done on their biospecimen?

    <p>Blanket consent</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In dynamic consent, donors cannot change their consent options once given.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a patent?

    <p>A legal form of monopoly of intellectual property that gives exclusive rights to the holder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Biological material that has undergone a ___ procedure in isolating or making it can be patented.

    <p>technical</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following consent models with their descriptions:

    <p>Study-specific consent = Consent acquired before each study Broad consent = Consent to future research with rights to withdraw Categorical consent = Choose specific options for future use Dynamic consent = Change consent options digitally</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which type of biological sample can be patented?

    <p>Biological materials after technical procedures</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Patents confer unlimited rights to the holder for all time.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be stated in a patent application for inventions taken from the human body?

    <p>The use of the invention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Biosecurity and Research Bioethics [APB1304]

    • Focuses on the ethical considerations surrounding human tissue and genetic data.
    • Ownership and control of human tissue are complex issues.
    • Lecture 8 specifically addresses ownership and control of human tissue and genetic data.
    • The case of Henrietta Lacks highlights the ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of human tissue in research.
    • Lacks' cells, known as HeLa cells, were harvested without her knowledge or consent and used extensively in research.
    • This case sparked a discussion about informed consent and equitable benefit sharing in research involving human samples.

    The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

    • Henrietta Lacks was a patient who died of cervical cancer in 1951.
    • Her cancer cells were harvested and cultured, leading to the HeLa cell line.
    • HeLa cells proved invaluable in scientific research, contributing to major breakthroughs in medicine.
    • However, her family was unaware of the use of her cells and the profit generated from them for decades.

    Key Concerns with Henrietta's Story

    • Was it ethical to use Henrietta's cells without her consent?
    • Was research conducted on her cells ethically?
    • Was the profit made from her cells justly distributed?
    • Did the identity of the donor woman need to be widely recognized?

    Publishing HeLa's Genome Sequence (2013)

    • Researchers published HeLa's genome, which was available to the public.
    • Public outcry led to the National Institute of Health (NIH) collaborating with the Lacks family.
    • They created a database with controlled access, and established a committee involving the Lacks family to review related research.

    Is the HeLa Case Generalizable?

    • The HeLa case was unusual. Rare for a biospecimen to be valuable as HeLa cells.
    • Usually, many samples from multiple people are needed for research.
    • The high profile of Henrietta Lacks made the donor identity significant to the case.

    Biobanks

    • Biobanks are systematic collections of human biological samples (biospecimens) and associated information for research.
    • Can be public or private (non-profit or commercial).
    • Various types exist (e.g., population, tissue, digital, blood, organ-oid biobanks).

    Biobanking Procedure

    • Core steps of biobanking.
    • Informed consent is crucial.
    • Sampling, processing, and storage are key steps.
    • Frozen storage methods are critical preservation techniques

    The Ethics of Owning Body Parts

    • John Locke believed every individual owns their own body, but it is limited.
    • The Declaration of Human Rights prohibits the ownership of another person (slavery).
    • The right of ownership over a corpse was traditionally not allowed, though some modern exceptions exist.

    Ownership of a Dead Body

    • The customary law, from 1614 to 1908, states that there can be no property in a corpse.
    • However, the case of Doodeward v. Spence (1908) created an exception.
    • Skilled modification or preservation of a corpse enabled ownership.

    The 1998 Case of the Royal College of Surgeons

    • Anthony Noel Kelly stole preserved body parts for art.
    • This case, and the courts decision related to the prior Doodeward case, recognized a special category of ownership for skilled modification/preservation.

    Human Tissue Ownership

    • A recipient gains the right to possess a removed body part.
    • Modification or processing of a body part adds to the recipient's rights.
    • Ethical considerations dominate the ownership of human body parts.

    Ethics of Human Tissue Commercialization

    • Profit generation from buying and selling human tissues is explicitly prohibited by the Council of Europe's conventions.
    • The human body and its parts, as such, cannot give rise to financial gain.
    • Storing and utilizing removed body parts for purposes beyond the initial removal requires adherence to appropriate information and consent procedures.
    • Exceptions exist if the body parts are hair or nails, as these are considered common waste products.
    • General notification: passive informing donors; default position (opt-in or out).
    • Study-specific consent: contacting donors for consent before each study.
    • Blanket consent: donor's consent to future research on their sample.
    • Broad consent: donor consent to future research; particular rules may apply.
    • Categorical consent: specific uses of the sample.
    • Dynamic consent: adjustable consent with technological support.

    Patenting Biological Samples

    • Intellectual property rights include the creations of human intellect including ideas and inventions
    • Patents are a form of legal monopoly; original, novel and non-obvious inventions can be patented and the rights are limited spatially and temporally.
    • Specific biological samples are patentable if they result from technical procedures: isolating, changing, or modifying a biological sample in a new way. Procedures or new applications of a biological sample in some way are also patentable.

    What Kind of Biological Samples can be Patented?

    • Biological materials modified by technical procedures.
    • Processes for making, modifying, or utilizing biological materials.
    • Novel applications of biological materials.
    • Inventions relating to human body material: proper application must be detailed in the patent document.

    What Kind of Rights Do Patents Give Their Holders?

    • Prevent others from importing, utilizing, or selling the invention.
    • The patent holder does not automatically have additional rights (e.g., to actually perform the process/measure that the invention relates to).
    • In some cases, additional rights require further steps and regulations.

    Moore v. Regents of the University of California Case (1990)

    • Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Regents of the University of California.
    • Moore's cells, after modification, were considered property of the university (reclassifying the cells from their original nature/state).
    • The modified state/condition of the cells gave the university ownership.
    • Physicians should have obtained informed consent for the economic interests.

    Washington University (WU) v. Catalona Case

    • Catalona routinely removed tissues from patients with consent for research.
    • WU objected to his transfer of tissue samples to a different lab.
    • The court ruled that the patients had no ownership rights over the tissues.
    • They had donated samples to the university, and the university held the ownership rights.

    Take-Home Message from the Moore and WU v. Catalona Cases

    • Tissue donors' rights to be informed on the use of their donated tissue, and about commercial and non-commercial uses.
    • Donors lose ownership once donation is complete.
    • Donors lose the right to specify future use once a donation is complete, unless specific agreements/restrictions have been defined in advance.
    • Sufficiently processed donated tissues can be commercially utilized.

    What About the Commercial Use of the Human Genome?

    • Craig Venter's action of requiring access-rights to the Human Genome to only researchers who allowed commercial use; this raised significant ethical concerns.
    • The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights declared that the human genome, in its natural state, should not give rise to financial gain.

    What About Commercial Use of the Human Genome? (cont.)

    • 23andMe and other companies offer direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    • These actions were unregulated until 2013, raising concerns about data ownership and use.
    • Sales of clients' genetic data to major pharmaceutical companies highlight the potential for financial gain from human genetic data. These commercial uses are considered ethical/legal with the proper informed consent from the client/donor. Client consent can also be an issue that is influenced and/or defined by the surrounding terms and conditions of the practice.

    What About Patenting Human Genes/Human Genome?

    • Angelina Jolie's breast cancer diagnosis and genetic testing (BRCA1/2) highlighted the issue of patenting genes.
    • Myriad Genetics' patenting of BRCA1 mutation testing resulted in high costs with limited accessibility.

    Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. Case

    • The Supreme Court ruled that genes are products of nature, not inventions, and, as such, not patentable.
    • Complementary DNA (cDNA), however, is patentable because of its transformation/process/modification.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Bioethics - Lecture 8 PDF

    Description

    This quiz covers significant legal cases and concepts surrounding the ownership of human tissues and corpses, including the outcomes of key lawsuits and the implications of human tissue laws. Test your knowledge on important rulings, rights related to body parts, and the legal status of human tissues in different contexts.

    More Like This

    Human Tissue Overview
    26 questions

    Human Tissue Overview

    DetachableHydra avatar
    DetachableHydra
    Human Tissue Act 2004 Overview
    45 questions
    Human Tissue Types Quiz
    40 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser