🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Grutter v. Bollinger: Affirmative Action in Higher Education
6 Questions
0 Views

Grutter v. Bollinger: Affirmative Action in Higher Education

Created by
@MarvellousIrony

Podcast Beta

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the key issue in the Supreme Court case of Grutter v. Bollinger?

  • Whether affirmative action policies were constitutional (correct)
  • Whether the University of Michigan discriminated against white applicants
  • Whether race-conscious admissions violated individual rights
  • Whether the Equal Protection Clause applied to university admissions
  • Who was the plaintiff in the case of Grutter v. Bollinger?

  • Bollinger
  • Barbara Grutter (correct)
  • Sandra Day O'Connor
  • University of Michigan Law School
  • What did the majority opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger state regarding diversity?

  • Affirmative action does not promote diversity
  • Achieving diversity is a compelling state interest (correct)
  • Diversity is irrelevant in educational settings
  • Diversity should not be a factor in admissions
  • How did the Supreme Court rule on the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions in higher education?

    <p>They upheld it as constitutional</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significance does Grutter v. Bollinger hold in American society?

    <p>It allowed universities to continue considering race in admissions</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the University of Michigan Law School's policy face scrutiny in Grutter v. Bollinger?

    <p>Due to allegations of favoring minority applicants over white candidates</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court faced an important decision regarding affirmative action policies in higher education institutions when they heard the case of Grutter v. Bollinger. At issue was whether the University of Michigan Law School's policy to consider racial diversity during its admissions process violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiff, Barbara Grutter, claimed she had been denied admission despite her strong qualifications due to the school favoring minority applicants over white candidates. However, the majority opinion, written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, ruled in favor of the law school, stating that the goal of achieving diversity among students is a compelling state interest and the admissions criteria used were narrowly tailored enough to pass constitutional muster. This ruling allowed universities to continue using race-conscious admissions to ensure diverse student bodies while also setting guidelines on how these programs could be enforced without infringing on individual rights. Today, Grutter v. Bollinger remains a landmark case in the ongoing debate around the role of affirmative action in American society.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case of Grutter v. Bollinger, which addressed the constitutionality of affirmative action policies in higher education institutions. Learn about the decision's impact on admissions processes and the ongoing debate surrounding affirmative action in American society.

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser