Government Intervention in Trade: Critique of Arguments
6 Questions
4 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the primary reason for government intervention in trade to protect domestic industries?

  • To correct market failures
  • To promote innovation and growth
  • To protect domestic industries from foreign competition (correct)
  • To safeguard national security
  • What is a potential consequence of protectionist measures according to critics?

  • Higher costs for consumers (correct)
  • Increased competitiveness
  • Faster innovation and growth
  • Lower prices for consumers
  • What is an example of a situation where government intervention in trade is justified for national security reasons?

  • To correct market failures
  • To protect domestic employment
  • To promote innovation and growth
  • To restrict trade with a country posing a security threat (correct)
  • What is a potential consequence of protecting industries from foreign competition according to critics?

    <p>Slowing down economic growth</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary argument for government intervention in trade to correct market failures?

    <p>To correct monopolistic practices</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a criticism of government intervention in trade to protect domestic employment?

    <p>It is counterproductive and can lead to higher prices for consumers</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Protecting Domestic Industries

    • Protecting domestic industries from foreign competition is a common rationale for government intervention.
    • Critics highlight that protectionist measures can diminish competitiveness, leading to stagnation in innovation and economic growth.
    • Tariffs and subsidies may distort market signals, resulting in inefficient resource allocation and increased costs for consumers.

    National Security

    • Intervention in trade is defended on the grounds of safeguarding national security.
    • Governments might exploit national security concerns to justify trade restrictions that serve economic or political agendas rather than true security needs.
    • Example: The U.S. government's scrutiny of TikTok based on perceived national security risks.

    Protecting Jobs

    • Government action aims to preserve domestic employment, especially in sectors exposed to foreign competition.
    • Critics argue that such protective measures are counterproductive, as they may lead to inflated consumer prices and decrease international competitiveness.
    • Protecting industries can hinder overall economic growth by creating a shield against competition.

    Correcting Market Failures

    • Intervention is deemed necessary to rectify market failures, including monopolistic practices that disrupt international trade dynamics.
    • Such interventions aim to create a more balanced and fair trading environment but can also lead to unintended economic consequences.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Evaluate the pros and cons of government intervention in trade, including protecting domestic industries, and its impact on competitiveness, innovation, and growth. Critique the arguments for and against government intervention in trade.

    More Like This

    Government's Role in Creating Wealth and Value Quiz
    10 questions
    BUS 200 - Governments and Trade Quiz
    29 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser