Good Neighbor Policy Quiz (1933-1941)

The Good Neighbor Policy aimed to improve US relations with Latin America, emphasizing non-intervention and respect for international law.

The Great Depression significantly impacted US domestic policy, leading to a focus on internal issues and initially putting foreign policy on the back burner.

The Good Neighbor Policy aimed to differentiate the United States from European colonial powers, promoting the image of a respectful and non-interfering neighbor.

The US withdrew troops from Cuba and Nicaragua, signifying a commitment to non-intervention and respecting Latin American sovereignty.

The Good Neighbor Policy aimed to revitalize Pan-Americanism, fostering cooperation and dialogue among the Americas.

The 1933 Pan-American Conference in Montevideo, Uruguay, was a significant event in implementing the Good Neighbor Policy, showcasing US commitment to non-intervention and fostering regional dialogue.

While the US aimed to improve trade relations, many Latin American countries prioritized getting rid of debt obligations and securing non-interference from the US.

The US Secretary of State Cordell Hull formalized the Good Neighbor Policy, outlining that the US would only intervene in Latin American affairs if US citizens or property were threatened.

A policy of non-interventionism became the guiding principle of the Good Neighbor Policy. The US embraced a more equal approach, recognizing Latin American countries as independent entities with autonomous decisions. It marked a shift from previous imperialistic tendencies towards a more respectful and collaborative relationship.

The US's shift towards noninterventionism was driven by Latin American nations' resolute demands for independence and self-determination. The US's historical dominance was increasingly challenged, forcing it to adapt its approach to international relations, moving away from direct control.

The Panama Canal, a colossal project representing billions of dollars and a decade of construction, symbolized the significant US investments in Latin America after World War I. This investment extended beyond the Canal to various sectors, illustrating the US's economic clout in the region.

American companies invested heavily in various sectors throughout Latin America. These investments spanned agriculture, mining, oil, and infrastructure, contributing significantly to the region's economic landscape. This economic involvement cemented US influence in various industries.

The United Fruit Company (UFC) emerged as a dominant force in the Caribbean region, particularly in Central America, through its extensive banana plantations. Its influence extended to countries like Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala, showcasing the economic power and political leverage held by US corporations.

The Guggenheim Brothers' mining corporations played a significant role in Mexico and Chile, while US oil companies expanded their operations in Mexico and Peru, showcasing the US's influence in resource extraction. These investments solidified the US's economic dominance in the region.

The US investments extended beyond resource extraction to encompass infrastructure development. Companies such as the International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) built and maintained railroads, telephone networks, and telegraphs, contributing to the modernization of Latin America's infrastructure.

US banks, including giants like Morgan and National City Bank, provided extensive financial support to Latin American countries. This credit system fueled economic growth and further strengthened the US's financial hold over the region.

The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA) of 1934 empowered the President to negotiate reciprocal trade agreements with other countries. This shifted from a uniform tariff applied to all countries to a more flexible system that allowed for personalized trade deals.

As part of the Good Neighbor Policy, Roosevelt addressed the issue of Latin American debts to the US, extending repayment periods for these debts. This measure signaled a commitment to economic stability and reduced the burden on Latin American countries.

The Good Neighbor Policy sought to establish a more secure and cooperative Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt used a trip to South America and speeches to showcase American commitment to regional peace and sovereignty, highlighting the importance of respecting borders.

The US aimed to strengthen ties with Latin America through trade, easing restrictions on imported goods like sugar and coffee from countries like Cuba and Brazil. The goal was to build mutually beneficial economic relationships.

The Good Neighbor Policy aimed to address concerns from Latin American countries who sought independence from US intervention. This included their desire to sell products freely to the US market without outside influence.

The Good Neighbor Policy aimed to foster a sense of solidarity among countries in the Western Hemisphere. This included helping Latin America during times of crisis and promoting cooperation amongst the nations.

The Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance of Peace in 1936, attended by Roosevelt, aimed to establish regional stability and prevent conflict in the Western Hemisphere. It signified a commitment to peaceful resolutions and the preservation of international peace.

The Teller Amendment, passed during the Spanish-American War, stated that the US would not annex Cuba, but aimed to protect Cuban independence.

The US's involvement in Cuba was deep-rooted, with significant investments in Cuban industries like sugar plantations and casinos, making it a key strategic location for the US.

Despite the US withdrawing troops from Cuba in the early 1930s, American influence remained strong, with significant investments in the Cuban economy.

The US's involvement in Cuban affairs and interventions in the past during the 1930s resulted in tensions and resentment towards the US, leading to political instability and a succession of coups in Cuba.

The US refused to recognize the results of Cuban elections, arguing they lacked legitimacy and public support. This action, a key tool of US diplomacy, obstructed trade relations and forced the US to find a more compliant leader.

Fulgencio Batista, a powerful military figure in Cuba, became the US-backed candidate. He eventually overthrew the elected president and installed a puppet government.

The Platt Amendment, a controversial agreement allowing US intervention in Cuba, was finally abrogated. However, this symbolic gesture coexisted with increased US economic and political influence.

In Nicaragua, the US intervened militarily, but it also sought to establish a stable republic. The US initially withdrew troops, but the rise of the oppressive Somoza regime ultimately reversed the US's initial goals.

The US supported the dictator Anastasio Somoza, despite acknowledging his brutality. The US saw Somoza as a useful tool for protecting its interests, demonstrating a cynical pragmatism in foreign policy.

Somoza's rise to power was marked by violence and fraud, undermining the democratic institutions the US had previously tried to cultivate in Nicaragua. The US, however, prioritized its relationship with Somoza due to his allegiance to US interests.

The Dominican Republic, under the dictator Trujillo, was a repressive regime that faced widespread human rights abuses. In this case, the US chose to overlook Trujillo's crimes, preferring a compliant ruler over upholding moral principles.

Rafael Trujillo, Dominican Republic's dictator from 1930, rose to power during the US occupation and strengthened his rule through anti-Haitian policies based on nativism and xenophobia.

Trujillo's policies, designed to expel Black Haitians from the Dominican Republic, included quotas, special taxes, and ultimately, violent massacres in 1937.

The US, despite being aware of Trujillo's brutal crackdown on Haitian immigrants, chose not to intervene directly, employing only diplomatic pressure to prevent an escalation of conflict between Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

Mexico, a larger and more independent nation, rejected US intervention. President Cardenas implemented transformative policies, including nationalizing key industries and land ownership, which stirred tensions with US investors.

Cardenas' policies, inspired by the US New Deal, aimed to strengthen Mexico's control over its resources and economy. These measures included nationalizing key industries and restricting non-Mexican land ownership. The US government, despite initial complaints, compensated American investors affected by the nationalization.

The US, under President Roosevelt, shifted towards a policy of 'Good Neighbor,' emphasizing non-intervention and respecting Latin American sovereignty. This approach aimed to mend past tensions and improve relations with Latin American countries.

The Good Neighbor Policy, while promoting non-intervention, aimed to protect US economic interests, establish free trade, and uphold values of freedom and human rights. This approach embodied a complex attempt to reconcile US's economic ambitions with its diplomatic objectives.

The US, under the Good Neighbor Policy, sought to address past grievances and improve relations with Latin American countries. However, it continued to assert its economic interests, demonstrating that its commitment to non-interventionism had limits.