Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the correct interpretation of the functional dependency notation X → Y?
What is the correct interpretation of the functional dependency notation X → Y?
- Each X value must be associated with exactly one Y value. (correct)
- X value can have multiple Y values.
- Y is independent of X.
- X and Y must be the same attribute.
Which of the following statements about trivial functional dependencies is true?
Which of the following statements about trivial functional dependencies is true?
- A trivial FD must have different attributes on both sides.
- Trivial FD includes all possible combinations of attributes.
- A trivial FD is one where Y is not a subset of X.
- A trivial FD occurs when Y is a subset of X. (correct)
If the functional dependency A → BC is true, which of the following is also true?
If the functional dependency A → BC is true, which of the following is also true?
- A does not determine B.
- BC does not depend on A.
- A → B is false.
- A → B and A → C are both true. (correct)
In the relation Drinkers(name, addr, beersLiked, manf, favBeer), which functional dependency is correctly derived?
In the relation Drinkers(name, addr, beersLiked, manf, favBeer), which functional dependency is correctly derived?
What does it mean for a functional dependency to hold in a relation R?
What does it mean for a functional dependency to hold in a relation R?
Which property does NOT apply to functional dependencies?
Which property does NOT apply to functional dependencies?
In the FD (title, year) → (length, genre, studioName), what can be inferred?
In the FD (title, year) → (length, genre, studioName), what can be inferred?
Which of the following is a correct example of a functional dependency?
Which of the following is a correct example of a functional dependency?
What does the Subset Property (Axiom of Reflexivity) state?
What does the Subset Property (Axiom of Reflexivity) state?
Which axiom states that if X functionally determines Y, then a combination of X and Z will functionally determine Y and Z?
Which axiom states that if X functionally determines Y, then a combination of X and Z will functionally determine Y and Z?
Which of the following correctly defines a key in a relation R?
Which of the following correctly defines a key in a relation R?
What is a super-key?
What is a super-key?
What does the closure of a set of attributes X under a set of functional dependencies S signify?
What does the closure of a set of attributes X under a set of functional dependencies S signify?
If X → Y, Z → W is true, which statement incorrectly combines these functional dependencies?
If X → Y, Z → W is true, which statement incorrectly combines these functional dependencies?
Which derived rule allows for separating attributes from a combined functional dependency?
Which derived rule allows for separating attributes from a combined functional dependency?
In relation to the closure of attributes, what is a naïve approach to find a closure set?
In relation to the closure of attributes, what is a naïve approach to find a closure set?
What is the first step in the closure set finding algorithm?
What is the first step in the closure set finding algorithm?
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the closure of a set of attributes?
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the closure of a set of attributes?
Given the functional dependencies S = {A→B, B→C, C→D, D→A}, what is a key of the relation R(A, B, C, D)?
Given the functional dependencies S = {A→B, B→C, C→D, D→A}, what is a key of the relation R(A, B, C, D)?
What is the result of computing {AB}+ with the given functional dependencies S = {AB → C, BC → AD, D → E, CF → B}?
What is the result of computing {AB}+ with the given functional dependencies S = {AB → C, BC → AD, D → E, CF → B}?
Which of the following super-keys can be identified for R(A, B, C, D) with the functional dependencies S = {A→B, A→C, C→D}?
Which of the following super-keys can be identified for R(A, B, C, D) with the functional dependencies S = {A→B, A→C, C→D}?
What will happen if you reach a fixpoint when calculating the closure?
What will happen if you reach a fixpoint when calculating the closure?
Which of the following represents a misconception about super-keys?
Which of the following represents a misconception about super-keys?
For the relation R (A, B, C, D) with S = {AD→B, AB→C, BC→D, CD→A}, which of the following is a key?
For the relation R (A, B, C, D) with S = {AD→B, AB→C, BC→D, CD→A}, which of the following is a key?
What is the main characteristic of a relation in First Normal Form (1NF)?
What is the main characteristic of a relation in First Normal Form (1NF)?
Which of the following indicates that a relation is not in 2NF?
Which of the following indicates that a relation is not in 2NF?
In which scenario would a relation be in Third Normal Form (3NF)?
In which scenario would a relation be in Third Normal Form (3NF)?
How can we recognize that a design is not in 1NF?
How can we recognize that a design is not in 1NF?
Which operation can lead to the loss of information when reconstructing a relation from its decomposed parts?
Which operation can lead to the loss of information when reconstructing a relation from its decomposed parts?
What is true about a primary key in a relation that is in 2NF?
What is true about a primary key in a relation that is in 2NF?
In a relation with attributes A, B, C, and D, if A leads to B, and B leads to C, what can be concluded?
In a relation with attributes A, B, C, and D, if A leads to B, and B leads to C, what can be concluded?
What is a potential outcome if primary key attributes are not unique in a relation?
What is a potential outcome if primary key attributes are not unique in a relation?
What is one of the principal kinds of anomalies encountered in relational databases?
What is one of the principal kinds of anomalies encountered in relational databases?
What type of anomaly occurs when the same information is updated in one tuple but left unchanged in others?
What type of anomaly occurs when the same information is updated in one tuple but left unchanged in others?
Which of the following best describes decomposition of relations?
Which of the following best describes decomposition of relations?
What happens if we delete certain tuples with a specific studio name in a database?
What happens if we delete certain tuples with a specific studio name in a database?
What can be a consequence of properly decomposing a relation?
What can be a consequence of properly decomposing a relation?
What is one sign that a relation is not properly designed and may lead to anomalies?
What is one sign that a relation is not properly designed and may lead to anomalies?
In the context of database anomalies, what does an update anomaly involve?
In the context of database anomalies, what does an update anomaly involve?
Which statement regarding decomposition is true?
Which statement regarding decomposition is true?
What is meant by the phrase 'deletion anomaly'?
What is meant by the phrase 'deletion anomaly'?
What issue may arise during the reconstruction of a decomposed relation?
What issue may arise during the reconstruction of a decomposed relation?
Which term refers specifically to unnecessary repetition of data in multiple tuples?
Which term refers specifically to unnecessary repetition of data in multiple tuples?
What is the impact of a well-designed relational database schema?
What is the impact of a well-designed relational database schema?
How can you describe a consequence of having too much data in a single relation?
How can you describe a consequence of having too much data in a single relation?
Flashcards
Functional Dependency (FD)
Functional Dependency (FD)
A constraint between two sets of attributes in a relation where each value in one set (determinant) uniquely determines a value in the other set (dependent) .
Determinant Set
Determinant Set
The set of attributes that functionally determines another attribute.
Dependent Attribute
Dependent Attribute
The attribute whose value is determined by the determinant set of attributes.
Trivial FD
Trivial FD
Signup and view all the flashcards
FD X → Y on a relation R
FD X → Y on a relation R
Signup and view all the flashcards
Splitting Right Sides of FD's
Splitting Right Sides of FD's
Signup and view all the flashcards
Key
Key
Signup and view all the flashcards
Super-Key
Super-Key
Signup and view all the flashcards
Armstrong's Axiom
Armstrong's Axiom
Signup and view all the flashcards
Subset Property (Reflexivity)
Subset Property (Reflexivity)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Augmentation Axiom
Augmentation Axiom
Signup and view all the flashcards
Transitivity Axiom
Transitivity Axiom
Signup and view all the flashcards
Key (Database)
Key (Database)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Functional Dependency
Functional Dependency
Signup and view all the flashcards
Closure Set
Closure Set
Signup and view all the flashcards
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 1
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 1
Signup and view all the flashcards
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 2
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 2
Signup and view all the flashcards
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 3
Closure Set Algorithm - Step 3
Signup and view all the flashcards
Closure Set Algorithm - Example
Closure Set Algorithm - Example
Signup and view all the flashcards
Super-Key vs Key
Super-Key vs Key
Signup and view all the flashcards
1NF (First Normal Form)
1NF (First Normal Form)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Atomic Attribute
Atomic Attribute
Signup and view all the flashcards
2NF (Second Normal Form)
2NF (Second Normal Form)
Signup and view all the flashcards
3NF (Third Normal Form)
3NF (Third Normal Form)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Transitive Dependency
Transitive Dependency
Signup and view all the flashcards
Primary Key
Primary Key
Signup and view all the flashcards
Is a relation in 1NF?
Is a relation in 1NF?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Is a relation in 2NF?
Is a relation in 2NF?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Anomalies in Database Design
Anomalies in Database Design
Signup and view all the flashcards
Redundancy Anomaly
Redundancy Anomaly
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deletion Anomaly
Deletion Anomaly
Signup and view all the flashcards
Decomposition
Decomposition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Relation Decomposition Rule
Relation Decomposition Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Decomposition Benefits
Decomposition Benefits
Signup and view all the flashcards
Decomposition Drawbacks
Decomposition Drawbacks
Signup and view all the flashcards
Loss of Information
Loss of Information
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reconstructing Original Information
Reconstructing Original Information
Signup and view all the flashcards
Functional Dependencies in Decomposition
Functional Dependencies in Decomposition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Fundamentals of Databases
- The presentation covers functional dependencies and normal forms in database design.
- Functional dependencies (FDs) in database design establish constraints between sets of attributes in a relation.
- An FD (X → Y) means that if two tuples in a relation share the same X value, they will also share the same Y value.
- If Y is a subset of X (X → Y), then the dependency is considered trivial.
- Several properties of functional dependencies are derived from Armstrong's axioms, which are important in database normalization.
- Subset Property: If Y is a subset of X, then X → Y.
- Augmentation: If X → Y, then XZ → YZ.
- Transitivity: If X → Y and Y → Z, then X → Z.
- Secondary rules derived from these include Union, Decomposition, Pseudo transitivity, Accumulation, and Extension.
- Keys and Superkeys in databases are important to uniquely identify entities in a relation.
- A key is a set of attributes that uniquely determines all other attributes of the relation.
- A superkey is a set of attributes that contains a key.
- Keys must be minimal, meaning no proper subset of the attributes can also serve as a key.
- Closure sets are used to determine all attributes that can be derived from a given set of attributes using functional dependencies established in the dataset (relation).
- The closure of X under S, written X+, represents all attributes determinable from X by applying all the functional dependencies in S.
Normal Forms
-
Normal forms (1NF, 2NF, 3NF) are used to organize data in a relational database to minimize redundancy and anomalies.
-
Anomalies are problems that can occur when data is not normalized correctly, such as redundancy in storing and retrieving data from the database.
-
First Normal Form (1NF): Ensure attributes are single-valued and atomic.
-
Correct: Each attribute contains only a single value; no attributes are multi-valued (e.g., contain comma-separated values.)
-
Incorrect : Example: a 'colors' attribute containing multiple colors for a single item, violates 1NF.
-
Second Normal Form (2NF): A relation is in 2NF if it is in 1NF and every non-prime attribute is fully functionally dependent on the primary key.
-
Non-primary key attributes must depend on the whole primary key, not just part of it.
-
Third Normal Form (3NF): A relation is in 3NF if it is in 2NF and no non-prime attribute depends on another non-prime attribute that is not part of the primary key.
-
Attributes should not be determined by non-key attributes, only by the primary key.
-
Decomposition: The accepted method to eliminate anomalies in database design involves splitting relations into smaller relations to reduce redundancy and avoid anomalies in databases
-
The presentation includes case studies and exercises to demonstrate how to identify functional dependencies, keys, superkeys, closure sets, different normal forms, and decompositions.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz covers essential concepts related to functional dependencies and normal forms in database design. It includes the properties derived from Armstrong's axioms and the importance of keys and superkeys in uniquely identifying entities within relations. Test your knowledge on these foundational topics critical to database normalization.