Forensic Science Overview - Chapters 1, 3, 24
10 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Explain the significance of the 2009 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report on forensic science. What were its key findings and recommendations?

The 2009 NAS report highlighted serious concerns about the scientific validity and reliability of many forensic disciplines, particularly those lacking a strong scientific foundation. It called for greater scientific rigor, standardization, and validation of forensic methods. The report advocated for increased research and funding for forensic science, emphasizing the need for more robust scientific evidence in criminal justice.

Describe the differences between physical and non-physical evidence, providing examples of each.

Physical evidence is tangible, material objects found at a crime scene, such as fingerprints, weapons, or DNA. Non-physical evidence is intangible, consisting of verbal statements, written documents, or electronic data. Examples include eyewitness testimony, audio recordings, or digital footprints.

Explain the concept of "chain of custody" in forensic science. Why is it crucial to maintain a complete and accurate chain of custody for evidence?

Chain of custody refers to the chronological documentation of the handling, storage, and transfer of evidence from the crime scene to the court. Maintaining a complete and accurate chain of custody ensures the evidence's integrity and prevents tampering or contamination, contributing to the admissibility of the evidence in court.

Distinguish between "individual" and "class" characteristics of evidence, providing examples of each.

<p>Individual characteristics are unique traits found on evidence that can be linked to a specific source, like fingerprints, DNA profiles, or unique markings on a weapon. Class characteristics are common features found in a group of similar objects but not unique to a single source, such as the type of blood or fiber.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the role of "probable cause" in the criminal justice system. How is it relevant to the gathering of evidence?

<p>Probable cause is a legal standard requiring reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and that evidence related to that crime is likely to be found in a particular location. Probable cause is needed for obtaining a warrant to search a location or to arrest a suspect. It ensures that searches and seizures are reasonable and not arbitrary, respecting individual rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Compare and contrast the Frye and Daubert standards for admissibility of scientific evidence in court. What are their key differences?

<p>The Frye standard, known as the &quot;general acceptance test,&quot; requires that scientific evidence be generally accepted in the relevant scientific community for it to be admissible in court. The Daubert standard, on the other hand, focuses on the reliability of the scientific evidence, requiring it to be based on sound scientific methodology and data, even if not widely accepted. Daubert allows for a greater degree of flexibility and scientific scrutiny compared to Frye.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define "relevance" and "materiality" in the context of evidence admissibility. Explain how they are distinct but related concepts.

<p>Relevance refers to the logical connection between the evidence and a fact in issue. Materiality, on the other hand, focuses on whether the evidence has a bearing on the outcome of the case. While relevance addresses the logical connection, materiality centers on the legal significance of that connection. Both concepts are essential for determining the admissibility of evidence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the role of the gatekeeper in a trial. Who typically acts as the gatekeeper, and what are their responsibilities?

<p>The gatekeeper in a trial is responsible for overseeing the admissibility of evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defense. Typically, the judge acts as the gatekeeper and ensures that only relevant, reliable, and admissible evidence is presented to the jury. This ensures that the trial is fair and conducted according to the rules of evidence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the difference between an expert witness and a lay witness. How are their testimonies distinguished in court?

<p>An expert witness possesses specialized knowledge and training in a particular field, enabling them to provide opinions and interpretations based on their expertise. A lay witness, on the other hand, is a non-expert who can only testify to facts they have personally witnessed. Expert testimonies are distinguished by their ability to provide specialized opinions and interpretations, while lay witness testimonies are limited to factual observations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the key contributions of Paul Kirk, Sir Alec Jeffries, Kary Mullis, and Edmond Locard to the field of forensic science. Briefly explain the significance of their work.

<p>Paul Kirk, known for his work in trace evidence analysis and pioneering the use of microscopy in forensic science, revolutionized the field's approach to identifying and analyzing physical evidence. Sir Alec Jeffries developed DNA fingerprinting, a groundbreaking technique that revolutionized forensic identification. Kary Mullis invented PCR, a technique for replicating DNA, making it possible to analyze minute amounts of DNA and revolutionizing forensic DNA analysis. Edmond Locard, known for his &quot;Locard's Exchange Principle,&quot; asserted that every contact leaves a trace, laying the foundation for the study of trace evidence in forensic science.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Forensic Science

The application of scientific methods to investigate crimes.

Chain of Custody

The process of maintaining and documenting evidence handling.

Types of Evidence

Physical, non-physical, real, demonstrative, known, and unknown evidence classifications.

Individualized Evidence

Evidence that can be linked to a specific source.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The 2009 NAS Report

A report that evaluated the state of forensic science, raising concerns about reliability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Probable Cause

A reasonable belief that a crime has been committed, needed for searches and arrests.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Expert Witness

A person with specialized knowledge called to testify in a trial.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Frye Test

A standard to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence based on general acceptance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Quality Assurance

Procedures to ensure quality standards in forensic analysis.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hearsay

Testimony based on what others said, not direct knowledge.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Introduction (Chapter 1)

  • Forensic means applying scientific methods to ascertain facts
  • Forensic science is about applying scientific methods to legal issues.
  • Key figures in forensic science history include Paul Kirk, Sir Alec Jeffries, and Kary Mullis.
  • Forensic engineering, digital forensics, and behavioral forensics are specialized fields
  • Understanding the US forensic lab system (number, types) and the significance of chain of custody is crucial.

Evidence (Chapter 3)

  • Types of evidence: physical, non-physical, real, demonstrative, known, unknown, individual, class
  • Techniques to individualize evidence are discussed.
  • A "magic number" for identification might not exist.
  • 2009 NAS Report on forensic science and its implications are explained.
  • Quality assurance and control measures (positive control, negative control, false positive, false negative) are important.

Law (Chapter 24)

  • Criminal Procedure, probable cause, and pleas are key legal considerations.
  • Roles in a trial (trier of fact, gatekeeper) are defined.
  • Determining admissibility of evidence rules (relevance, materiality, probativeness, competence, prejudice, constitutional constraints, privileges, hearsay)
  • Impact of Frye and Daubert cases and different between expert witnesses and lay witnesses is important to understand.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Quiz 1 Study Guide PDF

Description

This quiz covers the foundational concepts of forensic science, including its methods, key figures, and specialized fields. It also delves into the types of evidence and the importance of quality assurance in forensic studies. Lastly, key legal considerations related to criminal procedure are addressed.

More Like This

Forensic Science Study Guide Review
40 questions
Types of Evidence in Law
11 questions

Types of Evidence in Law

EntertainingConceptualArt avatar
EntertainingConceptualArt
Forensic Science Overview
50 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser