Evolutionary Psychology of Partner Preferences
10 Questions
2 Views

Evolutionary Psychology of Partner Preferences

Created by
@BeneficiaryHippopotamus660

Questions and Answers

Which of the following factors are associated with females' mate preferences?

  • Youth and status
  • Appearance and resources (correct)
  • Strength and physical characteristics (correct)
  • Access to females
  • According to the theories of romantic relationships, couples with less self-disclosure report better relationship satisfaction.

    False

    What does the matching hypothesis suggest about partner selection?

    People seek partners with similar attractiveness levels.

    The __________ Theory posits that relationships are based on a cost-benefit analysis.

    <p>Social Exchange</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following concepts with their corresponding descriptions:

    <p>Social Penetration Theory = Reciprocity in communication fosters intimacy Equity Theory = Fairness affects satisfaction and commitment Investment Theory = Investment impacts long-term commitment Filter Theory = Attraction is influenced by social demography and attitudes</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which stage of Duck's phase model involves constructing narratives to cope with a breakup?

    <p>Grave dressing phase</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Anonymity in virtual relationships reduces the chances of miscommunication.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What model explains the intense involvement in parasocial relationships as a form of escapism?

    <p>Absorption Addiction Model</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Insecure-resistant relationships with mothers can lead to a fear of ______ in adulthood.

    <p>rejection</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following relationship concepts with their descriptions:

    <p>Parasocial relationships = One-sided relationships with celebrities Grave dressing phase = Narrative construction post-breakup Internal working models = Mental frameworks affecting attachment Absorption Addiction Model = Escapism through celebrity involvement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Evolutionary Explanation for Partner Preferences

    • Human reproductive behavior is driven by survival and reproduction.
    • Sexual selection involves competition for mates, primarily affecting males.
    • Intersexual selection (mate choice): females select high-quality mates, investing more in offspring.
    • Intrasexual selection (male competition): males compete for access to females, driven by lower parental investment.
    • Physical characteristics like strength and resources are often sought by females, while males prefer indicators of fertility.
    • Studies reveal that men emphasize youth and status while women focus on appearance and resources in dating ads.
    • Research supports patterns of male promiscuity and female selectivity.

    Factors Affecting Attraction in Romantic Relationships

    • Self-disclosure increases attraction; sharing personal information suggests trust.
    • Social Penetration Theory emphasizes intimacy development through reciprocity in communication.
    • The appropriateness and timing of self-disclosure are crucial for relationship development.
    • Couples with higher self-disclosure report better relationship satisfaction, love, and commitment.
    • Physical attractiveness is linked to genetic health indicators; the halo effect suggests attractive individuals are viewed favorably in other life aspects.
    • The matching hypothesis states people seek partners with similar attractiveness levels to avoid rejection and maintain relationships.

    Filter Theory

    • Suggests attraction is influenced by a series of filters:
      • First filter: social demography influences initial contact.
      • Second filter: similarity in attitudes enhances compatibility.
      • Third filter: complementarity fosters emotional support.
    • Research indicates attitude similarity is vital for short-term relationships, while complementarity is critical for long-term relationships.

    Theories of Romantic Relationships

    • Social Exchange Theory posits relationships resemble business transactions, focusing on cost-benefit analysis.
    • Comparison Level and Alternatives assess satisfaction levels based on past relationships and potential partners.
    • Equity Theory incorporates fairness in relationship outcomes, suggesting balance affects satisfaction and commitment.
    • Investment Theory adds the idea that investments made in a relationship impact long-term commitment.

    Duck's Phase Model of Relationship Breakdown

    • Relationships typically end through a series of stages:
      • Psychic stage: consideration of relationship issues and alternatives.
      • Didactic phase: confrontations about problems.
      • Social phase: informing social networks and negotiating practical aspects.
      • Grave dressing phase: partners construct narratives to cope with the breakup.
    • Improved models include a resurrection stage for personal reconfiguration post-breakup.

    Virtual Relationships

    • Online communication allows for reduced gating mechanisms, fostering early intimacy.
    • Anonymity can lead to deindividuation, resulting in over-sharing and miscommunication.
    • Research indicates online relationships can be as sustainable as those formed in person but highlight a lack of non-verbal communication skills.

    Parasocial Relationships

    • One-sided relationships where fans are heavily invested while celebrities remain unaware.
    • Levels range from entertainment (casual interest) to borderline pathological (obsessive behaviors).
    • The Absorption Addiction Model explains these relationships as escapism from real-life deficiencies, leading to intense involvement and potential stalking behaviors.### Internal Working Models and Relationships
    • Defective internal working models can lead to relationship issues, particularly affecting the way individuals form attachments.
    • Insecure-resistant relationships with mothers, characterized by inconsistent affection and rejection, contribute to a fear of rejection in adulthood.
    • Parasocial relationships fulfill attachment needs without the risk of rejection, providing a safer emotional space.

    Evaluations and Findings

    • A study by Theut in 2016 analyzed 330 students through the CAST and emotional well-being tests, revealing higher anxiety levels linked to problematic intimate relationships.
    • The absorption-addiction model describes parasocial relationships but lacks a deeper explanatory framework.

    Childhood Attachment and Adult Relationships

    • Early attachment styles significantly influence adult relationships, including parasocial ones, though evidence supporting this remains mixed.
    • Research from 2006 assessed childhood attachment, celebrity worship, and tendencies towards stalking in 299 college students, finding no conclusive link between insecure attachment types and attraction to celebrities.

    Practical Applications and Relationship Counseling

    • Understanding the origins of parasocial relationships can enhance the effectiveness of relationship counseling by enabling better prioritization of real-life relationships.

    Validity Issues in Research

    • The validity of research on parasocial relationships is challenged by reliance on correlational data and retrospective recall of childhood attachments.
    • Parasocial relationships are often stigmatized and viewed negatively, sometimes labeled as pathological by researchers.

    Positive Perspectives on Parasocial Relationships

    • Jensen and Jenkins (1992) proposed a positive view, suggesting that parasocial relationships can serve vital functions, such as fostering social networks among isolated fans.

    Additional Resources

    • For further study, resources such as the Py Boost app can help test knowledge and offer model answers related to relationship topics.
    • Support and contributions from patrons help maintain educational efforts, particularly in developing accessible psychology courses.

    Evolutionary Explanation for Partner Preferences

    • Reproductive behavior is fundamentally motivated by survival and mate selection.
    • Sexual selection drives competition for mates; typically more pronounced in males.
    • Intersexual selection involves females choosing high-quality mates, emphasizing investment in offspring.
    • Intrasexual selection sees males fighting for access to females, spurred by lower parental investment.
    • Women often prefer traits indicating strength and resources; men tend to favor indicators of fertility.
    • Men highlight youth and status in dating advertisements, while women emphasize appearance and financial resources.
    • Patterns show males are generally more promiscuous, whereas females display greater selectivity.

    Factors Affecting Attraction in Romantic Relationships

    • Self-disclosure is linked to greater attraction, as sharing personal details fosters trust.
    • Social Penetration Theory outlines intimacy growth through reciprocal communication.
    • Timing and appropriateness of self-disclosure are critical for fostering relationships.
    • Couples who engage in higher levels of self-disclosure report greater satisfaction and commitment.
    • Physical attractiveness is correlated with genetic health; attractive individuals enjoy favorable perceptions in various life domains.
    • The Matching Hypothesis suggests individuals prefer partners of similar attractiveness to avoid rejection and maintain relationships.

    Filter Theory

    • Attraction is shaped by a multi-layered filtering process:
      • Initial contact is influenced by social demographics.
      • Compatibility is enhanced by attitudinal similarity.
      • Emotional support is fostered through complementarity.
    • Attitude similarity is essential for short-term relationships, while complementarity becomes more vital for long-term stability.

    Theories of Romantic Relationships

    • Social Exchange Theory equates relationships to business transactions, focusing on cost-benefit evaluations.
    • Comparison Level assesses satisfaction based on past relationships, while Comparison Alternatives examine potential partners.
    • Equity Theory highlights the importance of fairness, suggesting balanced outcomes contribute to relationship satisfaction.
    • Investment Theory proposes that personal investments affect long-term commitment in relationships.

    Duck's Phase Model of Relationship Breakdown

    • Relationship dissolution occurs in multiple stages:
      • Psychic stage entails contemplation of issues and alternatives.
      • Didactic phase involves direct confrontations about problems.
      • Social phase includes discussing the relationship with social circles for support.
      • Grave Dressing phase allows partners to create narratives for coping post-breakup.
    • Modern adaptations introduce a resurrection phase, allowing for personal reflection and growth after a breakup.

    Virtual Relationships

    • Online interactions diminish gating mechanisms, promoting quicker intimacy development.
    • Anonymity can lead to deindividuation, increasing risks of over-sharing and miscommunication.
    • Evidence suggests online relationships can be sustainable, but may lack essential non-verbal communication proficiency.

    Parasocial Relationships

    • These relationships are one-sided, where fans invest heavily while celebrities remain unaware.
    • Engagement levels can range from simple entertainment to obsessive behaviors.
    • The Absorption Addiction Model explains these relationships as a form of escapism from real-life deficiencies, which can lead to intense attachments and potential stalking tendencies.

    Internal Working Models and Relationships

    • Maladaptive internal working models can contribute to relationship difficulties, particularly attachment styles.
    • Insecure-resistant maternal attachments, marked by inconsistent care, can foster a fear of rejection in adulthood.
    • Parasocial relationships can satisfy attachment needs while mitigating the risk of real-life rejection, offering a safer emotional channel.

    Evaluations and Findings

    • A study examining 330 students revealed a correlation between higher anxiety levels and problematic intimate relationships, utilizing CAST and emotional well-being assessments.
    • The Absorption Addiction Model provides insights into parasocial relationships, yet lacks comprehensive explanatory depth.

    Childhood Attachment and Adult Relationships

    • Early attachment styles have significant implications for adult relational dynamics, including parasocial relationships, though supporting evidence is varied.
    • Research linking childhood attachment to celebrity worship and stalking tendencies shows no definitive connection between insecure attachment and attraction to celebrities.

    Practical Applications and Relationship Counseling

    • Gaining insights into the roots of parasocial relationships may improve the effectiveness of counseling by enabling a focus on prioritizing and enhancing real-life relationship dynamics.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the evolutionary factors influencing partner preferences, focusing on sexual selection and attraction behaviors in romantic relationships. It highlights the differences in mate selection processes for males and females, as well as the impact of self-disclosure and intimacy on attraction. Test your understanding of these concepts in human reproductive behavior!

    More Quizzes Like This

    Evolutionary Psychology Quiz
    10 questions
    Evolutionary Psychology Lecture 1
    124 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser