Ethics in Kinesiology Research
48 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Why is it crucial for researchers in kinesiology to prioritize ethical standards in their work?

To respect the rights of study participants and protect them from harm.

How did historical practices of unethical treatment in research, such as those by Nazi researchers influence the development of ethical policies in Canada and globally?

They led to the development of the Nuremberg Code, which outlines ethical principles for human medical research.

Explain why ethics in research should be viewed as an ongoing process rather than a one-time event.

Because ethical considerations can evolve as research progresses, new issues emerge, and continuous reflection is necessary.

What is the significance of Henrietta Lacks' story in the context of ethical considerations in research?

<p>It highlights the importance of informed consent and the ethical implications of using human biological material in research.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what ways might the core ethical principles influence the planning stage of a research project in kinesiology?

<p>By ensuring that the research design minimizes harm, maximizes benefits, respects autonomy, and promotes justice for all participants.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe, in practical terms, how researchers can ensure research and scientific integrity during the data analysis phase.

<p>By using appropriate statistical methods, avoiding data manipulation or fabrication, and being transparent about limitations and potential biases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How might the principle of 'respect' be applied differently when conducting research with Indigenous peoples compared to other populations?

<p>It requires incorporating Indigenous knowledge and perspectives, obtaining free, prior, and informed consent, and ensuring that the research benefits the community.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the Nuremberg Code's emphasis on voluntary consent relates to contemporary ethical guidelines for medical research.

<p>It emphasizes current requirements for informed consent, ensuring participants understand and agree to the risks and benefits of research participation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why were some researchers referred to as the 'Texas Vampires,' and what ethical concerns did their actions raise?

<p>Researchers were called 'Texas Vampires' because they collected DNA samples from participants but did not share the data or results. This raises ethical concerns about respect for participants' rights and transparency in research.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the presented material, what are the two primary ethical considerations that research policies should address when involving human participants?

<p>Research policies should focus on respecting the rights of study participants and protecting them from potential harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2) in Canada, and who is required to adhere to it?

<p>TCPS2 is a joint policy with Canada's three federal funding agencies aimed at ensuring the ethical treatment of individuals participating in research. All researchers funded by these agencies must adhere to it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary objective of TCPS2 regarding research practices?

<p>The primary purpose of TCPS2 is to ensure the ethical treatment of individuals participating in research and to uphold the integrity of the research process.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name three aspects of the research process covered by the TCPS2 (2022).

<p>Privacy and Confidentiality, Recruitment and Informed Consent, and Research with Indigenous Communities.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is it essential for participants in human research to understand the potential risks involved and freely choose to participate?

<p>It's essential because research generally carries some risk, and for the research to be ethical, participants must understand those risks and freely choose to participate based on their understanding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the material, what are the three core principles that convey the value of human dignity and inform the TCPS2 (2022)?

<p>The three core principles are Respect for Persons, Concern for Welfare, and Justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the principle 'Concern for Welfare' relates to maintaining the integrity of research involving human participants. Give an example.

<p>Concern for Welfare means minimizing risks to participants' physical, mental, and social well-being. For example, a study testing a new drug must have safety protocols to address potential side effects, ensuring participants' welfare is prioritized alongside scientific goals.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Briefly explain why informed voluntary consent is crucial in research involving human subjects.

<p>It respects autonomy, ensuring individuals have the right to decide whether or not to participate and promotes transparency, building trust between researchers and participants.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Outline the main ethical violation in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.

<p>Participants were not informed about their diagnosis, or given available treatment (penicillin) even after it became a known cure, violating their rights to informed consent and beneficence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the primary ethical justification, although flawed, used by researchers in the Willowbrook Institute experiments to defend their actions?

<p>Researchers argued that hepatitis was endemic at Willowbrook, and all patients would eventually contract it. They believed intentionally infecting patients would allow monitoring of the disease course, leading to less severe complications.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the main premise behind the BC Sexual Sterilization Act and its ethical implications.

<p>The Act allowed the sterilization of individuals in government-run institutions without their consent to control behavior and prevent disabilities from being passed to future generations, violating their reproductive rights and bodily autonomy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Identify two key ethical considerations that researchers should prioritize when conducting studies involving vulnerable populations, such as individuals with intellectual disabilities or those at high risk for specific health conditions.

<p>Ensuring informed consent and providing additional safeguards and advocacy to protect their rights and well-being.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the ethical importance of the Nuremberg Code, particularly its relevance to modern research ethics guidelines.

<p>It emphasizes the need for voluntary consent and avoiding unnecessary suffering. It laid the groundwork for ensuring protection and respect for human rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Outline a situation where a researcher might face a conflict of interest, and explain how this conflict could potentially compromise the integrity of a study.

<p>A researcher funded by a pharmaceutical company might be pressured to produce favorable results for the company's drug, leading to biased data, selective reporting, or manipulation of findings to support the company's interests.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe two essential components of an ethical research proposal that are designed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants' data.

<p>Anonymization (removing identifying information) and secure data storage/handling procedures to prevent unauthorized access or disclosure.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the TCPS 2 guidelines, what are the three core principles that guide most Canadian Universities in research ethics?

<p>The three core principles are respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Besides the TCPS 2 guidelines, what additional elements are typically in place at Canadian Universities and Colleges to ensure ethical research practices?

<p>Research Ethics Review Boards (REBs) and human research ethics policies are in place.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define what constitutes a 'biohazard' in the context of kinesiology research.

<p>A biohazard is any organism, or its derivative, that could negatively influence another organism.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain why researchers engaging in biological or medical research typically need to apply for biohazards approval from their university.

<p>To demonstrate their commitment to adhering to established safety guidelines and regulations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is it important for researchers to consider risks beyond those directly affecting research participants?

<p>Researchers themselves may be exposed to risks, and it is important to consider their safety and well-being.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of research ethics, what is a researcher's primary responsibility when addressing ethical issues that arise during the research process?

<p>Researchers are responsible for applying ethical guidelines to their specific research context.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the TCPS 2, what conditions must be met to ensure participants provide valid consent?

<p>Consent shall be given voluntarily, and can be withdrawn at any time</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a participant withdraws consent during a research study, what options does the participant have regarding their previously collected data or biological materials?

<p>The participant can request the withdrawal of their data or human biological materials.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What specific justification must researchers provide when using partial disclosure or deception in a study, beyond simply finding it convenient?

<p>Researchers must demonstrate that partial disclosure or deception is <em>necessary</em> to answer the research questions and conduct the study effectively.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Differentiate between 'privacy' and 'confidentiality' in the context of research involving human participants.

<p>Privacy refers to a person's right to be free from intrusion, while confidentiality is the researcher's obligation to safeguard entrusted information.</p> Signup and view all the answers

List three strategies researchers can employ to maintain privacy and confidentiality of participant data.

<p>Strategies include: using anonymous data collection, storing data securely, and limiting access to data.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research, what are the researchers' main responsibilities?

<p>Researchers must ensure that all research processes are open, honest, fair, and accountable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name and briefly define the three types of research misconduct.

<p>The three types are: falsification (changing data), fabrication (inventing data), and plagiarism (using others' work without attribution).</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how omitting specific data points from a research dataset to achieve a desired outcome would be classified as research misconduct. Which type and why?

<p>This would be classified as falsification, because changes are made to the research so that the research record does not accurately represent the research that took place.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A researcher alters some of the collected data to better support their hypothesis, and then publishes the revised dataset without noting the changes. How does this violate research integrity, and what specific principle from the Tri-Agency Framework does it breach?

<p>This violates research integrity through falsification of data, breaching the principles of honesty and rigor outlined in the Tri-Agency Framework.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A researcher discovers that some data contradicts their hypothesis and chooses to exclude this data from the final report without any justification. Besides potentially invalidating the research conclusions, what specific type of research misconduct is exemplified by this action, and why is it unethical?

<p>Excluding contradictory data without justification exemplifies falsification, a form of research misconduct because it manipulates the research record to misrepresent the actual findings, thus compromising objectivity and transparency.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the Dr. Strong's muscle-enhancing drug trial, how might offering a very large monetary incentive (e.g., $100,000) disproportionately attract participants who are more willing to overlook potential risks? Explain the ethical concern this raises.

<p>A very large incentive may cause participants to focus on the financial gain, potentially downplaying or ignoring the risks associated with the experimental drug. This raises concerns about whether their consent is truly informed and voluntary, as their decision might be unduly influenced by the money.</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the TCPS 2 guidelines, what is the researcher's responsibility when a potential participant lacks the legal capacity to consent but still possesses some understanding of the research?

<p>Researchers must ascertain the wishes of the individual regarding participation, even if an authorized third party has provided consent. If the individual dissents, their participation is precluded.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe a situation where partial disclosure or deception in research might be ethically justifiable according to Article 3.7A of the TCPS 2.

<p>Partial disclosure/deception may be justifiable if the study involves no more than minimal risk to participants, and the alteration of consent does not adversely affect their welfare.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Dr. Strong's clinical trial, how would you determine if a potential participant with a permanent intellectual impairment has the capacity to understand the significance of the research?

<p>Researchers should use methods appropriate to the individual's cognitive abilities to explain the research, potential risks, and their right to withdraw, gauging their comprehension and ability to express a choice about participation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the level of risk associated with a study affect the appropriateness of offering incentives to potential participants?

<p>As the risks increase, the appropriateness of offering incentives decreases. Higher risks mean incentives are more likely to unduly influence participants' decisions, undermining informed consent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how offering a $10 incentive versus a $100,000 incentive might change the pool of individuals willing to participate in Dr. Strong's muscle-enhancing drug trial.

<p>A $10 incentive would likely attract participants genuinely interested in contributing to research. A $100,000 incentive might attract individuals primarily motivated by financial gain, potentially leading them to disregard or downplay the study's risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What specific measures can researchers take to ensure that children (6-18 years old) who are capable of understanding the research provide assent in addition to consent from an authorized third party?

<p>Researchers can use age-appropriate language and methods to explain the research, risks, and benefits. They should also provide opportunities for children to ask questions, express their opinions, and voluntarily agree to participate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe a potential negative consequence of using partial disclosure in a study, even if it meets the TCPS 2 guidelines.

<p>Even if TCPS 2 guidelines are met, the study risks damaging trust between researchers and the public and if discovered, could reduce willingness to participate in future research.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Research Ethics

Upholding the rights of participants and shielding them from harm.

Ethics as a Process

An ongoing consideration, not a one-time checklist item.

Henrietta Lacks

A Black woman whose cells were used without consent for medical research.

HeLa Cells

Her cells were the first human cells successfully cultured outside the body.

Signup and view all the flashcards

HeLa Cells Contributions

Vaccines, cancer treatments, and cell biology advancements.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ethical Concern of HeLa

Use of human cells in research without informed consent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Historical Practices

Unethical treatment of people in research.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Nuremberg Code

A set of ethical research principles developed after the Nazi 'medical experiments'.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Voluntary Consent

Agreement to participate in research, given freely with full understanding of potential risks and benefits.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Animal Studies -> Human Studies

A progression from preliminary testing on animals to subsequent studies on humans.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

Unethical study from 1932-1972 where Black men with syphilis were left untreated to observe the disease's progression.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Willowbrook Hepatitis Experiment

Experiment where individuals with intellectual disabilities were intentionally infected with hepatitis to track the infection's course.

Signup and view all the flashcards

B.C. Eugenics Board

Board in BC with the power to sterilize individuals in government institutions without their knowledge or consent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

BC Sexual Sterilization Act

Act that allowed the B.C. Eugenics Board to sterilize people living in government institutions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Baylor College of Medicine of Texas (1998)

A research study conducted in Newfoundland and Labrador, researching families with a high risk of heart defects.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Texas Vampires

Researchers who took DNA samples but didn't share data/results; an unethical study.

Signup and view all the flashcards

TCPS 2

Guidelines adopted by most Canadian Universities for research ethics.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Research Ethics Review Boards (REBs)

Committees within Canadian Universities and Colleges that review research proposals for ethical considerations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Human research ethics policies

Policies in place at Canadian Universities and Colleges that researchers must follow.

Signup and view all the flashcards

TCPS2

A joint policy among Canada's federal funding agencies regarding ethical research conduct involving humans.

Signup and view all the flashcards

TCPS2 Purpose

To ethically treat research participants and maintain research integrity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Biohazard

Organisms or their derivatives that can negatively influence another organism.

Signup and view all the flashcards

TCPS2 Key Areas

Scientific and Social value, Integrity, Privacy, Recruitment, Consent, Indigenous communities, International research.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Biohazard Handling

Researchers must handle, store, and dispose of biohazards properly.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Biohazards Approval

A process to shows researchers are dedicated to following established safety rules.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ethical Research

Participants must understand study risks and freely agree to participate.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Human Dignity

The foundation of TCPS2, emphasizing the value every person holds.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Process of Consent

Participants must provide voluntary, informed, and ongoing consent throughout the research process.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Withdrawal of Consent

Participants can withdraw their consent at any time and request their data be removed.

Signup and view all the flashcards

TCPS2 Core Principles

Respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Clinical Trial

A study evaluating a treatment (e.g., drug) where participants are assigned to receive either the treatment or a placebo.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Control Group

A group in a study that receives the standard treatment or a placebo, serving as a baseline for comparison.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Incentive

Benefits or compensation offered to participants in a study.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Health Side Effects

Potential negative effects on health that may arise from participating in a study.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Autonomy

The freedom to make decisions about participating in research without coercion or excessive influence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Decision-Making Capacity

Having the ability to understand one's rights and the potential consequences of participating in research.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Participant Assent

Agreement to participate from someone who cannot legally give consent themselves.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Partial Disclosure/Deception

Withholding some information about the study's purpose or procedures from participants.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Privacy

A person's right to be free from intrusion by others.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Confidentiality

Safeguarding participant's entrusted information.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Privacy Strategies

Outlining how privacy is maintained and data is safeguarded.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Tri-Agency Integrity Policy

A policy researchers must follow, funded by federal agencies.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Responsible Conduct of Research

Ensuring research is open, honest, fair, and accountable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Research Misconduct

It compromises research integrity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Falsification

Changing research data, omitting key information.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Ethical Considerations in Research

  • Ethical standards in research are important within the kinesiology research process.
  • The core ethical principles and guidelines influence planning, data generation/analysis, and knowledge translation.
  • Engaging in research with Indigenous peoples requires unique ethical considerations.
  • Processes are needed to ensure integrity in research and science

Ethical Standards

  • Engaging in ethical research is the most important responsibility of researchers.
  • Ethics policies focus on respecting study participants’ rights, and protecting them from harm.
  • "Ethics" and "respect" are often used interchangeably.
  • Ethics should be viewed as an ongoing process not just a single event

Ethical and Research Policies

  • Black woman Henrietta Lacks' cells were taken without her consent in 1951.
  • Her cells led to significant contributions in medical research.
  • Her cells, known as HeLa cells, were successfully cultured and replicated outside the human body.
  • Hela cells have been crucial in numerous scientific advancements, including vaccines and cancer treatments.
  • Henrietta Lacks died of cervical cancer in 1951, and her story raises ethical questions about the use of human cells in research without consent.
  • Research practices/policies have been developed in response to unethical research practices, such as "medical experiments" by Nazi researchers.
  • The Nuremberg Code was developed and is known as the ten commandments of ethical human medical research; it includes voluntary consent.
  • In Alabama (1932-1972) the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments examined the full progression of untreated syphilis among ~400 black men.
  • Patients were told they were being treated for "bad blood" and were given only aspirin and mineral supplements, even though penicillin was an identified treatment despite the Nuremberg code.
  • Researchers convinced local physicians to not treat the disease, which allowed the study to continue.
  • In 1956, lasting 14 years, Willowbrook Institute Experiments in Staten Island, New York, people living with intellectual disabilities were unknowingly infected with hepatitis virus in an attempt to track the infection.
  • Researchers for Willowbrook argued that hepatitis was endemic and patients would have eventually contracted the disease anyway, and the study would provide opportunities for researchers to monitor the course of the disease.
  • The BC Sexual Sterilization Act (1933-1979) gave the B.C. Eugenics Board the right to sterilize patients living in institutions without their consent.
  • This treatment ensured the disability would not be passed down to future generations as means of controlling behavior.

Modern Research Ethics

  • Ethics is essential and policies involving humans focus on respect and protecting participants from harm.
  • The Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Researchers Involving Humans (TCPS-2; 2022) is a joint ethical statement of Canada's three federal funding agencies, to which all researchers funded by these agencies must adhere.
  • The main purpose of TCPS2 is to ensure individuals participating in research are treated ethically; it also upholds the integrity of the research process.
  • The 2022 TCPS2 covers aspects of research, including balancing scientific/social value, integrity, privacy/confidentiality, recruitment/informed consent, and research with Indigenous communities/international research

Pillars of TCPS2

  • Research is meant to enhance our understanding of the world, and it explores unknown, which generally has some risk.
  • Human research must be ethical, in that participants must understand and freely choose to participate despite potential risks.
  • TCPS2 is informed by three core principles conveying the value of human dignity: respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice.

Respect for Persons

  • Respect for persons involves guidelines to ensure that individuals are treated with dignity and autonomy, acknowledging the intrinsic value of human beings and the respect due to them.

Concern for Welfare

  • Concern for welfare refers to the quality of a person’s experience of life in all aspects.
  • Participants should not be exposed to unnecessary risks, and researchers should consider their physical, mental, and spiritual health.
  • For a research study to be ethical, benefits should outweigh the foreseeable risks.
  • The principle of Concern of Welfare imposes ethical obligations on REBs and researchers by protecting participants from unnecessary risks.

Justice

  • Justice is the obligation to treat people fairly and equitably.
  • Treating persons equitably requires fair distribution of the burdens and potential benefits of research; requires researchers to carefully select which participants to include/exclude for the study.
  • Questions meriting consideration for justice include: why this specific group of participating prospects; good rationale for participating inclusion/exclusion; and who will be exposed to the risks vs. who will have the benefits?
  • All core principles are interdependent, and applications vary across research studies, including: participants engaging in various ways/contexts (respect); various types of risks in research designs (welfare), and insuring proper inclusion/exclusion (justice).
  • By using core principles, researchers balance protection of participants and legitimate research requirements

Research Ethics

  • Most Canadian universities use TCPS 2 guidelines, guided by its three core principles.
  • Canadian universities and colleges will have Research Ethics Review Boards (REBs) and an ethics policy.
  • All researchers must stick to all ethics policies.
  • Kinesiology researchers commonly work with biohazards, including blood/sweat/saliva; researchers must know how to appropriately handle, store, and dispose of these biohazards.
  • A biohazard is any organism or its derivative that could negatively influence another organism.
  • Biohazards approval is required from the researcher's university.
  • By engaging in biohazards reviews and getting approvals, researchers demonstrate a commitment to ensuring research adheres to established safety guidelines/regulations
  • These are just one form of risks researcher are exposed to, which isn't just related to participants but can be related to the researcher's activities.
  • Researchers applying guidelines for their research is a responsibility, but no single ethics policy can provide answers to all issues arising throughout.
  • Researchers must ensure participants provide free, informed, and ongoing consent during research, following TCPS 2: consent is voluntary, can be withdrawn at anytime, and if withdrawn; a data/biological materials can be requested for withdrawn.
  • Researchers provide incentives to participants
  • If participants lack decision-making capacity (e.g. children aged 6-18 or those with impairments), assent or willingness to participate may be required.
  • The TCPS2 states "where an authorized third party has consented on behalf of an individual who lacks legal capacity, but that person has some ability to understand the significance of the research, the researcher shall ascertain the wishes of that individual with respect to participation. Prospective participants' dissent will preclude their participation."
  • Partial disclosure or deception: is possible but varies between conditions set out in the TCPS 2 .
  • Researchers demonstrate the study has minimal risk to participants, the welfare of participants is not adversely affected as result of consent alternation and disclosure / deception is necessary to answer research and conduct study.

Privacy & Confidentiality

  • Privacy: A person's right to be avoid intrusion from others.
  • Confidentiality: Researcher's obligation to safeguard information

Research and Scientific Integrity

  • Respect for privacy requires researchers to keep participant info confidential.
  • Researchers outline privacy/confidentiality and strategies used to safeguard info.
  • Researchers funded by federal funding agencies adhere to the Tri-Agency Research Integrity Policy outlined/detailed in the Tri-Agency Responsible Conduct of Research.
  • The Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research outlines the researcher's responsibilities for ensuring research is honest, open, fair, and accountable.

Research Misconduct

  • Research integrity: is compromised when research misconduct takes place (occurs when proposing performance, reviewing/reporting results; it has three types: falsification, fabrication, plagiarism. -Falsification: Changing of research (e.g omitting data) to misrepresent data. -Plagiarism: Taking from other work or results and failing to give credit or acknowledgement of the source. -Fabrication: When researchers creates data and record or report such data.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Description

Explore the crucial role of ethics in kinesiology research including the impact of historical unethical practices on current policies. Understand ethics as an ongoing process and the significance of informed consent, respect, and data integrity. Learn how ethical principles influence research planning and practice.

More Like This

Research Ethics and Inclusion
35 questions

Research Ethics and Inclusion

WellRegardedObsidian1129 avatar
WellRegardedObsidian1129
Research Ethics Quiz: Human Subjects
5 questions
Éthique de la Recherche en Kinésiologie
36 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser