Epistemology: Types and Validity of Knowledge

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which of the following is the MOST accurate definition of 'a priori' knowledge?

  • Knowledge gained through sensory experience and observation.
  • Knowledge that is inherent and does not require external proof.
  • Knowledge derived from memory and recall of past events.
  • Knowledge that can be deduced through existing understanding and logical reasoning. (correct)

According to René Descartes, what criterion must something meet to be considered 'known'?

  • It must be completely certain and indubitable. (correct)
  • It must be widely accepted by the general population.
  • It must be supported by empirical evidence.
  • It must be useful for practical purposes.

Which of the following BEST describes a potential issue with relying on memory as a source of knowledge?

  • Memories can be prone to gaps and distortions, leading to inaccurate information. (correct)
  • Memories are objective and free from personal interpretation.
  • Memories are always perfectly accurate records of past events.
  • Memories can be influenced by external sources but this doesn't affect validity.

What is the central idea behind skeptical hypotheses?

<p>An external force might be manipulating our beliefs about reality. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why does the question of cause pose a problem for perception as a reliable source of knowledge?

<p>We cannot directly observe the external causes of our perceptions. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following BEST describes circular reasoning?

<p>Reasoning that assumes the conclusion in its premises. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the concept of circular reasoning relate to the problem of proving the existence of an external world?

<p>Attempts to prove the external world often rely on assuming its existence. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the core idea of solipsism?

<p>Only one's own mind is sure to exist. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key difference between everyday skepticism and philosophical skepticism?

<p>Everyday skepticism can be resolved through evidence, while philosophical skepticism's doubts are irremovable. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What potential threat does skepticism pose to our understanding of the world?

<p>It undermines the idea that we are living in truth. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the central claim of Descartes' 'Cogito' argument?

<p>If one is thinking, one must exist. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of epistemology, what is 'shifting the onus'?

<p>Challenging the other side to prove their claims. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What logical structure does 'Modus Ponens' follow?

<p>If P, then Q; P; Therefore, Q. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Occam's Razor suggest one should do when faced with two points of equal reasoning?

<p>Choose the simpler explanation. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of skepticism, what is meant by arguing for 'a shadow of a doubt'?

<p>Asserting that a possibility does threaten knowledge. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the 'metaphysical turn' in the context of discussions about skepticism?

<p>A shift in focus towards what is at stake in feeling wrong or deceived. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the underlying assumption of 'commonsense realism', which contrasts it to the Skeptic's arguments?

<p>Our perceptions and observations roughly correspond to an independent external reality. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Imagine you are trying to argue that knowledge gained through scientific processes is undeniably 'true', but someone counters that science itself relies on perception, making it just as vulnerable to error. Which concept best describes the issue with your original argument?

<p>Circular Reasoning (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Person A: 'I can't be certain that gravity will cause an apple to fall if I drop it.' Person B: 'Are you suggesting that the common understanding of gravitational physics doesn't exist, and any explanation is as likely?' How would you categorize these statements, in the context of Epistemology?

<p>Person A is illustrating Philosophical Scepticism, countered by Person B. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements cannot be disproven, even if it is likely false?

<p>The Universe was created 5 minutes ago, complete with our memories from before that that did not happen. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the four kinds of information which constitute knowledge?

<p>Facts, memory, the 'a priori', and perception.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is circular reasoning, and why is it problematic in philosophical arguments?

<p>Circular reasoning, or 'begging the question,' occurs when the conclusion is assumed in the premises. It's problematic because it doesn't provide independent support for the conclusion.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Briefly explain Descartes' famous quote, 'Cogito, ergo sum'.

<p>It translates to 'I think, therefore I am.' It means that the very act of thinking proves one's existence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Give one example of a 'Skeptical Hypothesis' mentioned in the text.

<p>A skeptical hypothesis would be &quot;What if we’re within a simulation?&quot;</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the core idea behind solipsism, as outlined in the text?

<p>Solipsism is the idea that only one's own mind is sure to exist.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the difference between everyday scepticism and philosophical scepticism.

<p>Everyday scepticism's doubts can be resolved with evidence, while philosophical scepticism's doubts cannot.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is 'shifting the onus' or 'the burden of proof' in the context of responding to skepticism?

<p>It's challenging the skeptic to provide evidence for their claims, rather than trying to disprove them.</p> Signup and view all the answers

State Occam’s razor (or Ockham’s razor), and explain how it might be used as a response to skepticism.

<p>Occam's Razor is the principle of parsimony. Given equally valid explanations, the simpler one is preferred. Thus, the existence of the external world is more probable than a grand delusion.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Identify and explain one potential problem with relying on perception as a source of knowledge.

<p>Perception can be deceptive, as demonstrated by illusions. Our senses can be tricked, casting doubt on the accuracy of our observations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why does the text suggest that science is 'just as vulnerable as perception' when trying to prove the true nature of reality?

<p>Because scientific observations and experiments ultimately rely on our perception of reality, making them subject to the same potential flaws.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the 'Metaphysical Turn' frames what is at stake in the debate about skepticism.

<p>The 'Metaphysical Turn' frames the debate as concerning whether we are fundamentally wrong, deluded, or deceived about what we believe to be true.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one reason why humans might value truth over 'false pleasantries,' even if the truth is unsettling?

<p>The text argues that, as humans, we value truth over false pleasantries. Humans would rather 'take the truth pill from the Matrix'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain, in your own words, why the text implies that skeptical hypotheses are 'uncounterable'.

<p>Because according to the text, everything that we know, we know via our own thought processes, so we cannot use our own mind to prove the existence of an outside world.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the provided text, explain the significance of Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens in arguments against skepticism.

<p>Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens ensure arguments against skepticism are deductively valid; <em>if</em> the premises are true, they guarantee a true conclusion. For example, as explained in the text &quot;If this is a hand, then there is an external world. This is a hand. Therefore there is an external world&quot;, this is an example of Modus Ponens.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The text mentions the possibility that 'reality started 5 minutes ago.' Explain what this thought experiment is designed to challenge.

<p>It challenges the assumption that our memories and sense of continuity reflect a genuine past. If reality began recently, all our memories could be false.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The text states, 'Whenever we try to definitely prove the existence of an external world, we (explicitly or tacitly) rely on the fact that there is an external world.' Explain the problem this statement identifies.

<p>This statement identifies circular reasoning. Attempts to prove the external world inherently assume the existence of what they are trying to prove.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How can we describe the level of certainty from a philosophical skeptic, and why does this level matter?

<p>The level of certainty from a philosophical skeptic can be described as impossible to disprove, therefore we must consider that our experiences may be fabricated.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The initial response to a skeptic can be described as circular reasoning. How could we re-word this response to address the skeptic without circular reasoning?

<p>This cannot happen, as circular reasoning is an unavoidable component of speaking.</p> Signup and view all the answers

"Perception must have cause? It cannot simply be?". What makes this question difficult to answer?

<p>The causes outside the mind are unobservable. We can observe perception, but not the mind-independent causes, so it is impossible to make statements about it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

If an evil demon is manipulating your thoughts, are you still able to 'know' anything? Explain your answer within the framework presented in the text.

<p>Knowing becomes problematic if reality is controlled by an evil demon. Although Descartes's 'Cogito' asserts existence through thought, even manipulated thoughts raise doubts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Knowledge

Information that can be proven in the real world, recalled from memory, deduced through existing knowledge (a priori), or observed through perception.

Issues with Knowledge Validity

Facts may be subject to inaccurate research or distribution, memories are prone to gaps, and perception may deceive us through illusions.

Skeptical Hypotheses

The idea that an outside force manipulates our beliefs, questioning the reality we perceive.

Circular Reasoning

Assuming in our premises what we are setting out to prove in our conclusion.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Solipsism

The philosophical idea that only one's own mind is sure to exist.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Everyday vs. Philosophical Skepticism

Doubt that can be removed with evidence versus doubt that cannot be disproven.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Cogito

If our mind can think, we exist, even if manipulated or dreaming.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Modus Ponens

If P, then Q. P. Therefore, Q.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Modus Tollens

If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occam's Razor

The principle that the simplest explanation is usually the best.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Facts

Information, usually of a scientific nature, that can be proved in the real world.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Memory

Information we can recall. However, memories are prone to gaps, leading to false information.

Signup and view all the flashcards

A priori knowledge

Information we deduct through our existing knowledge. It is known independently from experience.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Perception

Knowledge gained through observation and our senses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Descartes' Certainty

Counting something as known when it is completely certain, without any room for doubt.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasoning for Solipsism

The belief that our mind is all that exists, stemming from the idea that we only have access to our own perceptions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Philosophical Scepticism

Questioning the possibility of genuine knowledge, given that all content/knowledge may be counterfeit.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Commonsense Realism

Common assumption that we perceive and observe reality as it truly exists, both in ordinary and complex scientific observations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Burden of Proof

The idea that the person making a claim has the responsibility to provide evidence for it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Skepticism's Stakes

The threat to the idea that our truths might be actually be complete falsehoods.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Types of Knowledge

  • Knowledge includes facts of a scientific nature, memory, the "i priori", and perception.
  • Facts: Information that can be proven in the real world through scientific means.
  • Memory: Information that can be recalled.
  • "I priori": Information deduced through existing knowledge (e.g., 2+2=4, not 5).
  • Perception: Knowledge gained through observation.

Issues with Knowledge Validity

  • Facts can be subject to inaccurate research or distribution.
  • Memories are prone to forming gaps, which can lead to false information, or the Mandela effect when trying to fill these gaps.
  • Perception may deceive through illusions.
  • Uncertainties regarding knowledge can, in principle, be overcome.
  • The possibility of genuine knowledge remains.

Skeptical Hypotheses

  • Skeptical hypotheses propose that an outside force manipulates what we believe.
  • Examples include being trapped in a dream, a demon casting illusions, reality starting five minutes ago, being in a simulation, or being a brain in a vat.

The Limits of Perception

  • Everything known is formed by one's own thought processes, making skeptical hypotheses uncounterable, as we cannot use our minds to disprove an external world.
  • Observation of causes isn't possible, so there's no mind-independent reason to assume its existence.
  • Science is as vulnerable as perception because it relies on our perception of reality.
  • Attempts to prove the external world rely on the assumption that there is an external world.

Circular Reasoning

  • Circular reasoning, or "begging the question," assumes in the premises what one is setting out to prove in the conclusion.
  • An example is arguing that God exists because the Bible says so, the Bible is infallible, and the Bible is the divine word of God.

Initial Response to the Skeptic

  • Relying on the belief that perceptions and observations correspond to an external reality is begging the question.
  • The question of the cause of perceptions is under dispute.

Solipsism

  • Argues that the mind is all that exists based on having access only to one's own perceptions.
  • Premise 1: One can only truly know what one can be certain of.
  • Premise 2: One can only be certain of the content of one's own mind.
  • Conclusion: Therefore, the content of one's mind is all that exists.

Scepticism

  • One can only truly know the content of one's mind.
  • There may or may not be a reality outside of one's mind, but all one knows for certain is the content of one's mind.
  • If this content may all be counterfeit or hallucinated, where does that leave any claim to "knowledge"?

Everyday vs. Philosophical Scepticism

  • Everyday scepticism: Grounds for doubt can be removed with a presupposition of background knowledge.
  • Philosophical scepticism: Grounds for doubt cannot be removed with no presupposition of background knowledge.
  • Ordinary doubt can still carry immense weight, and can be revealed within this world, while philosophical doubt, cannot.
  • Everyday scepticism involves being deceived within your external world, while philosophical scepticism involves being deceived about your external world.

What is at Stake?

  • Scepticism threatens the idea that we are living in the truth.
  • Humans value truth and don't want to feel wrong, deluded, or deceived.

The Cogito

  • Rene Descartes stated there is not one of his former beliefs about which a doubt may not properly be raised.
  • The Cogito believes that as long as our mind can think, we can exist.
  • "I think, therefore I am" ("Cogito ergo sum")
  • If we are being manipulated, or simply dreaming, even then, we must exist.

Commonsense Realist Responses

  • Question of "the burden of proof", shifting the onus which is the burden of proof.
  • Arguments for the existence of an external world can be structured using Modus Ponens (If P, then Q; P; Therefore Q) or Modus Tollens (If P, then Q; Not Q; Therefore Not P).
  • Both Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens are valid deductive arguments, meaning that if there premises are true it is guaranteed to have a true conclusion.

Occam's Razor

  • Also known as the Principle of Parsimony, favors the simpler explanation when two explanations have equal reasoning.
  • Would prefer the statement of there being a hand there as that is what is seen, instead of a gas tank or demon creating the image of a hand.
  • The Principle of Parsimony would favour the realist

The Sceptic's Argument

  • Only need to argue "a shadow of a doubt" by asserting "a possibility".
  • One needs to consider how concerned we should be about mere possibilities and whether they genuinely threaten "knowledge".

The Metaphysical Turn

  • We don’t want to feel wrong, deluded, deceived, that what we know is false.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Theory of Knowledge Quiz
5 questions

Theory of Knowledge Quiz

HealthfulConnemara258 avatar
HealthfulConnemara258
Epistemology: Theory of Knowledge
10 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser