5 Questions
According to the Court of King's Bench decision, what action did the farmer take in response to the text message from the grain buyer?
Confirmed the flax contract
What was the reason for the farmer not delivering the flax in November?
The prices for the crop had increased
Why did the grain buyer argue that the emoji amounted to an agreement?
The farmer had previously confirmed through text message
What was the amount of money the farmer was ordered to pay for not delivering the flax?
$82,000
What did the grain buyer do after sending the text message to the farmers?
Sent a picture of a contract
Can an emoji be considered a binding agreement? Test your knowledge on this Saskatchewan court case where a farmer was ordered to pay over $82,000 for not delivering product after responding with a thumbs-up emoji to a text message from a grain buyer. Explore the legal implications of using emojis in contractual agreements.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free