Donoghue vs. Stevenson: Landmark Consumer Protection Case Quiz
12 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the significance of Donoghue vs. Stevenson in the history of consumer protection law?

  • It was the first case to establish the concept of product liability.
  • It laid the groundwork for the development of the tort of negligence. (correct)
  • It introduced the principle of caveat emptor in consumer transactions.
  • It set a precedent for cases involving breach of contract by manufacturers.

    • Why did Mrs. Donoghue sue the manufacturer, Stevenson?

  • To claim damages for breach of contract.
  • To hold the cafe accountable for selling expired products.
  • Due to becoming ill after consuming contaminated ginger beer. (correct)
  • For emotional distress caused by finding a snail in her drink.

    • What was the key issue in the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson?

  • Whether Mrs. Donoghue was responsible for her illness.
  • If the cafe was liable for selling contaminated ginger beer.
  • Whether the manufacturer had a duty of care towards consumers. (correct)
  • If the snail was intentionally placed in the bottle.

    • What did the House of Lords rule in the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson?

    <p>Manufacturers have a duty of care to ensure product safety.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did Donoghue vs. Stevenson impact future cases regarding product liability?

    <p>It set a precedent for cases involving duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which aspect of consumer protection did Donoghue vs. Stevenson primarily focus on?

    <p>Establishing a duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary focus of the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case?

    <p>The validity of the lease agreement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did Fagbemi argue that the lease agreement in the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case was invalid?

    <p>It was not registered with the appropriate authorities</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal document did Aoko claim to have with the traditional ruler of the land in the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case?

    <p>Lease agreement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which court ultimately decided the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case in Nigeria?

    <p>Supreme Court of Nigeria</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case, what was highlighted as an important part of Nigeria's legal system but not above the constitution or other laws?

    <p>Customary law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significance did the Aoko vs.Fagbemi case hold for future land transactions in Nigeria?

    <p>Emphasized importance of registration</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Donoghue vs. Stevenson: A Landmark Case in the History of Consumer Protection Law

    Donoghue vs. Stevenson is a landmark case in the history of consumer protection law that occurred in the United Kingdom in 1932. It is considered a cornerstone case in the development of the tort of negligence. This case established the principle of duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers, and it has had a significant impact on the development of consumer protection laws in the UK and beyond.

    The Case

    In this case, Mrs. Donoghue purchased a ginger beer bottle from a cafe. When she poured the contents into a glass, a decomposing snail fell into her drink, causing her to become ill. Mrs. Donoghue sued the manufacturer, Stevenson, for damages. The key issue in the case was whether the manufacturer had a duty of care to ensure that the product was safe for consumption.

    The Decision

    The House of Lords, the highest court in the UK at the time, ruled that the manufacturer did indeed have a duty of care to ensure that the product was safe for consumption. This decision set a precedent for future cases involving product liability and the duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers.

    Impact on Consumer Protection Law

    Donoghue vs. Stevenson is considered a landmark case in the history of consumer protection law. It established the principle that manufacturers have a duty of care to ensure that their products are safe for consumers to use. This principle has been further developed in subsequent case law and legislation, leading to the establishment of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 in the UK, which provides a framework for consumer protection in the UK.

    Conclusion

    Donoghue vs. Stevenson is a significant case in the history of consumer protection law. It established the principle that manufacturers have a duty of care to ensure that their products are safe for consumers, which has had a profound impact on the development of consumer protection laws in the UK and beyond.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Test your knowledge about the landmark case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson, which set a precedent in consumer protection law. Learn about the key issues, the court's decision, and the impact of this case on future laws and regulations.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser