Donoghue v Stevenson (1932): Landmark Negligence Case
6 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the unusual contents of the bottle of ginger beer consumed by May Donoghue?

  • A foreign object
  • A contaminated liquid
  • A decomposed snail (correct)
  • A piece of glass
  • Who did May Donoghue sue for negligence?

  • The cafe owner
  • The manufacturer, Mr. Stevenson (correct)
  • The supplier of the snail
  • The distributer of the ginger beer
  • What principle was introduced by Lord Atkin's judgement in the Donoghue v Stevenson case?

  • The principle of proximity
  • The neighbour principle (correct)
  • The principle of manufacturers' liability
  • The principle of reasonable care
  • What is the 'neighbour' in the context of the neighbour principle?

    <p>Anyone who is so closely and directly affected by one's act</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the Donoghue v Stevenson case in tort law?

    <p>It expanded the scope of negligence in tort law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What test is used to determine whether a duty of care was breached in the context of the Donoghue v Stevenson case?

    <p>The reasonable person test</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

    Facts of the Case

    • May Donoghue consumed a bottle of ginger beer at a cafe in Paisley, Scotland
    • The bottle contained a decomposed snail
    • Donoghue claimed to have suffered personal injury and distress as a result
    • She sued the manufacturer, Mr. Stevenson, for negligence

    Judgement and Significance

    • The House of Lords ruled in favor of Donoghue, establishing a duty of care towards the ultimate consumer
    • Lord Atkin's judgement introduced the "neighbour principle" which states that:
      • One must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which can reasonably be foreseen to injure one's neighbour
      • "Neighbour" includes anyone who is so closely and directly affected by one's act that one ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being affected

    Key Principles Established

    • Manufacturers have a duty of care towards the ultimate consumer
    • The principle of proximity is applicable in determining duty of care
    • The "reasonable person" test is used to determine whether a duty of care was breached

    Impact on Tort Law

    • Donoghue v Stevenson expanded the scope of negligence in tort law
    • The case established a precedent for manufacturers' liability towards consumers
    • The "neighbour principle" has been applied in various areas of law, including negligence, nuisance, and occupiers' liability

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Test your knowledge on the influential Donoghue v Stevenson case, which established a duty of care towards consumers and introduced the 'neighbour principle' in tort law. Learn about the facts, judgement, and significance of this landmark case.

    More Like This

    Tort Law and Negligence
    26 questions

    Tort Law and Negligence

    PraisingMountRushmore avatar
    PraisingMountRushmore
    Tort Law and Negligence
    10 questions
    Defences to Negligence in Tort Law
    10 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser