Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the author's main objective in writing this letter?
What is the author's main objective in writing this letter?
The author uses sarcasm primarily to highlight which of the following?
The author uses sarcasm primarily to highlight which of the following?
What is the intended effect of the author's questions about slavery?
What is the intended effect of the author's questions about slavery?
What is the author's tone in the letter?
What is the author's tone in the letter?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the most likely reason for the author's use of the phrase 'End of debate'?
What is the most likely reason for the author's use of the phrase 'End of debate'?
Signup and view all the answers
The author uses the phrase 'a lesser abomination' in relation to which topic?
The author uses the phrase 'a lesser abomination' in relation to which topic?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the author imply by asking if there are "degrees" of abomination?
What does the author imply by asking if there are "degrees" of abomination?
Signup and view all the answers
Why does the author emphasize that the odor of the bull sacrifice is "pleasing to the Lord" but "not pleasing to [his] neighbors"?
Why does the author emphasize that the odor of the bull sacrifice is "pleasing to the Lord" but "not pleasing to [his] neighbors"?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Divine Command Theory - A Joke
-
Dr. Laura Schlesinger stated homosexuality is an abomination, citing Leviticus 18:22.
-
A US resident wrote a humorous and informative letter in response.
Letter to Dr. Laura
-
The letter challenged several divinely commanded practices outlined in the Bible.
-
Question 1: The writer inquired about owning slaves (Leviticus 25:44), questioning the distinction between Mexicans and Canadians.
-
Question 2: The letter questioned the price of selling a daughter into slavery (Exodus 21:7).
-
Question 3: The writer sought clarification on menstrual restrictions and maintaining purity (Leviticus 15:19-24).
-
He questioned how to determine menstrual periods and potential consequences.
-
Question 4: Asked about the offensive smell of animal sacrifices (Leviticus 1:9).
-
Question 5: Wanted to know if he should execute a Sabbath-breaker (Exodus 35:2).
-
Question 6: Discussed differing interpretations of different levels of religious transgression, in relation to shellfish (Leviticus 11:10) and homosexuality.
-
Question 7: Asked about the vision requirements for approaching the altar given flawed vision (Leviticus 21:20).
-
Question 8: Questioned the practice of hair trimming (Leviticus 19:27).
-
Question 9: Questioned the purity rules surrounding contact with pig carcasses (Leviticus 11:6-8).
-
Question 10: Criticized the practices of planting conflicting crops and wearing mixed fabrics (Leviticus 19:19), and the act of stoning people in general.
-
Further questioned the practice of executing people who sleep with their in-laws (Leviticus 20:14)..
-
Overall Conclusion: The letter emphasized the letter-writer's belief that God's word might not be so straightforward.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores a humorous letter challenging Dr. Laura Schlesinger's stance on homosexuality through biblical references. Each question addresses various divine commandments from the Bible, prompting critical thinking about their implications and modern interpretations. Test your understanding of these theological issues and their societal impact.