Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the author's main objective in writing this letter?
What is the author's main objective in writing this letter?
- To engage in a theological debate about the morality of slavery.
- To seek guidance from Dr. Laura on interpreting biblical passages.
- To express support for Dr. Laura's views on homosexuality.
- To provide a satirical critique of Dr. Laura's stance on homosexuality. (correct)
The author uses sarcasm primarily to highlight which of the following?
The author uses sarcasm primarily to highlight which of the following?
- The importance of interpreting the Bible literally.
- The complexity of ethical issues in modern society.
- The hypocrisy of selectively applying biblical laws. (correct)
- The need for a more nuanced understanding of the Bible's teachings.
What is the intended effect of the author's questions about slavery?
What is the intended effect of the author's questions about slavery?
- To challenge Dr. Laura's interpretation of the Bible on homosexuality.
- To promote a realistic understanding of biblical interpretations.
- To demonstrate the absurdity of applying ancient laws to modern society. (correct)
- To express a concern about the ethical implications of slavery.
What is the author's tone in the letter?
What is the author's tone in the letter?
What is the most likely reason for the author's use of the phrase 'End of debate'?
What is the most likely reason for the author's use of the phrase 'End of debate'?
The author uses the phrase 'a lesser abomination' in relation to which topic?
The author uses the phrase 'a lesser abomination' in relation to which topic?
What does the author imply by asking if there are "degrees" of abomination?
What does the author imply by asking if there are "degrees" of abomination?
Why does the author emphasize that the odor of the bull sacrifice is "pleasing to the Lord" but "not pleasing to [his] neighbors"?
Why does the author emphasize that the odor of the bull sacrifice is "pleasing to the Lord" but "not pleasing to [his] neighbors"?
Flashcards
Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 18:22
A biblical verse stating that homosexuality is an abomination.
Slavery in Leviticus 25:44
Slavery in Leviticus 25:44
This verse permits owning slaves from neighboring nations.
Exodus 21:7
Exodus 21:7
A verse that discusses selling a daughter into slavery.
Menstrual Uncleanliness
Menstrual Uncleanliness
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sabbath Work Penalty
Sabbath Work Penalty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Shellfish Abomination
Shellfish Abomination
Signup and view all the flashcards
Vision Defects and Altars
Vision Defects and Altars
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hair Cutting Prohibition
Hair Cutting Prohibition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Divine Command Theory - A Joke
-
Dr. Laura Schlesinger stated homosexuality is an abomination, citing Leviticus 18:22.
-
A US resident wrote a humorous and informative letter in response.
Letter to Dr. Laura
-
The letter challenged several divinely commanded practices outlined in the Bible.
-
Question 1: The writer inquired about owning slaves (Leviticus 25:44), questioning the distinction between Mexicans and Canadians.
-
Question 2: The letter questioned the price of selling a daughter into slavery (Exodus 21:7).
-
Question 3: The writer sought clarification on menstrual restrictions and maintaining purity (Leviticus 15:19-24).
-
He questioned how to determine menstrual periods and potential consequences.
-
Question 4: Asked about the offensive smell of animal sacrifices (Leviticus 1:9).
-
Question 5: Wanted to know if he should execute a Sabbath-breaker (Exodus 35:2).
-
Question 6: Discussed differing interpretations of different levels of religious transgression, in relation to shellfish (Leviticus 11:10) and homosexuality.
-
Question 7: Asked about the vision requirements for approaching the altar given flawed vision (Leviticus 21:20).
-
Question 8: Questioned the practice of hair trimming (Leviticus 19:27).
-
Question 9: Questioned the purity rules surrounding contact with pig carcasses (Leviticus 11:6-8).
-
Question 10: Criticized the practices of planting conflicting crops and wearing mixed fabrics (Leviticus 19:19), and the act of stoning people in general.
-
Further questioned the practice of executing people who sleep with their in-laws (Leviticus 20:14)..
-
Overall Conclusion: The letter emphasized the letter-writer's belief that God's word might not be so straightforward.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.