Preliminary evidential matters
40 Questions
0 Views

Preliminary evidential matters

Created by
@ExpansiveAwe634

Questions and Answers

What does the judge need to summarize in relation to circumstantial evidence?

  • The personal opinions of the judge about the case.
  • Only the jury's interpretations of the evidence.
  • Only the evidence presented by the prosecution.
  • Any evidence and arguments from both prosecution and defence. (correct)
  • What is a key characteristic of real evidence in court proceedings?

  • It can be considered valid without any corresponding testimony.
  • It must always be accompanied by expert testimony.
  • It is only valuable if it has been used in previous cases.
  • It should be presented for inspection by the tribunal of fact. (correct)
  • In what scenario must the tribunal of fact avoid making conclusions without assistance?

  • When the evidence presented is entirely circumstantial.
  • Without expert testimony on technical matters. (correct)
  • When there is an abundance of circumstantial evidence.
  • If the judge expresses doubt about the evidence.
  • What constitutes a 'view' in the legal context?

    <p>An inspection of material objects not brought to court.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who should ideally attend a view of evidence in a case?

    <p>The judge, parties, counsel, and shorthand writer.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What should jurors decide regarding circumstantial evidence?

    <p>Weigh all evidence and make fair and reasonable conclusions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one main challenge related to identifying real evidence in court?

    <p>It can sometimes exist independently of supporting testimonies.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must jurors refrain from doing when considering circumstantial evidence?

    <p>Making assumptions or developing theories about unproven matters.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary requirement for a formal admission under Section 10?

    <p>It should appear clearly on the shorthand note.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of Written Admissions, what happens to facts that are removed from a schedule pending judicial ruling?

    <p>They can be reinstated following a favorable ruling.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstances could a prosecution rely on admissions made during a defense opening speech?

    <p>When the defense admits facts pertaining to guilt.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the cardinal rule regarding evidence admissibility?

    <p>All relevant evidence is admissible unless excluded by law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What may happen to relevant evidence even if it meets the threshold of relevance?

    <p>It can be excluded if deemed prejudicial.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what condition might a court allow a party to resile from a formal admission?

    <p>If there is cogent evidence of mistake or misunderstanding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an implication if the jury cannot place weight on relevant evidence, according to admissibility rules?

    <p>The evidence is likely to be excluded from the trial.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements regarding formal admissions is true?

    <p>They are important when made with legal advice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens to a fact that is formally admitted under the CJA 1967, s. 10?

    <p>It ceases to be in issue and is taken as proven.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements is true regarding written admissions in court?

    <p>They must be relevant and not contain inadmissible material.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be considered when evaluating circumstantial evidence against direct evidence?

    <p>A variety of individual items of circumstantial evidence may weigh more than less credible direct evidence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a fact to be considered proven in the context of a criminal proceeding?

    <p>It must meet the required standard of proof.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key requirement before inferring guilt from circumstantial evidence?

    <p>One must ensure no other co-existing circumstances can weaken the inference.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what conditions can expert conclusions be admitted as fact?

    <p>When one party accepts the conclusions of the other party.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What role does the character of witnesses play in the admission of evidence?

    <p>Character evidence of both the accused and the prosecution witness is admissible.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a plea of not guilty, what is the responsibility of the prosecution?

    <p>They have to prove the entire case, including knowledge and intent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement best describes the nature of facts in issue?

    <p>They are determined by the legal ingredients of the offence and the defence raised.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement accurately reflects the nature of circumstantial evidence?

    <p>Circumstantial evidence can sometimes be conclusive but requires careful examination.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Regarding admissibility rules, when is evidence of good character considered relevant?

    <p>When the accused has contradicted the prosecution witness.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a limitation of formal admissions under CJA s10 (1)?

    <p>They can include inadmissible hearsay.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the outcome if the required standard of proof is not met in a criminal case?

    <p>The fact is assumed not to have happened.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of expert conclusions, what is a significant consideration?

    <p>The weight given to expert conclusions may vary depending on the context of the case.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does circumstantial evidence work in terms of possibilities?

    <p>It eliminates other possibilities cumulatively, strengthening an inference.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why must circumstantial evidence always be examined closely?

    <p>It is often fabricated to support a false narrative.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstances can a court exclude prosecution evidence according to PACE s78(1)?

    <p>If its admission would adversely affect the fairness of the proceedings.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When should applications to exclude evidence under PACE s78 be made?

    <p>Before the evidence is presented in court.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the role of discretion in the exclusion of evidence under PACE s78(1)?

    <p>The court must determine if the evidence affects fairness before exercising discretion.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What foundational legal principle governs the exclusion of evidence in court proceedings?

    <p>The necessity for fair judicial processes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How do judges typically approach the discretion of allowing or excluding evidence under similar circumstances?

    <p>Judges may have differing views despite similar circumstances.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does PACE s78(1) imply about the necessity of authority citations in excluding evidence decisions?

    <p>Citations are often unnecessary and fact-specific.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What could potentially undermine the admissibility of evidence, based on the provided content?

    <p>The manner in which the evidence was procured.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the Court of Appeal generally avoid regarding trial judges' decisions under s78?

    <p>Interfering with the decisions without compelling reasons.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Prosecution and Defence Evidence

    • Judges summarize circumstantial evidence and defence arguments to guide jury decision-making.
    • Jury should assess each piece of evidence, determine acceptance, and draw reasonable conclusions.
    • Jurors are instructed to avoid speculation about unproven matters.
    • Ultimately, jurors must decide if the prosecution has convincingly established guilt.

    Real Evidence

    • Real evidence consists of material objects relevant to the case, examined in court.
    • Accompanying testimony is essential to establish the significance of real evidence.
    • Expert testimony is sometimes required to assist the tribunal of fact in drawing conclusions.

    Views in Court

    • 'View' refers to inspections of material objects or locations relevant to the case outside the courtroom.
    • Inspections should involve the judge, parties, counsel, and a shorthand writer.
    • Views should not occur after summing-up unless specifically requested by the defence.

    Exclusion of Evidence

    • Under PACE 1984, section 78(1), courts can exclude prosecution evidence to maintain fairness.
    • Exclusion applies if the evidence’s admission would adversely affect the fairness of proceedings.
    • Applications to exclude should be made before evidence is presented; circumstances vary and discretion is case-specific.
    • The Court of Appeal seldom interferes with trial judges' decisions on evidence exclusion.

    Admissions in Evidence

    • Prosecution can rely on formal admissions made by the defence during opening speeches.
    • Any fact admitted by a party must be recorded clearly unless directed otherwise by the court.
    • Written records of admissions are required to maintain clarity for the jury.

    Relevance and Admissibility

    • Relevant evidence is generally admissible unless it violates exclusionary rules or no reasonable jury could give it weight.
    • Evidence of good character for both the accused and prosecution witnesses may be admitted for credibility assessment.

    Circumstantial Evidence

    • Circumstantial evidence refers to facts that infer the existence of facts in issue, rather than direct proof.
    • Cumulatively, multiple pieces of circumstantial evidence can provide greater weight than individual direct evidence.
    • Careful examination is needed to ensure no alternative explanations undermine the inference of guilt.

    Facts in Issue

    • Facts in issue are those the prosecution must prove to establish guilt or that the accused must prove for their defence.
    • In cases of not guilty pleas, the prosecution bears the burden of proving their entire case.

    CJA Section 10 Admissions

    • Facts formally admitted under CJA 1967, section 10, are no longer open to contradiction and must be treated as proven.
    • Formal admissions may include facts that are typically supported by oral evidence and cannot admit hearsay without exception.

    Written Admissions

    • Relevant written admissions should be presented to the jury, free of inadmissible content.
    • Formal admissions can be made orally by counsel or solicitors during court proceedings.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the principles surrounding circumstantial evidence in criminal law. Participants will examine how judges summarize evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and defense, as well as the importance of jury decisions in drawing fair conclusions. Test your understanding of these critical legal concepts.

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser