Criminal Justice: Key Terms and Cases
55 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In which scenario would the 'Inevitable Discovery Exception' most likely be applied, allowing illegally obtained evidence to be admissible in court?

  • Police conduct a search based on a mere hunch and find incriminating evidence that confirms their suspicions.
  • During an illegal interrogation, a suspect reveals the location of a body, which police would have found anyway due to a large-scale search operation. (correct)
  • Evidence is found during a consent search in the suspect's vehicle after the suspect was unlawfully detained.
  • Police illegally search a suspect's home without a warrant, finding a weapon that the suspect later admits to owning.

Which of the following scenarios presents a situation where the 'Exigent Circumstances Exception' would likely justify a warrantless search?

  • Authorities enter a suspect's property without a warrant to prevent the destruction of evidence related to a past crime.
  • Police suspect that a person has committed a crime based on an anonymous tip and enter their home to investigate.
  • Officers hear screams coming from inside a residence and have a reasonable belief that someone inside is in imminent danger. (correct)
  • Investigators delay obtaining a warrant while building a stronger case, then enter the premises without one.

In a scenario where an officer inadvertently discovers contraband while executing a search warrant for specific items, under what condition would the seizure of the contraband be considered lawful according to the Plain View Doctrine?

  • If the officer has a premonition that contraband would be present.
  • If the discovery is made during an unrelated investigation.
  • If the officer's presence at the location is lawful and the incriminating nature of the contraband is immediately apparent. (correct)
  • If the officer obtains verbal consent from the property owner to search for additional items.

A police officer stops an individual based on a 'mere hunch' that they may be involved in criminal activity. Which of the following actions is permissible based solely on this level of suspicion?

<p>Briefly observing the individual's behavior without directly engaging them. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did Brown v. Mississippi (1936) significantly impact law enforcement procedures during interrogations?

<p>It prohibited the use of physical force and torture to obtain confessions. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An officer responding to a domestic disturbance call observes visible injuries on one party and hears conflicting stories. To determine the primary aggressor, which approach aligns with legal and ethical standards, considering the complexities of domestic violence?

<p>Conduct a thorough investigation, considering factors such as the history of violence, threats, and who is the most significant contributor to the violence. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which scenario violates the principles established in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)?

<p>Police continue to interrogate a suspect who has requested to speak with their attorney, denying them access. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what scenario would the Public Safety Exception MOST likely permit a law enforcement officer to forego providing Miranda warnings before questioning a suspect?

<p>When the officer believes that delaying questioning to provide Miranda warnings may result in imminent harm to the public. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the Reasonable Person Test, how would a court evaluate whether an officer's use of force during an arrest was justified?

<p>By assessing whether a typical person with ordinary prudence, facing similar circumstances, would have acted in the same manner. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the critical distinction between a 'knock and announce' warrant and a 'no-knock' warrant?

<p>A 'knock and announce' warrant requires officers to identify their presence before entering, while a 'no-knock' warrant permits immediate entry. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what way did New York v. Quarles (1984) modify existing Miranda rights precedents?

<p>It created an exception allowing unwarned statements to be admissible if they were prompted by an immediate threat to public safety. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios BEST exemplifies a situation where an officer has reasonable suspicion, justifying a Terry Stop?

<p>An individual is observed peering into car windows and then quickly walking away when he notices police presence. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what circumstances does the 'Open Fields Doctrine' permit law enforcement to conduct a search without obtaining a warrant?

<p>When the search is conducted on private property located outside the immediate vicinity of a home. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Sixth Amendment guarantees several rights to accused persons. Which of the following scenarios accurately reflects the application of one of these rights in a criminal proceeding?

<p>A defendant is provided with a court-appointed attorney because they cannot afford one, ensuring their right to counsel. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the precedent set by Tennessee v. Garner (1985), which of the following scenarios would MOST likely be deemed an unconstitutional use of deadly force by a law enforcement officer?

<p>An officer shoots a fleeing suspect, who is unarmed and suspected of burglary, to prevent their escape. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did Weeks v. U.S. (1914) shape the landscape of criminal procedure in federal courts?

<p>It established the exclusionary rule, preventing illegally obtained evidence from being admissible in federal courts. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a jurisdiction where prosecutorial information is used instead of grand jury indictments, which constitutional right is NOT being fully observed?

<p>The right to an indictment by a grand jury. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Given that the term 'privacy' is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, how has the Supreme Court established the right to privacy?

<p>By synthesizing several explicitly stated rights to create a zone of privacy. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the critical legal distinction between police activity that is considered a 'search' by the courts versus the everyday understanding of a search?

<p>Court-defined searches are subject to probable cause requirements unless exceptions apply. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why does the responsibility of determining probable cause for a search lie with the courts rather than with law enforcement officers?

<p>To maintain an objective assessment of the evidence, preventing potential overzealousness from the police. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what specific way does the 'reasonableness test' for determining probable cause for a search, as applied by the courts, take into account the experience and training of police officers?

<p>It assesses probable cause based on what a reasonable officer, with similar training and experience, would believe. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the evolution of the exclusionary rule, which scenario would MOST likely result in the admission of illegally obtained evidence due to an exception established by the Supreme Court?

<p>Evidence that, although initially obtained through an unlawful search, would have inevitably been discovered later through legal means. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a scenario where an officer fails to provide Miranda warnings before questioning a suspect, which factor would be MOST critical in determining whether the 'Public Safety Exception' applies?

<p>The existence of an immediate threat to the safety of the public or the officers. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the application of the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination DIFFER between providing testimonial evidence and providing physical evidence?

<p>The Fifth Amendment primarily protects against the compelled production of testimonial evidence but does not generally extend to physical evidence. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the evolution of the understanding and application of the Fifth Amendment, which of the following interrogation tactics would be LEAST likely to be admissible in court?

<p>Continuing to question a suspect after they have invoked their right to remain silent, aiming to clarify their intentions. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what way did Mapp v. Ohio (1961) fundamentally change the landscape of criminal procedure in the United States?

<p>It extended the exclusionary rule to state courts, preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a jurisdiction where state courts have interpreted the state constitution to require police to inform citizens of their right to refuse a consent search, what is the likely outcome if an officer fails to provide this information before obtaining consent, and subsequently finds incriminating evidence?

<p>The evidence may be suppressed due to a violation of the state constitutional right to refuse consent, potentially leading to its inadmissibility in court. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An officer lawfully enters a home under the 'hot pursuit' exception, chasing a suspect wanted for armed robbery. While inside, the officer notices a closed but unsealed cardboard box labeled 'evidence from other robberies' in plain view. Can the officer open and search the box without obtaining a warrant?

<p>No, the plain view doctrine requires that the incriminating nature of the item be immediately apparent; a labeled box does not automatically establish probable cause without further investigation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

During a traffic stop for speeding, an officer observes several air fresheners hanging from the rearview mirror and a религиозная статуэтка on the dashboard, which, according to departmental policy, are considered potential indicators of drug activity. Based solely on these observations and the speeding violation, can the officer conduct a warrantless search of the vehicle for narcotics?

<p>No, the combination of a minor traffic violation and common items is unlikely to establish the probable cause required for a warrantless search under the automobile exception. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An officer arrests a suspect for disorderly conduct. Incident to the arrest, the officer searches the suspect and the immediate area, including a backpack within the suspect's reach. Inside the backpack, the officer finds a locked metal box. Can the officer force the box open as part of the search incident to arrest?

<p>No, while the officer can seize the locked box, forcing it open would likely require a warrant, since the exigency dissipates once the box is secured. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Police officers have probable cause to believe that an individual has committed a felony, but they do not have an arrest warrant. Under what circumstances would it be permissible for the officers to enter the suspect's home to make an arrest?

<p>The officers can only enter if exigent circumstances exist, such as an immediate threat to the safety of others or the imminent destruction of evidence. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Fourteenth Amendment impact the application of the Bill of Rights at the state level?

<p>It mandates that states adhere to the due process standards established in the federal Constitution, as interpreted by federal appellate courts. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what way do state constitutions, statutes, and administrative rules interact with the Fourth Amendment regarding police conduct?

<p>They can provide additional constraints on police conduct beyond those specified in the Fourth Amendment, offering greater protection to individuals. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios represents the most direct application of the Fifth Amendment?

<p>A suspect's refusal to answer police questions during an interrogation, invoking the right against self-incrimination. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Bill of Rights primarily influence police practices?

<p>The Supreme Court's interpretations establish binding precedents that define the boundaries of permissible police conduct. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what specific way does criminal procedure law most significantly affect the day-to-day operations of policing?

<p>It regulates how police officers must interact with citizens, influencing arrest procedures, searches, and interrogations. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An active shooter situation is accurately defined as an incident where someone is actively trying to harm others in a public area, regardless of whether the area is confined or heavily populated.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Child abuse exclusively refers to physical harm inflicted upon a child, excluding emotional or psychological mistreatment.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A high clearance rate indicates that a large proportion of reported crimes have resulted in convictions.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A confidential informant's identity can be disclosed in court to ensure transparency and uphold the defendant's right to confront their accusers.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) primarily focuses on apprehending suspects at the crime scene.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Domestic violence refers to physical altercations between spouses or family members as well as those in an intimate relationship, but only if living together.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Internal Affairs divisions typically handle only minor complaints against police officers, leaving serious allegations to external agencies.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Scene integrity is the responsibility of the lead investigator and requires attention from all other personnel present.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Traffic Units are exclusively responsible for enforcing traffic laws and do not engage in community outreach or public safety initiatives.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the 'totality of the circumstances' analysis impact the determination of probable cause?

<p>It requires a magistrate to consider all facts and context, forming a comprehensive assessment to determine if probable cause exists. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the legal consequence of making an arrest based on 'mere suspicion'?

<p>Any evidence obtained would likely be inadmissible due to the violation of Fourth Amendment rights. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what way did the Civil Rights Revolution of the Warren Court impact the legality of arrests?

<p>It led to the courts' reconsideration of the long-standing rule on arbitrary seizures and application of exclusionary rules to the states. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the trustworthiness of information from confidential informants impact the determination of probable cause?

<p>The courts require corroborating evidence to support the informant’s statements to establish trustworthiness and probable cause. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of obtaining an arrest warrant whenever possible?

<p>It provides the officer with legal protection and demonstrates agreement by a neutral, detached magistrate on probable cause. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did Katz v. United States (1967) fundamentally change the Supreme Court's interpretation of Fourth Amendment protections?

<p>It shifted the focus from property rights to the protection of individual privacy rights, especially concerning new technologies and methods of surveillance. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the most accurate interpretation of the Fourth Amendment's application to arrests, based on common law tradition and modern procedural rules?

<p>An arrest in a suspect's home requires a warrant, unless certain judicially recognized exceptions apply, while an arrest in a public place can be made on probable cause without a warrant. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do modern interpretations of the Fourth Amendment address the use of technology for surveillance and evidence gathering?

<p>The use of new technologies is evaluated against an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, ensuring that technological advancements do not erode constitutional protections. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what circumstance would the seizure of a person be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment, even if the individual is not formally arrested?

<p>If the detention constitutes a 'seizure' of the person, meaning a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, the protections of the Fourth Amendment are invoked, regardless of whether a formal arrest has been made. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the requirement of 'probable cause' in the Fourth Amendment balance the rights of individuals and the needs of law enforcement?

<p>It requires law enforcement to demonstrate a reasonable belief, based on specific facts and circumstances, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime will be found, thus protecting individuals from arbitrary intrusions while allowing legitimate investigations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

1983 Suit

Lawsuit against government employees for violating constitutional rights.

Affidavit

A sworn written statement used as evidence.

Arrest Warrant

Court order to arrest and bring someone to court.

Automobile Search

Exception to warrant requirement if police have probable cause.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Brown v. Mississippi (1936)

Police can't use torture to get confessions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consent Search

Search authorized by someone waiving their 4th Amendment rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

Suspects have the right to a lawyer during police questioning.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exigent Circumstances Exception

Exception to warrant rules based on immediate public safety.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Particularity Requirement

Warrant must clearly state the place to be searched and items to be seized.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Plain View Doctrine

Seizing contraband in plain sight from a lawful vantage point.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Police Brutality

Force exceeding what's needed for a legitimate policing purpose.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Primary Aggressor

The individual who contributed most significantly to violence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Public Safety Exception

Exception to Miranda for immediate questions about public safety.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonable Person Test

How a typical, prudent person would act in similar circumstances.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonable Suspicion

Evidentiary standard between a hunch and probable cause.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Right to Remain Silent

Right to not be forced to incriminate yourself.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Substantive Criminal Law

Body of law defining crimes and their punishments.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Procedural Criminal Law

Law governing the process of enforcing criminal law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fourth Amendment

Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fifth Amendment

Protects against self-incrimination and ensures due process.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Sixth Amendment

Guarantees the right to counsel and a speedy trial.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Appellate Court Authority

Federal courts can review the constitutionality of state actions and laws.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Right to Privacy

An implied constitutional right limiting police conduct, though not absolute.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Probable Cause

Sufficient evidence would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime is occurring.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Search Warrant

A court order allowing law enforcement to conduct a search.

Signup and view all the flashcards

No-Knock Warrant

Warrant served without prior notification due to safety concerns.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusionary Rule

Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in criminal court.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Good Faith Exception

An exception to the exclusionary rule; evidence can be used if police acted on a warrant they believed to be valid.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Miranda Warnings

Specific warnings that police must give to suspects in custody, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hot Pursuit

If an officer is chasing a suspect, they don't need to stop the chase to get a warrant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Search Incident to Arrest

Searching a person and the area around them after a lawful arrest.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Arrest

Taking someone into custody to charge them with a crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Probable Cause for Arrest

Officer must have reasonable grounds to believe a person has committed or is about to commit a crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Terry Stop (Stop and Frisk)

Brief detention and questioning based on suspicious behavior. Includes pat-down for weapons.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Active Shooter

Someone killing/trying to kill in a populated area.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Child Abuse

Physical, emotional, psychological, or sexual mistreatment of a child.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Child Neglect

Failing to provide necessary care to a child.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Clearance Rate

Solved crimes vs. all known crimes.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Confidential Informant

Secretly provides info to law enforcement, often for benefits.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Crime Scene Investigation (CSI)

Collecting, documenting, and preserving evidence at a crime scene.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Domestic Violence

Violent or harmful behavior within a home.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Internal Affairs

Unit that investigates police misconduct.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Scene Integrity

Keeping a crime scene free from contamination.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Traffic Unit

Enforcing traffic laws and accident reporting.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fourth Amendment Overview

Protects people, homes, papers, and effects from unreasonable government intrusion.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Warrant

A court order allowing law enforcement to conduct a search.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Protection of Privacy

The core principle ensuring the Fourth Amendment seeks to protect individuals' sense of privacy from government intrusion.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Arrest and the Fourth Amendment

Arresting someone requires probable cause, especially at home, where a warrant is usually needed, unless exceptions apply.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bench Warrant

An arrest warrant issued by a judge, commanding officers to arrest someone on sight.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Totality of Circumstances

Considering all circumstances, not just one factor, to determine if probable cause exists.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Trustworthy Information

Information known to the officer or provided by other officers that is generally considered reliable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Criminal procedure dictates how the government investigates, prosecutes, judges, and sentences those accused of crimes.
  • Focuses on interpreting the U.S. Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
  • State constitutions, statutes, and administrative rules also shape police conduct.
  • The Fourth and Fifth Amendments are especially important concerning police conduct.

Fourth Amendment:

  • Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
  • Requires warrants to be based on probable cause.
  • Warrants must specifically describe the place to be searched and the items/persons to be seized.
  • Covers both searches and seizures, so almost all physical evidence must be gathered in a way that passes Fourth Amendment standards.
  • Courts consider an arrest a seizure, so the Fourth Amendment applies to arrests.
  • Originally protected property, but now protects privacy based on reasonable expectation.
  • Homes are of critical importance because a person usually has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the home.

Fifth Amendment:

  • Protects against self-incrimination.
  • Ensures due process of law.

Sixth Amendment:

  • Guarantees the right to a public and speedy trial.
  • Includes the right to assistance of counsel at various stages, including custodial interrogations.

Fourteenth Amendment

  • Mandates that states adhere to federal due process standards.
  • Grants federal appellate courts the power to review the constitutionality of actions by state government agents, including police officers.

The Right to Privacy

  • The right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
  • The Supreme Court has interpreted several rights as creating a right to privacy, limiting police conduct.
  • Police interference must be reasonable, hinging on probable cause.

Searches

  • Courts define "search" differently than everyday usage.
  • Many exceptions exist where police action may seem like a search but isn't legally defined as such.
  • Probable cause is needed for a legal search, determined by the courts, not law enforcement.

Search Warrants

  • Probable cause is needed for a lawful search.
  • Evidence for probable cause must be given to an impartial magistrate.
  • The magistrate will issue a search warrant if they agree probable cause exists.
  • An applicant for a warrant must present to the magistrate facts sufficient to enable the officer himself to make a determination of probable cause.
  • All facts necessary to support a finding of probable cause must be in the affidavit.
  • A search warrant, an officer must establish probable cause to obtain an arrest warrant.
  • The courts regard an arrest as a seizure of the person, thus the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies to arrest warrants as well as search warrants.
  • For a warrant to be valid, it must be issued by a neutral, detached magistrate.
  • A warrant must be specific.
  • No question as to which person is to be searched or arrested, or, in the case of a home, which place should be searched.

Probable Cause

  • Magistrate must find that probable cause exists to issue a search warrant.
  • This has to be in the form of a sworn statement called an affidavit.
  • Reasonableness test considers the experience and training of police officers.
  • Standard for establishing probable cause is more likely than not.
  • An evidentiary standard that falls above a mere hunch, and coming up short of the beyond a reasonable doubt standard used at criminal trial.
  • No particular type of evidence is given paramount consideration and all evidence is taken together.
  • Trustworthy information as a major requirement, information known to the officer or to another officer is generally considered trustworthy

The Particularity Requirement

  • Search warrant must particularly describe the person or thing to be seized.
  • The place to be searched must be sufficiently described that it cannot be confused with some other place.

Obtaining and Executing a Search Warrant

  • Warrant application process varies by jurisdiction and is outlined in Rules of Criminal Procedure.
  • All officer evidence must be in an affidavit.
  • Warrant must be served during daylight hours, and officers must identify themselves and ask for entry. This is commonly known as knock and announce.

No-Knock Warrants

  • Requires special permission from a judge.
  • Authorized when announcing presence could endanger lives or lead to evidence destruction.
  • Grants law enforcement the ability to break down doors without warning and enter a structure.
  • Civil liberty and police advocates disagree on impacts of issuing these warrants

Searches Without Warrants

  • Several exceptions exist to the requirement that officers must obtain a search warrant for a search to be legal.
  • Exigent circumstances (emergencies) can justify a warrantless search.
  • Another common warrantless search is a consent search, so long as the permission is given voluntarily.
  • Police are not obligated to inform citizens that they have the right to refuse consent, under Federal Constitutional law but they do under the law of some states.
  • If an officer chases an offender into a private place, there is no legal requirement that the officer break off the pursuit.
  • Any contraband can be seized and will be admissible in court.
  • Requires probable cause but exempt from the warrant requirement.
  • The court allows this compromise because of the inherent mobility of vehicles.
  • Citing from a traffic violation, however, is not sufficient to establish probable cause for a lawful search.
  • Automobiles differ from homes in that they are mobile, and people generally have a lesser expectation of privacy in them.
  • Automobiles (and containers within them) may be searched if probable cause exists, but without a warrant.

Search Incident to Arrest

  • Allows officers to search a person and the area immediately under the arrestee’s control after they have been arrested.
  • Police can search people and areas in the immediate vicinity for weapons when a lawful arrest is made.

Arrests

  • Supreme Court has determined that an arrest is a seizure of the person for legal purposes.
  • Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures comes into play
  • A person is considered to have been arrested when they are taken into custody with the purpose of bring charged with a crime.
  • Can be made in a public place on probable cause, regardless of whether a warrant has been obtained.
  • In order to make an arrest in the suspect’s home, police officers must have a warrant.

Arrest Warrants

  • A document issued by a court ordering any law enforcement officer to take a particular individual into custody.
  • To enter a person’s home to make an arrest, the police must have an arrest warrant.
  • Should be made with warrants whenever possible for legal protection for the officer
  • An officer does not have to have physical custody of the warrant.
  • Knowledge amounting to probable cause to believe such a warrant exists is generally sufficient.
  • Arrests are frequently made based on warrant checks when an officer “runs” a suspect’s record via radio during traffic stops and other citizens encounters.
  • A bench warrant is a variant of an arrest warrant issued by a judge, commanding all law enforcement officers to arrest the named person on sight, when a judge deems a person to be in contempt of court

Domestic Violence Arrests

  • Research suggests arresting the primary aggressor prevents further battering in domestic violence cases.
  • Many police departments have a poor job in dealing with these sensitive domestic violence cases.
  • Domestic violence is defined as violent, aggressive, or harmful behavior within the home, most often between spouses.

Terry Stops

  • Allows police to stop individuals for a short period of time when their behavior seems suspicious, ask them questions, and pat them down for weapons.
  • Also known as stop and frisk.
  • Requires reasonable suspicion, which is less than probable cause but more than a mere hunch. Brief questions and pat-down searches for weapons are permitted based.

Standards of Suspicion

  • Mere Suspicion: Only a suspicion or “gut feeling” by an officer that someone is engaged in criminal behavior. Any contacts that officers make based on mere suspicion cannot involve detention or custodial arrest. The officer is free to initiate a voluntary conversation and the community member is free to walk away.
  • Reasonable Suspicion: An objectively justifiable suspicion for believing that a person may be involved in criminal activity. This level must be based on more than just a hunch or gut feeling; it must include specific facts and circumstances that an officer can articulate. An
  • Probable Cause: Before police can make an arrest, conduct a search in some circumstances, or apply for a search or arrest warrant, an officer must have probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed or a person has been involved in a committed crime.
  • Sources of information that police officers may use to satisfy these standards could include information identified in the course of their duties or observations of a person’s actions and demeanor; and personal knowledge, training, witnesses, and professional experiences, among other sources.

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

  • “Special Needs” Searches: Officers do not need any special evidence (PC) to justify a search in certain contexts, such as ports of entry into the United States from any other country (this includes all international airports), andAirline passengers
  • Some states allow the use of vehicle checkpoints to apprehend drunk drivers
  • Stop and Frisk: Note that the Supreme Court has recognized a substantial difference between a Stop and an Arrest. A stop is a brief interference with someone’s liberty that can be measured in mere minutes. Think of a “traffic stop.”
  • Search Incident to an Arrest: Police can search people and areas in the immediate vicinity for weapons when a lawful arrest is made (Chimel v. California, 1969).
  • Exigent circumstances: Officers might find themselves in the middle of an urgent situation where they must act swiftly and do not have time to request a warrant from the court. Exigent circumstances will usually exist when it is believed that someone might be in grave danger.
  • Consent: A citizen may waive his or her constitutional rights and allow police to search. Police officers do not have to inform citizens of their right to decline a request to search
  • Plain View Doctrine: An object in plain view (out in the open) with a criminal nature that is readily apparent, may be seized by an officer without a warrant.
  • Automobile Searches: Probable cause exists, but without a warrant.
  • Open Fields: Open fields—undeveloped land outside the scope of the home and curtilage—is subject to search without constituting a ‘search’ for Fourth Amendment purposes.

Items Subject to Seizure

  • Broadly speaking, three categories of things can always be seized pursuant to a warrant:Contraband, Fruits of crime, and Instrumentalities of crime.

The Exclusionary Rule

  • Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in criminal court.
  • Established in Weeks v. U.S. (1914) for federal agents only.
  • Extended to states in Mapp v. Ohio (1961).
  • Good faith exception: Evidence admissible if police acted on a warrant they thought was valid (U.S. v. Leon, 1984).
  • If evidence used in a criminal trial is obtained illegally (in violation of a person’s Fourth Amendment rights) it cannot be used in court, and any evidence stemming from the initial illegally obtained evidence is also excluded.

The Fifth Amendment

  • Guarantees the right to remain silent.
  • Protection applies only to testimonial communications, not physical evidence.
  • Right can be knowingly and voluntarily waived.

Confessions and Counsel

  • Escobedo v. Illinois (1964): Right to counsel activates when questioning shifts from investigatory to accusatory.

Miranda Warnings

  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966) requires advising suspects of their rights before custodial interrogation.
  • Suspects must be advised of the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them, the right to an attorney, and the provision of a state-appointed attorney if they cannot afford one.
  • These rights can be waived, but the right to remain silent can be invoked at any time.

Miranda Exceptions

  • New York v. Quarles (1984): Public safety exception allows questioning without Miranda warnings if public safety is at risk.
  • Nix v. Williams (1984): Inevitable discovery exception allows evidence if it would have been discovered anyway.
  • Miranda does not apply to brief street stops, traffic stops, or voluntary confessions without questioning.

Police Use of Force

  • Lawful only when reasonably necessary for a legitimate criminal justice purpose.
  • If excessive force is used, it is considered police brutality.
  • Police may not lawfully use deadly force to apprehend an unarmed, nonviolent fleeing felon.
  • The logic was that doing so constituted an unreasonable seizure of the person under the Fourth Amendment.

Civil Liability and Criminal Prosecution

  • Police officers risk lawsuits and criminal charges for excessive force.
  • Federal remedies exist, such as 1983 suits.

Deadly Force

  • Permitted when officers reasonably believe they are in imminent danger of serious bodily harm or death, or to protect others.
  • Invalidated the fleeing felon rule, shifting the standard to one of dangerousness.

The Fleeing Felon Rule:

  • Allowed an officer to use deadly force to apprehend a felon seeking to escape custody or a lawful arrest.
  • Ruled unconstitutional in Tennessee v. Garner (1985).

Law Enforcement Jobs Outlook

  • In 2010, the median income for police officers and detectives was $$55,010 per year ($26.45 per hour).
  • There were 794,300 jobs in the U.S. at this time, and the expected growth rate over the next decade is around 7%
  • Average starting salaries for entry-level local police officer ranged from $26,600 per year in the smallest jurisdictions to $49,500 in the largest.

What Investigators Do

  • Investigators gather information through interviews, crime scene investigations, and developing informants.
  • The traditional investigator is not always vital for solving crimes.
  • Many cases are cleared due to patrol officers' work.

The Patrol Function

  • Uniformed patrol officers are often the first responders.
  • Investigations usually begin when dispatchers receive a call, through a 911 system.
  • Officer safety is the first priority at a crime scene.
  • Scene integrity refers to the idea of keeping a crime scene free from contamination and tampering.
  • Patrol officers may be responsible for turning an investigation over to another department or agency when public safety demands immediate action.
  • A critical aspect of all investigative activity is the meticulous keeping of accurate records.
  • Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) is a component of the overall criminal investigation process wherein evidence is collected, documented, and preserved at the location where a crime took place.

Specialized Units

  • Strong correlation between the size of an agency's jurisdiction, and the existence of specialized units.
  • The bigger a city is, the more specialized officers tend to be within that city's police department.
  • Specialized units are any subdivision of a law enforcement agency that has a mission different from patrol.
  • The most common specialized units are traffic and drug enforcement units.
  • Many large departments divide investigative duties between crimes against persons and crimes against property
  • Agencies often create these to target a specific type of crime,
  • Domestic violence, vice, organized crimes, and sex crimes are common divisions.
  • Drug Enforcement Units are specialized units that focus on drug related crimes, these exist within local law enforcement agencies or multiagency taskforces.
  • Traffic Units are specialized units tasked with enforcing traffic regulations and providing related services such as writing accident reports.

Domestic Violence

  • Specialized units address the need for specific training to understand the dynamics of domestic violence
  • Social workers are paired with investigators for victim assistance
  • The code enforcer paradigm is an inappropriate way of subscribing to violent circumstances

Vice

  • This unit handles criminal acts considered victimless crimes by most people.
  • Prostitution, gambling and drug use are common examples.
  • Vice is also an informal term used to denote 'victimless crimes' such as gambling, prostitution, and drug possession.
  • Because the laws are unpopular, enforcement is often unpopular as well.

Organized Crime

  • Basic characteristic is a group of people working together to achieve some criminal purpose.
  • Often will stretch beyond state and local borders, complicating the idea of jurisdiction.
  • Electronic surveillance is common in the investigation, and confidential informants add an additional layer of legal complexity to such cases.
  • The Mafia is a criminal organization brought to the United States by Italian immigrants in the early nineteenth century.

Internal Affairs

  • Special units investigate allegations of police misconduct/corruption.
  • Internal affairs is a specialized unit within a police department that investigates allegations of misconduct by the department's officers.
  • Violations of the law and police codes of conduct are possible targets.
  • Internal affairs officers are placed outside of the usual police command structure, answering directly to the chief

Juveniles and the Police

  • Juveniles are responsible for a disproportionate amount of crime.
  • Status offenses: Acts that would not be criminal among adults, but are prohibited for minors.
  • Most police encounters with juveniles involve order maintenance.
  • Juvenile Curfew is law (most often a municipal ordinance) that prohibits persons under a certain age from being out in public after a certain time at night.

Community Policing - Juveniles

  • Community policing between juveniles and the police have proven to show potential success in implementations of community policing programs.
  • D.A.R.E ( Drug Awareness Resistance Education) and SRO (school Resource Officers) policing programs are commonly used throughout the United States.

D.A.R.E

  • D.A.R.E stands for Drug Awareness Resistance Education.
  • Is a cooperative program between police and schools designed to keep youth from becoming involved with drugs.
  • Specializes officers that undergo additional training so they can be D.A.R.E officers.
  • Teaches the importance for saying "no" in situations against drugs.

School Resource Officers (SROs)

  • SRO stands for School Resource Officer.

  • Sworn peace officers assigned to public schools for the purposes of crime prevention and education.

  • Career law enforcement officers, with sworn authority, deployed in community-oriented policing

  • Work in collaboration in schools and community based organizations.

  • U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) provided $68 million that was awarded to hire and train 599 SROs in 289 communities throughout the United States.

  • An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.

  • Child Abuse refers to the physical, emotional, psychological, or sexual mistreatment of a child.

  • Child Neglect is the failure to provide reasonably necessary care to a child.

  • A Clearance Rate is the proportion of crimes known to the police that are solved (an arrest is made) versus all crimes known to the police.

  • A Confidential Informant is a person who secretly provides information to law enforcement, often in return for money or an agreement not to prosecute the informant.

  • An Informant is a person who provides helpful information to the police.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

This lesson covers key terms and landmark cases in criminal justice. It includes definitions of legal terms like 'affidavit' and 'arrest warrant.' It also explores the implications of cases like Brown v. Mississippi and Escobedo v. Illinois.

More Like This

Arresto y Protección Constitucional
10 questions
Estatuto da OAB - 09. Examinar Autos
22 questions
Introduction to Criminal Justice
40 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser