Criminal Homicide Overview
48 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is established as malice aforethought in murder cases?

  • Negligence leading to a fatal outcome
  • An intention to cause grievous bodily harm or kill (correct)
  • Lack of intent to harm the victim
  • An intention to scare the victim

    • In the context of murder, what does the term 'implied malice' refer to?

  • An accidental killing that results from negligence
  • Eagerness to engage in violent behavior
  • Intent to kill someone without premeditation
  • Intention to cause grievous bodily harm (correct)

    • Which case clarified the position on grievous bodily harm constituting implied malice?

  • DPP v Smith (correct)
  • R v Smith
  • R v Vickers
  • R v Inglis

    • What is the essential difference between murder and manslaughter?

    <p>The presence or absence of malice aforethought (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which scenario would a killing be classified clearly as murder?

    <p>Killing done in heat of the moment with intent (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion did Lord Diplock reach in the case of Hyam?

    <p>That malice aforethought should be redefined (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the legal implication of an intention to cause 'really serious' harm according to case law?

    <p>It can lead to a murder charge regardless of intent to kill (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of R v Inglis, what was the conviction upheld by the Court of Appeal?

    <p>The mother was convicted for deliberately ending her son's life (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a primary condition for the defence of loss of self-control to be applicable?

    <p>The defendant lost their self-control. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what situation is the defence of loss of self-control NOT available?

    <p>If the defendant provoked the act that triggered the loss of self-control. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What undermines the claim of provocation according to the content provided?

    <p>The act being carried out after a significant time delay. (C), Having a desire for revenge. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must the judge do if there is sufficient evidence of loss of self-control, even if the defendant does not wish to raise this defense?

    <p>Leave the defense to the jury (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What element is involved in determining the loss of self-control in relation to the defendant's characteristics?

    <p>The defendant's sex and age. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In cases of loss of self-control, who has the burden of proof to disprove the defense?

    <p>The prosecution (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Ibrams, why was the defence of loss of self-control denied?

    <p>The defendant had time to reflect before the act. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the objective element consider when assessing loss of self-control?

    <p>The defendant’s gender and age (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the 2009 Act, what can the jury consider about the defendant when assessing provocation?

    <p>Characteristics only affecting gravity of provocation (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the actions of R v Ahluwalia illustrate the complexities of the defence?

    <p>It involved a long history of abusive behavior. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does subsection 6 imply regarding the qualifying trigger in loss of self-control?

    <p>The defendant cannot rely on loss of self-control if they provoked the act. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the case of Johnson establish regarding self-control in provocation situations?

    <p>Inciting violence can prevent loss of self-control defense (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterizes the defence of loss of self-control compared to other defences?

    <p>It is only applicable to murder with a mandatory life sentence. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is not a requirement for loss of self-control to be considered a defense?

    <p>The defendant must have acted reasonably (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario best illustrates the idea of loss of self-control as described in the content?

    <p>A defendant reacts in anger to an unexpected provocation. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What can affect the jury's decision regarding a defendant’s loss of self-control?

    <p>Any characteristic affecting the gravity of provocation (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a condition to be contested or ambiguous in court?

    <p>Testimony of expert witnesses (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to recent legal interpretations, how is alcohol intoxication treated in relation to medical conditions?

    <p>It is considered not a medical condition. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case indicated that ADHD does not provide grounds for appeal against conviction based on diminished responsibility?

    <p>R v Osborne (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what situation can chronic alcoholism be considered a cause of mental abnormality according to legal precedents?

    <p>Alcohol dependency leading to involuntary consumption. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a significant limitation discussed regarding using alcohol abuse in legal defenses?

    <p>Difficulty in proving rational decision-making. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following conditions was clarified by the court to potentially justify a legal defense under specific circumstances?

    <p>Chronic alcoholism (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the case of R v Stewart clarify regarding the relationship between alcohol dependency syndrome and criminal behavior?

    <p>It establishes that dependency may lead to involuntary actions. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the conclusion about intoxication in relation to legal defenses as highlighted in the provided content?

    <p>It does not support defense under either old or new law. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for liability to be incurred in cases of manslaughter?

    <p>The act must be criminal in itself. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of road traffic offences, what would automatically classify a driver as guilty of manslaughter?

    <p>If the act of driving was considered negligent. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the Church case illustrate regarding manslaughter?

    <p>The unlawful act must provoke a risk of physical injury. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In DPP v Newbury and Jones, what was confirmed regarding constructive manslaughter?

    <p>The subject matter does not need to be a crime of endangerment. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a key finding in the Jennings case regarding manslaughter charges?

    <p>The prosecution must specify the unlawful act relied upon. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Dhaliwal, what was necessary for an effective charge of constructive manslaughter?

    <p>Presence of an unlawful act must be established. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the 'directed at' doctrine indicate in the context of constructive manslaughter?

    <p>The act must show intent to harm the specific victim. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Dalby, why was the accused found not guilty of manslaughter?

    <p>The act of supplying drugs was not directed at the victim's body. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes murder from involuntary manslaughter?

    <p>The mental element or mens rea (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is an element of constructive manslaughter?

    <p>Commission of a crime likely to cause harm (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a killing to be deemed lawful?

    <p>The killing must be accidental (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of criminal homicide, how is a foetus regarded under the law?

    <p>As having no legal recognition until birth (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following scenarios would lead to a lawful killing in the eyes of criminal law?

    <p>A police officer using lethal force in self-defense (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the outcome of R v Nicklinson regarding euthanasia?

    <p>The claim for lawful termination of life was rejected (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What constitutes recklessness in manslaughter cases?

    <p>Foresight of death or serious injury (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a common element in criminal homicide?

    <p>Intent to commit a crime (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Criminal Homicide

    • Criminal homicide comprises murder and involuntary manslaughter
    • Distinguished by mental elements

    Murder

    • Requires intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) as the mens rea

    Manslaughter

    • Requires proof of fault, which varies:
      • Reckless manslaughter: foresight of death or serious injury
      • Gross negligence manslaughter: no foresight, but a very high degree of negligence as to risk of death
      • Constructive manslaughter: neither foresight nor negligence; the commission of a crime likely to cause harm with the relevant mens rea

    Common Elements in Criminal Homicide

    • The actus reus is the same for all types, constituted by a killing, which is unlawful, and has a human victim
      • Unlawful killing:
        • An accidental killing is not unlawful
        • A killing in self-defense is lawful
        • Consent is not a defense for criminal homicide by affirmative action (no defense of euthanasia)

    Human Victim

    • The law of criminal homicide only protects living human beings
    • A foetus is not considered a human being until birth

    Life Stops

    • Life stops when a human being stops breathing, heart stops pumping, or the brain ceases to function
    • A person whose brain ceases to function is legally dead
    • A medical practitioner cannot kill a legally dead person

    Malice Aforethought (Post 1957)

    • Established by proving intent to cause serious bodily harm (implied malice), or intent to kill (express malice)

    Other Information

    • R v Vickers: Malice aforethought is established upon proof of intent to cause grievous bodily harm.
    • DPP v Smith: Intention to cause serious harm was accepted as implied malice.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Criminal Homicide Law PDF

    Description

    This quiz explores the concepts of criminal homicide, including the distinctions between murder and manslaughter. It covers the mental elements required for different types of homicide, as well as common elements in criminal law. Test your understanding of these critical legal concepts.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser