Podcast
Questions and Answers
Given the intricacies of bacterial pathogenesis, which of the following scenarios would MOST critically undermine the virulence of a bacterium, rendering its toxic factors ineffectual?
Given the intricacies of bacterial pathogenesis, which of the following scenarios would MOST critically undermine the virulence of a bacterium, rendering its toxic factors ineffectual?
- Inefficient synthesis of virulence factors due to suboptimal codon usage.
- Production of toxins that are inherently unstable at physiological temperatures.
- Lack of post translational modification machinery for proper protein folding and function.
- Failure to effectively secrete or deliver toxins to target cells or the extracellular environment. (correct)
How would the disruption of the SecB chaperone protein in Gram-negative bacteria MOST directly impact the function of the general secretory (Sec) system?
How would the disruption of the SecB chaperone protein in Gram-negative bacteria MOST directly impact the function of the general secretory (Sec) system?
- It would impair the ability to maintain proteins in an unfolded state, hindering their delivery to SecA and subsequent translocation. (correct)
- It would inhibit the ATP-dependent conformational change in SecA required for translocation.
- It would disrupt the formation of the SecYEG translocase complex in the inner membrane.
- It would prevent the cleavage of signal sequences from exported proteins.
Considering the cotranslational Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) system, how might a mutation affecting the GTPase activity of the FtsY receptor MOST severely compromise its function?
Considering the cotranslational Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) system, how might a mutation affecting the GTPase activity of the FtsY receptor MOST severely compromise its function?
- By preventing the binding of the SRP complex to the ribosome.
- By impairing the release of the signal peptide from the SecYEG complex.
- By disrupting the hydrolysis of ATP required for SecYEG complex activation.
- By hindering the docking of the SRP complex to the membrane and subsequent delivery of the signal peptide to the SecYEG complex. (correct)
Given the unique functionality of the Twin-Arginine Transport (TAT) system, what would be the MOST consequential outcome of a mutation that prevents the formation of the large pore complex by TatA proteins?
Given the unique functionality of the Twin-Arginine Transport (TAT) system, what would be the MOST consequential outcome of a mutation that prevents the formation of the large pore complex by TatA proteins?
In the context of bacterial virulence, what is the MOST significant functional distinction between Sec-dependent and Sec-independent secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria?
In the context of bacterial virulence, what is the MOST significant functional distinction between Sec-dependent and Sec-independent secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria?
Considering the Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS), what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that impairs the function of the pseudopilus?
Considering the Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS), what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that impairs the function of the pseudopilus?
In the autotransporter mechanism of the Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS), what would be the MOST immediate effect of a mutation that prevents the cleavage of the signal sequence?
In the autotransporter mechanism of the Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS), what would be the MOST immediate effect of a mutation that prevents the cleavage of the signal sequence?
Given the architecture and functionality of the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS), what would be the MOST critical functional consequence of a mutation in the glycine-rich GGXGXD sequence motif within the C-terminal signal sequence of a secreted protein?
Given the architecture and functionality of the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS), what would be the MOST critical functional consequence of a mutation in the glycine-rich GGXGXD sequence motif within the C-terminal signal sequence of a secreted protein?
Considering the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what would be the MOST immediate consequence if the tape measure protein fails to function correctly?
Considering the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what would be the MOST immediate consequence if the tape measure protein fails to function correctly?
Within the context of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS), how does the Ti complex (VirB/VirD system) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens MOST distinctively subvert host cell processes to induce tumor formation?
Within the context of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS), how does the Ti complex (VirB/VirD system) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens MOST distinctively subvert host cell processes to induce tumor formation?
What is the MOST crucial biophysical property that enables Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS) to target a broad spectrum of cells, including both eukaryotic and prokaryotic, without the need for specific receptor-ligand interactions?
What is the MOST crucial biophysical property that enables Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS) to target a broad spectrum of cells, including both eukaryotic and prokaryotic, without the need for specific receptor-ligand interactions?
In the context of Gram-positive bacterial secretion, what is the MOST critical functional role of sortase enzymes (SrtA) in the virulence of pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pyogenes?
In the context of Gram-positive bacterial secretion, what is the MOST critical functional role of sortase enzymes (SrtA) in the virulence of pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pyogenes?
How does cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT) in Streptococcus pyogenes MOST distinctively exploit the pore-forming activity of streptolysin O (SLO) to facilitate the delivery of the SPN toxin into host cells?
How does cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT) in Streptococcus pyogenes MOST distinctively exploit the pore-forming activity of streptolysin O (SLO) to facilitate the delivery of the SPN toxin into host cells?
What is the MOST compelling evidence suggesting that the Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis plays roles beyond simple protein secretion, potentially impacting the organism's interaction with its environment?
What is the MOST compelling evidence suggesting that the Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis plays roles beyond simple protein secretion, potentially impacting the organism's interaction with its environment?
How would the absence of the accessory factor (membrane fusion protein) HlyD MOST directly affect the secretion of α-hemolysin (HlyA) in E. coli via the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS)?
How would the absence of the accessory factor (membrane fusion protein) HlyD MOST directly affect the secretion of α-hemolysin (HlyA) in E. coli via the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS)?
In the context of the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what critical advantage is conferred by the direct injection of toxic effector proteins into the host cytosol, as opposed to simple toxin excretion and intoxication via AB-type toxins?
In the context of the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what critical advantage is conferred by the direct injection of toxic effector proteins into the host cytosol, as opposed to simple toxin excretion and intoxication via AB-type toxins?
Given the multifaceted nature of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS), what feature is MOST critical for the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria, and how does this contribute to the spread of antimicrobial resistance?
Given the multifaceted nature of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS), what feature is MOST critical for the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria, and how does this contribute to the spread of antimicrobial resistance?
In Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS), what is the functional significance of the ClpV ATPase, and how does it contribute to the overall efficiency and sustainability of the T6SS mechanism?
In Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS), what is the functional significance of the ClpV ATPase, and how does it contribute to the overall efficiency and sustainability of the T6SS mechanism?
Considering the diverse arrangements of SecA-SecYEG transporters in Gram-positive bacteria, what ecological or virulence-related advantage might be conferred by concentrating these transporters at specific microdomains, such as the ExPortal in S. pyogenes?
Considering the diverse arrangements of SecA-SecYEG transporters in Gram-positive bacteria, what ecological or virulence-related advantage might be conferred by concentrating these transporters at specific microdomains, such as the ExPortal in S. pyogenes?
Given the unique challenges posed by the mycomembrane of mycobacteria, what key property renders the C-terminal motif on EsxB and other T7SS substrates essential for secretion?
Given the unique challenges posed by the mycomembrane of mycobacteria, what key property renders the C-terminal motif on EsxB and other T7SS substrates essential for secretion?
How would disruption of the SecA2 protein in Listeria monocytogenes, a Gram-positive bacterium, MOST profoundly influence virulence?
How would disruption of the SecA2 protein in Listeria monocytogenes, a Gram-positive bacterium, MOST profoundly influence virulence?
In the two-step secretion paradigm inherent to Gram-negative bacteria, how does the Type II Secretion System (T2SS) orchestrate its function in conjunction with the General Secretion (Sec) System or the Twin-Arginine Translocation (TAT) system?
In the two-step secretion paradigm inherent to Gram-negative bacteria, how does the Type II Secretion System (T2SS) orchestrate its function in conjunction with the General Secretion (Sec) System or the Twin-Arginine Translocation (TAT) system?
If an Escherichia coli strain expressing α-hemolysin (HlyA) carries a mutation rendering the TolC protein non-functional, what would be the resulting phenotype regarding HlyA secretion and the potential impact on E. coli's pathogenicity?
If an Escherichia coli strain expressing α-hemolysin (HlyA) carries a mutation rendering the TolC protein non-functional, what would be the resulting phenotype regarding HlyA secretion and the potential impact on E. coli's pathogenicity?
How does the evolutionary provenance of the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) from the bacterial flagellar assembly apparatus inform our understanding of the T3SS's mechanism and regulation of protein translocation?
How does the evolutionary provenance of the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) from the bacterial flagellar assembly apparatus inform our understanding of the T3SS's mechanism and regulation of protein translocation?
Given the diverse strategies employed to confirm effector delivery by the Type III Secretion System (T3SS), how does the use of subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting, coupled with detergents like digitonin, enhance the precision of localization studies?
Given the diverse strategies employed to confirm effector delivery by the Type III Secretion System (T3SS), how does the use of subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting, coupled with detergents like digitonin, enhance the precision of localization studies?
In the Type IV Secretion System (T4SS), what are the rationales behind separating the T4SS apparatus into four different component complexes, and how does each complex contribute to the system's overall functionality?
In the Type IV Secretion System (T4SS), what are the rationales behind separating the T4SS apparatus into four different component complexes, and how does each complex contribute to the system's overall functionality?
Considering the structural homology between the Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what biophysical constraints or adaptations facilitate T6SS function within the periplasmic space, as opposed to the phage's extracellular environment?
Considering the structural homology between the Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what biophysical constraints or adaptations facilitate T6SS function within the periplasmic space, as opposed to the phage's extracellular environment?
How might the absence of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria necessitate specialized arrangements of general secretory protein export systems, such as the ExPortal in Streptococcus pyogenes, to compensate for the loss of protein folding space and coordinate interactions between secreted proteins and membrane-associated chaperones or sortases?
How might the absence of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria necessitate specialized arrangements of general secretory protein export systems, such as the ExPortal in Streptococcus pyogenes, to compensate for the loss of protein folding space and coordinate interactions between secreted proteins and membrane-associated chaperones or sortases?
If Streptococcus pyogenes lost the streptolysin O(SLO) protein and could somehow not be compensated for, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
If Streptococcus pyogenes lost the streptolysin O(SLO) protein and could somehow not be compensated for, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
How does the presence of multiple T7SSs (ESX-1 through ESX-5) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, arising through gene duplication events, suggest a potential mechanism for adaptation and diversification of virulence strategies, particularly in the context of host-pathogen interactions?
How does the presence of multiple T7SSs (ESX-1 through ESX-5) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, arising through gene duplication events, suggest a potential mechanism for adaptation and diversification of virulence strategies, particularly in the context of host-pathogen interactions?
How does Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilize Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS) to orchestrate sophisticated interbacterial warfare, and what molecular mechanisms underpin its ability to selectively target antagonistic neighbors while sparing non-threatening ones?
How does Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilize Type 6 Secretion Systems (T6SS) to orchestrate sophisticated interbacterial warfare, and what molecular mechanisms underpin its ability to selectively target antagonistic neighbors while sparing non-threatening ones?
In the context of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) translocation assay utilized to study effector delivery by bacterial secretion systems, what is the underlying principle that allows for the quantification of effector translocation into host cells?
In the context of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) translocation assay utilized to study effector delivery by bacterial secretion systems, what is the underlying principle that allows for the quantification of effector translocation into host cells?
If a bacterial species were found to possess a previously uncharacterized secretion system exhibiting homology to both T3SS and T6SS components, what experimental approaches could be employed to elucidate its mechanism of action and determine whether it functions primarily in host-pathogen interactions, interbacterial competition, or both?
If a bacterial species were found to possess a previously uncharacterized secretion system exhibiting homology to both T3SS and T6SS components, what experimental approaches could be employed to elucidate its mechanism of action and determine whether it functions primarily in host-pathogen interactions, interbacterial competition, or both?
Considering the dynamic interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and accessory chaperones in protein translocation, what is the MOST compelling reason for the evolutionary conservation of multiple chaperone systems facilitating substrate delivery to SecA?
Considering the dynamic interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and accessory chaperones in protein translocation, what is the MOST compelling reason for the evolutionary conservation of multiple chaperone systems facilitating substrate delivery to SecA?
Given the dichotomy of SecA's role as both a chaperone receptor and a translocation motor, how would a mutation affecting SecA's ability to hydrolyze ATP, but NOT its ability to bind signal peptides, MOST critically impact bacterial physiology?
Given the dichotomy of SecA's role as both a chaperone receptor and a translocation motor, how would a mutation affecting SecA's ability to hydrolyze ATP, but NOT its ability to bind signal peptides, MOST critically impact bacterial physiology?
Considering the strategic advantage conferred by the accessory Sec system in Gram-positive pathogens, what selective pressure MOST likely drove the evolution of a dedicated SecA2-SecY2 pathway for serine-rich glycosylated virulence factors?
Considering the strategic advantage conferred by the accessory Sec system in Gram-positive pathogens, what selective pressure MOST likely drove the evolution of a dedicated SecA2-SecY2 pathway for serine-rich glycosylated virulence factors?
Given the topological constraints imposed by the SecYEG channel during cotranslational translocation, how does the YidC protein MOST critically facilitate the insertion of polytopic membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer?
Given the topological constraints imposed by the SecYEG channel during cotranslational translocation, how does the YidC protein MOST critically facilitate the insertion of polytopic membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer?
Considering the proofreading mechanisms inherent in protein folding, what intrinsic selective advantage does the TAT system confer by translocating fully-folded proteins?
Considering the proofreading mechanisms inherent in protein folding, what intrinsic selective advantage does the TAT system confer by translocating fully-folded proteins?
Given the architectural complexity of the TatABC complex and the energetic demands of transporting folded proteins, what biophysical principle MOST likely governs the TatA pore's capacity to accommodate diverse substrates of varying sizes and shapes?
Given the architectural complexity of the TatABC complex and the energetic demands of transporting folded proteins, what biophysical principle MOST likely governs the TatA pore's capacity to accommodate diverse substrates of varying sizes and shapes?
Considering the inherent limitations of periplasmic folding in Gram-negative bacteria, what evolutionary trade-off MOST likely dictated the reliance of Type II Secretion Systems (T2SS) on the Sec or TAT pathways for initial substrate translocation?
Considering the inherent limitations of periplasmic folding in Gram-negative bacteria, what evolutionary trade-off MOST likely dictated the reliance of Type II Secretion Systems (T2SS) on the Sec or TAT pathways for initial substrate translocation?
Given the structural homology between T2SS and Type IV pili biogenesis systems, which evolutionary adaptation MOST critically repurposed the pseudopilus from an adhesive appendage to a secretion-driving piston?
Given the structural homology between T2SS and Type IV pili biogenesis systems, which evolutionary adaptation MOST critically repurposed the pseudopilus from an adhesive appendage to a secretion-driving piston?
How would the ectopic expression of a bacterial autotransporter in a eukaryotic cell MOST critically compromise cellular integrity, assuming the eukaryotic cell lacks native machinery to process or degrade the autotransporter?
How would the ectopic expression of a bacterial autotransporter in a eukaryotic cell MOST critically compromise cellular integrity, assuming the eukaryotic cell lacks native machinery to process or degrade the autotransporter?
Given the physical constraints of translocating large proteins across cellular membranes, what advantage is conferred by the Type 1 Secretion System's (T1SS) ability to bypass the periplasm?
Given the physical constraints of translocating large proteins across cellular membranes, what advantage is conferred by the Type 1 Secretion System's (T1SS) ability to bypass the periplasm?
If a bacterial pathogen lost the ability to produce its Type III Secretion System (T3SS), but could somehow still produce all of its effector proteins, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
If a bacterial pathogen lost the ability to produce its Type III Secretion System (T3SS), but could somehow still produce all of its effector proteins, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
In the context of host-pathogen coevolution, how does the direct injection of effector proteins into the host cell cytosol via the T3SS MOST effectively counteract the host's extracellular defenses?
In the context of host-pathogen coevolution, how does the direct injection of effector proteins into the host cell cytosol via the T3SS MOST effectively counteract the host's extracellular defenses?
Given the evolutionary pressures on bacterial pathogens to optimize their virulence, how did the discovery of the T3SS challenge the prevailing understanding of exoenzymes as virulence factors?
Given the evolutionary pressures on bacterial pathogens to optimize their virulence, how did the discovery of the T3SS challenge the prevailing understanding of exoenzymes as virulence factors?
How does the observed interaction of effector proteins with specific bacterial cytoplasmic chaperones MOST critically ensure the fidelity and efficiency of T3SS-mediated translocation?
How does the observed interaction of effector proteins with specific bacterial cytoplasmic chaperones MOST critically ensure the fidelity and efficiency of T3SS-mediated translocation?
Considering the challenges of confirming effector delivery by T3SS, how does the implementation of subcellular fractionation, coupled with detergents like digitonin, refine the precision of localization studies?
Considering the challenges of confirming effector delivery by T3SS, how does the implementation of subcellular fractionation, coupled with detergents like digitonin, refine the precision of localization studies?
How does the Elk/NLS-tagged effector protein strategy MOST directly facilitate the quantitative measurement of T3SS-mediated effector translocation into cultured eukaryotic host cells?
How does the Elk/NLS-tagged effector protein strategy MOST directly facilitate the quantitative measurement of T3SS-mediated effector translocation into cultured eukaryotic host cells?
What mechanistic explanation allows for the quantification of effector translocation into host cells when using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) translocation assay?
What mechanistic explanation allows for the quantification of effector translocation into host cells when using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) translocation assay?
Given the multifaceted architecture of the Type IV Secretion System (T4SS), what biophysical rationale underlies the separation of the apparatus into distinct component complexes?
Given the multifaceted architecture of the Type IV Secretion System (T4SS), what biophysical rationale underlies the separation of the apparatus into distinct component complexes?
What primary mechanism underpins the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria, specifically in the context of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS)?
What primary mechanism underpins the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria, specifically in the context of Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS)?
If genes were found to be lacking a T4SS, encoding antibiotic resistance factors, how might that impact a population of bacteria?
If genes were found to be lacking a T4SS, encoding antibiotic resistance factors, how might that impact a population of bacteria?
Given the homology between Type VI Secretion Systems (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what adaptation allows for the T6SS to function within the periplasmic space instead of the extracellular environment?
Given the homology between Type VI Secretion Systems (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what adaptation allows for the T6SS to function within the periplasmic space instead of the extracellular environment?
Considering the dynamic cycles of assembly, contraction, and disassembly inherent in T6SS function, what biophysical obstacle MOST critically necessitates the ClpV ATPase for sustained secretion?
Considering the dynamic cycles of assembly, contraction, and disassembly inherent in T6SS function, what biophysical obstacle MOST critically necessitates the ClpV ATPase for sustained secretion?
How is the T6SS an important mediator of interbacterial competition, and how does it influence the dynamics of microbial communities?
How is the T6SS an important mediator of interbacterial competition, and how does it influence the dynamics of microbial communities?
Given the absence of an outer membrane in Gram-positive bacteria, what compensatory adaptation prevents the secreted proteins from diffusing into the surrounding medium?
Given the absence of an outer membrane in Gram-positive bacteria, what compensatory adaptation prevents the secreted proteins from diffusing into the surrounding medium?
How might the organization of SecA-SecYEG transporters into specialized microdomains, such as the ExPortal in Streptococcus pyogenes, MOST critically influence the virulence of Gram-positive pathogens?
How might the organization of SecA-SecYEG transporters into specialized microdomains, such as the ExPortal in Streptococcus pyogenes, MOST critically influence the virulence of Gram-positive pathogens?
In Streptococcus pyogenes, if the streptolysin O(SLO) protein did not have the ability to interact with cholesterol, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
In Streptococcus pyogenes, if the streptolysin O(SLO) protein did not have the ability to interact with cholesterol, what would be the MOST immediate and direct consequence on the bacteria's virulence?
What advantage is conferred by the colocalization of SLO and SPN genes in the same operon, along with their cotranslational secretion via the SRP pathway, in S. pyogenes?
What advantage is conferred by the colocalization of SLO and SPN genes in the same operon, along with their cotranslational secretion via the SRP pathway, in S. pyogenes?
What is the MOST compelling evidence suggesting that the Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis plays roles beyond simple protein secretion?
What is the MOST compelling evidence suggesting that the Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis plays roles beyond simple protein secretion?
If the C-terminal secretion signal on EsxB were mutated such that it could no longer bind to EccC, what would be the MOST immediate impact on mycobacterial virulence?
If the C-terminal secretion signal on EsxB were mutated such that it could no longer bind to EccC, what would be the MOST immediate impact on mycobacterial virulence?
In Mycobacterium, if the MycP protein in the T7SS secretion system was knocked out, what effect would that have?
In Mycobacterium, if the MycP protein in the T7SS secretion system was knocked out, what effect would that have?
A new strain loses its T7SS clusters during replication. Which of the following would BEST describe the potential impacts?
A new strain loses its T7SS clusters during replication. Which of the following would BEST describe the potential impacts?
A pathogenic bacterial strain upregulates its T7SS clusters, creating more copies of the cluster. Which of the following would be TRUE about how this happened?
A pathogenic bacterial strain upregulates its T7SS clusters, creating more copies of the cluster. Which of the following would be TRUE about how this happened?
A new bacterial species were found to possess a previously uncharacterized secretion system exhibiting homology to both T3SS and T6SS components, what experimental approaches could be employed to determine whether it functions primarily in host-pathogen interactions, interbacterial competition, or both?
A new bacterial species were found to possess a previously uncharacterized secretion system exhibiting homology to both T3SS and T6SS components, what experimental approaches could be employed to determine whether it functions primarily in host-pathogen interactions, interbacterial competition, or both?
Given a bacterium that is unable to secrete T3SS proteins, but somehow has a fully functioning T4SS system for the same virulence factors, which statement would be MOST true?
Given a bacterium that is unable to secrete T3SS proteins, but somehow has a fully functioning T4SS system for the same virulence factors, which statement would be MOST true?
If a bacterial cell overproduces the protein PAAR, what is the MOST likely outcome?
If a bacterial cell overproduces the protein PAAR, what is the MOST likely outcome?
The T6SS proteins TssM and TssL are MOST homologous to which proteins?
The T6SS proteins TssM and TssL are MOST homologous to which proteins?
In the context of bacterial competition, if a bacterial species lost its immunity proteins, what would happen?
In the context of bacterial competition, if a bacterial species lost its immunity proteins, what would happen?
Considering the intricate interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and the proton motive force (PMF) in protein translocation, what is the MOST probable outcome if a bacterial cell's PMF is entirely dissipated, while SecA retains full ATPase activity and substrate-binding affinity?
Considering the intricate interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and the proton motive force (PMF) in protein translocation, what is the MOST probable outcome if a bacterial cell's PMF is entirely dissipated, while SecA retains full ATPase activity and substrate-binding affinity?
Given the dual functionality of the SRP system in targeting nascent proteins and interacting with the SecYEG complex, how would a mutation that selectively disrupts the interaction between Ffh (the protein component of SRP) and the ribosome MOST critically affect the cell?
Given the dual functionality of the SRP system in targeting nascent proteins and interacting with the SecYEG complex, how would a mutation that selectively disrupts the interaction between Ffh (the protein component of SRP) and the ribosome MOST critically affect the cell?
Considering the unique substrate specificity of the TAT system, what would be the MOST significant consequence of engineering a mutation in Escherichia coli that allows the Tat translocase to transport unfolded proteins?
Considering the unique substrate specificity of the TAT system, what would be the MOST significant consequence of engineering a mutation in Escherichia coli that allows the Tat translocase to transport unfolded proteins?
In the context of the Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS), how would a mutation in the inner membrane complex that selectively impairs pseudopilus extension, without affecting substrate binding, MOST critically compromise the system's function?
In the context of the Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS), how would a mutation in the inner membrane complex that selectively impairs pseudopilus extension, without affecting substrate binding, MOST critically compromise the system's function?
Given that autotransporters in the Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS) rely on a self-mediated translocation mechanism, what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that prevents the oligomerization of the β-barrel domain within the outer membrane?
Given that autotransporters in the Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS) rely on a self-mediated translocation mechanism, what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that prevents the oligomerization of the β-barrel domain within the outer membrane?
Considering the mechanism of the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS), what is the MOST immediate effect of a mutation within the ABC transporter component that abolishes its capacity to bind ATP?
Considering the mechanism of the Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS), what is the MOST immediate effect of a mutation within the ABC transporter component that abolishes its capacity to bind ATP?
Within the context of the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what would be the MOST critical consequence of a mutation that disrupts the interaction between a specific effector protein and its cognate chaperone?
Within the context of the Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), what would be the MOST critical consequence of a mutation that disrupts the interaction between a specific effector protein and its cognate chaperone?
Given the complexity of the Type 4 Secretion System (T4SS) and its diverse functions, what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that disrupts the function of the T4CP (Type 4 Coupling Protein)?
Given the complexity of the Type 4 Secretion System (T4SS) and its diverse functions, what would be the MOST detrimental consequence of a mutation that disrupts the function of the T4CP (Type 4 Coupling Protein)?
How does the strategic advantage conferred by the accessory Sec system in Gram-positive pathogens MOST critically hinge upon the unique biochemical properties of secreted serine-rich glycosylated virulence factors?
How does the strategic advantage conferred by the accessory Sec system in Gram-positive pathogens MOST critically hinge upon the unique biochemical properties of secreted serine-rich glycosylated virulence factors?
In the context of the Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS), how would a mutation that prevents the polymerization of Hcp subunits MOST critically impair the system's function, considering its role in both interbacterial competition and host-pathogen interactions?
In the context of the Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS), how would a mutation that prevents the polymerization of Hcp subunits MOST critically impair the system's function, considering its role in both interbacterial competition and host-pathogen interactions?
Considering the dynamics of SLO and SPN secretion during cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT) in S. pyogenes, how would disrupting the cotranslational secretion of SLO via the SRP pathway MOST critically affect SPN delivery into host cells?
Considering the dynamics of SLO and SPN secretion during cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT) in S. pyogenes, how would disrupting the cotranslational secretion of SLO via the SRP pathway MOST critically affect SPN delivery into host cells?
Within the context of Gram-positive bacteria, what evolutionary pressure MOST likely drove the development of the ExPortal microdomain in Streptococcus pyogenes, considering the absence of a periplasmic space?
Within the context of Gram-positive bacteria, what evolutionary pressure MOST likely drove the development of the ExPortal microdomain in Streptococcus pyogenes, considering the absence of a periplasmic space?
How does the C-terminal secretion signal on EsxB in Mycobacterium tuberculosis MOST critically ensure efficient Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS)-mediated translocation across the mycomembrane?
How does the C-terminal secretion signal on EsxB in Mycobacterium tuberculosis MOST critically ensure efficient Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS)-mediated translocation across the mycomembrane?
How does the direct injection of effector proteins into the host cell cytosol via the T3SS MOST effectively subvert the host's intracellular signaling pathways, compared to toxin-mediated surface receptor modulation?
How does the direct injection of effector proteins into the host cell cytosol via the T3SS MOST effectively subvert the host's intracellular signaling pathways, compared to toxin-mediated surface receptor modulation?
Considering the evolutionary pressures on Mycobacterium tuberculosis to persist within macrophages, how might the redundancy of having multiple T7SSs (ESX-1 through ESX-5) MOST critically enhance its survival strategy?
Considering the evolutionary pressures on Mycobacterium tuberculosis to persist within macrophages, how might the redundancy of having multiple T7SSs (ESX-1 through ESX-5) MOST critically enhance its survival strategy?
What key element allows VgrG and PAAR to be considered among the first identified T6SS effectors?
What key element allows VgrG and PAAR to be considered among the first identified T6SS effectors?
Considering the dynamic interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and accessory chaperones in protein translocation, what biophysical rationale determines the conservation of multiple chaperone systems working in concert to facilitate substrate delivery to SecA?
Considering the dynamic interplay between SecA, SecYEG, and accessory chaperones in protein translocation, what biophysical rationale determines the conservation of multiple chaperone systems working in concert to facilitate substrate delivery to SecA?
Given the homology between Type VI Secretion Systems (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what adaptation allows the T6SS protein Hcp to reach target membranes by simply being adjacent to them.
Given the homology between Type VI Secretion Systems (T6SS) and contractile bacteriophages, what adaptation allows the T6SS protein Hcp to reach target membranes by simply being adjacent to them.
What is the MOST compelling counterargument to the hypothesis that the T7SS functions solely for protein secretion in mycobacteria, considering the system's presence in other Gram-positive bacteria lacking mycomembranes?
What is the MOST compelling counterargument to the hypothesis that the T7SS functions solely for protein secretion in mycobacteria, considering the system's presence in other Gram-positive bacteria lacking mycomembranes?
What is the MOST immediate and direct consequence on bacterial virulence if Streptococcus pyogenes lost the ability to produce the SPN protein, while still possessing a functional streptolysin O (SLO) toxin?
What is the MOST immediate and direct consequence on bacterial virulence if Streptococcus pyogenes lost the ability to produce the SPN protein, while still possessing a functional streptolysin O (SLO) toxin?
Flashcards
Bacterial Secretion Systems
Bacterial Secretion Systems
Specialized systems used by bacteria to transport proteins from the cytoplasm to the extracellular environment.
General Secretory (Sec) System
General Secretory (Sec) System
A system common to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, exporting unfolded proteins with a signal sequence.
Accessory Secretory (Sec) System
Accessory Secretory (Sec) System
A second independent export system that exports specific virulence factor proteins to the cell surface.
Signal-Recognition Particle (SRP) System
Signal-Recognition Particle (SRP) System
Signup and view all the flashcards
Twin-Arginine Transport (TAT) System
Twin-Arginine Transport (TAT) System
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS)
Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS)
Type 5 Secretion System (T5SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS)
Type 1 Secretion System (T1SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS)
Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 4 Secretion System (T4SS)
Type 4 Secretion System (T4SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS)
Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cytolysin-Mediated Translocation (CMT)
Cytolysin-Mediated Translocation (CMT)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS)
Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
ExoA
ExoA
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pertactin
Pertactin
Signup and view all the flashcards
TolC
TolC
Signup and view all the flashcards
Effector Proteins
Effector Proteins
Signup and view all the flashcards
EsxA
EsxA
Signup and view all the flashcards
EsxB
EsxB
Signup and view all the flashcards
slo operon
slo operon
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Bacterial Secretion Systems and Virulence
- Bacteria use secretion systems to transport proteins from the cytoplasm to the extracellular environment to modulate their surroundings.
- Secretion systems and secreted proteins become virulence determinants when used for virulence factors.
- Many bacteria need secretion systems to deliver virulence factors, like adhesins, toxins, and proteases, to be virulent.
- Pathogens usually have specialized secretion systems to move toxins out of the cytoplasm, onto the cell surface, into the medium, or into target cells.
- Gram-negative bacteria have more complex secretion systems than Gram-positive bacteria due to their two lipid bilayers.
Common Secretory Systems
- Some secretion systems are common to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
- Gram-negative bacteria use additional secretion systems to transport proteins across the outer membrane
The General Secretory (Sec) System
- Common to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
- Secreted proteins are synthesized as precursors and have a signal sequence at the N terminus.
- The signal sequence contains hydrophobic residues and a protease cleavage site.
- A leader peptidase cleaves the signal sequence for transport
- Lipids may be attached to proteins at a cysteine residue, resulting in lipoproteins that remain bound to the cell membrane.
- The signal sequence is needed for secreted proteins to be recognized and transported.
- The Sec system exports unfolded proteins.
- Most secretion occurs posttranslationally, but some happens co-translationally.
- SecB is a chaperone protein that binds to protein substrates in Gram-negative bacteria as they exit the ribosome, keeping them unfolded.
- Gram-positive bacteria lack SecB homologs and use other proteins as chaperones.
- SecA dimer is a molecular motor, providing energy for translocation.
- SecA binds to the SecYEG translocase complex, forming a protein-conducting channel through the membrane.
- SecB delivers the unfolded protein substrate to the SecA-SecYEG complex.
- ATP hydrolysis drives the polypeptide chain through the SecYEG channel.
- The signal peptide is cleaved, and the protein refolds.
- In Gram-positive bacteria, the protein folds and is released.
- In Gram-negative bacteria, the protein folds in the periplasmic space awaiting further transport.
The Accessory Secretory (Sec) System
- Found in some Gram-positive bacteria like Streptococcus, Listeria, and Mycobacterium.
- Exports specific virulence factor proteins to the cell surface.
- Uses two SecA proteins: SecA1 for the normal pathway and SecA2 for the accessory pathway.
- SecA2 often works with a SecY translocase homolog (SecY2) and other accessory proteins (Asp1-Asp5).
- Transports serine-rich glycosylated virulence factor proteins that the normal SecA system cannot.
The Cotranslational Signal-Recognition Particle (SRP) System
- Many proteins in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria remain embedded in the cell membrane.
- Integral membrane proteins use the SecYEG complex and are secreted cotranslationally.
- Signal peptides bind to the signal-recognition particle (SRP) complex as polytopic proteins exit the ribosome.
- The SRP complex docks to the membrane-bound SRP receptor protein (FtsY), which delivers the signal peptide to the SecYEG complex.
- Ribosome translation then drives the membrane protein into the cellular membrane.
- YidC acts alone or with SecYEG to insert a subset of polytopic membrane proteins into the membrane.
- Bitopic membrane proteins with a single transmembrane α-helix use both the SRP-YidC system and the SecA system for membrane insertion and export.
The Twin-Arginine Transport (TAT) System
- The TAT system is a protein export pathway for fully folded proteins in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
- TAT substrates may contain cofactors, but not all do.
- Proteins are targeted to the membrane-embedded TAT translocase by N-terminal twin-arginine signal sequences.
- The TAT translocase includes TatABC proteins.
- The TAT signal sequence is recognized by TatBC.
- TatA proteins assemble to form a pore complex.
- The proton motive force energizes the transport step.
- The TatABC complex dissociates after transport.
- Fusion of a TAT signal sequence can be used to export folded proteins.
Secretion Systems Specific to Gram-Negative Bacteria
- Gram-negative bacteria have at least six secretion mechanisms (types 1-6).
- Some depend on the general Sec system (types 2 and 5), while others don't (types 1, 3, 4, and 6).
Sec-Dependent Secretion Systems
- Proteins secreted through the type 2 secretion system (T2SS) use the Sec system to reach the periplasm.
- They then pass through the outer membrane via a channel formed by pore-forming proteins.
- The T2SS includes 12-14 proteins encoded by a gene cluster and is related to other bacterial systems.
- The T2SS is used to secrete the A and B portions of some AB toxins like ExoA and cholera toxin.
- The T2SS has an outer membrane complex and an inner membrane complex in which a pseudopilus extends.
- T2SS substrates are delivered to the periplasm by the Sec or TAT systems.
- The pseudopilus pushes the substrate through the outer membrane pore.
- In the type 5 secretion system (T5SS), the protein to be exported is an autotransporter delivered via Sec, that transports itself across the membrane.
- An autotransporter has an N-terminal Sec signal sequence, a passenger (P) domain, a linker (L) region, and a C-terminal β domain.
- Once internalized, the signal sequence is cleaved, and the β domain inserts into the outer membrane forming a pore.
- The remaining domains translocate to the bacterial cell surface.
- Proteins may undergo autoproteolysis, releasing domains into the medium or remaining associated with the cell surface.
- IgA protease from Neisseria and Haemophilus influenzae, serine protease from Serratia marcescens, VacA from Helicobacter pylori, and pertactin from Bordetella are examples of autotransporters.
Sec-Independent Secretion Systems
- In the type 1 secretion system (T1SS), proteins cross directly from the cytoplasm to the cell surface, bypassing the Sec system.
- T1SS can transport proteins up to 800 kDa quickly.
- T1SS has a three-protein complex spanning the inner membrane, periplasm, and outer membrane, delivering proteins directly into the medium.
- An ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter in the inner membrane uses ATPase activity for membrane traversal.
- The secreted protein binds to the ABC transporter via a C-terminal signal sequence.
- The outer membrane component is a pore-forming protein.
- An accessory factor holds the pore-forming components together, funneling the secreted protein.
- α-hemolysin (HlyA) from E. coli is secreted by a T1SS made of HlyB (ABC transporter), HlyD (accessory factor), and TolC (outer-membrane pore).
- In the type 3 secretion system (T3SS), bacteria inject toxic effector proteins directly into the eukaryotic cell cytosol in a contact-dependent system.
- The T3SS was first described in Yersinia pestis and is found in many pathogens.
- T3SS genes are often located on pathogenicity islands (PAIs).
- T3SS apparatus has over 20 proteins forming a needle-like injectisome that delivers proteins into the host cell.
- The proton motive force (pmf) provides energy for transport.
- The T3SS evolved from the bacterial flagellar assembly apparatus.
- Basal membrane complex is assembled and then structural components are secreted.
- A tape measure protein controls the length.
- A translocation pore forms in the host cell membrane for toxin delivery.
- Bacterial cytoplasmic chaperones bind toxins and guide them to the injectisome.
- Injecting effector proteins directly into the host cytosol avoids neutralizing antibodies, a key defense against toxins.
- The T3SS explains the function of exoenzymes that lacked a cognate B subunit.
- Effector proteins avoid contact with neutralizing antibodies.
- Effector proteins lacking B subunits have effects on the host cell.
- Experiments showed YopE from Yersinia was directly translocated into eukaryotic cells.
- YopE, along with YopH, YopT, and YpkA, prevents phagocytosis by targeting actin cytoskeletal proteins.
- YopE disrupts actin microfilaments and inhibits RhoA GTPases.
- Microscopy showed bacteria attached to the cell surface, while YopE was located inside host cell cytosol.
- A Yersinia strain producing YopE fused to adenylate cyclase (Cya) causes cAMP production inside the host cell.
- T3SS mutants show no cAMP production, and bacterial adhesion is necessary for cAMP production.
- Subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting determine the location of translocated effectors.
- Digitonin selectively permeabilizes the eukaryotic plasma membrane, allowing separation of nuclear and cytosolic fractions.
- Immunoblotting with anti-YopM or anti-YopE antibodies reveal YopM in the nuclear fraction and YopE in the cytosolic fraction.
- Translocation of Elk/NLS-tagged effector proteins into the host cell results in transport into the host nucleus
- Host kinase phosphorylates the tag, which is then detected with antibodies which confirm effector delivery into host cells.
- GSK-tagged effector protein results in host cell protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of the GSK tag at serine-9.
- Confocal fluorescence microscopy observes subcellular localization.
- Green fluorescent protein and β-lactamase show the delivery of effector proteins into the host cell through FRET.
- Hydrophobic ester modifications of hydroxyl groups allows fluorescent reporter to pass through the cellular membrane
- β-lactamase cleaves the reporter, causing a color change detectable using fluorescence microscopy.
- The type 4 secretion system (T4SS) involves a complex of 12+ proteins that form a tunnel to transfer proteins and/or DNA into host cells in an ATP-dependent manner.
- One subfamily is conjugation systems which transfers DNA and proteins from donor to recipient bacteria.
- Conjugation transfers genes conferring antibiotic resistance among bacteria.
- The Ti complex from Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers oncogenic Ti plasmid DNA and proteins into plant cells, causing tumors.
- Another subfamily is in pathogenicity islands (PAIs) in pathogens like Helicobacter pylori, Legionella pneumophila, and Brucella.
- T4SSs are important for virulence and intracellular survival.
- Some B. pertussis Ptl system components secrete pertussis toxin into the medium, using the Sec system.
- The T4SS apparatus has four component complexes: inner membrane ATPase (T4CP), inner membrane complex, outer membrane complex, and the pilus.
- The T4CP brings substrates to the translocation machinery.
- The inner membrane complex transfers substrates across the inner membrane.
- The outer membrane complex allows passage of substrates through the periplasm and outer membrane.
- The pilus initiates contact with potential target recipients.
- The type 6 secretion system (T6SS) was identified as a virulence determinant in V. cholerae.
- T6SS gene clusters have been identified in nearly a quarter of all sequenced Gram-negative genomes.
- Several T6SS components resemble components of the contractile tail of bacteriophage T4.
- The T6SS baseplate attaches to an inner membrane protein complex, so the sheath launches the inner tube into the extracellular space.
- In the T6SS, the inner membrane complex has TssM and TssL, which also have homologs in the Dot/Icm T4SS.
- The T6SS baseplate assembles on the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane complex.
- The sheath and inner tube are assembled from the baseplate structure.
- The inner tube is comprised of the protein Hcp.
- A spike is comprised of a trimer of VgrG proteins and is further sharpened by a PAAR motif-containing protein.
- VgrG and PAAR are often found to have enzymatic activities.
- Surrounding the inner tube is the T6SS sheath (TssB and TssC).
- At the opposite end of the sheath/tube assembly from the VgrG spike is a cap complex comprised of subunits of TssA which is required for subunits during assembly.
- Targets of T6SSs do not require a binding receptor but have a wide range of potential targets, including eukaryotic cells and other bacteria.
- The machinery is contained for reuse.
- The sheath is dynamic with cycles of assembly through disassembly with the ATPase ClpV.
- T6SS contributes to the virulence of Vibrio, Aeromonas, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Salmonella species.
- T6SS mediates interbacterial competition.
- T6SS effectors destroy other bacteria (nucleases, lipases, and lysozymes).
- Antibacterial effectors are accompanied by an immunity protein.
- Elaborate regulatory systems allow the T6SS to selectively target antagonistic neighbors.
- Pseudomonas cells assemble a T6SS apparatus at the point of attack for a retaliatory counterattack.
- Ultimately the T6SS plays an important role in maintaining balance between different bacteria.
Specialized Secretion Systems Specific to Gram-Positive Bacteria
- Gram-positive bacteria lack an outer membrane, so proteins appear on the surface or in the medium.
- Proteins for cell surface localization must interact with cell surface components.
- Some proteins are covalently linked to peptidoglycan by sortase.
- Others contain transmembrane anchors or are attached to lipids, becoming lipoproteins.
- Still other proteins bind to peptidoglycan or teichoic acids.
- Gram-positive pathogens arrange their SecA-SecYEG transporters into different organizations for surface structures or toxin export.
- Some have special accessory Sec secretion systems for toxins, in addition to an unusual mechanism for toxin delivery, CMT.
- Some have unusual waxy cell walls and require T7SS.
- Gram-positive bacteria re still express and utilize T4SS versions for DNA exchange processes, such as conjugation
General Secretory Transporter Systems in Gram-Positive Bacteria
- In Enterococcus faecalis, the SecA-SecYEG transporter locates to a single focus before cell division.
- The sortase enzyme (SrtA) co-localizes with the SecA-SecYEG transporter, attaching virulence factors to the cell surface.
- In S. pyogenes (Group A strep), SecA localizes at a single focus or microdomain (ExPortal).
- The ExPortal coordinates interactions between proteins secreted by the Sec system and membrane-associated chaperones or sortases.
- Microdomain co-localization of the SecA-SecYEG transporter and SrtA sortase have been reported.
- In Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), the SecA-SecYEG transporter localizes dynamically over the mid-cell region.
- An extracellular protease degrades misfolded proteins with the SecA-SecYEG transporter.
- The SecA-SecYEG transporter of Bacillus subtilis localizes in a spiral pattern.
- These SecA-SecYEG transporter organizations optimize protein export for different physiological needs.
- SecA-SecYEG transporters and quality-control proteases may be concentrated where needed.
- S. pyogenes (Group A strep) and other pathogens secrete many toxins, suggesting a dedicated ExPortal at certain infection stages.
Cytolysin-Mediated Translocation (CMT) in S. pyogenes (Group A Strep)
- Streptococcus pyogenes uses a pore-forming toxin (streptolysin O, SLO) to deliver a toxin to host cells in a process termed cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT).
- SLO interacts with cholesterol molecules in host cell membranes, leading to pore formation.
- SLO has a membrane interaction mode which allows it to bind to the SPN effector protein.
- SLO-SPN complex interacts with a host membrane receptor, without pore formation.
- The SPN toxin is rapidly internalized into the host cell cytosol through binding of an adhesin.
- SLO and SPN are encoded by genes in the same operon.
- Only SLO and SPN mediate CMT of SPN into a host cell, requiring close adhesion.
- Transport of SPN by CMT is specialized and specific to S. pyogenes.
Type 7 Secretion System (T7SS)
- Gram-positive mycobacteria have mycomembranes with hydrophobic mycolic acids and an exopolysaccharide capsule.
- M. tuberculosis secretes proteins like EsxA and EsxB (ESAT-6 and CFP-10), which are pore-forming toxins involved in escape from macrophage phagosomes.
- Comparative genomics revealed the genetic region surrounding the EsxA and EsxB genes was present only in the pathogenic strain.
- The genetic locus encoded a secretion system (T7SS), since expression, not secretion, was restored when the genes encoding these secreted proteins were reintroduced.
- Mycobacteria can have up to five different T7SSs, which evolved through gene duplication from the original ESX-3 T7SS.
- The mechanism of the T7SS is not fully understood, but some features such as those regarding the EXS-1 have been worked out.
- EsxA and EsxB form a heterodimer and are secreted, containing a signal in which binds to EccC.
- EccC has homology to ATPases like FtsK, SpoIIIE, and T4CP.
- EccC forms a complex with EccB, EccD, EccE, and MycP, forming the pore complex through which substrates leave the cytoplasm.
- MycP is a protease that cleaves the ExsB protein to induce its oligomerization.
- EccA is found to be associated with the T7SS, but its precise role remains unknown.
- T7SS gene clusters are also present in Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Bacillus anthracis.
- T7SS may have roles beyond protein secretion.
- In M. smegmatis, the T7SS is involved in conjugation, in which large chromosomal DNA fragments are exchanged.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.