Podcast
Questions and Answers
What percentage of the gross gate receipts was the respondent supposed to pay to the appellant for the use of the stadia?
What percentage of the gross gate receipts was the respondent supposed to pay to the appellant for the use of the stadia?
15%
When did the appellant inform the respondent that the tariff would be raised to 20%?
When did the appellant inform the respondent that the tariff would be raised to 20%?
1986
How did the respondent pay the 20% of the gross takings to the appellant?
How did the respondent pay the 20% of the gross takings to the appellant?
In cash after each game
In 1988, what percentage did the respondent insist on paying instead of the 20% it had been paying?
In 1988, what percentage did the respondent insist on paying instead of the 20% it had been paying?
What action did the appellant take when the respondent refused to pay the 20% and insisted on paying 15%?
What action did the appellant take when the respondent refused to pay the 20% and insisted on paying 15%?
What did the respondent seek and obtain to prevent the appellant from preventing access to the stadia?
What did the respondent seek and obtain to prevent the appellant from preventing access to the stadia?
What right did the original agreement confer on the respondent?
What right did the original agreement confer on the respondent?
What did the court hold about the respondent's acceptance of the variation in contract terms?
What did the court hold about the respondent's acceptance of the variation in contract terms?
What action of the respondent constituted a breach of the contract?
What action of the respondent constituted a breach of the contract?
What did the court presume when contracting parties reduce their agreement into writing?
What did the court presume when contracting parties reduce their agreement into writing?
Why did the court rule that the agreement between the parties subsisted?
Why did the court rule that the agreement between the parties subsisted?
Under what circumstances may the court deprive a successful party of its costs?
Under what circumstances may the court deprive a successful party of its costs?
