Contract Law Quiz

GenuineTiger avatar
GenuineTiger
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

10 Questions

Which of the following is a requirement for a valid contract?

Consideration

What is an invitation to treat?

The first step in negotiating

In the case of Lynn v Gunthing, why was the contract not valid?

The offer was too ambiguous

What did the defendant do in the Harvey v Facey case?

Supplied information in response to a question

What is vital in recognizing an offer?

Distinguishability from an invitation to treat

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a valid offer in a contract?

Made in writing

In the context of contract law, what distinguishes an invitation to treat from an offer?

Invitation to treat involves goods on display, while an offer is a quote.

What term was considered ambiguous in the case of Lynn v Gunthing, rendering the contract invalid?

Lucky

In the case of Harvey v Facey, what did the defendant's statement about the lowest acceptable price represent?

An invitation to treat

What did Beatson's definition of a contract emphasize, compared to the definition provided by Keenan & Doolan?

Acquisition of rights by one or more parties

Study Notes

Requirements for a Valid Contract

  • A valid contract requires certain elements, which are essential for its formation.

Invitation to Treat

  • An invitation to treat is a preliminary statement that expresses a willingness to negotiate, but it is not a definitive offer.

Lynn v Gunthing Case

  • In the Lynn v Gunthing case, the contract was not valid because the terms of the offer were ambiguous, specifically the term "ready and willing" was unclear.

Harvey v Facey Case

  • In the Harvey v Facey case, the defendant stated the lowest acceptable price, which represented a counteroffer, not an acceptance of the initial offer.

Key Elements of an Offer

  • To recognize an offer, it is vital to identify a clear and specific proposal that outlines the terms of the agreement.

Requirements for a Valid Offer

  • A valid offer must have a clear intention to be bound, communication of the offer, and certainty of terms.

Distinguishing Invitation to Treat from an Offer

  • In contract law, an invitation to treat is distinguished from an offer in that it lacks a clear intention to be bound and is often a preliminary statement.

Ambiguous Terms

  • Ambiguous terms, such as "ready and willing" in the Lynn v Gunthing case, can render a contract invalid.

Beatson's Definition of a Contract

  • Beatson's definition of a contract emphasizes the importance of a bargained-for exchange, unlike the definition provided by Keenan & Doolan, which focuses on the promise and acceptance.

Test your knowledge of contract law with this quiz! Explore the key elements and definitions of a legally binding agreement between parties.

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free

More Quizzes Like This

Contract Law Essentials Quiz
12 questions
Contract Law Quiz
22 questions

Contract Law Quiz

WorthyCongas avatar
WorthyCongas
Elements of a Valid Contract
10 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser