Contending and Yielding Strategies in Conflict

Questions and Answers

The problem-solving strategy shows low concern for both parties' outcomes.

False

Contending approach involves threats, punishment, and unilateral action.

True

Yielding requires a party to prioritize their own outcomes over the other party's outcomes.

False

The inaction strategy is synonymous with assertiveness and proactive engagement.

False Signup and view all the answers

Compromising represents a moderate effort to facilitate the other party's outcomes while pursuing one's own.

True Signup and view all the answers

Actors using a yielding strategy aim to maintain high aspirations for their own outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

The compromising strategy is located in a defined position within the context of conflict management strategies.

True Signup and view all the answers

Actors pursuing the problem-solving strategy are indifferent to the outcomes of the other party.

False Signup and view all the answers

In negotiations, both sides generally refuse to modify their initial positions to reach an agreement.

False Signup and view all the answers

Compromise in negotiations typically involves both sides moving toward the 'middle' of their original positions.

True Signup and view all the answers

Creative negotiations may not require any form of compromise between the parties involved.

True Signup and view all the answers

When parties do not perceive the situation as a negotiation, they are likely to engage in give-and-take discussions.

False Signup and view all the answers

Negotiation aims to avoid open conflict and instead seeks mutually acceptable solutions.

True Signup and view all the answers

A yielding strategy in negotiations focuses on one party completely capitulating to the other side's demands.

False Signup and view all the answers

An inaction strategy during negotiations can lead to a resolution through mutual agreement.

False Signup and view all the answers

Negotiations may include established rules and procedures that guide the resolution of conflicts.

False Signup and view all the answers

Contending strategy represents a high concern for both one's own outcomes and the other party's outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

The yielding strategy is primarily located in the upper right-hand corner of the dual concerns model.

False Signup and view all the answers

Compromising is a strategy that seeks to balance the concerns of both parties, leading to a moderate concern for each party's outcomes.

True Signup and view all the answers

Inaction strategy is considered a proactive method for conflict management.

False Signup and view all the answers

The dual concerns model can theoretically identify an infinite number of strategies based on levels of concern for outcomes.

True Signup and view all the answers

Actors using the contending strategy often attempt to persuade the other party to yield to their desires.

True Signup and view all the answers

A higher concern for the other party's outcomes generally leads to strategies located in the lower portion of the dual concerns model.

False Signup and view all the answers

People who have low concern for their own outcomes are likely to pursue strategies on the right side of the dual concerns model.

False Signup and view all the answers

The yielding strategy is characterized by a significant concern for attaining one's own outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

Actors utilizing the inaction strategy demonstrate a high level of concern for whether the other party achieves their desired outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

The compromising strategy is placed in a position that indicates low moderation in pursuing one's own goals and those of the other party.

False Signup and view all the answers

The contending approach typically relies on cooperation to maximize outcomes for both conflicting parties.

False Signup and view all the answers

Problem solving as a strategy indicates low concern for the outcomes of both parties involved in a conflict.

False Signup and view all the answers

A party that engages in yielding during negotiations does so to maximize their own competitive advantage.

False Signup and view all the answers

Compromising is considered a strategy that entirely rejects the pursuit of one's own outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

The inaction strategy promotes active engagement and dialogue between conflicting parties.

False Signup and view all the answers

The compromising strategy is characterized by an equal concern for both one's own outcomes and the other party's outcomes.

True Signup and view all the answers

The yielding strategy is defined by a strong concern for one’s own outcomes and a lack of concern for the other party’s outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

Inaction strategy involves actively engaging with the other party to negotiate outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

The contending strategy is located in the upper left-hand corner of the dual concerns model.

False Signup and view all the answers

Actors pursuing the problem-solving strategy are likely to engage collaboratively with the other party to achieve favorable outcomes for both.

True Signup and view all the answers

In the dual concerns model, a high concern for the other party's outcomes leads to strategies located at the bottom of the figure.

False Signup and view all the answers

The contending strategy emphasizes collaboration and mutual outcomes over individual gains.

False Signup and view all the answers

Yielding is a strategy primarily identified with a focus on achieving the other party's desired outcomes at the expense of one's own aspirations.

True Signup and view all the answers

The compromising strategy can be effectively utilized when both parties agree on the importance of their individual outcomes.

True Signup and view all the answers

Actors utilizing the inaction strategy often find themselves actively negotiating terms and conditions.

False Signup and view all the answers

The situation between Joe and Sue indicates a successful application of the compromising strategy.

False Signup and view all the answers

Choosing to flip a coin represents a yielding strategy in conflict management.

False Signup and view all the answers

Joe's approach to managing his vacation conflict demonstrates elements of a problem-solving strategy.

False Signup and view all the answers

Being unable to compromise on the vacation plans is indicative of a strong contention between Joe and Sue.

True Signup and view all the answers

Joe and Sue's discussions about their vacation plans could be classified as an example of the inaction strategy.

True Signup and view all the answers

The compromising strategy focuses entirely on maximizing one's own outcomes at the expense of the other party's interests.

False Signup and view all the answers

A yielding strategy requires a party to adjust their plans to prioritize the outcomes of the other party.

True Signup and view all the answers

Inaction strategy refers to actively engaging in negotiation discussions to reach a resolution.

False Signup and view all the answers

The contending strategy represents a high concern for both one’s own outcomes and the outcomes of the other party.

False Signup and view all the answers

Problem solving strategy aims for an outcome that optimizes the interests of all parties involved.

True Signup and view all the answers

In negotiations, making concessions leads to an expansion of the bargaining range.

False Signup and view all the answers

Mutual adjustment in negotiations often involves both parties maintaining their initial proposals without alterations.

False Signup and view all the answers

When deciding on how much truth to tell during negotiations, negotiators face the dilemma of honesty.

True Signup and view all the answers

In the yielding strategy, negotiators often aim to completely obstruct the other party's demands.

False Signup and view all the answers

The problem-solving strategy is often characterized by low concern for the outcomes of the other parties involved in the negotiation.

False Signup and view all the answers

Pruitt and Rubin believe that compromising is a lazy approach to problem-solving.

True Signup and view all the answers

The problem-solving approach is considered the least preferred method for managing conflict.

False Signup and view all the answers

Yielding strategies require a party to completely disregard their own interests in favor of the other party's outcomes.

False Signup and view all the answers

Inaction in negotiations is generally viewed as a proactive method for resolving conflicts.

False Signup and view all the answers

Compromising is represented as a valid strategic approach to conflict by many scholars.

True Signup and view all the answers

The contending strategy is characterized by a strong concern for one's own outcomes and low concern for the other party's outcomes.

True Signup and view all the answers

Problem-solving strategies are associated with an indiscriminate approach to conflict resolution.

False Signup and view all the answers

Each conflict management strategy has both advantages and disadvantages depending on the context.

True Signup and view all the answers

Pruitt and Rubin argue that all forms of yielding should be avoided in conflicts.

False Signup and view all the answers

The yield strategy focuses solely on achieving a balanced result for both parties.

False Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Conflict Management Strategies

Contending Strategy: Involves strong pursuit of one's own outcomes with little regard for the other party's goals. Characterized by competition and dominance.
Yielding Strategy: Emphasizes accommodating to the other party's interests, often at one's own expense. This can lead to favorable outcomes in certain contexts despite seeming counterintuitive.
Inaction Strategy: Represents avoidance behavior where the party is indifferent to both their own and the other party’s outcomes. It favors passivity or withdrawal from conflict situations.
Problem Solving Strategy: Prioritizes collaboration, focusing on maximizing joint outcomes. Both parties actively seek solutions that benefit everyone involved.
Compromising Strategy: Involves moderate efforts on both sides to meet halfway, balancing self-interest and the interests of the other party.

Dual Concerns Model

The model portrays two dimensions of concern:
- Assertiveness: Concern for one’s own outcomes (horizontal axis).
- Cooperativeness: Concern for the other party’s outcomes (vertical axis).
Strategies can fall anywhere along these axes, reflecting varying degrees of concern for both self and others.

Negotiation Dynamics

In negotiations, parties are willing to modify their positions in pursuit of an agreement, moving towards a compromise.
Creative solutions may arise that fulfill the goals of all parties, independent of initial positions.
Negotiation is preferred over open conflict, hierarchical resolution, or severing ties, allowing individuals to invent solutions outside established protocols.
Organizations may implement policies for conflict resolution, though negotiation is often an option for flexibility in handling disputes.

Example Cases

A deli sign highlights an instance of negotiation where the price can be adjusted based on customer interactions, demonstrating the fluidity of conflict resolution in a transactional context.
Attorneys often engage in negotiation or plea bargaining, emphasizing the desire for assured settlements rather than risking trial outcomes.

Key Insights

Effective conflict management requires awareness of one’s own and the other party’s aspirations.
Different strategies serve specific contexts, from aggressive contention to accommodating yielding or collaborative problem-solving.

Conflict Management Strategies

Contending (Competing/Dominating)
- Pursuers focus heavily on personal outcomes while disregarding the other party's needs.
- Commonly results in a win-lose dynamic.
Yielding (Accommodating/Obliging)
- Involves lowering personal aspirations to allow the other party to win.
- Shows high concern for the other party's outcomes, but low concern for one's own.
- May provide advantages in specific contexts.
Inaction (Avoiding)
- Characterized by little interest in both personal and others' outcomes.
- Often leads to withdrawal, passivity, or silence.
Problem Solving (Collaborating/Integrating)
- High concern for both parties' outcomes, aiming to maximize joint benefits.
- Encourages active engagement and finding mutual resolutions.
Compromising
- Represents a moderate concern for one’s own and the other party’s outcomes.
- Considered less effective by some scholars, viewed as lazy problem-solving or mutual yielding.
- Included in conflict strategies due to its common application in practice.

Dual Concerns Model Overview

Model illustrates two independent dimensions: concern for personal outcomes and concern for others' outcomes.
Dimensions are categorized as:
- Horizontal (Assertiveness) – Concern for personal outcomes.
- Vertical (Cooperativeness) – Concern for others' outcomes.
Strategies are positioned based on varying levels of concern in both dimensions (high/low).

Negotiation Process Dynamics

Negotiations often start with stated opening positions, where parties express their ideal proposals.
Reactions to proposals typically include defending and critiquing positions, leading to potential adjustments.
Making a concession narrows the range of acceptable agreements, affecting subsequent negotiations.

Dilemmas in Mutual Adjustment

Honesty Dilemma: Difficulty balancing truthfulness in negotiations, especially when trust is lacking.
Example scenario demonstrates familial negotiation complexities (e.g., choosing vacation plans).
Decisions about concessions and reading others' signals can complicate the negotiation process.

Historical Context of Conflict Strategies

Earlier conflict management literature favored problem-solving as the primary approach and viewed conflict negatively.
Recent works acknowledge that all strategies have pros and cons, emphasizing context-specific appropriateness.
Enhanced understanding of negotiation processes derived from real-world examples, such as everyday situations like Joe and Sue Carter's vacation planning.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the differences between contending and yielding strategies in conflict resolution. This quiz delves into concepts like intimidation, punishment, and the art of yielding in negotiations. Understand how these strategies can affect the outcomes in interpersonal and organizational conflicts.