Consumer Protection Act 2019 - Unfair Trade Practices Quiz
24 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What issue did the Complainant face with the Panasonic Smart LED Television?

  • Screen resolution problems
  • Remote control malfunction
  • Power supply issues
  • Fluctuating volume (correct)
  • Why couldn't the Complainant file a complaint immediately after noticing the issue with the TV?

  • Didn't have the Retailer's contact information
  • Was satisfied with the TV's performance
  • Due to Covid-19 lockdown (correct)
  • Forgot about the issue
  • What did the mechanics from Panasonic and the Retailer suggest if the issue with the TV persisted?

  • Replacing the speakers
  • Replacing the motherboard (correct)
  • Replacing the screen
  • Replacing the remote control
  • Why did the Complainant send a legal notice to Panasonic and the Retailer?

    <p>To demand a replacement for the faulty TV</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the reason behind the respondent being found in violation of the statutory duty?

    <p>Being registered to practice Allopathy only</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the outcome of the respondent's act in the case?

    <p>He was ordered to pay a compensation of three lakhs</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What action did the Complainant take upon discovering that his car was missing from the hotel premises?

    <p>He contacted the police and filed an FIR</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the Police Station have possession of the Complainant's vehicle?

    <p>It was confiscated due to an accident that caused damage</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What action did Vedix take after the Complainant notified them about the hair fall issue?

    <p>Suggested dietary changes</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the District Commission consider Vedix's practices unfair under the Consumer Protection Act 2019?

    <p>Using misleading advertisements to deceive customers</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the compensation amount directed by the District Commission for the mental agony of the Complainant?

    <p>Rs. 40,000/-</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did Vedix violate the Consumer Protection Act 2019 according to the District Commission?

    <p>By presenting a product with false qualities in their advertisements</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the hotel argue that there was no deficiency in their services regarding the stolen vehicle incident?

    <p>The thief was able to deceive the hotel staff using a counterfeit tag.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary reason cited by the District Commission for finding the hotel liable in the stolen vehicle case?

    <p>The hotel's careless handling of vehicle security measures.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of valet parking procedures, what did the hotel claim to diligently maintain despite the stolen vehicle incident?

    <p>Inward and outward registers for parked vehicles.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the District Commission consider the hotel's defense regarding CCTV installation as insufficient in proving their innocence?

    <p>A known criminal was identified stealing cars from multiple hotels.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why was the Manager of the hotel held vicariously liable for the actions of the staff?

    <p>The staff handed over the Complainant's car to the thief believing the valet tag was genuine.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the District Commission direct the Manager of the hotel to pay compensation to the Complainant?

    <p>For negligence in handling valet parking procedures.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In this case, why did the hotel's failure to act on previous incidents of theft matter?

    <p>It indicated a lack of proper security measures at the hotel.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why was the District Commission's decision significant in this case?

    <p>It set a precedent for holding hotels liable for thefts on their premises.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal duty did the respondent in the case violate according to the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956?

    <p>Section 15(3) regarding the practice of Allopathy</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the legal consequence faced by the respondent for practicing Allopathy without authorization?

    <p>Ordered to pay a compensation of three lakhs</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the hotel's staff fail to fulfill their duty towards the Complainant in the case of the missing car?

    <p>Providing no assistance in recovering the vehicle</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What immediate action did the Complainant take upon discovering his car was missing?

    <p>Contacted the police and filed an FIR</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser