Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to the experimental paradigm described, what is the primary difference between Component A and Component B?
According to the experimental paradigm described, what is the primary difference between Component A and Component B?
- Component A involves a higher absolute reinforcer rate compared to Component B.
- Component A involves a lower relative reinforcer rate for the right key compared to Component B. (correct)
- Component A provides the same reinforcer rate as Component B but with a different time-out period.
- Component A involves a lower absolute reinforcer rate compared to Component B.
In the experiment, what is the purpose of comparing right-key response rates in Components A and B?
In the experiment, what is the purpose of comparing right-key response rates in Components A and B?
- To evaluate the effects of alternative reinforcement for the left-key response on the right-key response. (correct)
- To determine the subjects' preference for key color (green vs. other colors).
- To assess the impact of different time-out periods on response rates.
- To measure the overall activity level of the subjects.
What do the results of the extinction tests reveal about the right-key responding in Components A and B?
What do the results of the extinction tests reveal about the right-key responding in Components A and B?
- Right-key responding in Component B starts above that in Component A and falls below it as extinction progresses. (correct)
- Right-key responding in Component B starts lower than in Component A and rises above it as extinction progresses.
- Right-key responding in Component A starts higher than in Component B and remains higher throughout extinction.
- Right-key responding in Components A and B are equally susceptible to extinction.
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the comparison of right-key responding in Components C and B?
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the comparison of right-key responding in Components C and B?
In this experiment, what is the independent variable being manipulated to assess resistance to change?
In this experiment, what is the independent variable being manipulated to assess resistance to change?
How did the researchers disrupt baseline performances to test resistance to change?
How did the researchers disrupt baseline performances to test resistance to change?
What was the total number of reinforcers per hour across both keys in Component C?
What was the total number of reinforcers per hour across both keys in Component C?
Why was a time-out period included between components?
Why was a time-out period included between components?
According to the content, what should researchers be cautious about when predicting or interpreting the effects of interventions based on basic research?
According to the content, what should researchers be cautious about when predicting or interpreting the effects of interventions based on basic research?
What general conclusion does the content draw about discriminated operant behavior and resistance to change?
What general conclusion does the content draw about discriminated operant behavior and resistance to change?
According to the content, what was the key finding of Harper and McLean (1992) that challenged previous conclusions about reinforcement and resistance to change?
According to the content, what was the key finding of Harper and McLean (1992) that challenged previous conclusions about reinforcement and resistance to change?
What condition did Harper and McLean (1992) identify as potentially influencing the relationship between resistance to change and baseline reinforcer rate?
What condition did Harper and McLean (1992) identify as potentially influencing the relationship between resistance to change and baseline reinforcer rate?
If a researcher aims to apply findings on behavioral momentum from basic research to a real-world scenario, what is the MOST critical step they should take?
If a researcher aims to apply findings on behavioral momentum from basic research to a real-world scenario, what is the MOST critical step they should take?
Based on the content, under what circumstances might the typical relationship between reinforcer rate and resistance to change be weakened or absent?
Based on the content, under what circumstances might the typical relationship between reinforcer rate and resistance to change be weakened or absent?
Nevin et al.'s (1990) experiment on behavioral momentum has been replicated with rats using visual stimuli, but not auditory stimuli. What does this suggest about the nature of behavioral momentum?
Nevin et al.'s (1990) experiment on behavioral momentum has been replicated with rats using visual stimuli, but not auditory stimuli. What does this suggest about the nature of behavioral momentum?
A researcher observes that an intervention based on basic research into behavioral momentum is not yielding the expected results in a classroom setting. Considering the content provided, what is the MOST likely reason for this discrepancy?
A researcher observes that an intervention based on basic research into behavioral momentum is not yielding the expected results in a classroom setting. Considering the content provided, what is the MOST likely reason for this discrepancy?
Which type of change is least likely to reliably confirm that resistance to change is directly related to reinforcer rate?
Which type of change is least likely to reliably confirm that resistance to change is directly related to reinforcer rate?
Why might a large reinforcer be a greater disrupter than a small reinforcer, potentially counteracting expected differences in resistance to change?
Why might a large reinforcer be a greater disrupter than a small reinforcer, potentially counteracting expected differences in resistance to change?
How do the effects of extinction (an internal disrupter) on multiple-schedule performances compare to those of external disruptors, according to the content?
How do the effects of extinction (an internal disrupter) on multiple-schedule performances compare to those of external disruptors, according to the content?
What did Cohen, Riley, and Weigle's (1993) research suggest about the relationship between resistance to change and reinforcer rate in single-schedule performances?
What did Cohen, Riley, and Weigle's (1993) research suggest about the relationship between resistance to change and reinforcer rate in single-schedule performances?
According to Lattal (1989), how did the resistance to disruption by free food differ between a tandem FR VI schedule and a tandem DRL VI schedule, when reinforcer rates were equated?
According to Lattal (1989), how did the resistance to disruption by free food differ between a tandem FR VI schedule and a tandem DRL VI schedule, when reinforcer rates were equated?
What critical factor needs to be identified in single-schedule studies to confirm the positive relation between resistance to change and reinforcer rate, but fails to do so?
What critical factor needs to be identified in single-schedule studies to confirm the positive relation between resistance to change and reinforcer rate, but fails to do so?
According to Lattal’s findings, what might establish behavioral classes that are differentially susceptible to disruption?
According to Lattal’s findings, what might establish behavioral classes that are differentially susceptible to disruption?
What remains to be achieved in the characterization of disrupters, according to the text?
What remains to be achieved in the characterization of disrupters, according to the text?
What is a potential risk associated with using metaphors in scientific contexts?
What is a potential risk associated with using metaphors in scientific contexts?
What positive effect can metaphors have on scientists, as mentioned in the text?
What positive effect can metaphors have on scientists, as mentioned in the text?
What is the primary reason that metaphors can be helpful in communicating scientific ideas?
What is the primary reason that metaphors can be helpful in communicating scientific ideas?
Which of the following best describes the author's view on the use of the 'behavioral momentum' metaphor?
Which of the following best describes the author's view on the use of the 'behavioral momentum' metaphor?
What does the text suggest about the development of the high-probability (high-p) request sequence procedure?
What does the text suggest about the development of the high-probability (high-p) request sequence procedure?
Based on the references provided, which research area appears to be a significant application of behavioral momentum?
Based on the references provided, which research area appears to be a significant application of behavioral momentum?
The references mention studies involving rats and pigeons. What aspect of behavioral momentum were these studies MOST likely investigating?
The references mention studies involving rats and pigeons. What aspect of behavioral momentum were these studies MOST likely investigating?
In the context of behavioral momentum, what does resistance to change typically refer to?
In the context of behavioral momentum, what does resistance to change typically refer to?
According to the formula log(BX1/BO1)/log(BX2/BO2) 5 m2/m1
, what relationship exists between the ratio of behavioral masses and the ratio of the logarithms of responding under disruption relative to baseline?
According to the formula log(BX1/BO1)/log(BX2/BO2) 5 m2/m1
, what relationship exists between the ratio of behavioral masses and the ratio of the logarithms of responding under disruption relative to baseline?
What is a more reliable method for estimating the ratio of behavioral masses when a disrupter value is varied systematically?
What is a more reliable method for estimating the ratio of behavioral masses when a disrupter value is varied systematically?
What did Nevin (1992b) find regarding the ratio of masses in his research?
What did Nevin (1992b) find regarding the ratio of masses in his research?
How can the value of the contingency ratio be experimentally altered?
How can the value of the contingency ratio be experimentally altered?
What aspect of behavior is being measured when evaluating 'velocity' in the context of multiple-schedule components?
What aspect of behavior is being measured when evaluating 'velocity' in the context of multiple-schedule components?
What does the contingency ratio quantify in the context described?
What does the contingency ratio quantify in the context described?
If a researcher wants to increase the 'behavioral mass' of a response, which of the following strategies aligns with the principles described in the text?
If a researcher wants to increase the 'behavioral mass' of a response, which of the following strategies aligns with the principles described in the text?
A researcher observes that disrupting a two-component multiple schedule has a minimal effect on Component 1 but significantly reduces responding in Component 2. Based on Equation 3, what can be inferred about the behavioral masses of the two components?
A researcher observes that disrupting a two-component multiple schedule has a minimal effect on Component 1 but significantly reduces responding in Component 2. Based on Equation 3, what can be inferred about the behavioral masses of the two components?
How does the high-probability (high-p) request sequence influence compliance, according to the text?
How does the high-probability (high-p) request sequence influence compliance, according to the text?
What theoretical framework supports the effectiveness of the high-p procedure?
What theoretical framework supports the effectiveness of the high-p procedure?
In the context of compliance as a discriminated operant, what serves as the consequence that reinforces the behavior?
In the context of compliance as a discriminated operant, what serves as the consequence that reinforces the behavior?
Why might the high-p procedure not always be effective in enhancing compliance?
Why might the high-p procedure not always be effective in enhancing compliance?
Which of the following is a key difference between the high-p procedure used in applied settings and basic research on behavioral momentum?
Which of the following is a key difference between the high-p procedure used in applied settings and basic research on behavioral momentum?
Why is it difficult to establish a steady-state baseline response rate in the high-p procedure?
Why is it difficult to establish a steady-state baseline response rate in the high-p procedure?
In the context of behavioral momentum, what role do reinforcers during the high-p sequence play?
In the context of behavioral momentum, what role do reinforcers during the high-p sequence play?
How does the concept of a 'discriminated operant' relate to understanding compliance?
How does the concept of a 'discriminated operant' relate to understanding compliance?
Flashcards
Three-component multiple-schedule paradigm
Three-component multiple-schedule paradigm
A multiple schedule with three components (A, B, and C) where different reinforcement rates are arranged for responding on concurrent VI VI schedules.
Component A properties
Component A properties
Component A offers a lower absolute reinforcer rate (15 per hour) and a lower relative reinforcer rate (0.25) for right-key pecks, alongside alternative reinforcement for left-key response.
Component B properties
Component B properties
Component B provides an intermediate absolute reinforcer rate (15 per hour) and the highest relative reinforcer rate (1.0) for right-key pecks.
Component C properties
Component C properties
Signup and view all the flashcards
Resistance to change
Resistance to change
Signup and view all the flashcards
Extinction
Extinction
Signup and view all the flashcards
External Disrupters
External Disrupters
Signup and view all the flashcards
Internal Disrupters
Internal Disrupters
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disruption methods
Disruption methods
Signup and view all the flashcards
Component A resistance
Component A resistance
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reinforcer Size
Reinforcer Size
Signup and view all the flashcards
Extinction as a Disrupter
Extinction as a Disrupter
Signup and view all the flashcards
Resistance and Reinforcer Rate
Resistance and Reinforcer Rate
Signup and view all the flashcards
Response Rate Influence
Response Rate Influence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingency Types
Contingency Types
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disruption Susceptibility
Disruption Susceptibility
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cross-Species Replication
Cross-Species Replication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Applied Research
Applied Research
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proportional Changes
Proportional Changes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Propensity to Respond
Propensity to Respond
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reinforcer Magnitudes
Reinforcer Magnitudes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Free Food Disruption
Free Food Disruption
Signup and view all the flashcards
Alternating Schedules
Alternating Schedules
Signup and view all the flashcards
High-Probability (High-p) Request Sequence
High-Probability (High-p) Request Sequence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Behavioral Momentum
Behavioral Momentum
Signup and view all the flashcards
Compliance
Compliance
Signup and view all the flashcards
Compliance as a Discriminated Operant
Compliance as a Discriminated Operant
Signup and view all the flashcards
High-Probability (high-p) Procedure
High-Probability (high-p) Procedure
Signup and view all the flashcards
Behavioral Momentum
Behavioral Momentum
Signup and view all the flashcards
Law of Effect
Law of Effect
Signup and view all the flashcards
High-p Reinforcement Effect
High-p Reinforcement Effect
Signup and view all the flashcards
High-Probability Request
High-Probability Request
Signup and view all the flashcards
Multiple Schedules
Multiple Schedules
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stimulus Control
Stimulus Control
Signup and view all the flashcards
Low-Probability Request
Low-Probability Request
Signup and view all the flashcards
Procedural differences in High-P
Procedural differences in High-P
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interspersed requests
Interspersed requests
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingencies
Contingencies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Behavioral Mass Ratio (Disruption)
Behavioral Mass Ratio (Disruption)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reliable Mass Ratio Estimation
Reliable Mass Ratio Estimation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingency Ratio
Contingency Ratio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stimulus-Reinforcer Relation
Stimulus-Reinforcer Relation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Altering Contingency Ratio
Altering Contingency Ratio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Behavioral Mass
Behavioral Mass
Signup and view all the flashcards
Velocity (in Behavioral Momentum)
Velocity (in Behavioral Momentum)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disruption Analysis
Disruption Analysis
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Overview of Compliance and Behavioral Momentum
- Compliance to normally ineffective demanding requests can be improved with a series of easy or high-probability demands beforehand.
- High-probability procedures relate to behavioral momentum, which is the tendency for a behavior to persist when challenged after initiation and reinforcement.
- High-probability procedures differ from lab momentum research, potentially limiting the relevance of basic research methods in applied compliance settings.
- Increased compliance with demanding requests following the high-probability procedure can be understood in relation to the procedures and findings of basic research.
- Translating research into application via the metaphor of momentum raises questions, which suggests new directions for experimental and applied behavior analysis.
Key Descriptors
- Behavioral momentum encompasses the rate of responding
- Behavioral momentum encompasses resistance to change
- Behavioral momentum encompasses compliance
- Behavioral momentum uses high-probability procedures
Behavioral Momentum as a Metaphor
- Behavioral momentum is a metaphor for understanding two dimensions of behavior, rate of responding, and its resistance to change.
- The metaphor links behavior speed to how quickly its established/maintained through reinforcement, and mass to how resistant it is to change.
- The aspects of behavior are identified with the velocity and mass of a physical object.
- Behavioral momentum captures the combined effect of training on both response rate and persistence.
- Applied behavior analysis aims to establish adaptive behavior that persists beyond interventions by ensuring it is sufficiently resistant to change.
- Resistance to change allows behavior to continue transitioning from treatment to everyday life.
- A successful intervention gives behavior a high level of momentum
- Interventions to establish compliance are successful if compliance occurs rapidly and reliably (high velocity) and persists (high mass) after training.
- Low compliance, even when persistent, doesn’t achieve the desired result.
- Highly resistant noncompliance is caused by reinforcement by escape
Maximizing Compliance Momentum
- Therapist’s goal includes overcoming client history by interventions to establish high rate of compliance during treatment.
- Therapist’s goal includes ensuring compliance persists when treatment concludes.
- Therapist’s goal includes maximizing the momentum of compliance.
Laboratory Research on Behavioral Momentum
- Lab research focuses on behavioral momentum, studying animals like pigeons
- Lab research summarizes core findings in animals, including their relevance to humans.
- Research discusses the high-probability procedure for establishing compliance in clinical settings.
- Research emphasizes the high-probability procedure is based on extending the momentum metaphor.
- Research stresses the high-probability procedure effectiveness is understandable within the context of momentum research.
Research Review: Methods and Measures
- Momentum is a property of a discriminated operant, including a stimulus situation, response class, and reinforcement contingencies.
- Interest centers on the asymptotic response rate and its resistance to change within that situation.
- Resistance to change is studied relative to other conditions.
- Comparison is based upon the nature/value of the disrupter (e.g. prefeeding, extinction duration).
- A multiple schedule of reinforcement is a convenient experimental paradigm
- Multiple schedules involves presenting stimuli successively for durations
- Multiple schedules creates contingencies/schedules for designated responses in presence of stimuli
- These stimuli define discriminated operants in components of the schedule.
- These stimuli are separated by time-out to minimize interaction.
- Performances are trained until response rates are stable for baseline
- The relative resistance is evaluated by disrupting performance equally across components
- Disruption is achieved through prefeeding.
- Disruption is arranged for a brief period to minimize interaction between the disrupter and baseline
- Resistance to change is measured by comparing response rate under disruption with that of the preceding baseline
- Judgments of how much an operant resists change is judged by shallower slope slopes exhibit more resistance
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore compliance strategies using high-probability demands to influence behavior. Understand how behavioral momentum, the tendency for a behavior to persist, can be applied in various settings. This approach bridges basic research with practical applications in behavior analysis.