Comparison of Buck-Passing and Bait-and-Bleed Strategies

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

What is the strategy where a state tries to weaken its rivals by provoking a long and costly war between them?

Bait and bleed

What strategy involves ensuring that any war in which an adversary is involved is protracted and deadly?

Bloodletting

Which strategy involves seriously committing to containing a dangerous opponent?

Balancing

What strategy involves trying to get another great power to check the aggressor while remaining on the sidelines?

Buck-passing Signup and view all the answers

Why do threatened states usually prefer buck-passing to balancing?

To avoid the costs of fighting the aggressor in case of war Signup and view all the answers

Why are the strategies of appeasement and bandwagoning not particularly useful for dealing with aggressors?

They involve conceding power to a rival state Signup and view all the answers

What is the main logic behind the strategy of buck-passing in international relations?

The more powerful a threatened state is, the less likely it is that an aggressor will attack it. Signup and view all the answers

Why must a buck-catcher still have the capability to contain an aggressor even without the buck-passer's help?

To ensure that the buck-catcher can stand alone against the aggressor if needed. Signup and view all the answers

What is one reason why states build formidable military forces for prophylactic reasons?

To be prepared in case they catch the buck and have to stand alone against an aggressor. Signup and view all the answers

During the 1930s, why could neither France nor the Soviet Union be certain about their security against Nazi Germany?

They could not be sure they would not catch the buck and have to stand alone against the aggressor. Signup and view all the answers

What is the insurance policy that a state might adopt in case buck-passing fails?

Improving its defenses as a precautionary measure. Signup and view all the answers

Explain a scenario where it makes sense for a buck-passer to allow the growth in power of the intended buck-catcher.

To increase the buck-passer's prospects of remaining on the sidelines by strengthening the burden-bearer. Signup and view all the answers

What is the main difference between buck-passing and bait and bleed strategies?

Buck-passing is a deterrence strategy with war-fighting as the default option, while bait and bleed purposely aims to provoke a war. Signup and view all the answers

Explain why appeasement and bandwagoning are not considered viable strategies for survival according to the text.

Both appeasement and bandwagoning involve conceding power to an aggressor, which violates balance-of-power logic and increases the danger to the state employing them. Signup and view all the answers

What happens in bandwagoning when a state joins forces with a more powerful opponent?

The weaker state concedes that the stronger state will gain a disproportionate share of the spoils they conquer together, shifting the power balance further against the bandwagoner. Signup and view all the answers

How do both buck-passing and bait and bleed strategies risk failure?

Both strategies can fail if one of the combatants wins a quick and decisive victory. Signup and view all the answers

In the context of strategies for survival, why should great powers neither appease nor bandwagon with their adversaries?

Appeasement and bandwagoning involve conceding power to an aggressor, which is detrimental to a state's survival. Signup and view all the answers

Explain why balancing and buck-passing are considered more suitable strategies for threatened states according to the text.

Balancing and buck-passing are preferred as they do not involve conceding power to an aggressor, aligning with balance-of-power logic and enhancing the state's security. Signup and view all the answers

Comparison of Buck-Passing and Bait-and-Bleed Strategies

Choose a study mode

Podcast

Questions and Answers