Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the context of collateral contracts, which statement is true regarding oral agreements?
In the context of collateral contracts, which statement is true regarding oral agreements?
- Oral agreements have no legal standing in the presence of a written contract.
- Oral agreements must always be documented in writing to be valid.
- Oral agreements can entirely replace written contracts.
- Oral agreements can exist alongside written contracts but cannot destroy the main contract. (correct)
What was the main finding in the case of Tan Chong and Sons Motor Co v Alan McKnight regarding warranties?
What was the main finding in the case of Tan Chong and Sons Motor Co v Alan McKnight regarding warranties?
- Printed conditions must always take precedence over oral statements.
- The case determined that no warranties can be implied in any sales agreement.
- Salesman representations can be overridden by signed agreements.
- Oral statements made by salesmen can have overriding effect despite written clauses denying warranties. (correct)
Which scenario illustrates the application of an exception to the parol evidence rule?
Which scenario illustrates the application of an exception to the parol evidence rule?
- A party claims that an oral collateral warranty allows for the return of unsuitable goods. (correct)
- A written contract is unsigned but contains no clauses indicating any agreements.
- A party relies on an oral agreement made after signing a written contract.
- A party attempts to invalidate a written contract using previous written negotiation records.
What was the key issue in the case of D returning excavators to P after claiming they were unsuitable?
What was the key issue in the case of D returning excavators to P after claiming they were unsuitable?
What is the significance of having a warranty in a contract?
What is the significance of having a warranty in a contract?
What is the function of the doctrine of promissory estoppel?
What is the function of the doctrine of promissory estoppel?
Which condition is NOT required for promissory estoppel to be applicable?
Which condition is NOT required for promissory estoppel to be applicable?
In the context of collateral contracts, what does parol evidence allow?
In the context of collateral contracts, what does parol evidence allow?
Which of the following best describes collateral contracts?
Which of the following best describes collateral contracts?
What does the Parol Evidence Rule primarily restrict?
What does the Parol Evidence Rule primarily restrict?
Which of the following is not a condition for establishing promissory estoppel?
Which of the following is not a condition for establishing promissory estoppel?
Which aspect does NOT fall under the purview of the Parol Evidence Rule?
Which aspect does NOT fall under the purview of the Parol Evidence Rule?
How does the evidence act of 1950 relate to oral agreements?
How does the evidence act of 1950 relate to oral agreements?
What is the primary purpose of the Parol Evidence Rule?
What is the primary purpose of the Parol Evidence Rule?
Which of the following is NOT an exception to the Parol Evidence Rule?
Which of the following is NOT an exception to the Parol Evidence Rule?
Under Section 92(b) of the Evidence Act, which type of oral agreement can be admitted?
Under Section 92(b) of the Evidence Act, which type of oral agreement can be admitted?
What is a collateral contract?
What is a collateral contract?
Which of the following statements about promissory estoppel is true?
Which of the following statements about promissory estoppel is true?
Which factor can invalidate a written document according to Section 92(a)?
Which factor can invalidate a written document according to Section 92(a)?
Section 91 of the Evidence Act states that no evidence shall be given to prove the terms of a contract except for what?
Section 91 of the Evidence Act states that no evidence shall be given to prove the terms of a contract except for what?
What does the Parol Evidence Rule primarily aim to prevent?
What does the Parol Evidence Rule primarily aim to prevent?
In the context of the Parol Evidence Rule, what is meant by 'condition precedent' as per Section 92(c)?
In the context of the Parol Evidence Rule, what is meant by 'condition precedent' as per Section 92(c)?
Flashcards
Collateral Contract
Collateral Contract
A separate agreement made alongside a main contract, often to modify or add to the main contract.
Parol Evidence Rule
Parol Evidence Rule
A rule of law that says written contracts cannot be contradicted or changed by earlier spoken or written agreements.
Collateral Contract's effect on Main Contract
Collateral Contract's effect on Main Contract
A collateral contract, when valid, can modify, but not entirely destroy, the main contract, it adds to the contract but is valid only if supported by new consideration.
Oral Warranty
Oral Warranty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Overriding Effect of Collateral Contracts
Overriding Effect of Collateral Contracts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel
Promissory Estoppel
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Contractual Relationship
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Contractual Relationship
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Promise/Statement
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Promise/Statement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Reliance & Change
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Reliance & Change
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Promisor's Withdrawal
Promissory Estoppel Condition: Promisor's Withdrawal
Signup and view all the flashcards
Promissory Estoppel's Impact on Contract
Promissory Estoppel's Impact on Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
S.91 Evidence Act 1950
S.91 Evidence Act 1950
Signup and view all the flashcards
S.92 Evidence Act 1950
S.92 Evidence Act 1950
Signup and view all the flashcards
S.92(a)-(c) Exceptions
S.92(a)-(c) Exceptions
Signup and view all the flashcards
Oral Contracts
Oral Contracts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Invalidating a document
Invalidating a document
Signup and view all the flashcards
Separate Oral Agreements (S.92(b))
Separate Oral Agreements (S.92(b))
Signup and view all the flashcards
Condition Precedent (S.92(c))
Condition Precedent (S.92(c))
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Collateral Contract Overview
- A collateral contract is a separate contract made alongside a main contract.
- It's a promise made during negotiations, and if the intention to be bound is clear, it can create a contractual obligation.
- This separate contract is subsidiary to the main contract.
- It can be created in situations where one party refuses to enter the main contract unless the other party agrees to a separate promise.
Elements of a Collateral Contract
- It's an oral contract.
- It exists alongside the main contract.
- It's independent of the main contract.
- If the terms contradict, the collateral contract has precedence over the written contract, but it cannot nullify the essential elements of the main contract.
- It's an exception to the parole evidence rule.
Establishing a Collateral Contract
- The promisor (defendant) made a statement with the intention it would be relied upon.
- That statement induced the other party to enter the main contract.
- The statement is a warranty (a promise of fact).
Types of Warranties Defined
- A warranty as a collateral guarantee forms a separate legally binding promise.
- A warranty as an insignificant contract term is a promise of fact within the primary contract.
Case Examples (Illustrative)
- Kluang Wood Products Sdn Bhd & Anor v Hong Leong Finance Berhad and Anor [1999]: This case demonstrates how to establish a collateral contract.
- Tan Chong & Sons Motor Co Sdn Bhd v Alan McKnight: Highlights a situation where a statement made by a salesperson overrides the specific condition clause in the main contract.
- Tan Swee Hoe v Ali Hussain Brothers: Emphasizes the "side-by-side" existence of an oral agreement alongside a written contract. Oral agreement creates a separate collateral contract, not contradicting the written contract conditions.
- Industrial & Agricultural Distribution Sdn Bhd v Golden Sands Construction Sdn Bhd [1993]: Illustrates a case where an oral collateral warranty allowed one party to return an unsatisfactory product.
Parol Evidence Rule
- Section 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act 1950 prohibit introducing oral evidence that contradicts, adds to, or subtracts from a written contract.
- This rule protects the integrity of written agreements.
Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule
- Collateral Contract: This is a primary exception to the rule.
- Sections 92(a) - (c) of the Evidence Act 1950: Exceptions to the rule involving issues such as fraud, incapacity, or mistake.
- Promissory Estoppel: A doctrine preventing a party from going back on a promise, even if not legally binding, if the other party relied on that promise to their detriment.
Distinguishing Collateral Contracts and Promissory Estoppel
- A collateral contract establishes a separate contractual agreement alongside a main contract.
- Promissory estoppel stops a party from enforcing the main contract if the original promise is relied upon, thus preventing detriment. It doesn't create a new contract.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores the concept and elements of collateral contracts in legal negotiations. Understanding how these subsidiary agreements relate to main contracts will enhance your comprehension of contractual obligations. Test your knowledge on their establishment and legal significance.
