Podcast
Questions and Answers
What distinguishes a collateral contract from other terms of a contract?
What distinguishes a collateral contract from other terms of a contract?
- It must be written down.
- It can only be made in writing.
- It is always a condition.
- It is a separate but related contract. (correct)
Which of the following statements is NOT true regarding terms of a contract?
Which of the following statements is NOT true regarding terms of a contract?
- All representations are considered terms. (correct)
- Terms can be either express or implied.
- Terms are binding provisions.
- Implied terms are not explicitly stated.
Which factor is NOT used to distinguish between a representation and a term?
Which factor is NOT used to distinguish between a representation and a term?
- The formalities of the written contract.
- When the statement is made.
- The importance of the statement.
- The legal consequence of the statement. (correct)
Which of the following best describes implied terms in a contract?
Which of the following best describes implied terms in a contract?
Which of these terms is a type of condition in a contract?
Which of these terms is a type of condition in a contract?
What is the primary purpose of the parol evidence rule?
What is the primary purpose of the parol evidence rule?
Which of the following is true concerning conditions and warranties?
Which of the following is true concerning conditions and warranties?
Which of the following does NOT typically result from a representation made during negotiations?
Which of the following does NOT typically result from a representation made during negotiations?
How does the timing of a statement relate to its binding nature?
How does the timing of a statement relate to its binding nature?
What did the case of Bannerman v White establish regarding the importance of statements?
What did the case of Bannerman v White establish regarding the importance of statements?
In the presence of a written contract, what does the exclusion of a statement indicate?
In the presence of a written contract, what does the exclusion of a statement indicate?
When assessing the knowledge and expertise of the statement maker, what is a critical comparison?
When assessing the knowledge and expertise of the statement maker, what is a critical comparison?
In the case of Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith Motors Ltd, what was the misrepresentation about?
In the case of Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith Motors Ltd, what was the misrepresentation about?
What conclusion can be drawn when a statement is made by an expert and is received by someone with lesser knowledge?
What conclusion can be drawn when a statement is made by an expert and is received by someone with lesser knowledge?
What principle can be derived from the case of Routledge v McKay concerning unlisted components in a contract?
What principle can be derived from the case of Routledge v McKay concerning unlisted components in a contract?
How does the duration between the statement and contract influence its classification?
How does the duration between the statement and contract influence its classification?
Flashcards
Time between statement and contract
Time between statement and contract
The length of time between the statement and the contract's conclusion.
Long time gap = representation
Long time gap = representation
The longer the gap, the more likely the statement is a mere representation and not a binding term.
Short time gap = term
Short time gap = term
The shorter the gap, the more likely the statement is a term and legally binding.
Importance of the statement
Importance of the statement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Important statement = term
Important statement = term
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inclusion in written contract
Inclusion in written contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exclusion from contract = representation
Exclusion from contract = representation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Maker's knowledge and expertise
Maker's knowledge and expertise
Signup and view all the flashcards
Terms of Contracts
Terms of Contracts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Representations
Representations
Signup and view all the flashcards
Collateral Contracts
Collateral Contracts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Condition
Condition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Warranty
Warranty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Innominate Term
Innominate Term
Signup and view all the flashcards
Implied Term
Implied Term
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exemption Clauses
Exemption Clauses
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Contract Contents - Introduction
- Contract negotiations are common
- Are statements made during negotiations part of the contract?
- Yes, if they are terms (binding)
- No, if they're mere representations (not binding)
- There are collateral contracts
- Distinct, separate contracts related but not part of the main contract.
- Are oral, not written terms of the main contract
Pre-Contractual Statements
- Terms vs. Representations
- Terms are binding promises
- Collateral Contracts
- Separate contracts from the primary one, related to it but not part of it.
- Usually oral, distinct from primary contract provisions.
Classifications of Contract Terms
- Conditions
- Essential terms; breach allows termination of contract
- Warranties
- Less important promises; breach only allows claim for damages
- Innominate terms
- Importance of breach depends on the specific consequences.
Method to Distinguish Terms and Representations
- When the statement is made:
- Longer time between statement and contract - likely a representation.
- Shorter time between statement and contract - likely a term.
- Importance of the statement:
- More important statement - more likely a term.
- Inclusion in the written contract:
- If excluded from a written contract - more likely a representation
- Knowledge and Expertise of the maker:
- Maker has higher knowledge - more likely a term
- Maker has lower knowledge - more likely a representation
Case Examples
- Routledge v McKay (1954):
- Statement about car age made weeks before sale
- Considered a representation because of the time gap
- Bannerman v White (1861):
- Crucial question about sulphur use in hops
- Considered a term because it was critical to the agreement.
- Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors [1965]:
- Statement about car mileage by car dealer.
- Considered a term because the dealer should have known the correct mileage.
- Oscar Chess v Williams [1957]:
- Non-dealer selling car relying on registration book for age
- Considered a representation because of the seller's lack of specialized knowledge.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.