Podcast
Questions and Answers
Match the research topic with the correct researcher:
Match the research topic with the correct researcher:
Yasmin = Barriers to mental health support among adult migrants in the UK Alex = The impact of flexible working hours on productivity in low-paid jobs Sandra = Academic dishonesty in online learning environments Not Applicable = The impact of technology in improving agricultural yields
Match each peer feedback suggestion with the section of the investigation it best applies to:
Match each peer feedback suggestion with the section of the investigation it best applies to:
Clarify the specific consequence = Section 3.1 (Problem Analysis) Explain the mental effect of instability = Section 3.2 (Needs and Opportunities) Connect issue to employment credibility = Section 3.3 (Why This Matters) Evaluate recent policy changes = Not Applicable
Match each research element with the type of data primarily associated with it:
Match each research element with the type of data primarily associated with it:
Understanding the problem = Introduction and background data Going deeper into causes = Own primary data Supporting with examples = Case studies or existing tools Describing the study methodology = Not Applicable
Match the described element with the correct stage of the group task, according to the scenario:
Match the described element with the correct stage of the group task, according to the scenario:
Match each question with the section of investigation it belongs to:
Match each question with the section of investigation it belongs to:
Match the potential outcome of online cheating with its corresponding impact:
Match the potential outcome of online cheating with its corresponding impact:
Match the type of data with its corresponding source:
Match the type of data with its corresponding source:
Match each peer feedback suggestion to its corresponding purpose in research enhancement:
Match each peer feedback suggestion to its corresponding purpose in research enhancement:
Match each statement with the appropriate research type:
Match each statement with the appropriate research type:
Match each scenario element to its purpose in collaborative inquiry:
Match each scenario element to its purpose in collaborative inquiry:
Match the following research activities with the corresponding section in the investigation:
Match the following research activities with the corresponding section in the investigation:
Match the concept with its descriptive action:
Match the concept with its descriptive action:
Match each step of the peer review process with its appropriate action:
Match each step of the peer review process with its appropriate action:
Match each section of research paper with the correct action:
Match each section of research paper with the correct action:
Match the statement with how to handle this:
Match the statement with how to handle this:
Match the scenario role with the correct trait:
Match the scenario role with the correct trait:
Match the following research situations with how to enhance the research:
Match the following research situations with how to enhance the research:
Link the scenario to key takeaways:
Link the scenario to key takeaways:
Match the tool to its action:
Match the tool to its action:
Match the action to the right team:
Match the action to the right team:
Flashcards
Focus of Week 11 Scenario
Focus of Week 11 Scenario
Collaborative inquiry and peer review on a situation.
What is Section 3.1?
What is Section 3.1?
Breaking down the causes and explaining the impact of a problem using data.
What is Section 3.2?
What is Section 3.2?
Identifying needs and opportunities, supported by relevant examples.
What is Section 3.3?
What is Section 3.3?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Peer Feedback
Peer Feedback
Signup and view all the flashcards
Primary Data
Primary Data
Signup and view all the flashcards
Support primary research
Support primary research
Signup and view all the flashcards
Needs to Improve Focus
Needs to Improve Focus
Signup and view all the flashcards
Feedback on CIPD
Feedback on CIPD
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- The scenario focuses on collaborative inquiry and peer review within the "Investigation of the Situation" sections 3.1-3.3.
Meet the Trio
- Yasmin is from Bangladesh, is 35 years old, and researches barriers to mental health support for adult migrants in the UK
- Alex is from Eastern Europe, is 28 years old, and researches the impact of flexible working hours on productivity in low-paid jobs
- Sandra is British, is 32 years old, and researches academic dishonesty in online learning environments
Setting the Scene
- The trio meets in Week 11 to complete sections 3.1 to 3.3 with peer feedback
Phase 1: Understanding 3.1 - Problem Analysis
- Yasmin wrote that many migrants don't access mental health services due to fear of judgement and lack of cultural understanding.
- Alex suggests Yasmin be more specific about the consequences in the problem statement
- Sandra points out the need to differentiate the problem statement from the introduction
- Sandra explains the introduction states the problem and its importance, while section 3.1 should explore the causes and provide data
- Peers should clarify the specific consequence and sharpen the problem statement
Phase 2: Exploring 3.2 - Needs and Opportunities
- Alex believes the need is job security and early schedule visibility, noting his app sometimes shows shifts only one day in advance
- Yasmin suggests explaining how this affects focus at work
- Sandra suggests exploring how companies address the issue, using case studies or tools
- Alex recalls reading about it in CIPD
- Peers should explain the mental effect of instability and add examples from existing company practice
Phase 3: Clarifying 3.3 - Why This Matters
- Sandra believes online cheating breaks trust between students, teachers, and the value of degrees
- Yasmin suggests this could affect employer trust in qualifications
- Alex suggests also considering if it's a rising trend or rare
- Sandra found a report indicating a rise in plagiarism since the pandemic
- Peers should connect the issue to employment credibility and indicate if the issue is increasing
Bonus Clarification: What Kind of Data Do I Need?
- Alex asks if a few survey responses are sufficient
- Sandra says primary data is expected, even from a few people, to show engagement with real experiences linked to the topic
- Yasmin notes that interviews and an NHS report count as data
- Sandra states that primary research can be supported with secondary sources, ensuring the findings answer the inquiry question
Steps for Group Task
- Step 1: Each person answers a section on a worksheet
- Step 2: Read answers out loud and provide feedback
- Peers note one thing that could be improved and one thing that was clear/well done and add it to a peer feedback box
- Step 3: As a group reflect and discuss one thing learned from peers and one way to improve Section 3 and complete the Group Reflection Box
Key Takeaways:
- 3.1: Requires going deeper than the intro, breaking down causes, and using data to explain the impact
- 3.2: Requires addressing what is needed and what could change, supported by examples
- 3.3: Requires explaining why the issue matters in the real world
- Using own data is acceptable even on a small scale
- Peer review can help rethink and improve ideas with confidence
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
