7) Attention II
42 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What percentage of Group A noticed their own name?

  • 65%
  • 20% (correct)
  • 40%
  • 10%
  • Which group was more likely to notice their name according to the own-name effect?

  • Participants with no working memory capacity
  • Participants with average working memory capacity
  • Participants with low working memory capacity (correct)
  • Participants with high working memory capacity
  • In the channel switching experiment, what was the primary reason participants repeated information from the unshadowed ear?

  • The message was more interesting
  • They were instructed to do so
  • They heard their own name
  • They became confused by the sudden incoherence (correct)
  • Why is it important to replicate research findings?

    <p>To ensure the original findings were accurate and reliable</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a possible effect of low working memory capacity on attention?

    <p>More frequent attention slips to irrelevant channels</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the outcome when the prime and target are the same in the same location?

    <p>Reaction times are faster.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion was drawn about identification without attention from the actual results?

    <p>Identification is impossible without attention.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Kouider et al. (2014) demonstrate about participants during sleep?

    <p>Participants prepared responses to new words indicating they understood their meaning.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Lavie's 1995 study suggest about the concepts of late and early selection?

    <p>Early and late selection processes can work together.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary design framework used in the discussed study?

    <p>2x2 design.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary assertion made about identification and attention?

    <p>Attention is necessary for identification.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did researchers traditionally believe about the irrelevant channel in early selection models?

    <p>It is never attended during tasks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What phenomenon was observed when participants reported words from the irrelevant ear?

    <p>Evidence of channel switching.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What evidence contradicts Early Selection theories according to the discussed findings?

    <p>Involuntary attention to stimuli was not controlled.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'own-name effect' refer to in the context of attention?

    <p>Involuntary attention to one's own name in an unattended channel.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which factor did Lachter et al. argue to be unaccounted for in previous experiments?

    <p>Slippage of attention between channels.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the implication of the instruction given to participants regarding the irrelevant and relevant channels?

    <p>Processing can occur in the irrelevant channel despite the instruction.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How do early selection theories conceptualize the analysis of meaning in stimuli?

    <p>Attention is essential for analyzing meaning.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do early selection theories assume about unattended stimuli?

    <p>They are attenuated and some information leaks through.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which concept illustrates how attentional resources may not always be focused on the relevant channel?

    <p>Slippage</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the metaphor of 'spillover' refer to in the context of attentional resources?

    <p>The depletion of attentional resources leading to less focus.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which theory has renewed interest due to its implications for understanding attentional processes?

    <p>Load theory of attention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does 'leakage' in attentional filtering refer to?

    <p>Irrelevant information is partially processed and identified.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the relationship between 'slippage' and attentional focus?

    <p>Slippage suggests a failure to consistently focus on the intended stimuli.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does perceptual load theory relate to attention in cognitive psychology?

    <p>It posits that attentional resources are influenced by the demands of the task.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What key difference exists between Lachter's early selection theory and load theory?

    <p>Load theory considers resource allocation based on perceptual load.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main finding of Dawson & Schell's 1982 study regarding skin conductance changes?

    <p>Skin conductance changes were found in subjects who sometimes attended to the irrelevant channel.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Lachter et al.'s hypothesis regarding identification without attention?

    <p>If slippage is excluded, there will be no identification without attention.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did Lachter et al. demonstrate that shifts of attention require time?

    <p>By presenting irrelevant stimuli in different locations very briefly.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In repetition priming, what effect does seeing a prime word have on responding to a target word?

    <p>It activates the concept in memory, making target identification easier.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the unique aspect of Lachter et al.'s presentation of the prime in their repetition priming experiment?

    <p>The prime was presented in a different location from the target.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the duration for which the prime and target stimuli were presented in Lachter et al.'s study?

    <p>55 milliseconds</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion can be drawn about attentional focus from the findings of Dawson & Schell's study?

    <p>Attentional resources can become divided even with attempts at focus.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does repetition priming influence the perception of pseudo-words?

    <p>It allows participants to mistakenly classify pseudo-words as real words.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the spillover effect indicate in perceptual processing?

    <p>Processing relevant stimuli can engage all available resources.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Lavie & Cox (1997), what was observed during high perceptual load trials?

    <p>There was no compatibility effect observed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Lavie's argument differ from late selection theory?

    <p>It maintains that perceptual processing is capacity limited.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens during low perceptual load trials according to Lavie & Cox?

    <p>Attentional resources spill over to the flanking letters.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'compatibility effect' refer to in Lavie & Cox's study?

    <p>When the target letter and the flanking letter match.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What main assumption is tested in Lavie's capacity limitations theory?

    <p>Only relevant stimuli can be identified under full resource consumption.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements reflects the nature of Lavie's hybrid theory?

    <p>It is predominantly an early selection theory.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lavie (1995), how does the processing of relevant stimuli affect irrelevant stimuli?

    <p>Processing relevant stimuli can prevent identification of irrelevant stimuli.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Cognitive Psychology 1: Attention II - Early and Late Selection

    • Early selection theories propose unattended stimuli are not identified.
    • Late selection theories assume unattended stimuli are identified and their meaning analyzed.
    • Evidence currently supports early selection.
    • However, sometimes, stimuli from the irrelevant channel are still identified.

    Reminder: Irrelevant vs. Relevant Channel

    • Irrelevant inputs (e.g., "The horses galloped across the field...") are processed differently from relevant inputs (e.g., "President Lincoln often read by the light of the fire...").
    • The distinction is based on instructions.

    Today's Learning Objectives

    • Compare leakage, slippage, and spillover in early selection.
    • Understand the renewed interest in early selection experiments.
    • Explain how perceptual load affects attention.
    • Evaluate differences between Lachter's early selection theory and load theory.

    Leakage

    • Treisman (1960, 1964) proposed that filters attenuate but don't block information from the irrelevant channel.
    • Information from the irrelevant channel can "leak" through the filter.
    • Attenuated information can activate long-term memory, leading to stimulus identification.

    Slippage and Spillover - Demonstration

    • Water represents attentional resources.
    • A small container represents the relevant channel.
    • A large container represents the irrelevant channel.
    • The goal is to precisely pour water into the small container.

    Slippage - Demonstration

    • A demonstration of how attention can slip to the irrelevant channel, due to the inability to precisely focus it.

    Slippage

    • Metaphorically, one cannot precisely control attention all the time to ensure that it is not directed to the irrelevant channel.
    • If attention isn't properly focused, it may slip to the irrelevant channel.

    Spillover - Demonstration

    • Demonstration of how excess attention may "spill over" to the irrelevant channel when the relevant channel is less demanding.

    Spillover

    • Attention cannot be completely confined to an intended source, and can spill over to other, irrelevant aspects of a task.
    • If a task demands less attention than available, attention "spills over" to the irrelevant channels.

    Slippage

    • Lachter et al. (2004) argued that researchers have mistakenly assumed identification can occur without attention.
    • They suggest reinterpretation of old experiments and design of new experiments to correctly understand the role of attention in identification.

    Reminder: Early Selection

    • Early selection theories assume no identification without attention.
    • Meaning is analysed only with attention.
    • Identification in the irrelevant channel implies prior attention.

    Reinterpreting Evidence from Last Lecture

    • Participants report words from the irrelevant ear when message switches to that ear (channel switching).
    • Evidence for own-name effect on unattended channel perception.
    • Studies observed skin conductance changes when words associated with electric shocks were in the unattended channel.
    • These findings seem to contradict early selection.
    • Lachter argued prior studies didn't control for slippage or involuntary attention.

    Irrelevant vs. Relevant Channel

    • The irrelevant channel is only irrelevant based on instructions.
    • It's been assumed this channel isn't attended, but people may sometimes attend to it.

    Own-Name Effect and Working Memory Capacity

    • Conway et al. (2001) tested high and low working memory capacity (WMC) groups.
    • Individuals with low WMC were more likely to notice their name in the irrelevant channel than those with high WMC.
    • The own-name effect is real but reflects an attentional problem.

    Channel Switching

    • Repetition of the channel switching experiment shows how information from the unshadowed ear can be processed.
    • One possible reason for this is semantic ambiguity, requiring shifts in attention for resolution.

    Replication Studies

    • A researcher attempts to replicate previous results in a replication study (often with minor changes).
    • Replication is critical to validating research findings but often unsuccessful.
    • Nosek et al. (2015) discussed the reproducibility of psychological science.

    Replicating Electric Shock Conditioning Study

    • Dawson & Schell (1982) attempted to replicate previous research showing skin conductance changes with unattended stimuli but mostly found they did not occur.
    • This suggested that prior results may have overstated the influence of unattended stimuli on responses.

    Lachter et al.

    • Lachter et al. hypothesized that no identification occurs without attention, excluding slippage.
    • Used visual stimuli, briefly presented stimuli in different locations, to exclude slippage due to time.

    The Task: Repetition Priming

    • Priming experiments involve presenting a prime word briefly before a target word (or pseudo-word).
    • If the prime is the same, processing of the target word is faster.

    How Does Repetition Priming Work?

    • Seeing the prime activates the corresponding concept in memory, facilitating the processing of the target word.

    Repetition Priming in Different Locations

    • Lachter et al. presented the prime in a different location from the target, differing from traditional methods.
    • This helped control for shifts in attention.

    Lachter et al. – Results for Same Location

    • Reaction times were faster when the prime and target matched in location.
    • Inconsistent results with location show that the change of location is relevant for reaction times.

    Lachter et al.

    • The theoretical conclusion supports that attention is necessary for identification in non-attended channels.

    Was Broadbent Correct...?

    • Kouider et al (2014) showed that participants can respond to unattended words during sleep, suggesting word processing outside of conscious awareness—in line with some previous results.

    Spillover

    • Lavie's research combined assumptions of late and early selection theory.
    • Lavie argued that perceptual processing is capacity-limited.

    Lavie (1995) - Spillover

    • Identification of irrelevant stimuli only occurs if processing of relevant stimuli doesn't exhaust resources.

    Lavie (1995) - Capacity Limitations

    • Processing relevant stimuli consumes resources, leaving none for irrelevant stimuli.

    Lavie & Cox (1997)

    • Task: detect a target letter among distractors, testing for compatibility effects.
    • Compatible vs. incompatible trials: target and flanker are either identical or different.

    Lavie & Cox (1997) – manipulating perceptual load

    • Two conditions: low and high perceptual load.
    • In low perceptual load, the target was immediately visible.
    • In high perceptual load, the target was harder to find.

    Lavie & Cox (1997)

    • Hypothesis: compatibility effect exists for low perceptual load but not high perceptual load.

    Lavie & Cox (1997)

    • Low perceptual load: large compatibility effect, suggesting identification of the irrelevant flanker.
    • High perceptual load: small compatibility effect, suggesting minimal identification of the irrelevant flanker.

    Lachter vs. Lavie

    • Both Lachter and Lavie support early selection theory.
    • Lachter: attention focused, no slippage/irrelevant processing is avoidable,
    • Lavie: perceptual capacity limited; irrelevant processing unavoidable (even under low perceptual load).

    Thank you

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the intricacies of cognitive psychology through this quiz, focusing on key concepts like the own-name effect, attention, and memory capacity. Test your understanding of foundational studies and their implications in real-world scenarios.

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser