Podcast
Questions and Answers
What fundamental right can Mr. Z cite to challenge the passport seizure?
What fundamental right can Mr. Z cite to challenge the passport seizure?
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding fundamental rights to movement and residence?
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding fundamental rights to movement and residence?
What is the status of Mr. A's marriage to Ms. C in relation to his marriage to Ms. B?
What is the status of Mr. A's marriage to Ms. C in relation to his marriage to Ms. B?
Which statement about reasonable restrictions on fundamental rights is true?
Which statement about reasonable restrictions on fundamental rights is true?
Signup and view all the answers
If Mr. A claims he has the right to marry Ms. C under religion 'X', which factor might complicate his case?
If Mr. A claims he has the right to marry Ms. C under religion 'X', which factor might complicate his case?
Signup and view all the answers
In what circumstance can a citizen challenge a law that imposes restrictions on fundamental rights?
In what circumstance can a citizen challenge a law that imposes restrictions on fundamental rights?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the outcome for Mr. A if Ms. B files a bigamy complaint?
What is the outcome for Mr. A if Ms. B files a bigamy complaint?
Signup and view all the answers
Which can be inferred about fundamental rights regarding residence?
Which can be inferred about fundamental rights regarding residence?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
CLAT 2022 Questions
-
Question 79: Mr. Z, an Indian citizen, had his passport seized by the Indian government. He can challenge the seizure based on his fundamental right to free movement and reside in India.
-
Question 80: Fundamental rights to movement and residence in India are protected, but subject to reasonable restrictions. The validity of laws imposing these restrictions can be challenged in court.
-
Question 81: Mr. A, a Hindu, married Ms. B, and later converted to a religion allowing polygamy (multiple wives). His subsequent marriage to Ms. C did not invalidate his marriage to Ms. B under Hindu law.
-
Question 82: The same facts as question 81. Ms. B's complaint of bigamy against Mr. A is not valid. His later marriage (to Ms. C) under a different religion does not affect his initial Hindu marriage.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
This quiz covers key questions from the CLAT 2022 exam related to fundamental rights and personal laws in India. It examines issues of free movement, residence, and the implications of conversions on marriage under Hindu law. Test your knowledge on these legal principles and their real-world applications.