Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to Proposition 1, when can state intervention increase efficiency?
According to Proposition 1, when can state intervention increase efficiency?
- When the market is perfectly efficient
- When all first-best assumptions hold true
- When one or more first-best assumptions fail (correct)
- When social justice is prioritized
Proposition 2 states that if no justification exists, the interests of social justice are best served by:
Proposition 2 states that if no justification exists, the interests of social justice are best served by:
- Cash transfers (correct)
- Market competition
- Public production and allocation
- State intervention
How can social justice be improved according to the text?
How can social justice be improved according to the text?
- Through market deregulation
- By reducing government spending
- Through cash transfers (correct)
- By increasing corporate profits
Which concept justifies state intervention other than cash redistribution according to Proposition 2?
Which concept justifies state intervention other than cash redistribution according to Proposition 2?
How can state intervention improve efficiency when first-best assumptions fail?
How can state intervention improve efficiency when first-best assumptions fail?
What does Proposition 1 suggest may lead to an increase in efficiency?
What does Proposition 1 suggest may lead to an increase in efficiency?
In what scenario does Proposition 2 recommend in-kind transfers for improving social justice?
In what scenario does Proposition 2 recommend in-kind transfers for improving social justice?
Which type of arguments are required to justify state intervention other than cash redistribution?
Which type of arguments are required to justify state intervention other than cash redistribution?