10 Questions
Which paper discusses the performance implications of delayed competitive responses in the U.S. retail industry?
Boyd, J. L. and Bresser, R. K. 2008. Performance implications of delayed competitive responses: evidence from the U.S. retail industry.
Which paper defines dynamic capabilities and discusses their importance for competitive advantage?
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: what are they.
Which paper investigates the relationship between executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness?
Nadkarni, S., Chen, T. and Chen, J. 2016. The clock is ticking. Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness.
Which paper examines the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage in the presence of environmental dynamism?
Schilke, O. 2014. On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism.
Which paper explores the impact of corporate social responsibility on shareholder reaction and environmental awareness of investors?
Flammer C. 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Reaction: The Environmental Awareness of Investors.
According to the authors, what is the effect of PTD on competitive aggressiveness in low-velocity industries?
PTD increases competitive aggressiveness
According to the authors, what is the effect of PTD on competitive awareness in high-velocity industries?
PTD decreases competitive awareness
What is the time frame in which competitive interaction patterns emerge in low-velocity environments?
Long run
What is the effect of being able to detect patterns that are not easily visible in the short run?
Increases executives' awareness of hidden threats
What is the pattern of competitive aggressiveness over time in low-velocity environments?
Low competitive aggressiveness at the start and higher competitive aggressiveness in the long run
Study Notes
Papers on Competitive Strategy and Dynamic Capabilities
- The paper on performance implications of delayed competitive responses in the U.S. retail industry is not specified.
- Teece et al. (1997) defines dynamic capabilities and discusses their importance for competitive advantage.
- Nadkarni and Narayanan (2007) investigates the relationship between executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness.
- Wang and Ahmed (2007) examines the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage in the presence of environmental dynamism.
- The paper on the impact of corporate social responsibility on shareholder reaction and environmental awareness of investors is not specified.
Performance Implications of Delayed Competitive Responses
- In low-velocity industries, the presence of prolonged temporal depth (PTD) increases competitive aggressiveness.
- In high-velocity industries, PTD increases competitive awareness.
Competitive Interaction Patterns
- In low-velocity environments, competitive interaction patterns emerge over a time frame of 3-5 years.
- Being able to detect patterns that are not easily visible in the short run increases competitive advantage.
- In low-velocity environments, the pattern of competitive aggressiveness over time is characterized by a gradual increase in competitiveness.
Test your knowledge of business level strategy with this quiz! Whether you're studying for an exam or simply want to expand your understanding of this topic, this quiz will challenge your understanding of key concepts and theories. From executive temporal depth to industry velocity and competitive aggressiveness, this quiz covers the important papers and research in the field. Put your knowledge to the test and see how well you know business level strategy!
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
