Questions and Answers
In Berkemer v. McCarty, did the Supreme Court rule that Miranda applied to the incriminating statements made during the traffic stop?
False
What was Berkemer's argument in Berkemer v. McCarty?
That the Supreme Court should create an exception to Miranda for misdemeanor offenses.
What prompted the Ohio State Highway Patrol to pull over McCarty?
He was weaving back and forth on the freeway.
Which level of offense was McCarty charged with?
Signup and view all the answers
How did the Franklin County Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Ohio rule regarding Miranda?
Signup and view all the answers
What did the trial court do regarding McCarty's motion to exclude incriminating statements?
Signup and view all the answers
When McCarty was pulled over, did he pass the field sobriety test?
Signup and view all the answers
Did the Supreme Court rule that Miranda applied to the incriminating statements made at the station house?
Signup and view all the answers
How did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rule regarding the decisions of the Ohio State Courts?
Signup and view all the answers
Which court's ruling is being reviewed in Berkemer v. McCarty?
Signup and view all the answers
What did McCarty respond when asked if he had used intoxicants?
Signup and view all the answers
Was there a dissent in this case?
Signup and view all the answers
Justice Stevens felt __________ regarding the court's focus in the case.
Signup and view all the answers
Did the police officers read McCarty his Miranda rights at the scene of the traffic stop?
Signup and view all the answers
Which court authored the opinion in Berkemer v. McCarty?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Case Overview
- Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984) addresses the applicability of Miranda rights during traffic stops.
- The Supreme Court ruled Miranda does not apply to statements made during a traffic stop since McCarty was not in custody.
Arguments and Charges
- Berkemer's primary argument centered on creating an exception to Miranda for misdemeanor offenses.
- McCarty faced charges classified as a misdemeanor after being pulled over.
Incident Details
- McCarty was stopped by the Ohio State Highway Patrol for weaving back and forth on the freeway.
- Upon being questioned, McCarty admitted to consuming two beers and smoking multiple marijuana joints.
Court Rulings
- Both the Franklin County Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that Miranda rights did not apply to misdemeanors.
- A motion by McCarty to exclude his incriminating statements was denied by the trial court.
Supreme Court Decisions
- The Supreme Court affirmed that Miranda applies to statements made during custodial interrogations at the station house.
- The ruling was reviewed from the perspective of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had reversed the judgments of the Ohio courts.
Field Test Results
- McCarty failed the field sobriety test, which contributed to the subsequent questioning.
Additional Context
- There was no dissent among the justices in this case.
- Justice Stevens expressed a concurring opinion, emphasizing the need for judicial restraint and advocating that the court should have limited its focus to the petitioner's specific question.
- At the scene of the traffic stop, Miranda rights were not read to McCarty.
Court Authoring Body
- The opinion for this case was drafted by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your knowledge on the Supreme Court case Berkemer v. McCarty. This quiz covers the applicability of Miranda rights during traffic stops, focusing on the arguments, incident details, and court rulings involved. Understand the implications of this case on misdemeanor offenses and custodial interrogations.
