Behavioural Approach in Political Science
18 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was a key argument made by David Easton regarding the direction of political science?

  • It should remain focused on constitutional descriptions.
  • It should transition to systematic, data-driven research. (correct)
  • It should prioritize ethical considerations over empirical evidence.
  • It should emphasize legalistic methods over qualitative ones.
  • How did behaviouralism impact research methods in political science?

  • It eliminated qualitative research entirely.
  • It prompted the adoption of statistical and quantitative methods. (correct)
  • It encouraged the use of only traditional surveys.
  • It discouraged the use of interdisciplinary approaches.
  • What aspect of behaviourism distinguishes it from earlier approaches to political science?

  • A focus on political theory.
  • A reliance on normative evaluations.
  • An emphasis on empirical and observable data. (correct)
  • An emphasis on descriptive analysis.
  • Which discipline did behaviouralists NOT typically borrow insights from?

    <p>Literature (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was one of the main outcomes of the shift towards behaviouralism in political science?

    <p>Enhanced standards for data collection and analysis. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following characteristics is associated with the behavioural approach in political science?

    <p>Use of hypothesis testing and survey data. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a major criticism directed at behaviouralism?

    <p>It ignored the importance of moral philosophy. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a primary focus of behaviouralism in political science?

    <p>Observable behavior and empirical evidence (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary focus of behavioralism in political science?

    <p>Public opinion and electoral studies (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following scholars is NOT associated with the behavioral approach in political science?

    <p>Leo Strauss (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of theories did behavioralists seek to build?

    <p>Middle-range theories based on empirical evidence (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect of political science did behavioralism shift its focus towards?

    <p>Interplay between institutions and individual/group behavior (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which criticism of behavioralism highlights the risk of overlooking historical and cultural factors?

    <p>Methodological reductionism (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following fields became prominent due to the influence of behavioralism?

    <p>Voting behavior (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did scholars like Theodore Lowi argue about the focus of behavioralism?

    <p>It undermined normative critiques of power structures. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did behavioralism contribute to the professionalization of political science?

    <p>By promoting quantitative analysis and research design education (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which topic became prominent due to the behavioral approach, reflecting its emphasis on human behavior?

    <p>Attitude formation (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What notion did followers of behavioralism strive for regarding political research?

    <p>A balance between empirical data and ethical considerations (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Behavioural Approach in Political Science

    • Behavioural political science significantly altered the mid-20th century political science landscape, a paradigm shift with both supporters and critics.
    • Key reasons for its influence: innovative methodology, challenge to traditional approaches, focus on empirical data, and its enduring impact on how political phenomena are studied.

    Shift Towards Empiricism and Scientific Rigor

    • Empirical Focus: Political Science should focus on observable behaviours, rather than abstract philosophical or normative ideas. Researchers like David Easton advocated moving beyond constitutional description and normative theories to data-driven research.
    • Quantitative Methods: Adoption of statistical and quantitative methods in political research. This contrasted with earlier descriptive or legalistic approaches, focused on measurable behavioural patterns (e.g., political actors' behavior). Heinz Eulau highlighted this in his work.
    • Interdisciplinary Perspective: Drawing from psychology, economics, and sociology to support empirical, observable data over normative/institutional analysis.

    Methodological Innovations and Systematic Inquiry

    • Systematic Data Collection: Rigorous data collection methods were introduced, including large-scale surveys, public opinion research, voting behavior analysis, and the use of computers for statistical processing. Robert Dahl exemplified this emphasis on public opinion and electoral studies.
    • Theory-Building and Hypothesis Testing: Building middle-range theories based on empirical evidence, seeking generalizable propositions about political behavior, and drawing closer to natural science standards.
    • New Research Questions: Expanding the scope of political science by focusing on behaviour rather than legal frameworks, studying topics like political culture, attitude formation, leadership styles, and group behaviour. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba’s work on political culture and democratic stability highlighted this.

    Transformation of the Discipline

    • Normative to Analytical: Political science shifted from focused on political theory, constitutional law, and comparative constitutions to a more 'scientific' or 'value-free' research model, inspiring debates about values in political science.
    • Institutional Reorientation: A shift from studying formal political structures to the impact of institutions on individual/group behaviour.
    • Professionalization of Political Science: Specialized training in research design, quantitative methods, and statistical analysis emerged. This led to university departments increasing their methods requirements.

    Criticisms and Limitations

    • Neglect of Normative Questions: Critics argued that behaviouralism ignored normative and philosophical questions about justice, power, and politics, focusing instead on empirical descriptions. Sheldon Wolin and Leo Strauss represent these viewpoints.
    • Methodological Reductionism: Critics argued that overly focusing on measurable variables ignored historical, cultural, and institutional nuances. Positivistic tendencies were also questioned.
    • Overemphasis on 'Value-Free' Research: The idea that pure description could legitimize existing power structures was raised. This led to new approaches emphasizing normative and interpretive dimensions. Theodore Lowi's work is a relevant example.

    Lasting Influence

    • Behaviouralism's legacy is undeniable.
    • Contemporary subfields (voting behavior, political psychology, quantitative policy analysis) are rooted in these methodological shifts.
    • Even critics acknowledge that both empirical and philosophical understanding remain crucial in contemporary political science.
    • Mixed methods (combining quantitative and qualitative approaches) are common, reflecting the discipline's acknowledgment of the need for both types of insights.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the transformative impact of the behavioural approach in political science during the mid-20th century. This quiz covers the shift towards empirical research, the adoption of quantitative methods, and the influence of key figures like David Easton and Heinz Eulau. Test your understanding of how this paradigm has shaped modern political studies.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser