Recent Lessons

Show all results for ""

Feature Overview

Ace your exams with our all-in-one platform for creating and sharing quizzes and tests.

Quizzes

Create quizzes and tests automatically from your content using AI.

Flashcards

Automatically turn your notes into digital flashcards.

Share, Export & Embed

Share with classmates or export to Excel and your learning management system.

Stats & Reporting

Auto-grading quizzes and tests with detailed stats and reports.

Mobile Apps

The smarter way to study – wherever you are.

Pricing

Search...

15 Questions

1 Views

First Nation Land P2

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz

Study Flashcards

Spaced Repetition

Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the significance of the Milurpum V Nabalco case in Australian law?

It was the first time the Australian court asserted Aboriginal ownership.

What did the Aboriginals argue in the Milurpum V Nabalco case?

They asserted that the land was not terra nullius, but instead, it was their communal native title.

What was the outcome of the Mabo v Queensland case?

The court rejected the concept of 'Terra Nulius' and acknowledged Native title and ancestral rights.

What is the debate over ownership of land in the context of Australian history?

It is the debate between the Native people's rights and the Colonials' takeover of their land. Signup and view all the answers

What did the Crown have, but did not eradicate, according to the Mabo v Queensland case?

Sovereign power, but not the traditional ownership of the Native people. Signup and view all the answers

What was the basis of the Aboriginals' court action in the Milurpum V Nabalco case?

Asserting land was not terra nullius, but rather communal native title. Signup and view all the answers

What concept was rejected in the Mabo v Queensland case?

The concept of 'Terra Nulius'. Signup and view all the answers

What was the significance of the Mabo v Queensland case in terms of ownership?

The Crown had sovereign ownership, but did not eradicate traditional Native ownership. Signup and view all the answers

What was the main point of contention in the debate over land ownership in Australian history?

Whether the land belonged to the Native people or the Colonials. Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the Aboriginals' court action in the Milurpum V Nabalco case?

The court ruled in favor of Nabalco, asserting terra nullius. Signup and view all the answers

What did the Aboriginals assert in the Milurpum V Nabalco case?

That the land was not terra nullius, but rather belonged to them. Signup and view all the answers

What was the main issue of contention between the Native people and the Colonials in the debate over land ownership?

The fairness of taking First Nation land. Signup and view all the answers

What rights were acknowledged in the Mabo v Queensland case?

Native title and ancestral rights. Signup and view all the answers

What did the Court rule in the Milurpum V Nabalco case?

That the land was terra nullius. Signup and view all the answers

What was the significance of the Mabo v Queensland case in terms of the concept of ownership?

It rejected the concept of terra nullius and recognized the sovereign rights of the Crown, but did not eradicate the traditional ownership of the Native people. Signup and view all the answers