Podcast
Questions and Answers
Given a portfolio (x) composed of assets (A), (B), and (C), and assuming a Certainty Equivalent Return (CER) model, which of the following statements about the portfolio return (R_{p,x}) is most accurate, considering the implications of matrix algebra?
Given a portfolio (x) composed of assets (A), (B), and (C), and assuming a Certainty Equivalent Return (CER) model, which of the following statements about the portfolio return (R_{p,x}) is most accurate, considering the implications of matrix algebra?
- \(R_{p,x}\) is a random variable with a mean equal to the weighted sum of individual asset expected returns, and variance derived from the covariance matrix. (correct)
- \(R_{p,x}\) is a scalar value representing the weighted average of individual asset returns, directly calculable without matrix operations.
- \(R_{p,x}\) represents a vector of returns unique to each asset, requiring decomposition via eigenvalue analysis to determine its statistical properties.
- \(R_{p,x}\) is derived from a sample of returns and the weights, which follows strictly non-normal distribution due to asset correlations, contradicting the initial CER model.
In matrix algebra representation of portfolio optimization, if (x) is a vector of portfolio weights, and (\mathbf{1}) is a conformable vector of ones, the constraint (x'\mathbf{1} = 1) ensures that short selling is strictly prohibited, and all portfolio weights must be non-negative and sum to one.
In matrix algebra representation of portfolio optimization, if (x) is a vector of portfolio weights, and (\mathbf{1}) is a conformable vector of ones, the constraint (x'\mathbf{1} = 1) ensures that short selling is strictly prohibited, and all portfolio weights must be non-negative and sum to one.
False (B)
Formulate the Lagrangian for determining the global minimum variance portfolio (m), given the covariance matrix (\Sigma), and the constraint that the portfolio weights sum to one. Explicitly denote all terms, including the Lagrangian multiplier.
Formulate the Lagrangian for determining the global minimum variance portfolio (m), given the covariance matrix (\Sigma), and the constraint that the portfolio weights sum to one. Explicitly denote all terms, including the Lagrangian multiplier.
(L(m, \lambda) = m'\Sigma m + \lambda(m'\mathbf{1} - 1))
In the context of mean-variance portfolio optimization, the efficient frontier represents a set of portfolios that offer the ________ expected return for a given level of ________, or conversely, the ________ level of risk for a given expected return.
In the context of mean-variance portfolio optimization, the efficient frontier represents a set of portfolios that offer the ________ expected return for a given level of ________, or conversely, the ________ level of risk for a given expected return.
Match the following matrix algebra expressions with their corresponding portfolio optimization interpretations:
Match the following matrix algebra expressions with their corresponding portfolio optimization interpretations:
Given the alternative derivation of the global minimum variance portfolio, where (m = -\frac{1}{2}\lambda\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf{1}) and (\lambda) is a Lagrange multiplier enforcing (\mathbf{1}'m = 1), deduce the most accurate implication regarding the relationship between the portfolio weights and the inverse of the covariance matrix.
Given the alternative derivation of the global minimum variance portfolio, where (m = -\frac{1}{2}\lambda\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf{1}) and (\lambda) is a Lagrange multiplier enforcing (\mathbf{1}'m = 1), deduce the most accurate implication regarding the relationship between the portfolio weights and the inverse of the covariance matrix.
In the context of Markowitz's efficient frontier, the problem of finding a portfolio (x) that minimizes portfolio variance (\sigma_{p,x}^2) subject to achieving a target expected return (\mu_{p}^0) and the budget constraint can always be solved analytically, irrespective of the number of assets or the structure of the covariance matrix.
In the context of Markowitz's efficient frontier, the problem of finding a portfolio (x) that minimizes portfolio variance (\sigma_{p,x}^2) subject to achieving a target expected return (\mu_{p}^0) and the budget constraint can always be solved analytically, irrespective of the number of assets or the structure of the covariance matrix.
Describe the process for composing efficient portfolios as convex combinations of two frontier portfolios, (x) and (y), detailing how the resulting portfolio (z) is formulated through the allocation parameter (\alpha).
Describe the process for composing efficient portfolios as convex combinations of two frontier portfolios, (x) and (y), detailing how the resulting portfolio (z) is formulated through the allocation parameter (\alpha).
In computing the tangency portfolio, the objective is to maximize the ________ ratio, which represents the excess expected return per unit of ________.
In computing the tangency portfolio, the objective is to maximize the ________ ratio, which represents the excess expected return per unit of ________.
Match the following concepts with their corresponding mathematical representation in portfolio optimization:
Match the following concepts with their corresponding mathematical representation in portfolio optimization:
Given a scenario where the first-order conditions for the tangency portfolio are being solved via Lagrangian methods, and assuming the Lagrangian multiplier (\lambda) has been determined, what inferential step is most critical for completing the determination of the tangency portfolio composition, assuming a risk-free rate (r_f)?
Given a scenario where the first-order conditions for the tangency portfolio are being solved via Lagrangian methods, and assuming the Lagrangian multiplier (\lambda) has been determined, what inferential step is most critical for completing the determination of the tangency portfolio composition, assuming a risk-free rate (r_f)?
If assets (A), (B), and (C) are perfectly positively correlated, then any portfolio constructed from these assets will always lie on the efficient frontier, regardless of the weights assigned to each asset.
If assets (A), (B), and (C) are perfectly positively correlated, then any portfolio constructed from these assets will always lie on the efficient frontier, regardless of the weights assigned to each asset.
Suppose you are given two frontier portfolios, (x) and (y), with known expected returns and variances. Explain how one would compute the expected return and variance of a portfolio (z) that is a convex combination of (x) and (y), highlighting the role of the covariance between (x) and (y) in determining the variance of (z).
Suppose you are given two frontier portfolios, (x) and (y), with known expected returns and variances. Explain how one would compute the expected return and variance of a portfolio (z) that is a convex combination of (x) and (y), highlighting the role of the covariance between (x) and (y) in determining the variance of (z).
The analytic solution for the global minimum variance portfolio involves solving a system of linear equations derived from the first-order conditions of the Lagrangian. If (A_m) represents the matrix containing the covariance matrix and constraint coefficients, and (z_m) represents the vector of portfolio weights and the Lagrange multiplier, then the solution can be expressed as (z_m =) ________.
The analytic solution for the global minimum variance portfolio involves solving a system of linear equations derived from the first-order conditions of the Lagrangian. If (A_m) represents the matrix containing the covariance matrix and constraint coefficients, and (z_m) represents the vector of portfolio weights and the Lagrange multiplier, then the solution can be expressed as (z_m =) ________.
Match the following matrix algebra concepts with their application in portfolio optimization when constructing efficient portfolios using the Markowitz algorithm.
Match the following matrix algebra concepts with their application in portfolio optimization when constructing efficient portfolios using the Markowitz algorithm.
In computing the tangency portfolio, what specific role does the risk-free rate play in determining the final portfolio composition, assuming the investor aims to maximize the Sharpe ratio?
In computing the tangency portfolio, what specific role does the risk-free rate play in determining the final portfolio composition, assuming the investor aims to maximize the Sharpe ratio?
Assuming that portfolio returns are normally distributed, diversifying a portfolio across a large number of uncorrelated assets will completely eliminate portfolio variance, leading to a risk-free investment.
Assuming that portfolio returns are normally distributed, diversifying a portfolio across a large number of uncorrelated assets will completely eliminate portfolio variance, leading to a risk-free investment.
For a portfolio consisting of assets (A), (B), and (C), represented by weights (x_A), (x_B), and (x_C) respectively, explain how the constraint (x_A + x_B + x_C = 1) is expressed and implemented within the matrix algebra framework of portfolio optimization.
For a portfolio consisting of assets (A), (B), and (C), represented by weights (x_A), (x_B), and (x_C) respectively, explain how the constraint (x_A + x_B + x_C = 1) is expressed and implemented within the matrix algebra framework of portfolio optimization.
In the context of portfolio optimization, the global minimum variance portfolio is characterized by the ________ possible variance among all feasible portfolios, irrespective of the ________ returns.
In the context of portfolio optimization, the global minimum variance portfolio is characterized by the ________ possible variance among all feasible portfolios, irrespective of the ________ returns.
Associate each component of the Lagrangian function for the Tangency Portfolio with its corresponding role in the portfolio optimization problem:
Associate each component of the Lagrangian function for the Tangency Portfolio with its corresponding role in the portfolio optimization problem:
Assuming that the risk-free rate is altered exogenously, deduce the implications regarding adjustments to the allocation weights within both the tangency portfolio (t) and a complete portfolio (c) that combines the tangency portfolio and the risk-free asset.
Assuming that the risk-free rate is altered exogenously, deduce the implications regarding adjustments to the allocation weights within both the tangency portfolio (t) and a complete portfolio (c) that combines the tangency portfolio and the risk-free asset.
When constructing the efficient frontier using the Markowitz model, if one asset has a demonstrably higher Sharpe ratio than all other assets, then, absent constraints on short selling, the efficient frontier will consist solely of portfolios fully invested in this single asset.
When constructing the efficient frontier using the Markowitz model, if one asset has a demonstrably higher Sharpe ratio than all other assets, then, absent constraints on short selling, the efficient frontier will consist solely of portfolios fully invested in this single asset.
Given two efficient portfolios, (x) and (y), with differing expected returns and variances, describe the rationale behind formulating a portfolio (z) as a convex combination of (x) and (y), explicitly referencing the properties of the resulting portfolio's expected return, variance, and location on the efficient frontier.
Given two efficient portfolios, (x) and (y), with differing expected returns and variances, describe the rationale behind formulating a portfolio (z) as a convex combination of (x) and (y), explicitly referencing the properties of the resulting portfolio's expected return, variance, and location on the efficient frontier.
The process of using Excel's Solver to determine optimal portfolio weights can be viewed as a ________ method, contrasting with the ________ solutions derived directly from matrix algebra.
The process of using Excel's Solver to determine optimal portfolio weights can be viewed as a ________ method, contrasting with the ________ solutions derived directly from matrix algebra.
Match each method or reference to its appropriate usage concerning portfolio construction and analysis:
Match each method or reference to its appropriate usage concerning portfolio construction and analysis:
Given a scenario where diversification across multiple assets demonstrably fails to enhance the Sharpe ratio beyond that attainable from a single asset, deduce the most plausible explanation, assuming non-restrictive short-selling constraints.
Given a scenario where diversification across multiple assets demonstrably fails to enhance the Sharpe ratio beyond that attainable from a single asset, deduce the most plausible explanation, assuming non-restrictive short-selling constraints.
In portfolio optimization, increasing the number of assets in a portfolio invariably leads to a superior Sharpe ratio, provided that transaction costs are negligible and short selling is permitted without constraints.
In portfolio optimization, increasing the number of assets in a portfolio invariably leads to a superior Sharpe ratio, provided that transaction costs are negligible and short selling is permitted without constraints.
Assuming two assets, (X) and (Y), exhibit a perfect negative correlation, delineate how an investor can construct a risk-free portfolio by determining the appropriate allocation weights, explicitly addressing the implications for hedging and risk management.
Assuming two assets, (X) and (Y), exhibit a perfect negative correlation, delineate how an investor can construct a risk-free portfolio by determining the appropriate allocation weights, explicitly addressing the implications for hedging and risk management.
The efficient portfolios from mean-variance optimisation all plot a curve called the ________ ________
The efficient portfolios from mean-variance optimisation all plot a curve called the ________ ________
Match the concept with their expression:
Match the concept with their expression:
In the three asset example where you create a portfolio (x) from Microsoft (A), Nordstrom (B) and Starbucks (C), with a return of Rp,x = xARA + xBRB + xCRC, what would happen if Nordstrom becomes highly correlated to Microsoft?
In the three asset example where you create a portfolio (x) from Microsoft (A), Nordstrom (B) and Starbucks (C), with a return of Rp,x = xARA + xBRB + xCRC, what would happen if Nordstrom becomes highly correlated to Microsoft?
Flashcards
Optimization with Matrix Algebra
Optimization with Matrix Algebra
A method using matrix operations to solve optimization problems, especially in finance for asset allocation.
Rᵢ (Return on Asset i)
Rᵢ (Return on Asset i)
Denotes the return on asset 'i' (A, B, C) following a Constant Expected Return model.
CER Model
CER Model
A simplified representation of returns, assuming returns are normally and independently distributed.
Covariance Matrix
Covariance Matrix
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Weights
Portfolio Weights
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Return (Rp,x)
Portfolio Return (Rp,x)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Variance (σ²p,x)
Portfolio Variance (σ²p,x)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Expected Return
Portfolio Expected Return
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Covariance
Portfolio Covariance
Signup and view all the flashcards
Matrix Derivatives
Matrix Derivatives
Signup and view all the flashcards
Global Minimum Variance Portfolio
Global Minimum Variance Portfolio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Minimum Variance Portfolio Weights
Minimum Variance Portfolio Weights
Signup and view all the flashcards
Efficient Frontier
Efficient Frontier
Signup and view all the flashcards
Efficient Portfolio
Efficient Portfolio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Minimum Variance for Target Return
Minimum Variance for Target Return
Signup and view all the flashcards
Portfolio Combination
Portfolio Combination
Signup and view all the flashcards
Tangency Portfolio
Tangency Portfolio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Optimization with Matrix Algebra
- Study notes for advanced asset allocation are provided.
- A three risky asset example is presented, where R_i denotes the return on asset i (A, B, C).
- Ri follows the CER model and are independent
Portfolio Math
- Portfolio "x" is a vector of asset allocations (X_a, X_b, X_c) with dimension Nx1.
- x_i represents the share of wealth in asset i.
- The sum of the wealth invested in each asset i is 1.
Portfolio Return
- The return of a portfolio is the sum of the product of the wealth invested in each asset and the return on that asset
- Rp,x = XARA + XBRB + XCRC = Σ xi Ri
Example Data
- The mean & standard deviation are provided for 3 stocks, Microsoft, Nordstrom and Starbucks.
- The co-variance between each pair of stocks is also provided.
Matrix Algebra Representation
- R is the return vector for assets A, B, and C.
- μ is the expected return vector for assets A, B, and C.
- The vector, combines the weights to sum portfolio of 1. Sigma is the covariance matrix.
- A portfolio must sum to 1: x'1 = (xA xB xC) * (1,1,1)' = x1 + x2 + x3 = 1
- This is a constraint to the equation
Portfolio Return
- Portfolio return formula: Rp,x = x'R = (xA xB xC) * (RA, RB, RC)' = XARA + XBRB + XCRC
Portfolio Expected Return
- Portfolio expected return formula: μp,x = x'μ = (xA xB xX) * (μA, μB, μC)' = xAμA + xBμB + xCμC
Portfolio Variance
- Portfolio variance formula: σ²p,x = x'∑x = (xA xB xC) * (σ²A, σAB, σAC, σAB, σ²B, σBC, σAC σBC σ²C) * (xA, xB, xC)' = x²Aσ²A + x²Bσ²B + x²Cσ²C + 2xAxBσAB + 2xAxCσAC + 2xBxCσBC
- Assuming normality, the portfolio distribution is: Rp,x ~ *(μp,x, σ²p,x)
Covariance
- Covariance between 2 portfolio returns: cov(Rp,x, Rp,y) = x'∑y = x' cov(R, R) y = y'Σx
Derivatives of Simple Matrix Functions
- The derivative of x'y with respect to x is y.
- The derivative of x'Ax with respect to x is 2Ax, where A is symmetric.
- x'y = (xA xB xC) * (yA, yB, yC)' = xAyA + xByB + xCyC
Minimum Variance Portfolio
- Find the portfolio m = (mA, mB, mC)' that solves the minimization problem: min σ²p,m = m'∑m such that m'1 = 1.
- Solve using matrix algebra.
- Solve numerically in Excel using the Solver with the "3firmExample.xls" excel provided.
Analytic Solution
-
The Lagrangian equation is: L(m, λ) = m'∑m + λ(m'1 − 1)
-
The first order conditions are:
- ∂L(m, λ)/∂m = ∂m'∑m/∂m + ∂/∂m[λ(m'1 − 1)] = 2∑m + λ1 = 0
- ∂L(m, λ)/∂λ = ∂m'∑m/∂λ + ∂/∂λ[λ(m'1 − 1)] = m'1 − 1 = 0
-
In matrix form this looks like:
- (2Σ 1, 1' 0) * (m, λ) = (0, 1)
-
Where
- A = (2Σ 1, 1' 0)
- Z = (m, λ)
- b = (0, 1)
Solving for Z
-
The linear system for the first order conditions is A_m * z_m = b
-
z_m = A_m^-1 b
-
The first three elements of z_m are the portfolio weights m = (mA, mB, mC)’ for the global minimum variance portfolio with expected return μp,m = m'μ and variance σ²p,m = m'∑m.
-
Use solver in Excel to solve 3firmExample.xls
Minimum Variance
-
Another way to do the analytic solution would be to use matrix algebra and say the following:
- ∂L(m, λ)/∂m = 2 · ∑m + λ · 1
- ∂L(m, λ) / ∂λ = m′1 – 1
-
Solving the first equation for m: 1’m = (1/2) * (λΣ^-11)
Re-arranging
- Multiply both sides to solve for lambda λ: 1 = 1'm = −(1/2) * λ1'Σ⁻¹1 -> λ = −2 1/(1'Σ⁻¹1)
- Substituting to solve for m: m = 1/2*(-2) Σ−11/(1′Σ−11)
Markowitz Algorithm
- Problem 1: Find the portfolio x such that you maximize the expected return given a level of risk as measured by portfolio variance
- max up,x = x'mu subject to, variance is equal to target risk and x'1 = 1
Portfolio Risk
- Problem 2: Find the portfolio x that has the smallest risk, measured by portfolio variance, that achieves a target expected return
- min variance = x'Sigma x such that u = target return and x'1 = 1
Portfolio frontier
- Write the langrangian function.
- Write all the first order conditions.
- Write the FOC's in matrix form.
Portfolio Frontier computing example
- Compute efficient portfolios with the same expected return as MSFT and SBUX
- μp,y = y'μ = μSBUX = .0285
Example Continued
-
Using matrix algebra equations and formulas for example, shows several use cases
μp,x = x'μ = 0.0427, μp,y = y'μ = 0.0285 σp,x = (x'∑x)1/2 = 0.09166, σp,y = (y'∑y)1/2 = 0.07355 σxy = x'∑y = 0.005914, pxy = σxy/(σp,xσp,y) = 0.8772
Theory
-
The portfolio frontier is made of combinations of any two frontier portfolios
-
The following must be noted
min_variance = x' Sigma x subject to: μp,x = x'μ = μp_0 and MUST x'1 = 1
min_variance = y'Sigma y subject to μp,y = y'μ = μp_1 is not equal to μp_0, and STARS y'1 = 1
-
Now let 'a' represent any constant
-
New portfolio equations from above z = a * x+ + 1-a *y
More Equations
- u = z^t Mu = a * u_px+ 1 *1 a μp,y
- o = z^t 2 = a o^ + (1 - a)2 ap, + 21 -1 o,
- = cov(Rp,x Rp,y) = x'S
3 Asset frontier
- Z = (Ax, Bx, Cx) Z =ax+ -(1=a)+7" (+)+(-a)+(5.7.) () =()
Find portfolio weight example
- Z=.5 (22:05) +5 (.2025).
(33)-13.31
Equation
- Equation: Find efficient portfolio with expected return from two efficient portfolios use, solve for alpha , 05= μg2=a + -(1+a) py-> 1+17=2 μpxy μy
Calculating Tangency
max Sharpe’s ratio =μg -rs subject to + 11.
- 1:1
- Sharpe’s satio 7 (t2t)2
Lagrangian
- The 1agrangian tor this problem is: L(€ 1) (t'at
First order conditions:
- 312.91-4f) (t2t) EAL
Tangency calculation
- Compute the tangent portfolio
- Analytic solution using matrix algebra in R
- Numerical solution in Excel using the solver
Software to use
- Solve for in Excel using the solver
- R Analytical implementation (see Chapter 12 of Zivot (2016))
- Use of package IntroCompFinR
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.