Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Questions and Answers
In the first scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
In the first scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
- Admissible as evidence of similar occurrences, happenings, events
- Admissible as propensity evidence (correct)
- Inadmissible
- Admissible as habit evidence
In the second scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
In the second scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
- Admissible as evidence of similar occurrences, happenings, events
- Admissible as habit evidence (correct)
- Inadmissible
- Admissible as propensity evidence
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the first scenario is to:
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the first scenario is to:
- Establish Monica's habit
- Show Monica's carelessness
- Prove Monica's negligence
- Demonstrate the similarity of events (correct)
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the second scenario is to:
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the second scenario is to:
Signup and view all the answers
In a negligence case, evidence of prior similar occurrences is often used to:
In a negligence case, evidence of prior similar occurrences is often used to:
Signup and view all the answers
