Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App
Questions and Answers
In the first scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
In the first scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
- Admissible as evidence of similar occurrences, happenings, events
- Admissible as propensity evidence (correct)
- Inadmissible
- Admissible as habit evidence
In the second scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
In the second scenario, the evidence of the two prior fires caused by Monica is:
- Admissible as evidence of similar occurrences, happenings, events
- Admissible as habit evidence (correct)
- Inadmissible
- Admissible as propensity evidence
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the first scenario is to:
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the first scenario is to:
- Establish Monica's habit
- Show Monica's carelessness
- Prove Monica's negligence
- Demonstrate the similarity of events (correct)
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the second scenario is to:
The purpose of admitting evidence of the two prior fires in the second scenario is to:
Signup and view all the answers
In a negligence case, evidence of prior similar occurrences is often used to:
In a negligence case, evidence of prior similar occurrences is often used to:
Signup and view all the answers
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
