Affordable Care Act Legal Challenges

What was the outcome of the latest attempt to challenge the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in the case California v. Texas?

How many times has the United States Supreme Court saved the Affordable Care Act (ACA) from a legal challenge?

What does 'standing' mean in the context of California v. Texas case?

Why are future challenges to the ACA likely to be aimed at more narrow aspects of the law?

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court's decision in 2012 regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual mandate?

What led two private individuals and Republican-led states to challenge the constitutionality of the individual mandate?

What did the District Court do in 2018 regarding the individual mandate?

Who intervened to defend the ACA and sought Supreme Court review?

What was the Supreme Court's decision in 2020 regarding the ACA?

What did the Court's decision in 2020 hinder?

In 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress’s taxing power.
In 2017, Congress set the tax imposed on those without healthcare coverage to zero, leading two private individuals and Republican-led states to challenge the individual mandate's constitutionality.
The plaintiffs argued that since the tax penalty was eliminated, the individual mandate was no longer a valid exercise of Congress’s taxing power and that the entire ACA was invalid due to the mandate's lack of severability.
In 2018, the District Court found the individual mandate unconstitutional and invalidated the ACA. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision but remanded it to the District Court for further review on severability.
California and 15 other Democratic-led states intervened to defend the ACA and sought Supreme Court review.
In 2020, the Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, reversed the Fifth Circuit and upheld the ACA, as the individual and state plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the individual mandate.
The Court's decision hindered the chances of future challenges to the ACA based on the individual mandate, as the tax penalty's removal eliminated the legal injury required for standing.
The ACA's opponents faced difficulties in repealing the law through the courts, as there was a strong presumption that an unconstitutional provision was severable from the rest of the law.
Future challenges to the ACA were expected to be focused on more targeted provisions rather than wholesale challenges.