Adolescent Development: Self-Concept and Identity

Erikson's crisis stages (1963)

Bronfenbrenner (1989)

Maslow (1943)

<p>Erikson's crisis stages (1963)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Young Mendoza's identity and experiences created a challenge as an ideal introduction to the discussion and inquiry.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Erikson's theory differs from Freud's in that Erikson saw crisis points as defining developmental points that allow for change and the opportunity to revisit and resolve earlier stages of development, whereas Freud's model focused more on predetermined, fixed stages of development.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>According to Erikson, psychosocial exchanges and communication with others are crucial as they influence each stage of an individual's development.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>According to Erikson, a negative early experience, such as a lack of trust in a caregiver, can negatively influence subsequent stages of development. For example, a lack of trust in a caregiver during the 'Trust vs. Mistrust' stage can lead to challenges with trust that may then negatively impact later stages of development.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>In Erikson's theory, 'crisis points' are seen as defining developmental points that allow for change and the opportunity to revisit and resolve earlier stages of development. These crisis points present problems to be solved, which can be experienced positively or negatively and influence the individual's identity development.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>A key difference between Erikson's theory and Freud's is that Erikson's model allows for the possibility of revisiting and resolving earlier developmental stages, whereas Freud's model was more focused on predetermined, fixed stages of development. Erikson believed that individuals could return to earlier stages and re-work them with new information and experiences.</p> Signup and view all the answers