Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which treatment showed a weighted mean difference of 1.40 mm in CAL change?
Which treatment showed a weighted mean difference of 1.40 mm in CAL change?
What was the range of CAL change difference between test and control groups?
What was the range of CAL change difference between test and control groups?
What was the conclusion regarding the use of specific biomaterials/biologicals compared to OFD?
What was the conclusion regarding the use of specific biomaterials/biologicals compared to OFD?
What was the result of the meta-analysis for bioactive glass?
What was the result of the meta-analysis for bioactive glass?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the observed heterogeneity in results between studies for most biomaterials/biologicals?
What was the observed heterogeneity in results between studies for most biomaterials/biologicals?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Treatment Comparison
- Bioactive glass treatment showed a weighted mean difference of 1.40 mm in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) change.
CAL Change Difference
- The range of CAL change difference between test and control groups was noted.
Biomaterials/Biologicals vs OFD
- Conclusion: No significant difference was found in the use of specific biomaterials/biologicals compared to Open-Flap Debridement (OFD).
Meta-Analysis for Bioactive Glass
- Result: A significant effect was observed in the meta-analysis for bioactive glass.
Heterogeneity in Results
- Most biomaterials/biologicals showed significant heterogeneity in results between studies, making it challenging to draw conclusions.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your knowledge on the adjunctive effect of grafting biomaterials/biological agents with open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of deep intraosseous defects. This quiz covers the background, objectives, and methods of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
