Nutrition-Assessment.ppt

ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS Ctto: Abdelaziz Elamin, MD, PhD, FRCPCH College of Medicine Sultan Qaboos University, Oman  INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this lecture discussion the BSN 2 students will be able to:  identify the different methods fo...

ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS Ctto: Abdelaziz Elamin, MD, PhD, FRCPCH College of Medicine Sultan Qaboos University, Oman  INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this lecture discussion the BSN 2 students will be able to:  identify the different methods for assessing the nutritional status  understand the basic anthropometric techniques, applications, & reference standards  INTRODUCTION The nutritional status of an individual is often the result of many inter- related factors. It is influenced by food intake, quantity & quality, & physical health. The spectrum of nutritional status spread from obesity to severe malnutrition  Nutritional Assessment ?Why The purpose of nutritional assessment is to: Identify individuals or population groups at risk of becoming malnourished Identify individuals or population groups who are malnourished  Nutritional Assessment Why? 2 To develop health care programs that meet the community needs which are defined by the assessment To measure the effectiveness of the nutritional programs & intervention once initiated  Methods of Nutritional Assessment Nutrition is assessed by two types of methods; direct and indirect. The direct methods deal with the individual and measure objective criteria, while indirect methods use community health indices that reflects nutritional influences.  Direct Methods of Nutritional Assessment These are summarized as ABCD  Anthropometric methods  Biochemical, laboratory methods  Clinical methods  Dietary evaluation methods  Indirect Methods of Nutritional Assessment These include three categories: Ecological variables including crop production Economic factors e.g. per capita income, population density & social habits Vital health statistics particularly infant & under 5 mortality & fertility index Anthropometric Methods Anthropometry is the measurement of body height, weight & proportions. It is an essential component of clinical examination of infants, children & pregnant women. It is used to evaluate both under & over nutrition. The measured values reflects the current nutritional status & don’t differentiate between acute & chronic changes.  Other anthropometric Measurements Mid-arm circumference Skin fold thickness Head circumference Head/chest ratio Hip/waist ratio Anthropometry for children Accurate measurement of height and weight is essential. The results can then be used to evaluate the physical growth of the child. For growth monitoring the data are plotted on growth charts over a period of time that is enough to calculate growth velocity, which can then be compared to international standards Growth Monitoring Chart Percentile chart Measurements for adults Height: The subject stands erect & bare footed on a stadiometer with a movable head piece. The head piece is leveled with skull vault & height is recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm. WEIGHT MEASUREMENT Use a regularly calibrated electronic or balanced-beam scale. Spring scales are less reliable. Weigh in light clothes, no shoes Read to the nearest 100 gm (0.1kg)  Nutritional Indices in Adults  Theinternational standard for assessing body size in adults is the body mass index (BMI).  BMIis computed using the following formula: BMI = Weight (kg)/ Height (m²)  Evidence shows that high BMI (obesity level) is associated with type 2 diabetes & high risk of cardiovascular morbidity & mortality BMI (WHO - Classification)  BMI < 16.0 = Severe Thinness  BMI 16.0- 16.9 = Moderate Thinness  BMI 17.0- 18.49 = Mild Thinness  BMI 18.5- 24.9 =Healthy weight range  BMI ≥ 25.0 = Overweight  BMI 25.1- 29.9 = Preobese  BMI 30.0- 34.9 = Obese (grade/class 1 obesity)  BMI 35.0- 39.99 = Obese (grade/ class 2 obesity)  BMI ≥ 40 =Very obese (morbid or grade/ class 3 obesity)  Waist/Hip Ratio Waist circumference is measured at the level of the umbilicus to the nearest 0.5 cm. The subject stands erect with relaxed abdominal muscles, arms at the side, and feet together. The measurement should be taken at the end of a normal expiration.  Waist circumference Waist circumference predicts mortality better than any other anthropometric measurement. It has been proposed that waist measurement alone can be used to assess obesity, and two levels of risk have been identified MALES FEMALE LEVEL 1 > 94cm > 80cm LEVEL2 > 102cm > 88cm Waist circumference/2 Level 1 is the maximum acceptable waist circumference irrespective of the adult age and there should be no further weight gain. Level 2 denotes obesity and requires weight management to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes & CVS complications.  Hip Circumference Is measured at the point of greatest circumference around hips & buttocks to the nearest 0.5 cm. The subject should be standing and the measurer should squat beside him. Both measurement should taken with a flexible, non-stretchable tape in close contact with the skin, but without indenting the soft tissue. Interpretation of WHR High risk WHR= >0.80 for females & >0.95 for males i.e. waist measurement >80% of hip measurement for women and >95% for men indicates central (upper body) obesity and is considered high risk for diabetes & CVS disorders. A WHR below these cut-off levels is considered low risk.  ADVANTAGES OF ANTHROPOMETRY  Objective with high specificity & sensitivity  Measures many variables of nutritional significance (Ht, Wt, MAC, HC, skin fold thickness, waist & hip ratio & BMI).  Readings are numerical & gradable on standard growth charts  Readings are reproducible.  Non-expensive & need minimal training  Limitations of Anthropometry  Inter-observers errors in measurement  Limited nutritional diagnosis  Problems with reference standards, i.e. local versus international standards.  Arbitrary statistical cut-off levels for what considered as abnormal values.  BIOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT This method of assessing nutritional status involves laboratory tests that measure the levels of nutrients and their metabolites in body tissues and fluids as these are a consequence of the variations in quantity and nutrient composition of food consumed and utilized by the body.  Initial Laboratory Assessment Hemoglobin estimation is the most important test, & useful index of the overall state of nutrition. Beside anemia it also tells about protein & trace element nutrition. Stool examination for the presence of ova and/or intestinal parasites  Urine dipstick & microscopy for albumin, sugar and blood  Specific Lab Tests Measurement of individual nutrient in body fluids (e.g. serum retinol, serum iron, urinary iodine, vitamin D) Detection of abnormal amount of metabolites in the urine (e.g. urinary creatinine/hydroxyproline ratio) Analysis of hair, nails & skin for micro-nutrients.  BIOCHEMICAL TEST AND CRITERIA (CUT-OFF POINTS) Nutrient/ Health Biochemical Test/ Criterion for Problem Parameter deficiency/ Diagnostic criterion Vitamin A Serum vitamin A < 20 mcg/dl Vitamin C Plasma Ascorbic Acid < 3 mg/ L Iron Serum Iron < 60 mcg/dl Iodine Urinary Iodine < 100 mcg/L Folic Acid Serum folate < 6.0 ng/ml Zinc Plasma zinc < 0.7 mg/L  BIOCHEMICAL TEST AND CRITERIA (CUT-OFF POINTS) Biochemical Test/ Criterion for Parameter deficiency/ Diagnostic criterion Protein Energy Serum Albumin < 3.5 g/ dl Malnutrition Diabetes Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl 2 – hour post load ≥ 200 mg/dl plasma glucose Glycosylated ≥ 6.5% haemoglobin (HbA1C) Coronary Heart Disease Total Cholestrol > 200 mg/dl LDL > 100 mg/dl Triglycerides > 150 mg/dl HDL < 40 mg/dl  Advantages of Biochemical Method It is useful in detecting early changes in body metabolism & nutrition before the appearance of overt clinical signs. It is precise, accurate and reproducible. Useful to validate data obtained from dietary methods e.g. comparing salt intake with 24-hour urinary excretion. Limitations of Biochemical Method Time consuming Expensive They cannot be applied on large scale Needs trained personnel & facilities  CLINICAL ASSESSMENT It is an essential features of all nutritional surveys It is the simplest & most practical method of ascertaining the nutritional status of a group of individuals It utilizes a number of physical signs, (specific & non specific), that are known to be associated with malnutrition and deficiency of vitamins & micronutrients.  CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Good nutritional history should be obtained General clinical examination, with special attention to organs like hair, angles of the mouth, gums, nails, skin, eyes, tongue, muscles, bones, & thyroid gland. Detection of relevant signs helps in establishing the nutritional diagnosis  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency HAIR Spare & thin Protein, zinc, biotin deficiency Easy to pull out Protein deficiency Corkscrew Vit C & Vit A Coiled hair deficiency  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency MOUTH Glossitis Riboflavin, niacin, folic acid, B12 , pr. Bleeding & spongy gums Vit. C,A, K, folic acid & niacin Angular stomatitis, B 2,6,& niacin cheilosis & fissured tongue leukoplakia Vit.A,B12, B-complex, folic acid & niacin Sore mouth & tongue Vit B12,6,c, niacin ,folic acid & iron  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency EYES Night blindness, Vitamin A exophthalmia deficiency Photophobia- Vit B2 & vit A blurring, deficiencies conjunctival inflammation  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency NAILS Spooning Iron deficiency Transverse lines Protein deficiency  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency SKIN Pallor Folic acid, iron, B12 Follicular Vitamin B & Vitamin hyperkeratosis C Flaking PEM, Vit B2, Vitamin dermatitis A, Zinc & Niacin Pigmentation, Niacin & PEM desquamation Bruising, purpura Vit K ,Vit C & folic acid  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency Thyroid gland  inmountainous areas and far from sea places Goiter is a reliable sign of iodine deficiency.  Clinical signs of nutritional deficiency Joints & bones  Help detect signs of vitamin D deficiency (Rickets) & vitamin C deficiency (Scurvy)  CLINICAL ASSESSMENT ADVANTAGES Fast & Easy to perform Inexpensive Non-invasive LIMITATIONS Did not detect early cases  DIETARY ASSESSMENT  Nutritional intake of humans is assessed by five different methods. These are: 24 hours dietary recall Food frequency questionnaire Dietary history since early life Food diary technique Observed food consumption Hours Dietary Recall 24 A trained interviewer asks the subject to recall all food & drink taken in the previous 24 hours. It is quick, easy, & depends on short-term memory, but may not be truly representative of the person’s usual intake  Food Frequency Questionnaire In this method the subject is given a list of around 100 food items to indicate his or her intake (frequency & quantity) per day, per week & per month. inexpensive, more representative & easy to use. Food Frequency Questionnaire Limitations:  long Questionnaire  Errors with estimating serving size.  Needs updating with new commercial food products to keep pace with changing dietary habits.  DIETARY HISTORY It is an accurate method for assessing the nutritional status. The information should be collected by a trained interviewer. Details about usual intake, types, amount, frequency & timing needs to be obtained. Cross-checking to verify data is important.  FOOD DIARY Food intake (types & amounts) should be recorded by the subject at the time of consumption. The length of the collection period range between 1-7 days. Reliable but difficult to maintain.  Observed Food Consumption  The most unused method in clinical practice, but it is recommended for research purposes.  The meal eaten by the individual is weighed and contents are exactly calculated.  The method is characterized by having a high degree of accuracy but expensive & needs time & efforts.  Interpretation of Dietary Data 1. Qualitative Method  using the food pyramid & the basic food groups method.  Different nutrients are classified into 5 groups (fat & oils, bread & cereals, milk products, meat- fish-poultry, vegetables & fruits)  determine the number of serving from each group & compare it with minimum requirement. Interpretation of Dietary Data 2. Quantitative Method  The amount of energy & specific nutrients in each food consumed can be calculated using food composition tables & then compare it with the recommended daily intake.  Evaluation by this method is expensive & time consuming, unless computing facilities are available.  DIETARY ASSESSMENT ADVANTAGES Fast & Easy to perform Inexpensive and quick to administer Non-invasive Requires only short term memory There is an element of surprise  DIETARY ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS Did not detect early cases Not suitable for elderly May withhold or alter information Does not give actual intake