Introduction to Theory of Computation Lecture Notes PDF
Document Details
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
2015
Tags
Related
- 01 Handout 1: Mathematical Preliminaries (Theory of Computation with Automata) PDF
- 01 Handout 1: Mathematical Preliminaries - Theory of Computation with Automata PDF
- Lecture Notes - Week 3 PDF
- Theory of Computation Automata PDF
- NPTEL Theory of Computation Assignment - Week 1 PDF
- CS402 Midterm MCQS Solved With References By Moaaz PDF
Summary
These lecture notes provide an introduction to the theory of computation, focusing on finite automata. They define key concepts and include illustrative examples of computational devices and models.
Full Transcript
Chapter 1 Introduction to Theory of Computation 1.1 Introduction Introduce myself – name, background, research interests, contact information Course syllabus 1. Homework assignments (15%): About 4 assignments throughout the semester. One week to solve the problems. Due a...
Chapter 1 Introduction to Theory of Computation 1.1 Introduction Introduce myself – name, background, research interests, contact information Course syllabus 1. Homework assignments (15%): About 4 assignments throughout the semester. One week to solve the problems. Due at the beginning of class on due date. Late submissions will be penalized. 2. Quizzes (20%): About 4 quizzes. May be unannounced. 3. Mid semester exam (20%): 14th Sepember, 2015. 7:30 am – 9:30 am. You may consult your course textbook and class notes in the exam. 4. End semester exam (45%): 16th November, 2015. 9 am – 12 noon. You may consult your course textbook and class notes in the exam. Course textbook: Introduction to the Theory of Computation by Michael Sipser. International student edition. Course website: http://moodle.cse.iitk.ac.in TAs: Information will be posted on moodle soon. 1.2 What is Theory of Computation? - We first need to understand what is computation. Step by step solution of a problem. Example: multiplication, searching for a word in a dictionary, solving a crossword puzzle, (browsing the web?). - Computational devices: calculator, computer, phone, pen and paper, etc. There is a vast set of computational. Introduce mathematical models that characterize all such computational devices based on their fundamental property and study them. We will be studying power and limitations of these models. - How do we come up with a solution? (Algorithms) 7 - What can be computed? Are there problems that cannot be computed? We will answer this question later in the semester. 1.3 Introduction to Finite Automata Informally, a finite automaton (plural is automata) is a system consisting of a set of states and interaction between them. Examples, 1. A switch push OFF ON push 2. A fan regulator c-wise 0 1 a/c-wise c-wise a/c-wise a/c-wise c-wise a/c-wise 3 2 c-wise 3. Traffic lights 4. Checking if a binary number is divisible by 4. We will use the fact that a binary number is divisible by 4 if and only if the last two digits are 0. 0 1 00 01 1 0 1 0 10 11 0 1 Exercise 1. Read Chapter 0 from textbook. Let us look at one more example of a finite state machine. 1.4 Another Example Assume that in a chemistry lab there are 3 compounds, A, B and C, and they react as follows: B + C −→ 2A (α − reaction) A + C −→ 2B (β − reaction) A + B −→ 2C (γ − reaction) Properties: - The reactions are symmetric - Total no. of units are the same We say the lab is dysfunctional if only 1 compound is left. At any given time the state of the lab is - static, if it will/has become dysfunctional. Eg. only one compound is left, or, 1 unit of A and 1 unit of B is left. - intermediate, if it can become dysfunctional. Eg. 2 units of A, 1 units of B, 1 units of C. - dynamic, if it cannot become dysfunctional. Eg. 2 units of A and 1 unit of B. We define a state to be a sequence of 3 integers denoting the no. of units A, B and C resp. Case: 2 units in the lab All states are 011 101 110 static. α β γ 200 020 002 Case: 3 units in the lab 111 γ α β All states are 300 003 static. 030 γ β 210 102 201 120 α β α γ 021 012 All states are dynamic. Case: 4 units in the lab α This state is 211 400 static γ β α Rest 4 states are 130 103 intermediate γ β 022 Note: The lab becoming dysfunctional is dependent on the “set” of numbers of each compound, and not on the “ordered triplet”. This is because of the symmetry of the three reactions. For example, the state 211 and 121 can be considered the same. We rewrite the states as a sequence of units in descending order of the numbers. 211 400 110 111 310 210 220 200 300 2 units 3 units 4 units Case: 5 units in the lab This state is 221 311 500 static Rest 4 states are 410 320 intermediate Case: 6 units in the lab 411 600 510 420 321 222 330 - State 600 is static. - States 411, 330, 222 are intermediate. - States 510, 420, 321 are dynamic. Exercise 2. 1. Draw the diagram for 7 units. 2. Read chapter 0 from textbook. We will now setup a mathematical framework to define and study various computational models. 1.5 Basic Definitions - An alphabet is a finite, non-empty set symbols. Convention: Σ, Γ. Egs: {0, 1}, {a, b,... , z}. - A string is a finite sequence of symbols chosen over some fixed alphabet. Eg. 0110. - The empty string is the string having 0 symbols. Denoted as . - Length of a string is the number of symbols in it. Eg. |0110| = 4, || = 0. - For an alphabet Σ, Σi = {w|w is a string over Σ of length i}. - Σ∗ = i≥0 Σi and Σ+ = i>0 Σi S S - L is a language over Σ if L ⊆ Σ∗. Note that L can be Σ∗ as well. Chapter 2 Deterministic Finite Automata 2.1 Deterministic Finite Automaton Consider the following language, L = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x has an even no. of 1’s} 0 0 1 start q0 q1 1 State diagram of an automaton that accepts L Definition 2.1.1. A deterministic finite automaton (in short DFA) is a 5 tuple (Q, Σ, δ, q0 , F ), where, - Q is a finite set called the set of states, - Σ is a finite set called the alphabet, - δ : Q × Σ → Q is the transition function, - q0 ∈ Q is the initial state, and - F ⊆ Q is the set of final states. We will now introduce some terminology related to DFA. Let M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0 , F ). - We say M accepts x ∈ Σ∗ if M halts at an accept state when given x. - L = L(M ) = {x ∈ Σ∗ |M accepts x} In such a case, we say that M accepts L or M recognizes L. The terms ‘accept’ and ‘recognize’ will be used synonymously in this course. 13 Remark. If we say M accepts L it means that M accepts every string in L and every string accepted by M is in L. In other words, both the sets are equal. It is a common rookie mistake to a think of one as a proper subset of the other. Please avoid it! Examples of DFA 1. L1 = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x ends with a 1} 0 1 1 start q0 q1 0 State diagram of an automaton that accepts L1 Intuition of the various states: - State q0 corresponds to all those strings that end with a 0. - State q1 corresponds to all those strings that end with a 1. 2. Consider the following DFA 0 1 1 q0 1 q1 0 q2 start 0 State diagram of DFA M2 L(M2 ) = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x ends with a 10} Intuition of the various states: - State q0 corresponds to all those strings that end with two 0’s or the string 0. - State q1 corresponds to all those strings that end with a 1. - State q2 corresponds to all those strings that end with a 10. 3. L3 = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x is divisible by 3} 0 1 1 0 start q0 q1 q2 1 0 State diagram of DFA M3 such that L3 = L(M3 ) Intuition of the various states: - q0 : all strings x such that x ≡ 0 mod 3. - q1 : all strings x such that x ≡ 1 mod 3. - q2 : all strings x such that x ≡ 2 mod 3. 4. L4 = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x begins and ends with the same symbol} start q0 0 1 0 q1 q2 1 0 1 1 0 1 q3 q4 0 State diagram of DFA M4 such that L4 = L(M4 ) Intuition of the various states: - q0 : accepts . - q1 : all strings beginning and ending with 0. - q3 : all strings beginning with 0 and ending with 1. - q2 and q4 are symmetric to q1 and q3. Note 1. - Given a language there exist many DFAs (infact infinitely many) that accept the given language. However, given a DFA, there is only a unique language that the DFA accepts. - The size of an automaton is independent of the length of the input string given to it. Strings can be arbitrarily long. This is the meaning of the term finite in a DFA. - An automaton reads one bit at a time. - At any instant while reading an input, the automaton does not know when the string will terminate. Its action at that point depends only on the (i) current state, and (ii) currently read input symbol. - For every state p and every input symbol a, there is a unique state q that a DFA will go to from p on seeing the symbol a. This means that once a string is fixed, the automaton has a unique walk starting from the start state. If the last state is an accept state then the string is accepted, otherwise not. This is the meaning of the term deterministic in a DFA. - The states of a DFA informally correspond to some property. Since a DFA has a finite number of states, hence it can “remember” only a finite amount of information of the input string. For example, a DFA cannot count the number of 1’s present in a binary input string. We will prove such limitations of a DFA later in this course. 2.2 Definition of Computation of a DFA Let M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0 , F ) be a DFA. Let w = a1 a2... an be a string in Σ∗. - We say that M accepts w if there exists a sequence of states r0 , r1 ,... , rn ∈ Q (not necessarily distinct), such that 1. r0 = q0 , 2. ri = δ(ri−1 , ai ) for i = 1, 2,... n 3. rn ∈ F. - We say that M accepts A ⊆ Σ∗ if A = {w ∈ Σ∗ |M accepts w} Denoted as L(M ). Once again note that M accepts a language A if and only if M accepts exactly those strings that belong to A. - A language L is said to regular if L = L(M ) for some DFA M. So far we have seen several regular languages. Here is an example of a non-regular language. We will prove this later. L = {0n 1n |n ≥ 0} Some more examples 1. L1 = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ |x does not contain the substring 11} 0 0, 1 1 q0 q1 1 q2 start 0 State diagram of DFA M1 such that L1 = L(M1 ) Intuition of the various states: - q0 : strings that do not contain 11 and end with a 0. - q1 : strings that do not contain 11 and end with a 1. - q2 : strings that contain 11. Remark. States from which the automaton can never reach an accept state are known as dump states. The state q2 in the above DFA is an example of a dump state. 2. L2 = {x ∈ {0, 1}∗ ||x| = 3} 0, 1 0, 1 0, 1 0, 1 0, 1 start q0 q1 q2 q3 q4 DFA for L2 Intuition of the various states: - q0 : string of length 0. - q1 : strings of length 1. - q2 : strings of length 2. - q3 : strings of length 3. - q4 : strings of length ≥ 4. 2.3 Regular Operations Let us define some operations on languages and study their properties. Let A, B ⊆ Σ∗ be two languages. 1. Union operation: A ∪ B = {x | x ∈ A or x ∈ B} 2. Concatenation operation: A · B = {xy | x ∈ A and x ∈ B} This is also denoted as AB. 3. Star operation: A∗ = {x1 x2... xk | k ≥ 0 and xi ∈ A} Example: Let A = {1, 2} and B = {a, b, c}. Then A ∪ B = {1, 2, a, b, c} AB = {1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c} A∗ = {, 1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 22, 111, 112, 121, 122, 211, 212, 221, 222,...} Note that AB need not be the same as BA. 2.3.1 Closure Properties We say that a class of objects is closed under some operation if applying that operation to objects of the class, produces an object that belongs to the same class as well. Example: N is closed under addition and multiplication but not closed under subtraction. Theorem 1. Let A, B be two regular languages. Then A ∪ B, AB and A∗ are also regular. In other words, regular languages are closed under the union, concatenation and star operations. We will see a proof of this theorem later in the course. Exercise 3. Construct DFAs for the following languages. 1. L1 = {w ∈ {0, 1}∗ |#0 (w) is even and #1 (w) is odd} 2. L2 = {w ∈ {0}∗ ||w| is divisible by 2 or 7} 3. L3 = {w ∈ {0, 1}∗ |w is divisible by 5} Remark. #0 (w) denotes the number of occurrences of 0 in w. Similarly #1 (w). Exercise 4. Read chapter 1.1 from textbook. Chapter 3 Nondeterministic Finite Automata 3.1 Nondeterminism - From a state q on an input symbol a there can be 0 or more transitions to other states (outgoing edges). - The automaton simultaneously moves to all the states in one move. - Here transitions can also be labelled by . On an epsilon transition, the automaton moves to the corresponding without reading an input bit. - The automaton accepts its input if one of the computation paths lead to an accept state. Let us look at an example before moving further. Here is an example of a nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA in short). 0, 1 0, 1 1 0, 1 start q0 q1 q2 q3 - 0, 1 or many transitions from a state on seeing a symbol. Such as - (q0 , 1) −→ {q0 , q1 } - (q1 , 1) −→ {} - (q1 , 0) −→ {q2 } - Labels on transitions marked with symbols from Σ ∪ {}. If there is a transition from a state qi to another state qj labelled with , then the automaton simultaneously moves to the states qi (i.e. stays at the same state) and qj without reading any input symbol. Example - (q1 , ) −→ {q1 , q2 } 3.1.1 Computation of an NFA on a given input Let us now see how computation happens on an NFA, given an input. Input: Let the input string be 010110. 19 Current set of positions of Symbol Read the NFA {q0 } (Initial position of the NFA) 0 {q0 } 1 {q0 , q1 , q2 } 0 {q0 , q2 } 1 {q0 , q1 , q2 , q3 } 1 {q0 , q1 , q2 , q3 } 0 {q0 , q2 , q3 } Input is accepted since q3 is an accept state You may want to picture a nondeterministic computation as follows. From a state q, on an input symbol a, if there are k(≥ 0) outgoing edges then imagine that the automaton “consumes” the bit a, makes k copies of itself at that instant with each copy going to one of the outgoing states. If k = 0, then that particular copy of the automaton “dies” on seeing the symbol a. Similarly, from a state q, if there are k(≥ 0) edges, then the automaton makes k + 1 copies of itself at that instant with each copy going to one of the outgoing states and one copy staying at the current state without consuming any input bit. Computation proceeds in parallel in all the copies. We usually refer to the different copies of the automaton as different computation paths. The input is accepted if the final set of states of the automaton after it has read the input completely, has an accept state. Remark. Nondeterminism is not a realistic model in the sense that there are no nondeterministic computers in the real world. However often it makes description of the automaton easier. 3.1.2 Difference between deterministic and nondeterministic computations Deterministic Computation Nondeterministic Computation (state, input symbol) pair −→ A SINGLE (state, input symbol) pair −→ MULTIPLE state state (≥ 0) simultaneously a single computation path multiple computation paths computation is at a unique state in each step computation is in a set of states in each step input accepted if computation path leads to an input accepted if at least one computation accept state path leads to an accept state input rejected if computation path does not input rejected if none of the computation paths lead to an accept state lead to an accept state does not allow transitions allows transitions 3.2 Nondeterministic Finite Automaton Let Σ = Σ ∪ {}. For a set A, let 2A denote the power set of A. Definition 3.2.1. A nondeterministic finite automaton (in short NFA) is a 5 tuple N = (Q, Σ, δ, q0 , F ), where, - Q is a finite set called the set of states, - Σ is a finite set called the alphabet, - δ : Q × Σ → 2Q is the transition function, - q0 ∈ Q is the initial state, and - F ⊆ Q is the set of final states. We say that N accepts w = a1 a2... an if we can write w as w = b1 b2... bm , where each bi ∈ Σ and there exists a sequence of states r0 , r1 ,... , rm ∈ Q (not necessarily distinct), such that 1. r0 = q0 , 2. ri ∈ δ(ri−1 , bi ) for i = 1, 2,... m 3. rm ∈ F. Then, L(N ) = {w ∈ Σ∗ | N accepts w}. 3.2.1 Examples of NFA 1. Consider the following language L = {w ∈ {0, 1}∗ | the 3rd last symbol of w is 1} Below is an NFA for the above language. 0, 1 1 0, 1 0, 1 start q0 q1 q2 q3 Exercise 5. Now construct a DFA for the above language. What can you say about the size (i.e. no. of states) of the DFA compared to the NFA? Consider the language Lk = {w ∈ {0, 1}∗ | the k-th last symbol of w is 1} What is the smallest sized NFA that can accept Lk (as a function of k)? What about the smallest sized DFA? 2. Recall the following language discussed earlier L = {w ∈ {0}∗ | |w| is divisible by 2 or 7} Below is an NFA that accepts L. 0 0 start 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 How does the size of the DFA and NFA compare with each other for L? 3. Another example. L = {w ∈ {0}∗ | #0 (w) = 1 or #1 (w) is odd} 1 1 q1 0 q3 start q0 1 q2 q4 1 0 0 Exercise 6. Problem 1.5 from chapter 1 in the textbook. Note 2. Observe that a DFA is also an NFA. It just so happens that a DFA does not uses its nondeterminism. Therefore if N is the class of all languages accepted by some NFA then regular languages are a subset of N. But what about the converse? Theorem 2. Let N = (Q, Σ, δ, q0 , F ) be an NFA. Then there exists a DFA M = (Q0 , Σ, δ 0 , q00 , F 0 ) such that L(N ) = L(M ). We will give the construction of the DFA M. The idea is to consider all subset of states of N. Construction of M 1. Q0 = 2Q. 2. Let R be a state in Q0. Then by definition of Q0 , R ⊆ Q. We define δ 0 as follows: [ δ 0 (R, a) = δ(r, a). r∈R 3. qo0 = {q0 }. 4. F 0 = {R ∈ Q0 | R ∩ F 6= ∅}. What about -transitions? Let R ⊆ Q. Define the -closure of R as, [ E(R) = {q | q can be reached from r by using 0 or more -transitions}. r∈R The transition function δ 0 can be modified as [ δ 0 (R, a) = E(δ(r, a)), r∈R and qo0 = E({q0 }). Corollary 3. A language is regular if and only if it is accepted by some NFA. An Example Consider the language L = {w ∈ {0, 1}∗ | the 2nd last symbol of w is 1}. Here is an NFA for L. 0, 1 1 0, 1 start q0 q1 q2 Based on the construction given earlier, the corresponding DFA for L will be as follows. 0 q0 0 q02 start 0 1 0 1 q01 q012 1 1 Although there are 23 = 8 subsets of the set {q0 , q1 , q2 }, but only 4 of them are reachable from the start state q0. Hence it is sufficient to consider these 4 states. Remark. States of a DFA/NFA that are not reachable from the start state via any sequence of symbols are redundant and therefore, need not be considered. 3.3 Closure properties of Regular Languages Recall the following theorem discussed in the previous Lecture Notes. Theorem 4. Let A, B be two regular languages. Then A ∪ B, AB and A∗ are also regular. In other words, regular languages are closed under the union, concatenation and star operations. We will give a constructive proof of the theorem. Let NA and NB be two NFA’s accepting A and B respectively. We assume without loss of generality that NA and NB have a unique start state and a unique accept state, with no incoming transitions to the start state and no outgoing edges from the accept state. This is because if the NFA has more than one accept state, then we add a new accept state to the NFA and add -transitions from the old accept states to the new accept state. 1. Union operation q1 r1 NA start q r q2 r2 NB Construction of an NFA that accepts the language A ∪ B. 2. Concatenation operation q q1 r1 q2 r2 start r NA NB Construction of an NFA that accepts the language AB. 3. Star operation q q1 r1 start r NA Construction of an NFA that accepts the language A∗. Exercise 7. Read Section 1.2 from textbook.