CEE 266 Construction Management Lecture 2b&c PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by WellManagedSugilite797
Lehigh University
Prof. Pervizpour
Tags
Summary
These lecture notes cover payment and awarding methods in construction management. They detail contract components, payment schemes, and risk allocation. The document seems to be a set of lecture notes, rather than a past exam paper.
Full Transcript
Outline Contract components Contract components CEE 266 Project Delivery Method Contracts...
Outline Contract components Contract components CEE 266 Project Delivery Method Contracts Traditional Prequalification & RFPs CONSTRUCTION Pure Construction Management Key elements MANAGEMENT Construction Management At Risk Design/Build Standard contract forms AIA, IPD, CMAA, AGC, DBIA, Lean and EJCDC Payment Scheme Administrating Contracts Lecture 2b&c. Payment and General points Lump sum Pay Estimates & Payments Claims Awarding Methods Unit prices Cost plus percentage fee Remedies Bonds Cost plus fixed fee Insurances Prof. Pervizpour Guaranteed maximum price x8-2137 Incentive [email protected] Award Mechanism Bidding August 30, 2015 Negotiation Best value Risk and Risk Allocation Addenda and Change Orders Risks that owner can handle should be kept by the Addenda owner (ex: Geotechnical site condition …) Any changes that arise before bid opening and during the Risks that contractor can handle better are bidding period become part of the bid package imposed on him (material, equipment, labor, …) Change Orders Impose high enough risk incentive to get Any changes that arise after the contract is signed due to: contractor to do the job efficiently (incentive to Different site conditions finish on time, to stay within budget) Errors / Omissions in the Contract Documents Owner’s Requirement Others Requires adjustments in scope, time, and cost. Change Orders …. Payment Schemes Changes contract (cost/schedule/scope/etc.) Payment Scheme Can lead to costs beyond contract specification General points Anticipated costs may be incorporated in Lump sum “contingency” (typically 1‐10% on top of agreed upon Unit prices price) Cost plus percentage fee Often only paid for additional direct costs (big Cost plus fixed fee problem if disruption in work) Guaranteed maximum price Incentive Source of very large risk Lump Sum or “Fixed Price” Unit Price Contract Actual cost is known by owner before the project Agreement on the price charged per unit by the Contractor begins to the Owner Contractor overhead must be integrated in the Unit’s Prices Contactor required to achieve the project at the The lowest bidder is normally selected Bid/Negotiated Contract Value Owner to be present on site to measure the actual quantities Minimizes the risk for the Owner if the project is well Highly dependent on the accuracy of the estimation of the estimated, contractual documents accurate, and project quantities given by the Owner/Designer clearly defined Difficult to accurately quantify work required High Risk for the Contractor in case of many unforeseen Contractor can make higher profit since payment based on actual quantities (may lose money in the same manner) problems Total cost for the Owner can be greater than planned Generally utilized with the Traditional Method (DBB) & Typically renegotiate if quantity 20% off (quantity influences price due to economies of scale) usually not possible with Fast Track Risk sharing, Owner carries risk of uncertainty in quantity, Contractor the Usually a high incentive to finish early at low cost risk of unit price (efficiency, etc) Cost plus percentage fee Cost Plus Fixed Fee Owner is paying the actual cost plus a fixed percentage fee Cost may vary but the fee remains firm High risk for the Owner, Contractor very little risk The fee is independent of the duration of the project Maximum flexibility for the Owner (no fighting over Used only if the pricing could not be determined in an change orders‐ contractor gets paid for any extra work alternative manner required) No financial insurance of ultimate cost Used only if the pricing could not be calculated in any Little incentive to reduce costs but high incentive to other way and if it is urgent or confidential (civil, military) finish early No financial insurance of ultimate cost The Contractor agrees to make best efforts to Little incentive to reduce costs, cost unknown until complete the work completion Promotes collaboration at the early stages of the Contractor agrees to do his best efforts to achieve the project goals Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Conclusion Variation of the Cost Plus a Fee by having a cap (on When the market is not very good, clients insist on direct costs) fixed price bids whereas when the project offers The Contractor assumes any additional costs after the are numerous, it is more difficult to obtain those “Ceiling” point is reached conditions Similar to CPFF but quality may be sacrificed to avoid The choice of payment scheme (contract type) increases in cost beyond GMP must depend on: The accuracy of the estimation Variation: Usually, GM shared savings – below the The ultimate cost known since the beginning or at guaranteed maximum, savings are shared between least the maximum Owner and Contractor The desired risk Good for turnkey, well‐defined scope The priority of the goal of quick completion of work Permits easier financing, and can fast‐track AWARD METHODS Bidding Award Methods Variants Bidding Low bid Negotiation Multi‐parameter bidding Best Value Low bid plus arithmetic combination of other factors Low bid divided by ranking of other factors Fixed price low bid is win‐lose Typically associated with lump‐sum (or unit price) contract Pre‐qualifications critical Bidding Tradeoffs Bidding Tradeoffs Time provided to bidders to review documents Advantages Too long: Construction delayed Can get good price Too short: Transparency Bidslow‐quality because too little time to review contract Disadvantages docs (incorporate high risk premium or unrealistically low) Canset up win‐lose situation Few bidders willing to participate Competitive pressures can eliminate profit from bid Bid count Tryto make up with change orders, cutting corners Too many bidders: Scare away best contractors Can lead to combative relationships Too few bidders: Bid not competitive Insufficient consideration of design before pricing Bidding Process Public vs. Private Bidding A/E oversight typical Public Bidding Publicity (specifies qualification requirements) Must be publicly advertised (posting in newspapers, public building, etc.) Provide bid documents Qualification occurs after submission of bids Typically include fair cost estimate, sample contract Typically 60 day period in which can submit bids Answer RFIs Private Bidding Pre‐bid conference May be by invitation only Explain scope, working conditions, answer questions, Qualification occurs before submission of bids documented in writing Qualifications Negotiation Common items for qualifications Typically selected based on reputation, Bonds/Insurance (bid, performance, payment) qualifications Safety record Typically used for two cases Reputation Very simple: use trusted, familiar party Financial strength Very complex/big: get contractor involved in design, Total/Spare capacity start work early Licensing Requires relatively savvy owner Background in type of work Evaluate proposals, monitor performance Experience in local area/Labor market Management system (QA, planning, estimation, control) Important even for DBB for post‐bid changes Interest, adaptability shown Negotiation Considerations Negotiation Tips Can get win‐win because of differences in Try to maintain clear sense of reservation price Riskpreferences Price or conditions under which will accept offer Relative preferences for different attributes Want to adopt some objective basis for position Goal is to find a pareto optimal agreement Without this impersonal criteria, other party can take Key skill in negotiation: Ability to find win‐win disagreements personally as arbitrarily demands options Discuss multiple issues at once Permits trading off issues flexibly Formal exposure good‐but experience give edge Some Details on Contracting, Bonds, Best Value Insurance and Bid Packages Used by the Federal Government Provides a uniform set of procurement regulations Request for Proposal (RFP) states: Relativeimportance of price Technical merit Technical evaluation criteria and their weights Selection of Contractor is based on the best value of the proposed work Price Technical Factors