Counseling Patients in Primary Care: Evidence-Based Strategies PDF

Counseling Patients in Primary Care:​Evidence-Based Strategies Family physicians spend substantial time counseling patients with psychiatric conditions, unhealthy behaviors, and medical adherence issues. Maintaining efficiency while providing counseling is a major challenge. There are several effect...

Counseling Patients in Primary Care:​Evidence-Based Strategies Family physicians spend substantial time counseling patients with psychiatric conditions, unhealthy behaviors, and medical adherence issues. Maintaining efficiency while providing counseling is a major challenge. There are several effective, structured counseling strategies developed for use in primary care settings. The transtheoretical (stages of change) model assesses patients’ motivation for change so that the physician can select the optimal counseling approach. Structured sequential strategies such as the five A’s (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) and FRAMES (feedback, responsibility of patient, advice to change, menu of options, empathy, self-efficacy enhancement) are effective for patients who are responsive to education about health risk behavior. For patients ambivalent about change, motivational interviewing is more likely to be successful. Capitalizing on a teachable moment may enhance the effectiveness of health behavior change counseling. The BATHE (background, affect, troubles, handling, and empathy) strategy is useful for patients with psychiatric conditions and psychosocial issues. Patients should be referred for subspecialty mental health or substance abuse treatment if they do not respond to these brief interventions. (Am Fam Physician. 2018;​98(12):​719-728. Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Family Physicians.) Counseling patients on lifestyle modification and psy- chosocial problems is a fundamental competency for family physicians.1-4 Approximately 40% of primary care office visits are for chronic illness5 in which psychosocial factors play a major role in etiology and disease progression.6 Counseling patients about health risk behaviors and health education is a core component of 18% of all primary care office visits.5 Although counseling regarding weight management, diet, smoking, and alcohol use is an important part of clinical practice, a survey found that only between 31% and 56% of primary care physicians rated themselves as having significant expertise in counseling about these issues.4 See related FPM articles at https://​w ww.aafp.org/fpm/2011​ /0500/p21.html and https://​w ww.aafp.org/fpm/2016/0900/ p32.html. CME This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for continuing medical education. See CME Quiz on page 711. Author disclosure:​​ No relevant financial affiliations. Illustration by Todd Buck H. Russell Searight, PhD, MPH, Lake Superior State University, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan In the past decade, primary care counseling strategies have been refined,7-10 and some have been empirically evaluated.10-12 This article describes practical counseling strategies typically requiring no more than five to 10 minutes that can be integrated into a typical office visit1,3,9,13,14 (Table 13,15). Research and clinical guidelines suggest that smoking cessation can be effectively addressed in three WHAT IS NEW ON THIS TOPIC Counseling Strategies Research based on the transtheoretical (stages of change) model suggests that it is possible to change multiple health risk behaviors concurrently. Application of the FRAMES counseling protocol to French primary care patients found reductions in cannabis use among patients up to 18 years of age at the six-month follow-up, whereas use increased among adolescents receiving routine care. Downloaded from the American Physician Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncom◆ VolumeFamily December 15, 2018 98, Number 12website at www.aafp.org/afp. www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 719 mercial use of one individual user of the website. All other rights reserved. Contact [email protected] for copyright questions and/or permission requests. COUNSELING PATIENTS SORT:​KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE Evidence rating References Comments The five A’s (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) technique has been associated with reduced smoking and alcohol use as well as modest weight loss. B 10, 25, 26 Multisite studies;​recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force The FRAMES (feedback about personal risk, responsibility of patient, advice to change, menu of options, empathy, self-efficacy enhancement) technique has been associated with reductions in alcohol-related risk behavior and reduced cannabis use. B 31, 32 Leads to harm reduction The use of motivational interviewing in primary care is associated with decreases in weight, blood pressure, and alcohol use. A 16, 33, 35 Meta-analyses and systematic reviews specific to the primary care setting The BATHE (background, affect, troubles, handling, empathy) technique is associated with increased patient satisfaction. B 11, 45 Two recent studies have found this pattern The transtheoretical (stages of change) model increases coaction of health behavior change for weight management. B 3, 49 Three studies combined for analysis Clinical recommendation A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence;​B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence;​C = consensus, diseaseoriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://​w ww.aafp. org/afpsort. TABLE 1 Summary of Primary Care Counseling Strategies Counseling strategy Problem type Major features Transtheoretical (stages of change) model Specific health behavior and adherence Assumes that patients have varying levels of motivation for change;​assesses patients’ pros and cons for changing behavior Five A’s (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) Substance use;​lifestyle modification;​lack of adherence to medication, medical testing, or a procedure Assumes that patients lack complete knowledge of the impact of health risk behavior, nonadherence, etc.; patients will respond to direct advice FRAMES (feedback about personal risk, responsibility of patient, advice to change, menu of options, empathy, self-efficacy enhancement) Substance use;​lifestyle modification;​lack of adherence to medication, medical testing, or a procedure Provides new information;​encourages patients to select personalized treatment or lifestyle modifications from a menu to increase likelihood of a behavior change Motivational interviewing Substance use;​health behavior and adherence Recognizes and directly acknowledges patients’ ambivalence about change;​systematic approach to increasing patients’ motivation;​relates health behavior to patients’ core values BATHE (background, affect, troubles, handling, empathy) Psychosocial problems and their social, emotional, and cognitive dimensions Specific statements and questions that quickly develop rapport with patients;​focuses on a specific dimension of a problem;​ encourages improved coping Information from references 3 and 15. minutes, problem alcohol use in five minutes, and dietary fat consumption and lipid levels in eight minutes.13 These strategies may also be adapted to multiple patient contacts. For example, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines16 and a recent Cochrane review 17 for addressing alcohol misuse suggest that several 10- to 15-minute 720 American Family Physician counseling appointments are most effective for reducing alcohol consumption. Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model The stages of change model (Table 23,15,18-20), originally developed from studying successful smoking cessation www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 12 ◆ December 15, 2018 COUNSELING PATIENTS TABLE 2 Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model for Addressing Health Risk Behavior Stage Description Counseling statements Goals Precontemplation Patient has no plans to change health-related behavior;​may not be interested or may oppose change “Is it okay if I talk to you about your smoking?” Increases patient awareness of the health-related issue;​ emphasizes patient choice to continue the behavior “What are your thoughts about your weight?” “Has your drinking been a problem to you or anyone else in your life?” “What would be the first sign that would tell you that it might be time to cut down on your use of marijuana?” “How long do you think you will keep smoking two packs of cigarettes per day?” Contemplation Preparation Patient considering behavior change in the next six months;​ likely ambivalent about behavior change;​has not taken specific action “What do you see as the pros and cons of continuing to smoke?” Definitely planning on making behavior change in the next 30 days;​notifies others in social network “How can I help you be successful in quitting smoking?“ Making environmental changes (e.g., removing ashtrays and lighters from home;​considering possible challenges to behavior change Action Maintenance “What do you think the hardest thing would be about reducing your drinking?” “What do you like about smoking marijuana?” Helps the patient articulate ambivalence about health behavior change;​increases pros and decreases cons of behavior change “What would be the biggest challenge you would face if you decided to change your diet?” “What would be the best day in the next month to stop smoking?” “Once you quit smoking, what do you see as the major challenges?” “What could happen that might make you start drinking again?” Engaging in new behavior for a continuous period of six months;​ has successfully negotiated unanticipated challenges to behavior change “You’ve done really well in cutting down your drinking.” New behavior has been in place for more than six months;​the patient has likely had several lapses “Some lapses are normal when you change a long-standing habit. After you smoked those 10 cigarettes, how did you regain control?” “What have been the major challenges in staying away from cigarettes?” “Have there been any situations in which you were tempted to overeat? How did you handle the situation?” “It sounds like there were some new situations that could trigger heavy drinking that you had not anticipated. That is entirely understandable. The important thing is that after that night of heavy drinking, you went back to having only one drink per day.” Elicits specific commitment to change;​encourages collaboration with the patient in developing a concrete plan Helps patient recognize and prepare for challenges with smoking, alcohol, and cannabis abstinence Reinforces patient success;​ highlights patient self-efficacy;​ encourages patient to consider unanticipated challenges to abstinence Reinforces patient success;​ normalizes lapses as part of the change process;​highlights patient success in preventing lapses from becoming relapses;​emphasizes that the new behavior is the result of the patient’s efforts and is under his or her control Information from references 3, 15, and 18 through 20. techniques,18,19 recognizes that many patients are currently unmotivated or ambivalent about habit change. The stages of change model provides a framework for assessing the patient’s degree of commitment to change, and can guide physicians in choosing from counseling strategies such as the five A’s, FRAMES, or motivational interviewing. December 15, 2018 ◆ Volume 98, Number 12 By asking questions assessing the patient’s motivation, and determining his or her specific stage in the change process (i.e., precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance), physicians can move the patient toward initiating action or support ongoing health behavior change.15,18,19 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 721 COUNSELING PATIENTS Patients in the precontemplative stage pose a particular protocol for primary care physicians to efficiently assess and challenge. If a patient appears unconcerned about health counsel patients about smoking cessation,3,10,15,26 alcohol risks, the physician may be tempted to emphasize the conse- intake,3,19 and weight loss.24,25 Whenever possible, advising quences of a behavior such as continued smoking or excess and assessing should link the patient’s presenting problem alcohol use. However, aggressive education may increase (e.g., gastrointestinal distress, knee pain with a body mass resistance and has the unintended effect of reducing patient index above 30 kg per m2) to objective, factual standards openness to physician input.3,15,16,18,19,21 (e.g., safe vs. unsafe levels of alcohol use, recommended In precontemplation, the cons of changing outweigh daily caloric intake). Patients are likely to respond more any perceived benefits.18 Therefore, counseling at this stage favorably to “I” statements (“I recommend…”) rather than should emphasize the benefits of change. Achieving “deci- “You” statements (“You should…”).3 sional balance” involves eliciting the patient’s stated pros and In one study, using some of the five A’s in a brief emercons for changing his or her behaviors. To move the patient gency department intervention required a median of seven from contemplation to action, the physician should address minutes that included screening, describing the relationobstacles to change. Studies of multiple health behaviors ship between alcohol and the patient’s presenting probconclude that moving through these stages involves a cross- lem, enhancing patient motivation, and goal setting. This over, with an increase in the pros and a decrease in the cons physician-delivered intervention, when assessed during a of changing behaviors.18 In the action and maintenance TABLE 3 stages, patients contend with possible lapse and relapse. When a lapse occurs, Five A’s for Addressing Health Risk Behavior patients are more likely to relapse to Technique Physician intervention their former habit when they attribute the lapse to internal causes such as perAsk “How many alcoholic drinks have you had in the past week?” sonality, genetics, or lack of willpower. “How long does a pack of cigarettes last for you?” Patients attributing their lapse to “When was the last time that you exercised for half an hour straight?” external factors such as peer pressure (May also use structured surveys such as the CAGE questionnaire or or work-related stress are less likely Fagerstrom Scale) to relapse.20 Physicians should frame Advise Describe, in factual terms, the patient-relevant health risks of conlapses and relapses as learning experitinuing the current behavior. ences and help patients recognize forProvide written patient education information as appropriate. merly unanticipated challenges as well “As your doctor, I recommend that you stop smoking (reduce alcohol as develop a plan for preventing future use or begin exercising for 30 minutes at least five times per week).” episodes. When appropriate, link the presenting problems to the recommenAlthough the stages accurately dation (e.g., “Cutting back on alcohol use has been found to reduce predict health-related behaviors, the blood pressure,” “Patients using marijuana as much as you describe effects of specific stage-matched interoften do have chronic cough.”) ventions are unclear.22,23 For examAssess “What do you know about how drinking/smoking/lack of exercise ple, the stages of change are useful in affects health?” approaching smoking cessation coun“What do you know about the level of alcohol use that is considseling, with precontemplative patients ered safe for men?” responding best to a brief motivational Assist “Do you feel you are ready to quit smoking in the next month?” intervention accompanied by written 23 “Strategies that have helped many patients stop smoking include information. Patients in the preparamedication and educational support groups. Would you like to hear tion or action stage benefit most from a more about these?” combination of focused advice, written guidance, and prescription medication Arrange “I would like to see you again in about two weeks. At that time, we can see how your exercise program is going and if there is any help when indicated.23 The Five A’s The five A’s (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange;​ Table 33,10,15,24,25), is a stepwise 722 American Family Physician you need with it. We can also discuss diet and whether speaking with a nutritionist might help.” Information from references 3, 10, 15, 24, and 25. www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 12 ◆ December 15, 2018 COUNSELING PATIENTS six-month follow-up visit, was associated with an average of 3.3 fewer binge episodes in the previous 28 days compared with 1.5 fewer episodes for patients receiving standard care.27 Some evidence suggests that depending on the clinical context and problem, the impact of the specific A’s may vary.24,25 For example, when the five A’s impact on dietary change was assessed at the three-month follow-up, weight loss of 3.3 lb (1.5 kg) occurred only when the intervention included the “arrange” step, whereas small, statistically significant self-reported changes in fat and fiber intake occurred with the first four A’s alone.25 FRAMES FRAMES (feedback about personal risk, responsibility of patient, advice to change, menu of options, empathy, selfefficacy enhancement) is a precursor to motivational interviewing, and was originally developed to address alcohol misuse. However, it has been applied to other health issues such as reducing stroke risk 28 (Table 4 3,15,27,28). To facilitate collaboration, the physician obtains the patient’s permission before providing information. By granting permission, patients maintain control, implicitly demonstrate interest, and are less likely to experience a threat to their independence. 3,15,21,29,30 How open the patient is to change will usually be evident by his or her answer to the responsibility statement that emphasizes the patient’s autonomous choice to address health risk behavior. Specific, individualized feedback is presented in a factual, nonjudgmental manner. For some patients, seeing numerical data, such as blood pressure readings or body weight, in the context of normal values, may be adequate for eliciting motivation to change. 3,15,27 The FRAMES strategy incorporates elements of motivational interviewing21 and patient-centered care’s emphasis TABLE 4 FRAMES for Addressing Health Risk Behavior Technique Physician intervention Feedback about personal risk Provide information in a factual manner;​for example, use a CAGE questionnaire or laboratory test results to explain alcohol use. Make the connection, “Do you see any connection between drinking and your blood pressure, your history of falling and breaking bones, your stomach pain and indigestion?” If yes, briefly elaborate again using facts. “There is a pretty clear association between unintentional injuries and the amount of alcohol people drink.” If no, provide information and then ask, “What do you think of that?” Responsibility of patient “Making a change in your alcohol use is a choice that only you can make.” Advice to change Advice should be conveyed neutrally, but based on objective indicators such as the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism standards for moderate drinking (one drink per day for women and two for men27). “Although stopping marijuana altogether would probably be the best thing that you can do, cutting down would benefit you.” Menu of options “Different strategies work better for different patients based on their lifestyle. Here are some strategies that have been successful for stopping smoking.” Options may include medication and/or educational groups for smoking cessation or following written guidelines or attending self-help groups for dietary changes. Empathy “You sound like you have a lot of stressors in your life. It is hard to make a major change when you’re feeling all these demands.” “It sounds like you are at a point where you want to make a change and are really motivated to quit smoking and at the same time are a bit nervous about going through nicotine withdrawal.” Self-efficacy enhancement “Two years ago, you were able to quit smoking for six months. You succeeded despite the worst part for many patients—nicotine withdrawal. That tells me that you have a lot of strength and follow-through. I genuinely believe you can be successful this time.” Information from references 3, 15, 27, and 28. December 15, 2018 ◆ Volume 98, Number 12 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 723 COUNSELING PATIENTS on understanding patients’ values and preferences.29,30 The menu of options step reflects the growing importance of shared decision making in clinical practice—particularly when there are several therapeutic options.3,15,30 Research has shown that providing choices increases patient adherence and satisfaction.29 Although abstinence remains the standard treatment for excessive alcohol use, reduced consumption has health benefits and diminishes risk of harm.31 In a randomized controlled trial, FRAMES was associated with 40% to 50% lower alcohol intake with a corresponding reduction in alcoholrelated arrests and automobile crashes.31 A recent application of FRAMES to French primary care patients found reductions in cannabis use among patients up to 18 years of age at the six-month follow-up, whereas use increased among adolescents receiving routine care.32 Motivational Interviewing Motivational interviewing has been successfully adapted to a range of behaviors including medication adherence, dietary change, and safe sex practices.33,34 Motivational interviewing was developed from the observation that substance abuse counselors who communicated empathy, understanding, and objective information were more successful in reducing patients’ substance use than those relying on confrontation.21 In the past decade, this strategy has developed further and its evidence base, particularly in primary care, has grown.33 A meta-analysis of outcomes across multiple medical conditions found that compared with usual care, motivational interviewing strategies resulted in an average of 10% to 15% added benefit in patient outcomes such as alcohol consumption, blood pressure readings, body weight, and human immunodeficiency virus viral load.33,35 Similar to the stages of change model, motivational interviewing assumes that patients are ambivalent about change21,34 and are more likely to change if they consider and explain their own reasons for new behavior.21 In the context of a supportive relationship, physicians ask Socraticstyle questions that help patients articulate their own reasons and goals for addressing health risk behaviors21,34,36 (Table 53,15,21,30). The initial stage of motivational interviewing focuses on understanding the patient’s concerns and developing rapport (Table 6 21,34,36-38). Effectiveness is optimized when physicians maintain a ratio of two reflective statements per question.38 When providing information, the physician should demonstrate a neutral, objective tone:​“The amount that you reported drinking is at the 95th percentile for your age and sex, which means that you drink more than 95% of men your age in the United States.”39 In focusing the conversation, the physician emphasizes the patient’s own reasons for and against change:​“After learning about your blood pressure, you are concerned about the overall effect that drinking is having on your health and that drinking beer is the way that you relax after work. Do I have that right?” The use of “and” rather than “but” is deliberate;​“but” is likely to increase defensiveness.38,39 TABLE 5 General Motivational Interviewing Skills:​Establishing Rapport and Eliciting Patient Values Technique Examples of physician statements and questions Goals Open-ended question “What brings you in today?” Elicit patient’s agenda;​determine key values “How can I help you? “How do you view your drinking?” Affirmations “You have been smoking since you were 15 years old;​I applaud your determination to quit at this point in your life.” Validate patient’s interest in changing;​ highlight strengths and past successes Reflections “You have become more uneasy about the amount you drink at night and don’t like the queasy feeling in the morning.” Indicates to the patient that he or she is being heard;​helpful in redirecting if the encounter goes off track Summarization “You have tried to make regular exercise a part of your life in the past, and the demands of work and family have often gotten in the way. Now, you are worried about your weight and blood pressure and are more determined to start and stick with a regular exercise routine.” Ties together discussion and sets stage for the next step Information from references 3, 15, 21, and 30. 724 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 12 ◆ December 15, 2018 COUNSELING PATIENTS TABLE 6 Motivational Interviewing:​Guidelines for Presenting Information and Developing Discrepancy Technique Examples of physician statements and questions Goals Ask permission before presenting information;​present information in a neutral manner “Would it be okay if I shared some information about drinking alcohol during pregnancy?” “Would you mind if I gave you some information about diet and cholesterol?” Increase patient’s sense of control and investment in addressing the concern Follow-up question after presenting information;​question posed in noncritical tone in a spirit of curiosity “What do you think of what I have just shared with you?” Assess whether the patient heard and understood information;​a basis for developing discrepancy Pair health risk behavior/symptoms with important aspects of patient’s life when the patient does not make a connection between information and current health concerns or between core values and health risk behavior “How does your smoking fit with your desire to be part of the lives of your grandchildren?” Creates cognitive dissonance;​ to resolve this, the patient must change behavior to coincide with values “How does your alcohol use fit with your desire to be more productive at work?” Information from references 21, 34, and 36 through 38. Patient values are a key component of developing an effective treatment plan (Table 7 34,38). Asking the patient about his or her ideas for habit change and continuing to ask permission before presenting options further the patient’s investment in change. This approach is also more likely to result in patient adherence. Although motivational interviewing techniques can be learned, maintaining the overall spirit of this strategy is more demanding.27 In primary care settings, benefits have been demonstrated with one to three 15- to 20-minute sessions.35 Descriptive reviews of motivational interviewing training for primary care physicians report a median of nine hours of training time40;​ however, basic skills have been acquired with two hours of training.41 BATHE At least one-half of all mental health encounters occur in primary care,1,3,42 and patients with psychiatric conditions are twice as likely to be treated by primary care physicians than by mental health professionals.42 The BATHE (background, affect, troubles, handling, empathy) strategy is a structured set of questions and statements created specifically for the primary care setting and its inherent time constraints to address a range of psychosocial problems3,9,43 (Table 89,43,44). Compared with usual care, the BATHE technique has been associated with improved patient satisfaction in several medical settings.9,45 The background question deliberately encourages the patient to focus on a specified present topic or event since the most recent office visit. It is not usually productive or practical to pursue a detailed history, and physicians December 15, 2018 ◆ Volume 98, Number 12 should generally avoid the psychotherapist’s, “Tell me more about that?” query.3,19 Affect is the next step. Nonverbal cues such as tone of voice, posture, and facial expression can be clues to emotional states that the physician can encourage the patient to consider, because some patients may have difficulty articulating their feelings.9,15 The troubles question is particularly useful with patients who are overwhelmed or are responding to a major life stressor, and it provides focus for the remaining queries. The physician should not assume that he or she knows what is most troubling to the patient.9,15 For example, if a patient’s spouse has just announced that she is filing for divorce, the key concern may not be loss of the relationship but financial worry about how to survive on a single income. Handling is primarily an issue of coping. When there are specific actions that would render a situation less distressing, a problem focus is most helpful (e.g., learning about available treatment options for newly diagnosed cancer). However, for uncontrollable situations such as the death of a loved one, emotion-focused coping may be associated with less distress.46 In this approach, the patient is encouraged to consider activities that can help him or her get through an emotionally difficult period. An expression of empathy closes the interview. Approach to the Patient These counseling strategies should be implemented in a stepped care model.47 For patients who respond to direct physician advice, the five A’s and FRAMES are likely to be www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 725 COUNSELING PATIENTS TABLE 7 Motivational Interviewing:​Guidelines for Establishing a Treatment Plan Technique Examples of physician statement and questions Goals Reflectively restate patient’s desire to change “You have thought about quitting smoking before. The combination of having these frequent coughs and the money spent on cigarettes is telling you it is now time to quit.” Establishes that the patient is currently ready to change;​affirms that you and the patient are working toward a shared goal Ask the patient for his or her ideas about change strategies “What approaches do you know about for quitting smoking?” Increases patient investment in change;​emphasizes patient self-efficacy Ask if patient is interested in hearing about effective interventions or treatments “Different approaches work best for different people. You know yourself better than I do.” Provide a menu of evidence-based options;​if the patient seems to be seeking direction, provide a recommendation based on knowledge of the patient “I have some printed dietary guidelines for men your age. I can also refer you to a nutritionist who can work with you to develop an eating plan. There are also several self-help groups. What do you think would work best for you?” “Do you think any of the strategies you mentioned would work well for you?” “I can describe several approaches to quitting smoking that I have seen work with my patients. Are you interested in hearing about them?” Highlights patient choice and emphasizes that they should consider approaches that are consistent with their lifestyle;​further emphasizes patient control over change Provides information;​continues to emphasize patient choice Information from references 34 and 38. TABLE 8 BATHE for Addressing Health Risk Behavior Technique New patient or established patient with new presenting problem Follow-up visit Background “What is going on in your life?” “What has been happening since our last visit?” Affect “How do you feel about … (the situation patient described)? “Many people in that situation might feel … ?” “How are you feeling today (or during the past week) about the situation?” Name some emotional states, then ask, “Do any of these words fit with how you are feeling?” “It sounds like you feel more hopeful today.” “What bothers you most about the situation?” “When we met last week, you said that was the most upsetting part of this situation;​How do you see that today?” Troubles “Is the emotional reaction the same or different as previously? Is the intensity different?” “What has been the most troubling issue that has arisen since we last met?” Handling “How are you managing or coping with the situation?” “How could you approach the situation?” Empathy “That sounds very frustrating.” “That sounds very difficult.” Information from references 9, 43, and 44. effective. When patient motivation is a factor, the stages of change can guide counseling. Motivational interviewing techniques for increasing patient awareness of risk and resolving ambivalence are indicated for patients who are not interested in addressing health risk behavior. For patients 726 American Family Physician with psychiatric conditions and broader psychosocial issues, the BATHE technique is a useful starting point.3,15 A common dilemma is how to proceed when patients exhibit comorbid problems such as smoking and excessive alcohol use. Historically, physicians were advised to target www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 12 ◆ December 15, 2018 COUNSELING PATIENTS one behavior at a time.48 Recent research suggests that this limitation may not be necessary.49 In a recent study clinicians used transtheoretical model–based counseling to address three weight-related behaviors simultaneously (e.g., reducing fat intake by less than 30% of overall calories consumed, increasing exercise to 30 minutes at least five times per week, and reducing daily food intake by 500 calories). Patients progressing to the action or maintenance stage with one behavior were twice as likely to move to the action or maintenance stage with a second behavior during a 24-month period compared with a usual care group.49 Physicians capitalizing on the teachable moment, estimated to occur in 10% of primary care office visits, may have greater counseling success.50 These moments are typically acute medical events or pregnancy that increase patients’ motivation for change.50 For example, a patient presenting with acute bronchitis may be more open to discussing smoking cessation, particularly when the physician connects the acute symptoms to cigarettes. Patients with psychiatric conditions or psychosocial stressors will benefit from the BATHE technique, combined with psychotropic medication when appropriate.51 These patients should be closely monitored to assess their response to this initial intervention. Patients demonstrating a minimal response to brief psychosocial counseling should be referred for subspecialty mental health care. This article updates a previous article on this topic by the author.3 Data Sources:​ Search terms included counseling and psychotherapy paired with primary health care. Some of the counseling strategies described (five A’s, FRAMES, BATHE) were entered alone. Motivational interviewing and transtheoretical (stages of change) model were paired with primary medical care. The author’s previous articles (references 3 and 15) were reviewed for recent citations. In addition to Medline, searches were run in the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Finally, to search for applications of newer counseling approaches to the primary care setting, acceptance and commitment therapy, solution focused therapy, and positive psychology were paired with primary medical care in Medline. Search dates:​October 2017 through January 2018, and April, May, and September 2018. The Author References 1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Mental health care services by family physicians (position paper). https://​w ww.aafp.org/about/ policies/all/mental-services.html. Accessed May 10, 2018. 2. LeFevre ML; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors:​recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;​161(8):​587-593. 3. Searight HR. Realistic approaches to counseling in the office setting. Am Fam Physician. 2009;​79(4):​277-284. 4. Weinehall L, Johansson H, Sorensen J, Jerdén L, May J, Jenkins P. Counseling on lifestyle habits in the United States and Sweden:​a report comparing primary care health professionals’ perspectives on lifestyle counseling in terms of scope, importance and competence. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;​15:​83. 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Characteristics of officebased physician visits, 2014. https://​w ww.cdc.gov/nchs/products/ databriefs/db292.htm. Accessed May 12, 2018. 6. Bauer UE, Briss PA, Goodman RA, Bowman BA. Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century:​elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. The Lancet. 2014;​ 384(9937):​45-52. 7. Jonas DE, Garbutt JC, Amick HR, et al. Behavioral counseling after screening for alcohol misuse in primary care:​a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2012;​157(9):​6 45-654. 8. Midboe AM, Cucciare MA, Trafton JA, Ketroser N, Chardos JF. Implementing motivational interviewing in primary care:​the role of provider characteristics. Transl Behav Med. 2011;​1(4):​588-594. 9. Stuart MR, Lieberman JA. The Fifteen Minute Hour:​Therapeutic Talk in Primary Care. 5th ed. New York, NY:​Radcliffe Publishing;​2015. 10. Quinn VP, Hollis JF, Smith KS, et al. Effectiveness of the 5-As tobacco cessation treatments in nine HMOs. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;​24(2):​ 149-154. 11. Pace EJ, Somerville NJ, Enyioha C, Allen JP, Lemon LC, Allen CW. Effects of a brief psychosocial intervention on inpatient satisfaction:​a randomized controlled trial. Fam Med. 2017;​49(9):​675-678. 12. O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, et al. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare:​a systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;​49(1):​66-78. 13. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care:​ is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;​93(4):​ 635-641. 14. Shaw MK, Davis SA, Fleischer AB, Feldman SR. The duration of office visits in the United States, 1993 to 2010. Am J Manag Care. 2014;​20(10):​ 820-826. 15. Searight HR. Efficient counseling techniques for the primary care physician. Prim Care. 2007;​3 4(3):​551-570, vi-vii. 16. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents and adults:​an updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (draft evidence review). https://​w ww.uspreventive​services​ task ​ f orce.org/Page/Document/draft-evidence-review/unhealthyalcohol-use-in-adolescents-and-adults-screening-and-behavioralcounseling-interventions. Accessed September 22, 2018. H. RUSSELL SEARIGHT, PhD, MPH, is a professor of psychology at Lake Superior State University, Sault Sainte Marie, Mich. 17. Kaner EF, Beyer FR, Muirhead C, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;​(2):​CD004148. Address correspondence to H. Russell Searight, PhD, MPH, Lake Superior State University, 650 W. Easterday Ave., Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 (e-mail:​hsearight@​lssu.edu). Reprints are not available from the author. 18. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994;​13(1):​39-46. December 15, 2018 ◆ Volume 98, Number 12 19. Zimmerman GL, Olsen CG, Bosworth MF. A ‘stages of change’ approach to helping patients change behavior. Am Fam Physician. 2000;​61(5):​ 1409-1416. www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 727 COUNSELING PATIENTS 20. Marlatt GA, Donovan DM. Relapse Prevention:​Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors. 2nd ed. New York, NY:​Guilford Publications;​ 2007. 35. VanBuskirk KA, Wetherell JL. Motivational interviewing with primary care populations:​a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2014;​37(4):​768-780. 21. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing:​Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York, NY:​Guilford Press;​2012. 36. Stewart EE, Fox CH. Encouraging patients to change unhealthy behaviors with motivational interviewing. Fam Pract Manag. 2011;​18(3):​21-25. 22. Mastellos N, Gunn LH, Felix LM, Car J, Majeed A. Transtheoretical model stages of change for dietary and physical exercise modification in weight loss management for overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;​(2):​CD008066. 37. Reims K, Ernst D. Using motivational interviewing to promote healthy weight. Fam Pract Manag. 2016;​23(5):​32-38. 38. Rosengren DB. Building Motivational Interviewing Skills:​A Practitioner Workbook. 2nd ed. New York, NY:​Guilford Publications; 2017. 23. Cahill K, Lancaster T, Green N. Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;​(11):​CD004492. 39. DiClemente CC. Addiction and Change:​How Addictions Develop and Addicted People Recover. 2nd ed. New York, NY:​Guilford Press; 2018. 24. Sherson EA, Yakes Jimenez E, Katalanos N. A review of the use of the 5 A’s model for weight loss counselling:​differences between physician practice and patient demand. Fam Pract. 2014;​31(4):​389-398. 40. Söderlund LL, Madson MB, Rubak S, Nilsen P. A systematic review of motivational interviewing training for general health care practitioners. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;​84(1):​16-26. 25. Alexander SC, Cox ME, Boling Turer CL, et al. Do the five A’s work when physicians counsel about weight loss? Fam Med. 2011;​43(3):​179-184. 41. Mitchell S, Heyden R, Heyden N, et al. A pilot study of motivational interviewing training in a virtual world. J Med Internet Res. 2011;​1 3(3):​e77. 26. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence:​2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008;​35(2):​157-176. 42. Kessler R, Stafford D. Collaborative Medicine Case Studies:​Evidence in Practice. New York, NY:​Springer; 2008. 27. D’Onofrio G, Fiellin DA, Pantalon MV, et al. A brief intervention reduces hazardous and harmful drinking in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;​60(2):​181-192. 28. Miller ET, Spilker J. Readiness to change and brief educational interventions:​successful strategies to reduce stroke risk. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;​ 35(4):​215-222. 29. Hashim MJ. Patient-centered communication:​basic skills. Am Fam Physician. 2017;​95(1):​29-34. 30. Elwyn G, Dehlendorf C, Epstein RM, Marrin K, White J, Frosch DL. Shared decision making and motivational interviewing:​achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care problems [published correction appears in Ann Fam Med. 2014;​12(4):​301]. Ann Fam Med. 2014;​1 2(3):​270-275. 31. Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, Manwell LB, Stauffacher EA, Barry KL. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers:​long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;​26(1):​36-43. 32. Laporte C, Vaillant-Roussel H, Pereira B, et al. Cannabis and young users—a brief intervention to reduce their consumption (CANABIC):​a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2017;​ 15(2):​1 31-139. 33. Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke BL, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings:​a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;​93(2):​157-168. 43. McCulloch J, Ramesar S, Peterson H. Psychotherapy in primary care:​ the BATHE technique. Am Fam Physician. 1998;​57(9):​2131-2134. 44. Searight HR. Behavior change. In:​Smith MA, Schrager SB, WinklerPrins V, eds. Essentials of Family Medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.:​Wolters Kluwer; 2018:​60-72. 45. DeMaria S Jr., DeMaria AP, Silvay G, Flynn BC. Use of the BATHE method in the preanesthetic clinic visit. Anesth Analg. 2011;​1 13(5):​1020-1026. 46. Taylor SE, Stanton AL. Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;​3:​377-401. 47. Cabezas C, Martin C, Granollers S, et al. Effectiveness of a stepped primary care smoking cessation intervention (ISTAPS study):​design of a cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2009;​9:​48. 48. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD. Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;​1(1):​1 15-128. 49. Johnson SS, Paiva AL, Mauriello L, Prochaska JO, Redding C, Velicer WF. Coaction in multiple behavior change interventions:​consistency across multiple studies on weight management and obesity prevention. Health Psychol. 2014;​33(5):​475-480. 50. McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments:​the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003;​18(2):​156-170. 51. Searight HR. Substance use disorders. In:​Smith MA, Schrager SB, WinklerPrins V, eds. Essentials of Family Medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.:​ Wolters Kluwer; 2018:​453-467. 34. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC. Motivational Interviewing in Health Care:​Helping Patients Change Behavior. New York, NY:​Guilford Publications; 2007. 728 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 12 ◆ December 15, 2018