Retainers in Fixed Prosthodontics PDF

especially if the opposing teeth R especially if the opposing teeth especially if the opposing teeth higher thickness needed for better strength malleable cant be used high occlusal forces ver strong even if thin  especial...

especially if the opposing teeth R especially if the opposing teeth especially if the opposing teeth higher thickness needed for better strength malleable cant be used high occlusal forces ver strong even if thin  especially if the opposing teeth since the metal will appear in case of non esthetics all of the above posterior only or subgingival equigingival not accepted in esthetic areas emax normal zirconia is strong when bruxism..  strength and esthetics are inversely proportional but now more options with zirconia less extensive pep needed monolithic sabbe wehde lithium disilicate glass ceramics 2mm premium in esthetics but differ in strength zirconia strength but now with glazed with polished surfaces it decreased a bit monolithic dull not durable but direct less destructive  not durable for healing period to solve the different path of insertion problem except in the case of perfectly done access cavity preparation  clinical and anatomical crown change with age sensitivity youg age ca  especially if the opposing teeth RPD strength is needed class 5 and 3 show low oral hygiene high index caries never do partial coverage HIGH FORCES THEN FULL COVERAGE  OR MESIAL TO FIX IT GLASSY