Macroeconomics PDF - Overview and Key Questions
Document Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f93/c1f93b821ada854a2f4577fe31192e455b30fa7c" alt="RadiantRaleigh8037"
Uploaded by RadiantRaleigh8037
Udelar
Tags
Summary
This document introduces macroeconomics, explaining its focus on aggregate economic processes. It differentiates macroeconomics from microeconomics, discusses key concepts and questions, and provides an overview of world economics. The discussion includes examples and policy targets.
Full Transcript
1 Macroeconomics Macroeconomics (Greek makro = ‘big’) describes and explains economic processes that concern aggregates. An aggregate is a multitude of economic subjects that share some common features. By contrast, microeconomics treats economic processes that concern individuals. Example:...
1 Macroeconomics Macroeconomics (Greek makro = ‘big’) describes and explains economic processes that concern aggregates. An aggregate is a multitude of economic subjects that share some common features. By contrast, microeconomics treats economic processes that concern individuals. Example: The decision of a firm to purchase a new office chair from com- pany X is not a macroeconomic problem. The reaction of Austrian house- holds to an increased rate of capital taxation is a macroeconomic problem. Why macroeconomics and not only microeconomics? The whole is more complex than the sum of independent parts. It is not possible to de- scribe an economy by forming models for all firms and persons and all their cross-effects. Macroeconomics investigates aggregate behavior by imposing simplifying assumptions (“assume there are many identical firms that pro- duce the same good”) but without abstracting from the essential features. These assumptions are used in order to build macroeconomic models. Typi- cally, such models have three aspects: the ‘story’, the mathematical model, and a graphical representation. Macroeconomics is ‘non-experimental’: like, e.g., history, macro- economics cannot conduct controlled scientific experiments (people would complain about such experiments, and with a good reason) and focuses on pure observation. Because historical episodes allow diverse interpretations, many conclusions of macroeconomics are not coercive. Classical motivation of macroeconomics: politicians should be ad- vised how to control the economy, such that specified targets can be met optimally. policy targets: traditionally, the ‘magical pentagon’ of good economic growth, stable prices, full employment, external equilibrium, just distribution 1 of income; according to the EMU criteria, focus on inflation (around 2%), public debt, and a balanced budget; according to Blanchard, focus on low unemployment (around 5%), good economic growth, and inflation (0—3%). In all specifications, aim is meeting several conflicting targets simultaneously. Examples for further typical questions to macroeconomics: what causes business cycles (episodes of stronger and weaker economic growth)? can an increase in the monetary supply by the central bank cause real effects? what is responsible for long-run economic growth? should the exchange rate of a currency be kept at a fixed level? can one decrease unemployment, if one accepts an increase in inflation? A survey of world economics: three large economic blocks (Eu- rope, USA+Canada, Japan+Far East) with different problems, the remain- der mostly developing countries. 1. USA: good growth, low inflation, tolerable unemployment rate, per- sistent external deficit, increasing income inequality. 2. EU: moderate growth, low inflation, in some countries high unem- ployment, inconspicuous external balance (total EU active, in Austria recently turned active), for some countries large public debt, currently important unification process, convergence and heterogeneity of indi- vidual countries. ‘Richest’ EU countries Luxembourg, Denmark, then ‘mid-field’ with Austria, IRL, B, NL, UK, D, F, FIN, I, S; slightly be- low E, GR, SLO, P. Last come most ‘new’ (2004 accession) countries (from Malta down to Latvia). Very ‘rich’ non-EU countries Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland. 3. Japan: recently weak growth, large external surplus, deflationary ten- dencies. 2