Fundamentals of Financial Markets and Institutions Lecture - PDF

Summary

This lecture, from January 30, 2025, gives an overview of financial markets and institutions. It covers financial innovation, securitization, the rise of cryptocurrency, and the development of Fintech, including discussions on their acceptance, pros, and cons. The evolution of Fintech is also assessed, along with the roles of traditional banks.

Full Transcript

**Fundamentals of Financial Markets and Institutions** **30.01.2025 -- Lecture 8** Financial innovation has been somewhat controversial, with some key financial characters being unappreciative of it. - Innovation is considered good in most other, so why is it not always considered good in f...

**Fundamentals of Financial Markets and Institutions** **30.01.2025 -- Lecture 8** Financial innovation has been somewhat controversial, with some key financial characters being unappreciative of it. - Innovation is considered good in most other, so why is it not always considered good in finance? - There are cases where innovation has gone too far, or there hasn't been strict enough regulation on the innovations. - *GFC, with CDOs, and credit default swaps.* - However, overall, when looking at financial innovation there is significantly more positive than negative. Financial innovation: the creation of new financial instruments, technologies, institutions, markets. [Response to supply and demand:] - Private companies who make financial innovations need to match supply and demand of customers. - *For example, if investors want forest linked assets, they might create a forest fund.* - Solutions for sales needs are created. - Financial innovations may also occur to minimize taxes. - *Equity savings account, which only requires you to pay taxes once you start taking out the shares, shifting taxation to later.* Securitization: a process in which traditional banks assets are converted into securities. - *CDOs, ABSs.* - There were used in the GFC, whether they were the cause of simply amplified the crisis depends on viewpoint. A diagram of a company AI-generated content may be incorrect. - The issue with securitization is that the end investors do not know the true value of the riskiness, they depend on credit rating agencies. - During the GFC it became apparent that the ratings given by credit rating agencies underestimated the risk significantly. ![](media/image2.png) - Since the GFC the market for CDOs and ABSs has shrunk significantly. **Cryptocurrency** A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect. - Before bitcoin only banks were able to create money -\> monopoly. - Since there is an additional money market. Currency is what we use to pay for things, would you buy a tesla with bitcoin? Realistically not, as you would expect it to increase in value and want to avoid regret. - Crypto is a vehicle of speculation. - For transactions we prefer stable currencies/fiat currencies -\> when we use it to buy something we do not need to consider what the value will be in a week. Pros of crypto: 1. Quick and easy payments 2. Innovative financial services Cons of crypto: 1. Lack strong operational, governance, and risk practices. 2. Consumer protection risks due to limited oversight and disclosure. 3. Anonymity causes use for money laundering and terrorist financing. - Fraud cases in crypto are more common than in traditional banking. - *The fall of FTX cryptocurrency sparked fears of a crypto GFC, however in the end this did not occur, proving to be particularly agile.* The value of bitcoin is based on how much speculators value it. - However, it is unlikely to ever go away, since it is a global phenomenon with demand. [Acceptance of crypto:] The value of bitcoin is based on how much speculators value it. - However, it is unlikely to ever go away, since it is a global phenomenon with demand. Trump had originally been a sceptic but has recently suggested that the US will become the model for the crypto market, and planning on launching a crypto division. - In 2024 there was the landmark approval of the first bitcoin ETF. - This showed recognition and approval by the SEC. - However, the SEC was clear to point out it was not endorsing it due to its speculative and volatile nature, and the fact that it is often used for illicit activity. - In response, the SEC is launching a crypto task force, to develop clear regulation. - When crypto first started it was based on the idea of no regulation, but to be classified as an asset class it must be -\> crypto investors are now considering whether this is for the better. ![A table with blue and white text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](media/image4.png) - Unlike fiat currencies crypto has a limited supply. - This raises the question of who sets the limit? -\> anonymous so we don't know -\> do we trust them? Financial technology (FinTech): the use of technology to deliver financial solutions. A graph of financial growth AI-generated content may be incorrect. - FinTech is large and rapidly growing industry. - Consequently, it has faced greater regulatory scrutiny. ![A diagram of a pie chart AI-generated content may be incorrect.](media/image6.png) - FinTech allows newcomers into the industry, competing with older large banks in certain sectors -\> the biggest threat to traditional banking. - *For example, the payments industry, with newcomers like visa and apple pay.* A group of logos and text AI-generated content may be incorrect. - The FinTech ecosystem has grown substantially in the last 20 years, with some major companies like PayPal, Lending Club, Revolut. ![A graph with blue lines and a line AI-generated content may be incorrect.](media/image8.png) Neobank: a non-traditional bank. - However, FinTech is now facing a downturn, with investments in them drying up. [Case: checkout.com] - Checkout.com was able hit a \$40bn valuation after its funding round. - Since, it has been facing challenges in its valuations. - Reflecting how there was hype in the sector, but now the FinTech bubble has burst. Peer-to-peer lending: an alternative to bank loans, where individuals or companies can borrow directly from individuals who are ready to lend through online platforms. [Case: Lending Club] A screenshot of a computer screen AI-generated content may be incorrect. - P-2-P lending was able to take up a large market share from traditional banks. [P-2-P versus traditional lending:] - Loans from traditional banks are funded with deposits, appearing on the bank's balance sheet, with the credit risk falling on the bank. - In P-2-P lending, investors willing to lend are connected to borrowers, without intermediation from a traditional financial institution -\> the credit risk falls on the investor. - If the risk is realized, there is no bailout. ![A graph of a financial statement AI-generated content may be incorrect.](media/image10.png) - The operating costs for P-2-P lending platforms is also significantly lower than for traditional banks. - There are less stringent capital requirements, fewer employees, no office space. - Most of the costs come from marketing. [Advantages of P-2-P lending platforms]: 1. Lower capital requirements 2. Lower outstanding costs 3. After GFC there was distrust/dislike of the banks, meaning higher likelihood of participation. A comparison of graphs and charts AI-generated content may be incorrect. - These led to the growth of the industry, circa 2015. [Disadvantages of P-2-P lending platforms:] 1. Low barriers of entry led to increased competition. 2. Pooled different levels of risk into a portfolio for investors to invest in. - Once the borrowers with the highest risk class did not pay the loans back, many investors were disappointed -\> loses for P-2-P platforms and investors leaving. - Traditional banks perform credit worthiness analysis, if someone is not approved for a loan, the find another way -\> P-2-P lending platforms. ![A graph of a stock market AI-generated content may be incorrect.](media/image12.png) - Consequentially, many P-2-P lending platforms show a steep drop in share prices. Lending Club opted to buy a commerical bank, coming to the conclusion that regulation and capital requirements are worth the cheap funding from deposits. - Regulation provides safety. Crowdfunding: funding by raising money from many people who contribute relatively small amounts. - The CMU has been pushing for alternative financing, including crowd funding. - After the first round of funding from friends and family, crowdfunding could work as an intermediate step before turning to VCs. [Case: Oura] - Oura received its first funding round on Kickstarted, a crowdfunding site. - Since Oura has amassed a large valuation of around \$5.2bn and managed to raise significant VC funding. - However, this case is an exception, with most crowdfunded startups going bankrupt. A graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of a graph of AI-generated content may be incorrect. - Similarly to P-2-P lending platforms, crowdfunding has recently been facing a downturn. - Many investors have faced underwhelming results, economic uncertainty and cases of failed deliveries. [Traditional banks and FinTech:] - Banks have been lobbying against FinTech, stating it is unfair that newcomers do not face the same regulation, even though they provide the same services. - Suggesting they lack consumer protection and risk financial stability. [Sustainabiliy of new shadow banks:] - Many claim that the growth trends are not sustainable due to the following reasons. 1. Increased regulatory scrutiny as non-banks become too large. - Bank lobbyists. 2. Expansion to other asset classes. - Challenges in expanding into other asset classes, particularly mortgages where profitability is higher, there is greater volatility and even more regulatory scrutiny. 3. Competitive response from incumbent banks. - If incumbent banks see a new service, they may begin to offer it themselves, reduce prices of current services, or push for more regulations.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser