Analytical Techniques And Instrumentation Lecture 2 PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by CompatibleMorganite2491
Tags
Related
- Analytical Chemistry (CH & RP 174) - Section 4: Titrimetric Analysis - University of Mines and Technology - July 2024 PDF
- Complexometric Titration PDF
- Analytical Chemistry PDF
- Ultra Summary - Clinical Chemistry PDF
- Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry (I) 2024-2025 PDF
- Clinical Chemistry I 0202304 Lecture Notes PDF
Summary
This document is a lecture or presentation on analytical techniques and instrumentation. It outlines learning goals, introduces the concept of method evaluation and various performance standards. Considerations for selecting suitable analytical methods and the process of method evaluation are also covered. The lecture, or presentation, appears oriented toward an undergraduate chemistry or similar science program.
Full Transcript
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMENTATION MLS 2100 LECTURE 2 LEARNING GOALS: ◼ On completing this topic, the student should be able to: ◼ List, define and distinguish among performance standards ◼ Explain the importance of method evaluation ◼ Make inferences about method acceptability based...
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMENTATION MLS 2100 LECTURE 2 LEARNING GOALS: ◼ On completing this topic, the student should be able to: ◼ List, define and distinguish among performance standards ◼ Explain the importance of method evaluation ◼ Make inferences about method acceptability based on evaluation ◼ Formulate or judge the soundness of a plan for method evaluation What is Method Evaluation? ◼ “Method evaluation [or method validation] is a procedure of performing assessments designed to verify that an analytical test system is suitable for its intended [use] and is capable of providing [reliable] analytical data.” Why do we evaluate methods? WHEN TO VALIDATE / VERIFY? ◼ After a period of non‐use ◼ Periodically as required by Quality Management System ◼ New methods. ◼ Methods developed in house. ◼ Amended standard/commercial methods. ◼ If there are Changes: ◼ Application (use) ◼ Working environment ◼ Analyst Selecting an analytical method ◼ Consideration: ◼ Sample Matrix ◼ Expected concentration of the analyte ◼ Accuracy needed ◼ Number of samples to be analysed (Turnaround time) ◼ Cost ◼ Time ◼ Available equipment and ◼ Expertise Evaluation of Methods: How do you evaluate? Performance standards/characteristics Performance standards/characteristics Precision ◼ The precision of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement (degree of scatter) between a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogenous sample under the prescribed conditions. ◼ Precision may be considered at two levels: repeatability and reproducibility. Precision Precision ◼ Repeatability: expresses the precision under the same operating conditions over a short interval of time. For example: the same analyst analyses samples on the same day with the same instrument. ◼ Reproducibility: refers to the degree of agreement between the results of experiments conducted by different individuals, at different locations, with different instruments. Accuracy ◼ The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the value that is accepted either as a conventional true value or an accepted reference value and the value found. This is sometimes termed trueness. Precision Vs Accuracy Specificity ◼ Specificity refers to the ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in the presence of components that may be expected to be present eg impurities, degradation products, matrix components ◼ This parameter is concerned with the extent to which other substances interfere with the identification. Ruggedness Robustness ◼ Robustness is the method’s capability to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate changes in method parameters, eg. pH, temperature, reagents, brands,