DSP Modules PDF

Module 1: History and Overview 1.0 Defining DSP Digital Signal Processing is one of the most powerful technologies that will shape science and engineering in the twenty-first century. Revolutionary changes have already been made in a broad range of fields: communications, medical imaging, radar & sonar, high fidelity music reproduction, and oil prospecting, to name just a few. Each of these areas has developed a deep DSP technology, with its own algorithms, mathematics, and specialized techniques. This combination of breath and depth makes it impossible for any one individual to master all of the DSP technology that has been developed. DSP education involves two tasks: learning general concepts that apply to the field as a whole, and learning specialized techniques for your particular area of interest. This chapter starts our journey into the world of Digital Signal Processing by describing the dramatic effect that DSP has made in several diverse fields. The revolution has begun. 1.1 The Roots of DSP Digital Signal Processing is distinguished from other areas in computer science by the unique type of data it uses: signals. In most cases, these signals originate as sensory data from the real world: seismic vibrations, visual images, sound waves, etc. DSP is the mathematics, the algorithms, and the techniques used to manipulate these signals after they have been converted into a digital form. This includes a wide variety of goals, such as: enhancement of visual images, recognition and generation of speech, compression of data for storage and transmission, etc. Suppose we attach an analog-to-digital converter to a computer and use it to acquire a chunk of real world data. DSP answers the question: What next? The roots of DSP are in the 1960s and 1970s when digital computers first became available. Computers were expensive during this era, and DSP was limited to only a few critical applications. Pioneering efforts were made in four key areas: radar & sonar, where national security was at risk; oil exploration, where large amounts of money could be made; space exploration, where the data are irreplaceable; and medical imaging, where lives could be saved. The personal computer revolution of the 1980s and 1990s caused DSP to explode with new applications. Rather than being motivated by military and government needs, DSP was suddenly driven by the commercial marketplace. Anyone who thought they could make money in the rapidly expanding field was suddenly a DSP vender. DSP reached the public in such products as: mobile telephones, compact disc players, and electronic voice mail. Figure 1-1 illustrates a few of these varied applications. This technological revolution occurred from the top-down. In the early 1980s, DSP was taught as a graduate level course in electrical engineering. A decade later, DSP had become a standard part of the undergraduate curriculum. Today, DSP is a basic skill needed by scientists and engineers in many fields. As an analogy, DSP can be compared to a previous technological revolution: electronics. While still in the realm of electrical engineering, nearly every scientist and engineer has some background in basic circuit design. Without it, they would be lost in the technological world. DSP has the same future. This recent history is more than a curiosity; it has a tremendous impact on your ability to learn and use DSP. Suppose you encounter a DSP problem, and turn to textbooks or other publications to find a solution. What you will typically find is page after page of equations, obscure mathematical symbols, and unfamiliar terminology. It's a nightmare! Much of the DSP literature is baffling even to those experienced in the field. It's not that there's anything wrong with this material, it is just intended for a very specialized audience. State-of-the-art researchers need this kind of detailed mathematics to understand the theoretical implications of the work. A basic premise of this book is that most practical DSP techniques can be learned and used without the traditional barriers of detailed mathematics and theory. The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing is written for those who want to use DSP as a tool, not a new career. The remainder of this chapter illustrates areas where DSP has produced revolutionary changes. As you go through each application, notice that DSP is very interdisciplinary, relying on technical work in many adjacent fields. As Fig. 1-2 suggests, the borders between DSP and other technical disciplines are not sharp and well defined, but rather fuzzy and overlapping. If you want to specialize in DSP, these are the allied areas you will also need to study. 1.2 Telecommunications Telecommunications is about transferring information from one location to another. This includes many forms of information: telephone conversations, television signals, computer files, and other types of data. To transfer the information, you need a channel between the two locations. This may be a wire pair, radio signal, optical fiber, etc. Telecommunications companies receive payment for transferring their customer's information, while they must pay to establish and maintain the channel. The financial bottom line is simple: the more information they can pass through a single channel, the more money they make. DSP has revolutionized the telecommunications industry in many areas: signaling tone generation and detection, frequency band shifting, filtering to remove power line hum, etc. Three specific examples from the telephone network will be discussed here: multiplexing, compression, and echo control. Multiplexing There are approximately one billion telephones in the world. At the press of a few buttons, switching networks allow any one of these to be connected to any other in only a few seconds. The immensity of this task is mind boggling! Until the 1960s, a connection between two telephones required passing the analog voice signals through mechanical switches and amplifiers. One connection required one pair of wires. In comparison, DSP converts audio signals into a stream of serial digital data. Since bits can be easily intertwined and later separated, many telephone conversations can be transmitted on a single channel. For example, a telephone standard known as the T-carrier system can simultaneously transmit 24 voice signals. Each voice signal is sampled 8000 times per second using an 8 bit companded (logarithmic compressed) analog-to-digital conversion. This results in each voice signal being represented as 64,000 bits/sec, and all 24 channels being contained in 1.544 megabits/sec. This signal can be transmitted about 6000 feet using ordinary telephone lines of 22 gauge copper wire, a typical interconnection distance. The financial advantage of digital transmission is enormous. Wire and analog switches are expensive; digital logic gates are cheap. Compression When a voice signal is digitized at 8000 samples/sec, most of the digital information is redundant. That is, the information carried by any one sample is largely duplicated by the neighboring samples. Dozens of DSP algorithms have been developed to convert digitized voice signals into data streams that require fewer bits/sec. These are called data compression algorithms. Matching uncompression algorithms are used to restore the signal to its original form. These algorithms vary in the amount of compression achieved and the resulting sound quality. In general, reducing the data rate from 64 kilobits/sec to 32 kilobits/sec results in no loss of sound quality. When compressed to a data rate of 8 kilobits/sec, the sound is noticeably affected, but still usable for long distance telephone networks. The highest achievable compression is about 2 kilobits/sec, resulting in sound that is highly distorted, but usable for some applications such as military and undersea communications. Echo control Echoes are a serious problem in long distance telephone connections. When you speak into a telephone, a signal representing your voice travels to the connecting receiver, where a portion of it returns as an echo. If the connection is within a few hundred miles, the elapsed time for receiving the echo is only a few milliseconds. The human ear is accustomed to hearing echoes with these small time delays, and the connection sounds quite normal. As the distance becomes larger, the echo becomes increasingly noticeable and irritating. The delay can be several hundred milliseconds for intercontinental communications, and is particularly objectionable. Digital Signal Processing attacks this type of problem by measuring the returned signal and generating an appropriate anti signal to cancel the offending echo. This same technique allows speakerphone users to hear and speak at the same time without fighting audio feedback (squealing). It can also be used to reduce environmental noise by canceling it with digitally generated antinoise. 1.3 Audio Processing The two principal human senses are vision and hearing. Correspondingly, much of DSP is related to image and audio processing. People listen to both music and speech. DSP has made revolutionary changes in both these areas. Music The path leading from the musician's microphone to the audiophile's speaker is remarkably long. Digital data representation is important to prevent the degradation commonly associated with analog storage and manipulation. This is very familiar to anyone who has compared the musical quality of cassette tapes with compact disks. In a typical scenario, a musical piece is recorded in a sound studio on multiple channels or tracks. In some cases, this even involves recording individual instruments and singers separately. This is done to give the sound engineer greater flexibility in creating the final product. The complex process of combining the individual tracks into a final product is called mix down. DSP can provide several important functions during mix down, including: filtering, signal addition and subtraction, signal editing, etc. One of the most interesting DSP applications in music preparation is artificial reverberation. If the individual channels are simply added together, the resulting piece sounds frail and diluted, much as if the musicians were playing outdoors. This is because listeners are greatly influenced by the echo or reverberation content of the music, which is usually minimized in the sound studio. DSP allows artificial echoes and reverberation to be added during mix down to simulate various ideal listening environments. Echoes with delays of a few hundred milliseconds give the impression of cathedral-like locations. Adding echoes with delays of 10-20 milliseconds provide the perception of more modest size listening rooms. Speech generation Speech generation and recognition are used to communicate between humans and machines. Rather than using your hands and eyes, you use your mouth and ears. This is very convenient when your hands and eyes should be doing something else, such as: driving a car, performing surgery, or (unfortunately) firing your weapons at the enemy. Two approaches are used for computer generated speech: digital recording and vocal tract simulation. In digital recording, the voice of a human speaker is digitized and stored, usually in a compressed form. During playback, the stored data are uncompressed and converted back into an analog signal. An entire hour of recorded speech requires only about three megabytes of storage, well within the capabilities of even small computer systems. This is the most common method of digital speech generation used today. Vocal tract simulators are more complicated, trying to mimic the physical mechanisms by which humans create speech. The human vocal tract is an acoustic cavity with resonate frequencies determined by the size and shape of the chambers. Sound originates in the vocal tract in one of two basic ways, called voiced and fricative sounds. With voiced sounds, vocal cord vibration produces near periodic pulses of air into the vocal cavities. In comparison, fricative sounds originate from the noisy air turbulence at narrow constrictions, such as the teeth and lips. Vocal tract simulators operate by generating digital signals that resemble these two types of excitation. The characteristics of the resonant chamber are simulated by passing the excitation signal through a digital filter with similar resonances. This approach was used in one of the very early DSP success stories, the Speak & Spell, a widely sold electronic learning aid for children. Speech recognition The automated recognition of human speech is immensely more difficult than speech generation. Speech recognition is a classic example of things that the human brain does well, but digital computers do poorly. Digital computers can store and recall vast amounts of data, perform mathematical calculations at blazing speeds, and do repetitive tasks without becoming bored or inefficient. Unfortunately, present day computers perform very poorly when faced with raw sensory data. Teaching a computer to send you a monthly electric bill is easy. Teaching the same computer to understand your voice is a major undertaking. Digital Signal Processing generally approaches the problem of voice recognition in two steps: feature extraction followed by feature matching. Each word in the incoming audio signal is isolated and then analyzed to identify the type of excitation and resonate frequencies. These parameters are then compared with previous examples of spoken words to identify the closest match. Often, these systems are limited to only a few hundred words; can only accept speech with distinct pauses between words; and must be retrained for each individual speaker. While this is adequate for many commercial applications, these limitations are humbling when compared to the abilities of human hearing. There is a great deal of work to be done in this area, with tremendous financial rewards for those that produce successful commercial products. 1.4 Echo Location A common method of obtaining information about a remote object is to bounce a wave off of it. For example, radar operates by transmitting pulses of radio waves, and examining the received signal for echoes from aircraft. In sonar, sound waves are transmitted through the water to detect submarines and other submerged objects. Geophysicists have long probed the earth by setting off explosions and listening for the echoes from deeply buried layers of rock. While these applications have a common thread, each has its own specific problems and needs. Digital Signal Processing has produced revolutionary changes in all three areas. Radar Radar is an acronym for RAdio Detection And Ranging. In the simplest radar system, a radio transmitter produces a pulse of radio frequency energy a few microseconds long. This pulse is fed into a highly directional antenna, where the resulting radio wave propagates away at the speed of light. Aircraft in the path of this wave will reflect a small portion of the energy back toward a receiving antenna, situated near the transmission site. The distance to the object is calculated from the elapsed time between the transmitted pulse and the received echo. The direction to the object is found more simply; you know where you pointed the directional antenna when the echo was received. The operating range of a radar system is determined by two parameters: how much energy is in the initial pulse, and the noise level of the radio receiver. Unfortunately, increasing the energy in the pulse usually requires making the pulse longer. In turn, the longer pulse reduces the accuracy and precision of the elapsed time measurement. This results in a conflict between two important parameters: the ability to detect objects at long range, and the ability to accurately determine an object's distance. DSP has revolutionized radar in three areas, all of which relate to this basic problem. First, DSP can compress the pulse after it is received, providing better distance determination without reducing the operating range. Second, DSP can filter the received signal to decrease the noise. This increases the range, without degrading the distance determination. Third, DSP enables the rapid selection and generation of different pulse shapes and lengths. Among other things, this allows the pulse to be optimized for a particular detection problem. Now the impressive part: much of this is done at a sampling rate comparable to the radio frequency used, at high as several hundred megahertz! When it comes to radar, DSP is as much about high-speed hardware design as it is about algorithms. Sonar Sonar is an acronym for SOund NAvigation and Ranging. It is divided into two categories, active and passive. In active sonar, sound pulses between 2 kHz and 40 kHz are transmitted into the water, and the resulting echoes detected and analyzed. Uses of active sonar include: detection & localization of undersea bodies, navigation, communication, and mapping the sea floor. A maximum operating range of 10 to 100 kilometers is typical. In comparison, passive sonar simply listens to underwater sounds, which includes: natural turbulence, marine life, and mechanical sounds from submarines and surface vessels. Since passive sonar emits no energy, it is ideal for covert operations. You want to detect the other guy, without him detecting you. The most important application of passive sonar is in military surveillance systems that detect and track submarines. Passive sonar typically uses lower frequencies than active sonar because they propagate through the water with less absorption. Detection ranges can be thousands of kilometers. DSP has revolutionized sonar in many of the same areas as radar: pulse generation, pulse compression, and filtering of detected signals. In one view, sonar is simpler than radar because of the lower frequencies involved. In another view, sonar is more difficult than radar because the environment is much less uniform and stable. Sonar systems usually employ extensive arrays of transmitting and receiving elements, rather than just a single channel. By properly controlling and mixing the signals in these many elements, the sonar system can steer the emitted pulse to the desired location and determine the direction that echoes are received from. To handle these multiple channels, sonar systems require the same massive DSP computing power as radar. Reflection seismology As early as the 1920s, geophysicists discovered that the structure of the earth's crust could be probed with sound. Prospectors could set off an explosion and record the echoes from boundary layers more than ten kilometers below the surface. These echo seismograms were interpreted by the raw eye to map the subsurface structure. The reflection seismic method rapidly became the primary method for locating petroleum and mineral deposits, and remains so today. In the ideal case, a sound pulse sent into the ground produces a single echo for each boundary layer the pulse passes through. Unfortunately, the situation is not usually this simple. Each echo returning to the surface must pass through all the other boundary layers above where it originated. This can result in the echo bouncing between layers, giving rise to echoes of echoes being detected at the surface. These secondary echoes can make the detected signal very complicated and difficult to interpret. Digital Signal Processing has been widely used since the 1960s to isolate the primary from the secondary echoes in reflection seismograms. How did the early geophysicists manage without DSP? The answer is simple: they looked in easy places, where multiple reflections were minimized. DSP allows oil to be found in difficult locations, such as under the ocean. 1.5 Image Processing Images are signals with special characteristics. First, they are a measure of a parameter over space (distance), while most signals are a measure of a parameter over time. Second, they contain a great deal of information. For example, more than 10 megabytes can be required to store one second of television video. This is more than a thousand times greater than for a similar length voice signal. Third, the final judge of quality is often a subjective human evaluation, rather than an objective criteria. These special characteristics have made image processing a distinct subgroup within DSP. Medical In 1895, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovered that x-rays could pass through substantial amounts of matter. Medicine was revolutionized by the ability to look inside the living human body. Medical x-ray systems spread throughout the world in only a few years. In spite of its obvious success, medical x-ray imaging was limited by four problems until DSP and related techniques came along in the 1970s. First, overlapping structures in the body can hide behind each other. For example, portions of the heart might not be visible behind the ribs. Second, it is not always possible to distinguish between similar tissues. For example, it may be able to separate bone from soft tissue, but not distinguish a tumor from the liver. Third, x-ray images show anatomy, the body's structure, and not physiology, the body's operation. The x-ray image of a living person looks exactly like the x-ray image of a dead one! Fourth, x-ray exposure can cause cancer, requiring it to be used sparingly and only with proper justification. The problem of overlapping structures was solved in 1971 with the introduction of the first computed tomography scanner (formerly called computed axial tomography, or CAT scanner). Computed tomography (CT) is a classic example of Digital Signal Processing. X-rays from many directions are passed through the section of the patient's body being examined. Instead of simply forming images with the detected x-rays, the signals are converted into digital data and stored in a computer. The information is then used to calculate images that appear to be slices through the body. These images show much greater detail than conventional techniques, allowing significantly better diagnosis and treatment. The impact of CT was nearly as large as the original introduction of x-ray imaging itself. Within only a few years, every major hospital in the world had access to a CT scanner. In 1979, two of CT's principle contributors, Godfrey N. Hounsfield and Allan M. Cormack, shared the Nobel Prize in Medicine. That's a good DSP! The last three x-ray problems have been solved by using penetrating energy other than x-rays, such as radio and sound waves. DSP plays a key role in all these techniques. For example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) uses magnetic fields in conjunction with radio waves to probe the interior of the human body. Properly adjusting the strength and frequency of the fields cause the atomic nuclei in a localized region of the body to resonate between quantum energy states. This resonance results in the emission of a secondary radio wave, detected with an antenna placed near the body. The strength and other characteristics of this detected signal provide information about the localized region in resonance. Adjustment of the magnetic field allows the resonance region to be scanned throughout the body, mapping the internal structure. This information is usually presented as images, just as in computed tomography. Besides providing excellent discrimination between different types of soft tissue, MRI can provide information about physiology, such as blood flow through arteries. MRI relies totally on Digital Signal Processing techniques, and could not be implemented without them. Space Sometimes, you just have to make the most out of a bad picture. This is frequently the case with images taken from unmanned satellites and space exploration vehicles. No one is going to send a repairman to Mars just to tweak the knobs on a camera! DSP can improve the quality of images taken under extremely unfavorable conditions in several ways: brightness and contrast adjustment, edge detection, noise reduction, focus adjustment, motion blur reduction, etc. Images that have spatial distortion, such as encountered when a flat image is taken of a spherical planet, can also be warped into a correct representation. Many individual images can also be combined into a single database, allowing the information to be displayed in unique ways. For example, a video sequence simulating an aerial flight over the surface of a distant planet. Commercial Imaging Products The large information content in images is a problem for systems sold in mass quantity to the general public. Commercial systems must be cheap, and this doesn't mesh well with large memories and high data transfer rates. One answer to this dilemma is image compression. Just as with voice signals, images contain a tremendous amount of redundant information, and can be run through algorithms that reduce the number of bits needed to represent them. Television and other moving pictures are especially suitable for compression, since most of the images remain the same from frame-to-frame. Commercial imaging products that take advantage of this technology include: video telephones, computer programs that display moving pictures, and digital television. Module 2: Statistics, Probability, and Noise 2.1 Signal and Graph Terminology Statistics and probability are used in Digital Signal Processing to characterize signals and the processes that generate them. For example, a primary use of DSP is to reduce interference, noise, and other undesirable components in acquired data. These may be an inherent part of the signal being measured, arise from imperfections in the data acquisition system, or be introduced as an unavoidable byproduct of some DSP operation. Statistics and probability allow these disruptive features to be measured and classified, the first step in developing strategies to remove the offending components. This chapter introduces the most important concepts in statistics and probability, with emphasis on how they apply to acquired signals. A signal is a description of how one parameter is related to another parameter. For example, the most common type of signal in analog electronics is a voltage that varies with time. Since both parameters can assume a continuous range of values, we will call this a continuous signal. In comparison, passing this signal through an analog-to-digital converter forces each of the two parameters to be quantized. For instance, imagine the conversion being done with 12 bits at a sampling rate of 1000 samples per second. The voltage is curtailed to 4096 possible binary levels, and the time is only defined at one millisecond increments. Signals formed from parameters that are quantized in this manner are said to be discrete signals or digitized signals. For the most part, continuous signals exist in nature, while discrete signals exist inside computers (although you can find exceptions to both cases). It is also possible to have signals where one parameter is continuous and the other is discrete. Since these mixed signals are quite uncommon, they do not have special names given to them, and the nature of the two parameters must be explicitly stated. Figure 2-1 shows two discrete signals, such as might be acquired with a digital data acquisition system. The vertical axis may represent voltage, light intensity, sound pressure, or an infinite number of other parameters. Since we don't know what it represents in this particular case, we will give it the generic label: amplitude. This parameter is also called several other names: the y- axis, the dependent variable, the range, and the ordinate. The horizontal axis represents the other parameter of the signal, going by such names as: the x-axis, the independent variable, the domain, and the abscissa. Time is the most common parameter to appear on the horizontal axis of acquired signals; however, other parameters are used in specific applications. For example, a geophysicist might acquire measurements of rock density at equally spaced distances along the surface of the earth. To keep things general, we will simply label the horizontal axis: sample number. If this were a continuous signal, another label would have to be used, such as: time, distance, x, etc. The two parameters that form a signal are generally not interchangeable. The parameter on the y-axis (the dependent variable) is said to be a function of the parameter on the x-axis (the independent variable). In other words, the independent variable describes how or when each sample is taken, while the dependent variable is the actual measurement. Given a specific value on the x-axis, we can always find the corresponding value on the y-axis, but usually not the other way around. Pay particular attention to the word: domain, a very widely used term in DSP. For instance, a signal that uses time as the independent variable (i.e., the parameter on the horizontal axis), is said to be in the time domain. Another common signal in DSP uses frequency as the independent variable, resulting in the term frequency domain. Likewise, signals that use distance as the independent parameter are said to be in the spatial domain (distance is a measure of space). The type of parameter on the horizontal axis is the domain of the signal; it's that simple. What if the x-axis is labeled with something very generic, such as a sample number? Authors commonly refer to these signals as being in the time domain. This is because sampling at equal intervals of time is the most common way of obtaining signals, and they don't have anything more specific to call it. Although the signals in Fig. 2-1 are discrete, they are displayed in this figure as continuous lines. This is because there are too many samples to be distinguishable if they were displayed as individual markers. In graphs that portray shorter signals, say less than 100 samples, the individual markers are usually shown. Continuous lines may or may not be drawn to connect the markers, depending on how the author wants you to view the data. For instance, a continuous line could imply what is happening between samples, or simply be an aid to help the reader's eye follow a trend in noisy data. The point is, examine the labeling of the horizontal axis to find if you are working with a discrete or continuous signal. Don't rely on an illustrator's ability to draw dots. The variable, N, is widely used in DSP to represent the total number of samples in a signal. For example, N ' 512 for the signals in Fig. 2-1. To keep the data organized, each sample is assigned a sample number or index. These are the numbers that appear along the horizontal axis. Two notations for assigning sample numbers are commonly used. In the first notation, the sample indexes run from 1 to N (e.g., 1 to 512). In the second notation, the sample indexes run from 0 to N & 1 (e.g., 0 to 511). Mathematicians often use the first method (1 to N), while those in DSP commonly uses the second (0 to N & 1 ). In this book, we will use the second notation. Don't dismiss this as a trivial problem. It will confuse you sometime during your career. Look out for it! 2.2 Mean and Standard Deviation The mean, indicated by µ (a lower case Greek mu), is the statistician's jargon for the average value of a signal. It is found just as you would expect: add all of the samples together, and divide by N. It looks like this in mathematical form: In words, sum the values in the signal, xi, by letting the index, i, run from 0 to N-1. Then finish the calculation by dividing the sum by N. This is identical to the equation: μ =(x0 + x1 + x2 +... + xN-1)/N. If you are not already familiar with Σ (uppercase Greek sigma) being used to indicate summation, study these equations carefully, and compare them with the computer program in Table 2-1. Summations of this type are abundant in DSP, and you need to understand this notation fully. In electronics, the mean is commonly called the DC (direct current) value. Likewise, AC (alternating current) refers to how the signal fluctuates around the mean value. If the signal is a simple repetitive waveform, such as a sine or square wave, its excursions can be described by its peak-to-peak amplitude. Unfortunately, most acquired signals do not show a well defined peak-to-peak value, but have a random nature, such as the signals in Fig. 2-1. A more generalized method must be used in these cases, called the standard deviation, denoted by σ (a lowercase Greek sigma). As a starting point, the expression,|xi-μ|, describes how far the ith sample deviates (differs) from the mean. The average deviation of a signal is found by summing the deviations of all the individual samples, and then dividing by the number of samples, N. Notice that we take the absolute value of each deviation before the summation; otherwise the positive and negative terms would average to zero. The average deviation provides a single number representing the typical distance that the samples are from the mean. While convenient and straightforward, the average deviation is almost never used in statistics. This is because it doesn't fit well with the physics of how signals operate. In most cases, the important parameter is not the deviation from the mean, but the power represented by the deviation from the mean. For example, when random noise signals combine in an electronic circuit, the resultant noise is equal to the combined power of the individual signals, not their combined amplitude. The standard deviation is similar to the average deviation, except the averaging is done with power instead of amplitude. This is achieved by squaring each of the deviations before taking the average (remember, power ∝ voltage2). To finish, the square root is taken to compensate for the initial squaring. In equation form, the standard deviation is calculated: In the alternative notation: sigma = sqrt((x0 -μ)2 + (x1 -μ)2 +... + (xN-1 -μ)2 / (N-1)). Notice that the average is carried out by dividing by N - 1 instead of N. This is a subtle feature of the equation that will be discussed in the next section. The term, σ2, occurs frequently in statistics and is given the name variance. The standard deviation is a measure of how far the signal fluctuates from the mean. The variance represents the power of this fluctuation. Another term you should become familiar with is the rms (root-mean-square) value, frequently used in electronics. By definition, the standard deviation only measures the AC portion of a signal, while the rms value measures both the AC and DC components. If a signal has no DC component, its rms value is identical to its standard deviation. Figure 2-2 shows the relationship between the standard deviation and the peak-to-peak value of several common waveforms. Table 2-1 lists a computer routine for calculating the mean and standard deviation using Eqs. 2-1 and 2-2. The programs in this book are intended to convey algorithms in the most straightforward way; all other factors are treated as secondary. Good programming techniques are disregarded if it makes the program logic more clear. For instance: a simplified version of BASIC is used, line numbers are included, the only control structure allowed is the FOR-NEXT loop, there are no I/O statements, etc. Think of these programs as an alternative way of understanding the equations used. in DSP. If you can't grasp one, maybe the other will help. In BASIC, the % character at the end of a variable name indicates it is an integer. All other variables are floating point. Chapter 4 discusses these variable types in detail. This method of calculating the mean and standard deviation is adequate for many applications; however, it has two limitations. First, if the mean is much larger than the standard deviation, Eq. 2-2 involves subtracting two numbers that are very close in value. This can result in excessive round-off error in the calculations, a topic discussed in more detail in Chapter 4. Second, it is often desirable to recalculate the mean and standard deviation as new samples are acquired and added to the signal. We will call this type of calculation: running statistics. While the method of Eqs. 2-1 and 2-2 can be used for running statistics, it requires that all of the samples be involved in each new calculation. This is a very inefficient use of computational power and memory. A solution to these problems can be found by manipulating Eqs. 2-1 and 2-2 to provide another equation for calculating the standard deviation: While moving through the signal, a running tally is kept of three parameters: (1) the number of samples already processed, (2) the sum of these samples, and (3) the sum of the squares of the samples (that is, square the value of each sample and add the result to the accumulated value). After any number of samples have been processed, the mean and standard deviation can be efficiently calculated using only the current value of the three parameters. Table 2-2 shows a program that reports the mean and standard deviation in this manner as each new sample is taken into account. This is the method used in hand calculators to find the statistics of a sequence of numbers. Every time you enter a number and press the Σ (summation) key, the three parameters are updated. The mean and standard deviation can then be found whenever desired, without having to recalculate the entire sequence. Before ending this discussion on the mean and standard deviation, two other terms need to be mentioned. In some situations, the mean describes what is being measured, while the standard deviation represents noise and other interference. In these cases, the standard deviation is not important in itself, but only in comparison to the mean. This gives rise to the term: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which is equal to the mean divided by the standard deviation. Another term is also used, the coefficient of variation (CV). This is defined as the standard deviation divided by the mean, multiplied by 100 percent. For example, a signal (or other group of measure values) with a CV of 2%, has an SNR of 50. Better data means a higher value for the SNR and a lower value for the CV. 2.3 Signal vs. Underlying Process Statistics is the science of interpreting numerical data, such as acquired signals. In comparison, probability is used in DSP to understand the processes that generate signals. Although they are closely related, the distinction between the acquired signal and the underlying process is key to many DSP techniques. For example, imagine creating a 1000 point signal by flipping a coin 1000 times. If the coin flip is heads, the corresponding sample is made a value of one. On tails, the sample is set to zero. The process that created this signal has a mean of exactly 0.5, determined by the relative probability of each possible outcome: 50% heads, 50% tails. However, it is unlikely that the actual 1000 point signal will have a mean of exactly 0.5. Random chance will make the number of ones and zeros slightly different each time the signal is generated. The probabilities of the underlying process are constant, but the statistics of the acquired signal change each time the experiment is repeated. This random irregularity found in actual data is called by such names as: statistical variation, statistical fluctuation, and statistical noise. This presents a bit of a dilemma. When you see the terms: mean and standard deviation, how do you know if the author is referring to the statistics of an actual signal, or the probabilities of the underlying process that created the signal? Unfortunately, the only way you can tell is by the context. This is not so for all terms used in statistics and probability. For example, the histogram and probability mass function (discussed in the next section) are matching concepts that are given separate names. Now, back to Eq. 2-2, calculation of the standard deviation. As previously mentioned, this equation divides by N-1 in calculating the average of the squared deviations, rather than simply by N. To understand why this is so, imagine that you want to find the mean and standard deviation of some process that generates signals. Toward this end, you acquire a signal of N samples from the process, and calculate the mean of the signal via Eq. 2.1. You can then use this as an estimate of the mean of the underlying process; however, you know there will be an error due to statistical noise. In particular, for random signals, the typical error between the mean of the N points, and the mean of the underlying process, is given by: If N is small, the statistical noise in the calculated mean will be very large. In other words, you do not have access to enough data to properly characterize the process. The larger the value of N, the smaller the expected error will become. A milestone in probability theory, the Strong Law of Large Numbers, guarantees that the error becomes zero as N approaches infinity. In the next step, we would like to calculate the standard deviation of the acquired signal, and use it as an estimate of the standard deviation of the underlying process. Herein lies the problem. Before you can calculate the standard deviation using Eq. 2-2, you need to already know the mean, μ. However, you don't know the mean of the underlying process, only the mean of the N point signal, which contains an error due to statistical noise. This error tends to reduce the calculated value of the standard deviation. To compensate for this, N is replaced by N-1. If N is large, the difference doesn't matter. If N is small, this replacement provides a more accurate estimate of the standard deviation of the underlying process. In other words, Eq. 2-2 is an estimate of the standard deviation of the underlying process. If we divided by N in the equation, it would provide the standard deviation of the acquired signal. As an illustration of these ideas, look at the signals in Fig. 2-3, and ask: are the variations in these signals a result of statistical noise, or is the underlying process changing? It probably isn't hard to convince yourself that these changes are too large for random chance, and must be related to the underlying process. Processes that change their characteristics in this manner are called nonstationary. In comparison, the signals previously presented in Fig. 2-1 were generated from a stationary process, and the variations result completely from statistical noise. Figure 2-3b illustrates a common problem with nonstationary signals: the slowly changing mean interferes with the calculation of the standard deviation. In this example, the standard deviation of the signal, over a short interval, is one. However, the standard deviation of the entire signal is 1.16. This error can be nearly eliminated by breaking the signal into short sections, and calculating the statistics for each section individually. If needed, the standard deviations for each of the sections can be averaged to produce a single value. 2.4 Histogram, PMF, and PDF Suppose we attach an 8 bit analog-to-digital converter to a computer, and acquire 256,000 samples of some signal. As an example, Fig. 2-4a shows 128 samples that might be a part of this data set. The value of each sample will be one of 256 possibilities, 0 through 255. The histogram displays the number of samples there are in the signal that have each of these possible values. Figure (b) shows the histogram for the 128 samples in (a). For example, there are 2 samples that have a value of 110, 8 samples that have a value of 131, 0 samples that have a value of 170, etc. We will represent the histogram by Hi, where i is an index that runs from 0 to M-1, and M is the number of possible values that each sample can take on. For instance, H50 is the number of samples that have a value of 50. Figure (c) shows the histogram of the signal using the full data set, all 256k points. As can be seen, the larger number of samples results in a much smoother appearance. Just as with the mean, the statistical noise (roughness) of the histogram is inversely proportional to the square root of the number of samples used. From the way it is defined, the sum of all of the values in the histogram must be equal to the number of points in the signal: The histogram can be used to efficiently calculate the mean and standard deviation of very large data sets. This is especially important for images, which can contain millions of samples. The histogram groups samples together that have the same value. This allows the statistics to be calculated by working with a few groups, rather than a large number of individual samples. Using this approach, the mean and standard deviation are calculated from the histogram by the equations: Table 2-3 contains a program for calculating the histogram, mean, and standard deviation using these equations. Calculation of the histogram is very fast, since it only requires indexing and incrementing. In comparison, calculating the mean and standard deviation requires the time consuming operations of addition and multiplication. The strategy of this algorithm is to use these slow operations only on the few numbers in the histogram, not the many samples in the signal. This makes the algorithm much faster than the previously described methods. Think a factor of ten for very long signals with the calculations being performed on a general purpose computer. The notion that the acquired signal is a noisy version of the underlying process is very important; so important that some of the concepts are given different names. The histogram is what is formed from an acquired signal. The corresponding curve for the underlying process is called the probability mass function (pmf). A histogram is always calculated using a finite number of samples, while the pmf is what would be obtained with an infinite number of samples. The pmf can be estimated (inferred) from the histogram, or it may be deduced by some mathematical technique, such as in the coin flipping example. Figure 2-5 shows an example pmf, and one of the possible histograms that could be associated with it. The key to understanding these concepts rests in the units of the vertical axis. As previously described, the vertical axis of the histogram is the number of times that a particular value occurs in the signal. The vertical axis of the pmf contains similar information, except expressed on a fractional basis. In other words, each value in the histogram is divided by the total number of samples to approximate the pmf. This means that each value in the pmf must be between zero and one, and that the sum of all of the values in the pmf will be equal to one. The pmf is important because it describes the probability that a certain value will be generated. For example, imagine a signal generated by the process described by Fig. 2-5b, such as previously shown in Fig. 2-4a. What is the probability that a sample taken from this signal will have a value of 120? Figure 2-5b provides the answer, 0.03, or about 1 chance in 34. What is the probability that a randomly chosen sample will have a value greater than 150? Adding up the values in the pmf for: 151, 152, 153,⋅⋅⋅, 255, provides the answer, 0.0122, or about 1 chance in 82. Thus, the signal would be expected to have a value exceeding 150 on an average of every 82 points. What is the probability that any one sample will be between 0 to 255? Summing all of the values in the histogram produces the probability of 1.00, a certainty that this will occur. The histogram and pmf can only be used with discrete data, such as a digitized signal residing in a computer. A similar concept applies to continuous signals, such as voltages appearing in analog electronics. The probability density function (pdf), also called the probability distribution function, is to continuous signals what the probability mass function is to discrete signals. For example, imagine an analog signal passing through an analog-to-digital converter, resulting in the digitized signal of Fig. 2-4a. For simplicity, we will assume that voltages between 0 and 255 millivolts become digitized into digital numbers between 0 and 255. The pmf of this digital signal is shown by the markers in Fig. 2-5b. Similarly, the pdf of the analog signal is shown by the continuous line in (c), indicating the signal can take on a continuous range of values, such as the voltage in an electronic circuit. The vertical axis of the pdf is in units of probability density, rather than just probability. For example, a pdf of 0.03 at 120.5 does not mean that the a voltage of 120.5 millivolts will occur 3% of the time. In fact, the probability of the continuous signal being exactly 120.5 millivolts is infinitesimally small. This is because there are an infinite number of possible values that the signal needs to divide its time between: 120.49997, 120.49998, 120.49999, etc. The chance that the signal happens to be exactly 120.50000⋅⋅⋅ is very remote indeed! To calculate a probability, the probability density is multiplied by a range of values. For example, the probability that the signal, at any given instant, will be between the values of 120 and 121 is: (121 - 120) x 0.03 = 0.03. The probability that the signal will be between 120.4 and 120.5 is: (120.5 - 120.4) x 0.03 = 0.003, etc. If the pdf is not constant over the range of interest, the multiplication becomes the integral of the pdf over that range. In other words, the area under the pdf is bounded by the specified values. Since the value of the signal must always be something, the total area under the pdf curve, the integral from -∞ to +∞, will always be equal to one. This is analogous to the sum of all of the pmf values being equal to one, and the sum of all of the histogram values being equal to N. The histogram, pmf, and pdf are very similar concepts. Mathematicians always keep them straight, but you will frequently find them used interchangeably (and therefore, incorrectly) by many scientists and engineers. Figure 2-6 shows three continuous waveforms and their pdfs. If these were discrete signals, signified by changing the horizontal axis labeling to "sample number", pmfs would be used. A problem occurs in calculating the histogram when the number of levels each sample can take on is much larger than the number of samples in the signal. This is always true for signals represented in floating point notation, where each sample is stored as a fractional value. For example, integer representation might require the sample value to be 3 or 4, while floating point allows millions of possible fractional values between 3 and 4. The previously described approach for calculating the histogram involves counting the number of samples that have each of the possible quantization levels. This is not possible with floating point data because there are billions of possible levels that would have to be taken into account. Even worse, nearly all of these possible levels would have no samples that correspond to them. For example, imagine a 10,000 sample signal, with each sample having one billion possible values. The conventional histogram would consist of one billion data points, with all but about 10,000 of them having a value of zero. The solution to these problems is a technique called binning. This is done by arbitrarily selecting the length of the histogram to be some convenient number, such as 1000 points, often called bins. The value of each bin represent the total number of samples in the signal that have a value within a certain range. For example, imagine a floating point signal that contains values from 0.0 to 10.0, and a histogram with 1000 bins. Bin 0 in the histogram is the number of samples in the signal with a value between 0 and 0.01, bin 1 is the number of samples with a value between 0.01 and 0.02, and so forth, up to bin 999 containing the number of samples with a value between 9.99 and 10.0. Table 2-4 presents a program for calculating a binned histogram in this manner. How many bins should be used? This is a compromise between two problems. As shown in Fig. 2-7, too many bins makes it difficult to estimate the amplitude of the underlying pmf. This is because only a few samples fall into each bin, making the statistical noise very high. At the other extreme, too few bins makes it difficult to estimate the underlying pmf in the horizontal direction. In other words, the number of bins controls a tradeoff between resolution in along the y-axis, and 2.5 Normal Distribution Curve and the Central Limit Theorem Signals formed from random processes usually have a bell shaped pdf. This is called a normal distribution, a Gauss distribution, or a Gaussian, after the great German mathematician, Karl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855). The reason why this curve occurs so frequently in nature will be discussed shortly in conjunction with digital noise generation. The basic shape of the curve is generated from a negative squared exponent: y(x) = e-x2 This raw curve can be converted into the complete Gaussian by adding an adjustable mean, ?, and standard deviation, σ. In addition, the equation must be normalized so that the total area under the curve is equal to one, a requirement of all probability distribution functions. This results in the general form of the normal distribution, one of the most important relations in statistics and probability: Figure 2-8 shows several examples of Gaussian curves with various means and standard deviations. The mean centers the curve over a particular value, while the standard deviation controls the width of the bell shape. An interesting characteristic of the Gaussian is that the tails drop toward zero very rapidly, much faster than with other common functions such as decaying exponentials or 1/x. For example, at two, four, and six standard deviations from the mean, the value of the Gaussian curve has dropped to about 1/19, 1/7563, and 1/166,666,666, respectively. This is why normally distributed signals, such as illustrated in Fig. 2-6c, appear to have an approximate peak-to-peak value. In principle, signals of this type can experience excursions of unlimited amplitude. In practice, the sharp drop of the Gaussian pdf dictates that these extremes almost never occur. This results in the waveform having a relatively bounded appearance with an apparent peakto- peak amplitude of about 6-8σ. As previously shown, the integral of the pdf is used to find the probability that a signal will be within a certain range of values. This makes the integral of the pdf important enough that it is given its own name, the cumulative distribution function (cdf). An especially obnoxious problem with the Gaussian is that it cannot be integrated using elementary methods. To get around this, the integral of the Gaussian can be calculated by numerical integration. This involves sampling the continuous Gaussian curve very finely, say, a few million points between -10σ and +10σ. The samples in this discrete signal are then added to simulate integration. The discrete curve resulting from this simulated integration is then stored in a table for use in calculating probabilities. The cdf of the normal distribution is shown in Fig. 2-9, with its numeric values listed in Table 2-5. Since this curve is used so frequently in probability, it is given its own symbol: Φ(x) (upper case Greek phi). For example, Φ(-2) has a value of 0.0228. This indicates that there is a 2.28% probability that the value of the signal will be between -∞ and two standard deviations below the mean, at any randomly chosen time. Likewise, the value: Φ(1) = 0.8413, means there is an 84.13% chance that the value of the signal, at a randomly selected instant, will be between -∞ and one standard deviation above the mean. To calculate the probability that the signal will be will be between two values, it is necessary to subtract the appropriate numbers found in the Φ(x) table. For example, the probability that the value of the signal, at some randomly chosen time, will be between two standard deviations below the mean and one standard deviation above the mean, is given by: Φ(1) - Φ(-2) = 0.8185 or 81.85% Using this method, samples taken from a normally distributed signal will be within ?1σ of the mean about 68% of the time. They will be within ?2σ about 95% of the time, and within ?3σ about 99.75% of the time. The probability of the signal being more than 10 standard deviations from the mean is so minuscule, it would be expected to occur for only a few microseconds since the beginning of the universe, about 10 billion years! Equation 2-8 can also be used to express the probability mass function of normally distributed discrete signals. In this case, x is restricted to be one of the quantized levels that the signal can take on, such as one of the 4096 binary values exiting a 12 bit analog-to-digital converter. Ignore the 1/ √2πσ term, it is only used to make the total area under the pdf curve equal to one. Instead, you must include whatever term is needed to make the sum of all the values in the pmf equal to one. In most cases, this is done by generating the curve without worrying about normalization, summing all of the unnormalized values, and then dividing all of the values by the sum. 2.6 Digital Noise Generation Random noise is an important topic in both electronics and DSP. For example, it limits how small of a signal an instrument can measure, the distance a radio system can communicate, and how much radiation is required to produce an xray image. A common need in DSP is to generate signals that resemble various types of random noise. This is required to test the performance of algorithms that must work in the presence of noise. The heart of digital noise generation is the random number generator. Most programming languages have this as a standard function. The BASIC statement: X = RND, loads the variable, X, with a new random number each time the command is encountered. Each random number has a value between zero and one, with an equal probability of being anywhere between these two extremes. Figure 2-10a shows a signal formed by taking 128 samples from this type of random number generator. The mean of the underlying process that generated this signal is 0.5, the standard deviation is 1/√12 = 0.29, and the distribution is uniform between zero and one. Algorithms need to be tested using the same kind of data they will encounter in actual operation. This creates the need to generate digital noise with a Gaussian pdf. There are two methods for generating such signals using a random number generator. Figure 2-10 illustrates the first method. Figure (b) shows a signal obtained by adding two random numbers to form each sample, i.e., X = RND+RND. Since each of the random numbers can run from zero to one, the sum can run from zero to two. The mean is now one, and the standard deviation is 1/√6 (remember, when independent random signals are added, the variances also add). As shown, the pdf has changed from a uniform distribution to a triangular distribution. That is, the signal spends more of its time around a value of one, with less time spent near zero or two. Figure (c) takes this idea a step further by adding twelve random numbers to produce each sample. The mean is now six, and the standard deviation is one. What is most important, the pdf has virtually become a Gaussian. This procedure can be used to create a normally distributed noise signal with an arbitrary mean and standard deviation. For each sample in the signal: (1) add twelve random numbers, (2) subtract six to make the mean equal to zero, (3) multiply by the standard deviation desired, and (4) add the desired mean. The mathematical basis for this algorithm is contained in the Central Limit Theorem, one of the most important concepts in probability. In its simplest form, the Central Limit Theorem states that a sum of random numbers becomes normally distributed as more and more of the random numbers are added together. The Central Limit Theorem does not require the individual random numbers be from any particular distribution, or even that the random numbers be from the same distribution. The Central Limit Theorem provides the reason why normally distributed signals are seen so widely in nature. Whenever many different random forces are interacting, the resulting pdf becomes a Gaussian. In the second method for generating normally distributed random numbers, the random number generator is invoked twice, to obtain R1 and R2. A normally distributed random number, X, can then be found: Just as before, this approach can generate normally distributed random signals with an arbitrary mean and standard deviation. Take each number generated by this equation, multiply it by the desired standard deviation, and add the desired mean. Random number generators operate by starting with a seed, a number between zero and one. When the random number generator is invoked, the seed is passed through a fixed algorithm, resulting in a new number between zero and one. This new number is reported as the random number, and is then internally stored to be used as the seed the next time the random number generator is called. The algorithm that transforms the seed into the new random number is often of the form: In this manner, a continuous sequence of random numbers can be generated, all starting from the same seed. This allows a program to be run multiple times using exactly the same random number sequences. If you want the random number sequence to change, most languages have a provision for reseeding the random number generator, allowing you to choose the number first used as the seed. A common technique is to use the time (as indicated by the system's clock) as the seed, thus providing a new sequence each time the program is run. From a pure mathematical view, the numbers generated in this way cannot be absolutely random since each number is fully determined by the previous number. The term pseudo-random is often used to describe this situation. However, this is not something you should be concerned with. The sequences generated by random number generators are statistically random to an exceedingly high degree. It is very unlikely that you will encounter a situation where they are not adequate. 2.7 Precision and Accuracy Precision and accuracy are terms used to describe systems and methods that measure, estimate, or predict. In all these cases, there is some parameter you wish to know the value of. This is called the true value, or simply, truth. The method provides a measured value, that you want to be as close to the true value as possible. Precision and accuracy are ways of describing the error that can exist between these two values. Unfortunately, precision and accuracy are used interchangeably in non-technical settings. In fact, dictionaries define them by referring to each other! In spite of this, science and engineering have very specific definitions for each. You should make a point of using the terms correctly, and quietly tolerate others when they use them incorrectly. As an example, consider an oceanographer measuring water depth using a sonar system. Short bursts of sound are transmitted from the ship, reflected from the ocean floor, and received at the surface as an echo. Sound waves travel at a relatively constant velocity in water, allowing the depth to be found from the elapsed time between the transmitted and received pulses. As with all empirical measurements, a certain amount of error exists between the measured and true values. This particular measurement could be affected by many factors: random noise in the electronics, waves on the ocean surface, plant growth on the ocean floor, variations in the water temperature causing the sound velocity to change, etc. To investigate these effects, the oceanographer takes many successive readings at a location known to be exactly 1000 meters deep (the true value). These measurements are then arranged as the histogram shown in Fig. 2-11. As would be expected from the Central Limit Theorem, the acquired data are normally distributed. The mean occurs at the center of the distribution, and represents the best estimate of the depth based on all of the measured data. The standard deviation defines the width of the distribution, describing how much variation occurs between successive measurements. This situation results in two general types of error that the system can experience. First, the mean may be shifted from the true value. The amount of this shift is called the accuracy of the measurement. Second, individual measurements may not agree well with each other, as indicated by the width of the distribution. This is called the precision of the measurement, and is expressed by quoting the standard deviation, the signal-to-noise ratio, or the CV. Consider a measurement that has good accuracy, but poor precision; the histogram is centered over the true value, but is very broad. Although the measurements are correct as a group, each individual reading is a poor measure of the true value. This situation is said to have poor repeatability; measurements taken in succession don't agree well. Poor precision results from random errors. This is the name given to errors that change each time the measurement is repeated. Averaging several measurements will always improve the precision. In short, precision is a measure of random noise. Now, imagine a measurement that is very precise, but has poor accuracy. This makes the histogram very slender, but not centered over the true value. Successive readings are close in value; however, they all have a large error. Poor accuracy results from systematic errors. These are errors that become repeated in exactly the same manner each time the measurement is conducted. Accuracy is usually dependent on how you calibrate the system. For example, in the ocean depth measurement, the parameter directly measured is elapsed time. This is converted into depth by a calibration procedure that relates milliseconds to meters. This may be as simple as multiplying by a fixed velocity, or as complicated as dozens of second order corrections. Averaging individual measurements does nothing to improve the accuracy. In short, accuracy is a measure of calibration. In actual practice there are many ways that precision and accuracy can become intertwined. For example, imagine building an electronic amplifier from 1% resistors. This tolerance indicates that the value of each resistor will be within 1% of the stated value over a wide range of conditions, such as temperature, humidity, age, etc. This error in the resistance will produce a corresponding error in the gain of the amplifier. Is this error a problem of accuracy or precision? The answer depends on how you take the measurements. For example, suppose you build one amplifier and test it several times over a few minutes. The error in gain remains constant with each test, and you conclude the problem is accuracy. In comparison, suppose you build one thousand of the amplifiers. The gain from device to device will fluctuate randomly, and the problem appears to be one of precision. Likewise, any one of these amplifiers will show gain fluctuations in response to temperature and other environmental changes. Again, the problem would be called precision. When deciding which name to call the problem, ask yourself two questions. First: Will averaging successive readings provide a better measurement? If yes, call the error precision; if no, call it accuracy. Second: Will calibration correct the error? If yes, call it accuracy; if no, call it precision. This may require some thought, especially related to how the device will be calibrated, and how often it will be done. Module 3: DAC and ADC 3.0 Quantization First, a bit of trivia. As you know, it is a digital computer, not a digit computer. The information processed is called digital data, not digit data. Why then, is analog-to-digital conversion generally called: digitize and digitization, rather than digitalize and digitalization? The answer is nothing you would expect. When electronics got around to inventing digital techniques, the preferred names had already been snatched up by the medical community nearly a century before. Digitalize and digitalization mean to administer the heart stimulant digitalis. Figure 3-1 shows the electronic waveforms of a typical analog-to-digital conversion. Figure (a) is the analog signal to be digitized. As shown by the labels on the graph, this signal is a voltage that varies over time. To make the numbers easier, we will assume that the voltage can vary from 0 to 4.095 volts, corresponding to the digital numbers between 0 and 4095 that will be produced by a 12 bit digitizer. Notice that the block diagram is broken into two sections, the sample-and-hold (S/H), and the analog-to-digital converter (ADC). As you probably learned in electronics classes, the sample-and-hold is required to keep the voltage entering the ADC constant while the conversion is taking place. However, this is not the reason it is shown here; breaking the digitization into these two stages is an important theoretical model for understanding digitization. The fact that it happens to look like common electronics is just a fortunate bonus. As shown by the difference between (a) and (b), the output of the sample-and-hold is allowed to change only at periodic intervals, at which time it is made identical to the instantaneous value of the input signal. Changes in the input signal that occur between these sampling times are completely ignored. That is, sampling converts the independent variable (time in this example) from continuous to discrete. As shown by the difference between (b) and (c), the ADC produces an integer value between 0 and 4095 for each of the flat regions in (b). This introduces an error, since each plateau can be any voltage between 0 and 4.095 volts. For example, both 2.56000 volts and 2.56001 volts will be converted into digital number 2560. In other words, quantization converts the dependent variable (voltage in this example) from continuous to discrete. Notice that we carefully avoid comparing (a) and (c), as this would lump the sampling and quantization together. It is important that we analyze them separately because they degrade the signal in different ways, as well as being controlled by different parameters in the electronics. There are also cases where one is used without the other. For instance, sampling without quantization is used in switched capacitor filters. First we will look at the effects of quantization. Any one sample in the digitized signal can have a maximum error of ±? LSB (Least Significant Bit, jargon for the distance between adjacent quantization levels). Figure (d) shows the quantization error for this particular example, found by subtracting (b) from (c), with the appropriate conversions. In other words, the digital output (c), is equivalent to the continuous input (b), plus a quantization error (d). An important feature of this analysis is that the quantization error appears very much like random noise. This sets the stage for an important model of quantization error. In most cases, quantization results in nothing more than the addition of a specific amount of random noise to the signal. The additive noise is uniformly distributed between ±? LSB, has a mean of zero, and a standard deviation of 1/√12 LSB (~0.29 LSB). For example, passing an analog signal through an 8 bit digitizer adds an rms noise of: 0.29/256, or about 1/900 of the full scale value. A 12 bit conversion adds a noise of: 0.29/4096 ≈ 1/14,000, while a 16 bit conversion adds: 0.29/65536 ≈ 1/227,000. Since quantization error is a random noise, the number of bits determines the precision of the data. For example, you might make the statement: "We increased the precision of the measurement from 8 to 12 bits." This model is extremely powerful, because the random noise generated by quantization will simply add to whatever noise is already present in the analog signal. For example, imagine an analog signal with a maximum amplitude of 1.0 volts, and a random noise of 1.0 millivolts rms. Digitizing this signal to 8 bits results in 1.0 volts becoming digital number 255, and 1.0 millivolts becoming 0.255 LSB. As discussed in the last chapter, random noise signals are combined by adding their variances. That is, the signals are added in quadrature: √(A2 + B2) = C. The total noise on the digitized signal is therefore given by: √(0.2552 + 0.292) = 0.386 LSB. This is an increase of about 50% over the noise already in the analog signal. Digitizing this same signal to 12 bits would produce virtually no increase in the noise, and nothing would be lost due to quantization. When faced with the decision of how many bits are needed in a system, ask two questions: (1) How much noise is already present in the analog signal? (2) How much noise can be tolerated in the digital signal? When isn't this model of quantization valid? Only when the quantization error cannot be treated as random. The only common occurrence of this is when the analog signal remains at about the same value for many consecutive samples, as is illustrated in Fig. 3-2a. The output remains stuck on the same digital number for many samples in a row, even though the analog signal may be changing up to +? LSB. Instead of being an additive random noise, the quantization error now looks like a thresholding effect or weird distortion. Dithering is a common technique for improving the digitization of these slowly varying signals. As shown in Fig. 3-2b, a small amount of random noise is added to the analog signal. In this example, the added noise is normally distributed with a standard deviation of 2/3 LSB, resulting in a peak-to-peak amplitude of about 3 LSB. Figure (c) shows how the addition of this dithering noise has affected the digitized signal. Even when the original analog signal is changing by less than ±? LSB, the added noise causes the digital output to randomly toggle between adjacent levels. To understand how this improves the situation, imagine that the input signal is a constant analog voltage of 3.0001 volts, making it one-tenth of the way between the digital levels 3000 and 3001. Without dithering, taking 10,000 samples of this signal would produce 10,000 identical numbers, all having the value of 3000. Next, repeat the thought experiment with a small amount of dithering noise added. The 10,000 values will now oscillate between two (or more) levels, with about 90% having a value of 3000, and 10% having a value of 3001. Taking the average of all 10,000 values results in something close to 3000.1. Even though a single measurement has the inherent ±? LSB limitation, the statistics of a large number of the samples can do much better. This is quite a strange situation: adding noise provides more information. Circuits for dithering can be quite sophisticated, such as using a computer to generate random numbers, and then passing them through a DAC to produce the added noise. After digitization, the computer can subtract the random numbers from the digital signal using floating point arithmetic. This elegant technique is called subtractive dither, but is only used in the most elaborate systems. The simplest method, although not always possible, is to use the noise already present in the analog signal for dithering. 3.1 The Sampling Theorem The definition of proper sampling is quite simple. Suppose you sample a continuous signal in some manner. If you can exactly reconstruct the analog signal from the samples, you must have done the sampling properly. Even if the sampled data appears confusing or incomplete, the key information has been captured if you can reverse the process. Figure 3-3 shows several sinusoids before and after digitization. The continuous line represents the analog signal entering the ADC, while the square markers are the digital signal leaving the ADC. In (a), the analog signal is a constant DC value, a cosine wave of zero frequency. Since the analog signal is a series of straight lines between each of the samples, all of the information needed to reconstruct the analog signal is contained in the digital data. According to our definition, this is proper sampling. The sine wave shown in (b) has a frequency of 0.09 of the sampling rate. This might represent, for example, a 90 cycle/second sine wave being sampled at 1000 samples/second. Expressed in another way, there are 11.1 samples taken over each complete cycle of the sinusoid. This situation is more complicated than the previous case, because the analog signal cannot be reconstructed by simply drawing straight lines between the data points. Do these samples properly represent the analog signal? The answer is yes, because no other sinusoid, or combination of sinusoids, will produce this pattern of samples (within the reasonable constraints listed below). These samples correspond to only one analog signal, and therefore the analog signal can be exactly reconstructed. Again, an instance of proper sampling. In (c), the situation is made more difficult by increasing the sine wave's frequency to 0.31 of the sampling rate. This results in only 3.2 samples per sine wave cycle. Here the samples are so sparse that they don't even appear to follow the general trend of the analog signal. Do these samples properly represent the analog waveform? Again, the answer is yes, and for exactly the same reason. The samples are a unique representation of the analog signal. All of the information needed to reconstruct the continuous waveform is contained in the digital data. How you go about doing this will be discussed later in this chapter. Obviously, it must be more sophisticated than just drawing straight lines between the data points. As strange as it seems, this is proper sampling according to our definition. In (d), the analog frequency is pushed even higher to 0.95 of the sampling rate, with a mere 1.05 samples per sine wave cycle. Do these samples properly represent the data? No, they don't! The samples represent a different sine wave from the one contained in the analog signal. In particular, the original sine wave of 0.95 frequency misrepresents itself as a sine wave of 0.05 frequency in the digital signal. This phenomenon of sinusoids changing frequency during sampling is called aliasing. Just as a criminal might take on an assumed name or identity (an alias), the sinusoid assumes another frequency that is not its own. Since the digital data is no longer uniquely related to a particular analog signal, an unambiguous reconstruction is impossible. There is nothing in the sampled data to suggest that the original analog signal had a frequency of 0.95 rather than 0.05. The sine wave has hidden its true identity completely; the perfect crime has been committed! According to our definition, this is an example of improper sampling. This line of reasoning leads to a milestone in DSP, the sampling theorem. Frequently this is called the Shannon sampling theorem, or the Nyquist sampling theorem, after the authors of 1940s papers on the topic. The sampling theorem indicates that a continuous signal can be properly sampled, only if it does not contain frequency components above one-half of the sampling rate. For instance, a sampling rate of 2,000 samples/second requires the analog signal to be composed of frequencies below 1000 cycles/second. If frequencies above this limit are present in the signal, they will be aliased to frequencies between 0 and 1000 cycles/second, combining with whatever information that was legitimately there. Two terms are widely used when discussing the sampling theorem: the Nyquist frequency and the Nyquist rate. Unfortunately, their meaning is not standardized. To understand this, consider an analog signal composed of frequencies between DC and 3 kHz. To properly digitize this signal it must be sampled at 6,000 samples/sec (6 kHz) or higher. Suppose we choose to sample at 8,000 samples/sec (8 kHz), allowing frequencies between DC and 4 kHz to be properly represented. In this situation their are four important frequencies: (1) the highest frequency in the signal, 3 kHz; (2) twice this frequency, 6 kHz; (3) the sampling rate, 8 kHz; and (4) one-half the sampling rate, 4 kHz. Which of these four is the Nyquist frequency and which is the Nyquist rate? It depends who you ask! All of the possible combinations are used. Fortunately, most authors are careful to define how they are using the terms. In this book, they are both used to mean one-half the sampling rate. Figure 3-4 shows how frequencies are changed during aliasing. The key point to remember is that a digital signal cannot contain frequencies above one-half the sampling rate (i.e., the Nyquist frequency/rate). When the frequency of the continuous wave is below the Nyquist rate, the frequency of the sampled data is a match. However, when the continuous signal's frequency is above the Nyquist rate, aliasing changes the frequency into something that can be represented in the sampled data. As shown by the zigzagging line in Fig. 3-4, every continuous frequency above the Nyquist rate has a corresponding digital frequency between zero and one-half the sampling rate. It there happens to be a sinusoid already at this lower frequency, the aliased signal will add to it, resulting in a loss of information. Aliasing is a double curse; information can be lost about the higher and the lower frequency. Suppose you are given a digital signal containing a frequency of 0.2 of the sampling rate. If this signal were obtained by proper sampling, the original analog signal must have had a frequency of 0.2. If aliasing took place during sampling, the digital frequency of 0.2 could have come from any one of an infinite number of frequencies in the analog signal: 0.2, 0.8, 1.2, 1.8, 2.2, …. Just as aliasing can change the frequency during sampling, it can also change the phase. For example, look back at the aliased signal in Fig. 3-3d. The aliased digital signal is inverted from the original analog signal; one is a sine wave while the other is a negative sine wave. In other words, aliasing has changed the frequency and introduced a 180? phase shift. Only two phase shifts are possible: 0? (no phase shift) and 180? (inversion). The zero phase shift occurs for analog frequencies of 0 to 0.5, 1.0 to 1.5, 2.0 to 2.5, etc. An inverted phase occurs for analog frequencies of 0.5 to 1.0, 1.5 to 2.0, 3.5 to 4.0, and so on. Now we will dive into a more detailed analysis of sampling and how aliasing occurs. Our overall goal is to understand what happens to the information when a signal is converted from a continuous to a discrete form. The problem is, these are very different things; one is a continuous waveform while the other is an array of numbers. This "apples-to-oranges" comparison makes the analysis very difficult. The solution is to introduce a theoretical concept called the impulse train. Figure 3-5a shows an example analog signal. Figure (c) shows the signal sampled by using an impulse train. The impulse train is a continuous signal consisting of a series of narrow spikes (impulses) that match the original signal at the sampling instants. Each impulse is infinitesimally narrow, a concept that will be discussed in Chapter 13. Between these sampling times the value of the waveform is zero. Keep in mind that the impulse train is a theoretical concept, not a waveform that can exist in an electronic circuit. Since both the original analog signal and the impulse train are continuous waveforms, we can make an "apples-apples" comparison between the two. Now we need to examine the relationship between the impulse train and the discrete signal (an array of numbers). This one is easy; in terms of information content, they are identical. If one is known, it is trivial to calculate the other. Think of these as different ends of a bridge crossing between the analog and digital worlds. This means we have achieved our overall goal once we understand the consequences of changing the waveform in Fig. 3-5a into the waveform in Fig. 3.5c. Three continuous waveforms are shown in the left-hand column in Fig. 3-5. The corresponding frequency spectra of these signals are displayed in the right-hand column. This should be a familiar concept from you knowledge of electronics; every waveform can be viewed as being composed of sinusoids of varying amplitude and frequency. Later chapters will discuss the frequency domain in detail. (You may want to revisit this discussion after becoming more familiar with frequency spectra). Figure (a) shows an analog signal we wish to sample. As indicated by its frequency spectrum in (b), it is composed only of frequency components between 0 and about 0.33 f>s, where fs is the sampling frequency we intend to use. For example, this might be a speech signal that has been filtered to remove all frequencies above 3.3 kHz. Correspondingly, fs would be 10 kHz (10,000 samples/second), our intended sampling rate. Sampling the signal in (a) by using an impulse train produces the signal shown in (c), and its frequency spectrum shown in (d). This spectrum is a duplication of the spectrum of the original signal. Each multiple of the sampling frequency, fs, 2fs, 3fs, 4fs, etc., has received a copy and a left-for-right flipped copy of the original frequency spectrum. The copy is called the upper sideband, while the flipped copy is called the lower sideband. Sampling has generated new frequencies. Is this proper sampling? The answer is yes, because the signal in (c) can be transformed back into the signal in (a) by eliminating all frequencies above ?fs. That is, an analog low-pass filter will convert the impulse train, (b), back into the original analog signal, (a). If you are already familiar with the basics of DSP, here is a more technical explanation of why this spectral duplication occurs. (Ignore this paragraph if you are new to DSP). In the time domain, sampling is achieved by multiplying the original signal by an impulse train of unity amplitude spikes. The frequency spectrum of this unity amplitude impulse train is also a unity amplitude impulse train, with the spikes occurring at multiples of the sampling frequency, fs, 2fs, 3fs, 4fs, etc. When two time domain signals are multiplied, their frequency spectra are convolved. This results in the original spectrum being duplicated to the location of each spike in the impulse train's spectrum. Viewing the original signal as composed of both positive and negative frequencies accounts for the upper and lower sidebands, respectively. This is the same as amplitude modulation, discussed in Chapter 10. Figure (e) shows an example of improper sampling, resulting from too low of sampling rate. The analog signal still contains frequencies up to 3.3 kHz, but the sampling rate has been lowered to 5 kHz. Notice that along the horizontal axis are spaced closer in (f) than in (d). The frequency spectrum, (f), shows the problem: the duplicated portions of the spectrum have invaded the band between zero and one-half of the sampling frequency. Although (f) shows these overlapping frequencies as retaining their separate identity, in actual practice they add together forming a single confused mess. Since there is no way to separate the overlapping frequencies, information is lost, and the original signal cannot be reconstructed. This overlap occurs when the analog signal contains frequencies greater than one-half the sampling rate, that is, we have proven the sampling theorem. 3.2 Digital to Analog Conversion In theory, the simplest method for digital-to-analog conversion is to pull the samples from memory and convert them into an impulse train. This is illustrated in Fig. 3-6a, with the corresponding frequency spectrum in (b). As just described, the original analog signal can be perfectly reconstructed by passing this impulse train through a low-pass filter, with the cutoff frequency equal to one-half of the sampling rate. In other words, the original signal and the impulse train have identical frequency spectra below the Nyquist frequency (one-half the sampling rate). At higher frequencies, the impulse train contains a duplication of this information, while the original analog signal contains nothing (assuming aliasing did not occur). While this method is mathematically pure, it is difficult to generate the required narrow pulses in electronics. To get around this, nearly all DACs operate by holding the last value until another sample is received. This is called a zeroth-order hold, the DAC equivalent of the sample-and-hold used during ADC. (A first-order hold is straight lines between the points, a second-order hold uses parabolas, etc.). The zeroth-order hold produces the staircase appearance shown in (c). In the frequency domain, the zeroth-order hold results in the spectrum of the impulse train being multiplied by the dark curve shown in (d), given by the equation: This is of the general form: sin(πx)/(πx), called the sinc function or sinc(x). The sinc function is very common in DSP, and will be discussed in more detail in later chapters. If you already have a background in this material, the zeroth-order hold can be understood as the convolution of the impulse train with a rectangular pulse, having a width equal to the sampling period. This results in the frequency domain being multiplied by the Fourier transform of the rectangular pulse, i.e., the sinc function. In Fig. (d), the light line shows the frequency spectrum of the impulse train (the "correct" spectrum), while the dark line shown the sinc. The frequency spectrum of the zeroth order hold signal is equal to the product of these two curves. The analog filter used to convert the zeroth-order hold signal, (c), into the reconstructed signal, (f), needs to do two things: (1) remove all frequencies above one-half of the sampling rate, and (2) boost the frequencies by the reciprocal of the zeroth-order hold's effect, i.e., 1/sinc(x). This amounts to an amplification of about 36% at one-half of the sampling frequency. Figure (e) shows the ideal frequency response of this analog filter. This 1/sinc(x) frequency boost can be handled in four ways: (1) ignore it and accept the consequences, (2) design an analog filter to include the 1/sinc(x) response, (3) use a fancy multirate technique described later in this chapter, or (4) make the correction in software before the DAC (see Chapter 24). Before leaving this section on sampling, we need to dispel a common myth about analog versus digital signals. As this chapter has shown, the amount of information carried in a digital signal is limited in two ways: First, the number of bits per sample limits the resolution of the dependent variable. That is, small changes in the signal's amplitude may be lost in the quantization noise. Second, the sampling rate limits the resolution of the independent variable, i.e., closely spaced events in the analog signal may be lost between the samples. This is another way of saying that frequencies above one-half the sampling rate are lost. Here is the myth: "Since analog signals use continuous parameters, they have infinitely good resolution in both the independent and the dependent variables." Not true! Analog signals are limited by the same two problems as digital signals: noise and bandwidth (the highest frequency allowed in the signal). The noise in an analog signal limits the measurement of the waveform's amplitude, just as quantization noise does in a digital signal. Likewise, the ability to separate closely spaced events in an analog signal depends on the highest frequency allowed in the waveform. To understand this, imagine an analog signal containing two closely spaced pulses. If we place the signal through a low-pass filter (removing the high frequencies), the pulses will blur into a single blob. For instance, an analog signal formed from frequencies between DC and 10 kHz will have exactly the same resolution as a digital signal sampled at 20 kHz. It must, since the sampling theorem guarantees that the two contain the same information. 3.3 Analog Filters for Data Conversion Figure 3-7 shows a block diagram of a DSP system, as the sampling theorem dictates it should be. Before encountering the analog-to-digital converter, the input signal is processed with an electronic low-pass filter to remove all frequencies above the Nyquist frequency (one-half the sampling rate). This is done to prevent aliasing during sampling, and is correspondingly called an antialias filter. On the other end, the digitized signal is passed through a digital-to-analog converter and another low-pass filter set to the Nyquist frequency. This output filter is called a reconstruction filter, and may include the previously described frequency boost. Unfortunately, there is a serious problem with this simple model: the limitations of electronic filters can be as bad as the problems they are trying to prevent. If your main interest is in software, you are probably thinking that you don't need to read this section. Wrong! Even if you have vowed never to touch an oscilloscope, an understanding of the properties of analog filters is important for successful DSP. First, the characteristics of every digitized signal you encounter will depend on what type of antialias filter was used when it was acquired. If you don't understand the nature of the antialias filter, you cannot understand the nature of the digital signal. Second, the future of DSP is to replace hardware with software. For example, the multirate techniques presented later in this chapter reduce the need for antialias and reconstruction filters by fancy software tricks. If you don't understand the hardware, you cannot design software to replace it. Third, much of DSP is related to digital filter design. A common strategy is to start with an equivalent analog filter, and convert it into software. Later chapters assume you have a basic knowledge of analog filter techniques. Three types of analog filters are commonly used: Chebyshev, Butterworth, and Bessel (also called a Thompson filter). Each of these is designed to optimize a different performance parameter. The complexity of each filter can be adjusted by selecting the number of poles, a mathematical term that will be discussed in later chapters. The more poles in a filter, the more electronics it requires, and the better it performs. Each of these names describe what the filter does, not a particular arrangement of resistors and capacitors. For example, a six pole Bessel filter can be implemented by many different types of circuits, all of which have the same overall characteristics. For DSP purposes, the characteristics of these filters are more important than how they are constructed. Nevertheless, we will start with a short segment on the electronic design of these filters to provide an overall framework. Figure 3-8 shows a common building block for analog filter design, the modified Sallen-Key circuit. This is named after the authors of a 1950s paper describing the technique. The circuit shown is a two pole low-pass filter that can be configured as any of the three basic types. Table 3-1 provides the necessary information to select the appropriate resistors and capacitors. For example, to design a 1 kHz, 2 pole Butterworth filter, Table 3-1 provides the parameters: k1 = 0.1592 and k2 = 0.586. Arbitrarily selecting R1 = 10K and C = 0.01uF (common values for op amp circuits), R and Rf can be calculated as 15.95K and 5.86K, respectively. Rounding these last two values to the nearest 1% standard resistors, results in R = 15.8K and Rf = 5.90K All of the components should be 1% precision or better. The particular op amp use isn't critical, as long as the unity gain frequency is more than 30 to 100 times higher than the filter's cutoff frequency. This is an easy requirement as long as the filter's cutoff frequency is below about 100 kHz. Four, six, and eight pole filters are formed by cascading 2,3, and 4 of these circuits, respectively. For example, Fig. 3-9 shows the schematic of a 6 pole Bessel filter created by cascading three stages. Each stage has different values for k1 and k2 as provided by Table 3-1, resulting in different resistors and capacitors being used. Need a high-pass filter? Simply swap the R and C components in the circuits (leaving Rf and R1 alone). This type of circuit is very common for small quantity manufacturing and R&D applications; however, serious production requires the filter to be made as an integrated circuit. The problem is, it is difficult to make resistors directly in silicon. The answer is the switched capacitor filter. Figure 3-10 illustrates its operation by comparing it to a simple RC network. If a step function is fed into an RC low-pass filter, the output rises exponentially until it matches the input. The voltage on the capacitor doesn't change instantaneously, because the resistor restricts the flow of electrical charge. The switched capacitor filter operates by replacing the basic resistor-capacitor network with two capacitors and an electronic switch. The newly added capacitor is much smaller in value than the already existing capacitor, say, 1% of its value. The switch alternately connects the small capacitor between the input and the output at a very high frequency, typically 100 times faster than the cutoff frequency of the filter. When the switch is connected to the input, the small capacitor rapidly charges to whatever voltage is presently on the input. When the switch is connected to the output, the charge on the small capacitor is transferred to the large capacitor. In a resistor, the rate of charge transfer is determined by its resistance. In a switched capacitor circuit, the rate of charge transfer is determined by the value of the small capacitor and by the switching frequency. This results in a very useful feature of switched capacitor filters: the cutoff frequency of the filter is directly proportional to the clock frequency used to drive the switches. This makes the switched capacitor filter ideal for data acquisition systems that operate with more than one sampling rate. These are easy-to-use devices; pay ten bucks and have the performance of an eight pole filter inside a single 8 pin IC. Now for the important part: the characteristics of the three classic filter types. The first performance parameter we want to explore is cutoff frequency sharpness. A low-pass filter is designed to block all frequencies above the cutoff frequency (the stopband), while passing all frequencies below (the passband). Figure 3-11 shows the frequency response of these three filters on a logarithmic (dB) scale. These graphs are shown for filters with a one hertz cutoff frequency, but they can be directly scaled to whatever cutoff frequency you need to use. How do these filters rate? The Chebyshev is clearly the best, the Butterworth is worse, and the Bessel is absolutely ghastly! As you probably surmised, this is what the Chebyshev is designed to do, roll-off (drop in amplitude) as rapidly as possible. Unfortunately, even an 8 pole Chebyshev isn't as good as you would like for an antialias filter. For example, imagine a

Document Details

Tags

Related

Summary

Full Transcript

Upgrade to continue