The Neo-Liberal State: A Path to Democracy? PDF
Document Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/755f2/755f289a4099e8185e9053a5d74bbeb0d8fcb1ee" alt="AffableMoldavite389"
Uploaded by AffableMoldavite389
Antelope Valley College
Tags
Summary
This document examines the Mexican political and economic landscape. Key themes include political reforms and the impact of neoliberalism on Mexican society and its governance. The document discusses significant events such as the presidency of Miguel de la Madrid.
Full Transcript
Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. CH PT 37...
Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. CH PT 37 THE NEC-LIBERAL STATE: A PATH T,Q,.D EMOCRACY? I GUEL DE LA -ADR IID: FROM CR'IS I $ T O CRIS _, 1982- 98 in uh - ti th. nrury p i e I elim ·- nate o en cm1c in office. ptlon during ress most o -ran ngg fl i t I $43 million.. Dfaz Serrano, crim o uraz.o, Mm o Chy' hi o police and a friend of L6 ildhood. " Durazo. d with fi t murd - , traffi king 1 ' p ponio lu. url u residenc in the roastaJ rem "The Panlu~non, to wh ch il bo m ' mblan 11 mpl l wilh i ·n a d~ 5 ate in po.lice hclt , tri.ng o rn1on lno, mnmas.iun ,.tnd II I wi opined, could ha e acru tbi ld SU Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. S28 Ill I A D CIIA. CE. I -~ I [RA O'f LOB LIZ TIO:-. o. g ~.nme.m ~ I, 65 pt!.' w Bm Dur.iz escaped p ing mh country prior to his arrest; after leg a.d !Ill ml h i tori in the t. knew Lhatlhebaltleagainslgo emment.a.lmalf. eel , omptr II f\ n al ya c:tl \ lJ 11k garb. it llad n equally perusle.lll d counnys d epenin. n t slip ag um th nd th n beg n v market. lany tood in eied from 150 Lo g th 1.1. bottom had ustc nd I] 1h y Jr 1 'P Le was an incredible 2 300 to L eb.tio u1 o killer in l 7 Lhat same amount. M r · ·btu gr·wing m'tri·p1 ugh Lb"" p eded in a:rrangm rescbeduJi~ o paymen n on him , Poli p ·no grou · I uh. Vi bim l I pu 10 dedare a unilareral mor,uor.. t. De la Mad t rat.es being I Jid oil. but , 'Ii.zed 1h m Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. IM N'oo-1.ibmJj St,atr. A Pa th ra De:t1i oci. S 2. 9 degree ofconfidaice in ili.e world's banking community and fimmda1 markets. He opted for economic_ austerity. not repudiation. Responding to prefflll from th Inmnational Mo ·w y· Fund, la Madrid not nly rnrtaikd many new projects but also announced siiveeping cuts in social spending, i::educ- tions in federal su idi for foodstuffs and rents. th sale of in ffid nl and unprofita l sta1:£-m1, ned enterprises, and a freeze on fed rai emp]oymcnt. Usmg the nsiderah}e influ- ence of the presidential office, be did his best to limit the s:ize of wage increases in the labor force and h limi:oated thousands of federal jo.. The economic ri>ti"lm,c gan a pro th.at wouJd subsequently bmgeon under the rubric of nrolibcralism. the economic and po- H ·cal. philosophy messing i.n!.de liberaliz.:alion, privatization of ta -owned enterprises,~ d _ction& in socials rvice spending, and economic deregulation. Un er de la Mad, d, Mexico joined lhe General A,greemeot on Turiffs and Trade and sold off so e Sew'.O hundred com- panies, o d r partlaU own d by th o mment. As the counny strugglm economically, suddenly tra edy s.t:ruc:k during the moming rush hour on Sept.embu 19, 19851 as Mexico City paid the prlce of itting a:t the jnru:ture of th e o th ,earth's te nk pla , An nh uak, regi g in ss of on m Richw- Scale devastated the capital, leaving as many as 1m.ousand dead. many more injm:ed, and dama ·mated ·t $4 biJlion. al hundred buildings collapsed and thousan were damaged, leaving multitudes of peop11=' homeless, without food or water. Whim the de la Madrid administration responded at a ,· 's pac:e, Mexican cilizcn:s mganiz d grassroots organizations to dig th _ t of e dis Mr, lm m tionat relie arrw , ni am hesitancy on the pan of e government to r«cive it. onethcless. many- anafys:ts believe d:t t th - euthquakc rvccl a lyst for the em.erg nee of an embryonic dvil odety in Mexico. A pleth of groups egan to advo a:ie for democratic funns to the bankrupt [n lat 1987 when it ,ook eie\'1!'D thousand five hundred twenty cemavo pLll«'.i to buy ooe US doUar, Mexica.m imply rcfu:sed fO !he h r coin.. rl ~in 'l'! n of h.ardw:1R «1rc11 l n, nora _ - d l!I i In solution. Not concerned abom defacing narlonal amency, they druled holes in the middle of the ml.ns and liiund bri busineilll in th~ good-qua]il), w~herL Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. 530 CRISIS A. ID CII,>. CE IN ,; ll R A OF CLOIIA U ZATlO ,' D m111gc Mexico City ~ ac mi~ nd I.M dean-up lask mo1twnental, mir the eaJt.h qum of S p1ffllb J9. 19 Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. ThcNoo-libmJI St,atr.APathraDemoa:. 531 political system, omen's an.d indigenous righISr afformble housing, and envi:mn.menml protections. Althou8l;i most of tbese organizations and alliances did not sustain thems.elves vigorou~l ov r tim , dvi-l so t.y continu to o:rpniz a subs.eq11mt mom n o , Ht The last years of the de la Madrid admin.istration saw Mexico slip deeper and deepn into th economic morass. In addition th coll ps of the p o, infladon soared to tm~ pw:edenwl hf!"igt.u.s. Official inflation rates, re:leased by exico' Centtal Bank, report 63.7 percent in 1985, 105.7 pe:rcrnt in 1986, and 159 percrnt in l987. The person on the meet s tha:c m acwa_J 6 ~ w even nigher. Inaea s in o gasolil , com. wheat, and clectridty led the assaui.t on the consumer price i but no product or ser- vice emergro unscathed The ocl ming mat martehed the rapid tis m priw. was the rapid (ll'Owth of the foreign debt. Wh n de la Madrid left offic in D ber il.988, the Mexican gove.mmrnt owed foreigncrs a whopping J,05 billion in outstaml:mg debts. UNITED STATES-MEXICO RELATIONS Two major prob! ms d fyin,g easy solution dom 'nated United States-Mexico.relations in the 1970,s and 1980 Both of them roncemoo mowm across the common border, and both o 1.h m h d n tional signiti.can at ttan cended th int.em -uonal line that dM the two counmes.. ince the 195 -. the Unit d taks- , border region has witness~ on - of the mo profound demographic , ift! in dd histocry not conditioned by either war or ,eJ)id m ·c disease. The result of a ·gh birthrate and massive nonhem migration in, E'Xico a:nd the equally telUng un It ph. m n in lb United tat th populati soared on both sides of the border.. ln 19 0, on :y about 16 million persons. ocrupied the four US and six Mexican states tha sh intemation.al lin~ Aube begmnmij of 990, th~ estimated pop- ulation of the: a.in n tares h d ris n to over 50 million.. dfflm.atic J has not only domina-n!d day-to-day human re.la:rions of the region but alS. CE IN ,; llRA O F CLOIIA U ZATlO ,' United mies began calling for tigh.W" c:om:rols, ~ bile an equally broad spectrum of emplay- in both.rural and urban are.as. favored the maintenance of the status quo. ei:s, A solution o oru w.u r adl in 1986 wh th U Congre:.ss p ~ th hnmigm- tion Reform and Control Ao: (the Simpson-Rodino Att). 'Ihe main feanrres of die legisla- tion p rided for a tighw ,enfota?ment of immigtation pot cy, sanaions against tbos who knowing) employed oodorumentecl workers, and an amnesty for those rke:rs. ho c:oul establish. continued residence in the U:oired States since 1982. But Si.mpson-Rodi:no did not so.I~ th undocum n d ~or · r problem bcaw, it a d11 ed onlJ th. ors that pulled the: Mexican workec; toward the United States, 1g11orlng D5e th.at p hed them out of eitico. The undocumented cominu d LO oom as th - was no shortage of U employers ·mng to offer wo,r despite threatened s.inctions, The fundamm problems remained. In 1989, Jo~ Bustamante. exko's leading bordenpe:cialist, n:poned that ramings sa1t back to ·oo by undocumen ed work n total d $1.25 nu nan uany, makin this ur; o income the cour1try's third largest source of foreign ach;m. The emnd pR>blem that pfagued th gmcrally good n:hitions brnvem Washington, DC and Mdico Ci , and that contri ured lo a p I tkaUy chargl!d aunosphe.r th unr aut- ting flow of drugs a:cross the United States-Mexico or:dcr; The smuggling of rnnttaband betw en th tWO countri erwnfy was notrun new. Arms and ammunition. ut mo- biles, trucks, agriru:ltur.aJ equipment, household items, and srnres of other pmdurn bad long evadm the eyes, regu?ation and tIXing authority of me customs 11;g~ts. at made th p blem ·o vol til ini th l l 80, s tbt es:p dally insidious n WJi of th illegal cargo. The international drug trafli both sides agreed, not only left its legacy of abuse and d p nde:ntt bu:t al o fo an entire host of parns.jti aim , p in the bord - region. Authori ' from. e two countries, however, agreed on tht1 clse. The public was soon treated to e most izarre misapplication of the 1heories lhe Scottish emnomist Adam milh: U o 'al found th pr blem to imply p y, whil theif exican cmmterpans more accw:atcly retorted that it was simply one0f demand. followin e murder of US Dru Enforcement dm ttativ agent EruiqUJ Camarena daJaj in 19 6 and 1987 the U Con~ held formal heari.n~ on tcrmri m and hearings prompted the most intemperate statements 011 Mexico's alleg,ed lack ooc)oer.auon n th drug i su despite ID i m t th contrary &om th US amb ador in MaJco City. By 1988,, exko-bashingh Become a favorite pastime ofchose ho could k of no other reason- fut th · U fail to win iu much publiciz~d war on drugs. ln that yeair, the U mate failed u, c: rtify ·co for conomic assistana? b cause it w _ not doing enough to inten:q>t the flDW of bdore they crossed tht" bordu.s M o was. bout o m r th lat d d ofth nti th Wl.tuty, as:~ adH increas- ing number of its citizens had become disillrniioned with pernisive corruption. and with pol- hiai as usual ongovemmcntal organizations th.a wale.seed afte1 the disastf'ous earthquake had intro u -d new actors into the pol" I stage JU~ for lectoral and sod al reforms. At the same time, the shift to neoliberalism in the: age of globalization had not. reduced pov 0 eny and octal inequltJ. Some PIU ctivi began to call for ma: or chang ev n they w muure where the path might leacl Togmi.er with fellow e:xican.s of the opposition parties they would have am answenmooer than anticipated. Printed by: [email protected]. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. The N L'r! 1.i.bt'f.il !