Chapter 1: Understanding Owners and Projects PDF
Document Details
Paige Williams
Tags
Summary
This document provides an overview of the roles of owners in construction projects, differentiating between public and private sectors, and detailing various project delivery methods, including Design-Bid-Build, Multiple Prime Contracting, Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), and Design-Build. It highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each method and focuses on considerations for selecting a suitable approach.
Full Transcript
# Understanding Owners and Projects ## An Owner's Role - the party responsible for a construction project. - can be a person, group, or company. - initiates and raises funding. - develops facilities to meet functional and business requirements. ## Public Sector Owners - develop facilities to...
# Understanding Owners and Projects ## An Owner's Role - the party responsible for a construction project. - can be a person, group, or company. - initiates and raises funding. - develops facilities to meet functional and business requirements. ## Public Sector Owners - develop facilities to meet federal, state, or municipal project needs. - funded through taxes or public revenue such as bonds. - include traditional owners as well as semi-public institutions such as utilities, regional airport authorities, and educational and research institutions. - spend about 80% of all funds on projects. ## Private Sector Owners - are not bound by public acquisition regulations. - have more flexibility in the procurement process. - subject to applicable federal, state, and local regulations such as building codes, zoning restrictions, and environmental requirements. - use relationships based on prior experience or other business motives to procure project teams. - limit risk with contractual relationships that share project risks and rewards. ## Public-Private Partnerships (P3) - a funding and delivery method that arose in response to federal, state, and municipal lack of funds to promote public projects. - involve a public sector entity seeking a private sector partner to fund, develop, and operate an infrastructure or facility project. - private sector partners typically provide design, build, and operational services. - compensated for their efforts via tolls or fees collected from project users. - combine elements of both public and private sector procedures. ## Project Delivery Methods - **Project Delivery** is the process of planning, designing, building, and completing a construction project. - **Project Delivery Method** refers to the chosen system for achieving the satisfactory completion of a construction project. ### Traditional Construction Manager Approach (Design-Bid-Build) - linear five-phase process: pre-design, design, procurement, construction, and post-construction. - owner hires a design consultant who prepares a complete design package. - the design package is presented to GCs who submit bids for the work and execute contracts with subcontractors. - the lowest responsive and responsible bid is typically chosen. - the contractor constructs the facility according to the design. - the designer maintains limited oversight of the work and responds to questions about the design. **Advantages:** - well-understood and widely applicable. - clear roles for all parties. - provides owner with control over the final product. **Disadvantages:** - time-consuming. - limited input by contractor in design. - owner exposed to potential contractor claims over design errors. - adversarial relationships among owner, designer, and contractor. - contractor pursues a least-cost approach, requiring increased oversight by the owner. ### Multiple Prime Contracting - owner holds separate contracts with contractors of multiple disciplines. - owner manages the overall schedule and budget. **Advantages:** - widely applicable and well-understood. - clearly defined roles for all parties. - provides owner with control over the project. - open price competition. **Disadvantages:** - owner assumes greater risk. - owner is responsible for project changes and schedule gaps. - increased oversight by the CM. ## Construction Manager At-Risk (CM at Risk or CMAR) - owner uses the CM as a consultant to provide advisory professional management assistance in the pre-construction phase. - CM transitions to the role of the GC and assumes risk by guaranteeing the project’s completion for a negotiated price (GMP). **Advantages:** - early development of working relationships. - cost security for owner. - transparency in subcontracting process. - potential cost savings/sharing incentives. **Disadvantages:** - owner has little control over cost contingencies. - lack of explicit duties of loyalty and care to the owner. - potential for adversarial relationships. ## Design-Build (D-B) - owner contracts with a D-B team to plan, implement, and control the entire project through completion. - D-B team negotiates a fixed price to complete the design and construction of the facility. **Advantages:** - simplicity of having one party responsible for the entire project. - decreased potential for disputes. - owner has a single point of responsibility. - fast-tracking and/or phasing options. **Disadvantages:** - owner has fewer checks and balances and less control over design, price, schedule, and technical matters. - difficult for the owner to verify the best value. - complex logistical planning, scheduling, and coordination. ## Considerations for Selecting a Delivery Method - **Type of Project:** gauge the level of complexity and uniqueness. - **Size of Project:** consider the amount of assistance and number of participants. - **Owner Capabilities:** make a realistic assessment of in-house expertise. - **Time Considerations:** consider if the project needs to be completed in a compressed timeframe. - **Likelihood of Changes:** evaluate the potential cost of changes. ## Construction Management - a discipline uniquely tailored to the planning, design, and construction process. - used successfully in all contracting methods and delivery systems. **Advantages:** - provides the owner with control over the project. - maximizes the owner’s control over scope, quality, time, cost, and safety. - adds predictability to the project. - increases the owner’s confidence in the success of the project. **Advantages of Using CM Services:** - most effective use of available funds. - enhanced control of the scope of work. - optimal project or program scheduling. - best use of individual project team members’ expertise. - maximum avoidance of delays, changes, and claims. - enhanced design and construction quality. - optimal flexibility in contracting or procurement options. - recommendations for emerging technology tools. **Key Tasks of Construction Management Services:** - development of a written scope of work. - development of thorough design criteria. - communication and management of risk. - design quality assurance. - consideration of material, systems, and process alternatives. - constructability reviews. - code compliance review. - matching construction spending to funds availability. - milestone cost estimating. - construction contract administration and compliance. - continuous schedule analysis. - program management. - project controls. - project management. - project monitoring. - quality management. - risk management. - energy and sustainability solutions. - inspection services. - operations and maintenance. - safety and environmental health management. - schedule management. - virtual design and construction services. ## Other Project Delivery Methods - Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) - Lean Construction - Engineering-Procurement-Construction (EPC) - Engineering-Procurement-Construction-Management (EPCM)